TL Mafia LX - Page 205
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
The Macho Man
171 Posts
| ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:10 DoctorHelvetica wrote: ill keep quoting the relevant bits throughout the day so it doesnt get lost in the discussion Sounds like you might give a shit about this game again. Can I have your thoughts on my WoS association? I presume by your attitude regarding Vivax, you disapprove of my methods for identifying WoS? | ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:14 The Macho Man wrote: i can not wrap my head around a scum shooting his own teammate it just seems to stupid to be possible. I know, right... but can you think of a single other explanation for N2? | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:14 The Macho Man wrote: i can not wrap my head around a scum shooting his own teammate it just seems to stupid to be possible. (1) Vivax has precedent.. he has done it before (2) Vivax is known for acting rouge as scum; and casting doubt on scum team mates without consent (3) Look at the town cred he has.. everyone fighting it vehemently. (4) http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=204#4063 Do you really think.. "fail to submit action .. so fake RB on Aquanim" >>>> "shoot your own guy, who was contributing fuck all and was going to be under pressure the next day"? ======= I can guarantee you, i was looking to lead on RO >> Geript Day 3.. (but RO death, made me default to Geript) | ||
Mocsta
Australia9388 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:17 Aquanim wrote: I know, right... but can you think of a single other explanation for N2? I believe my association case clears you anyways..(when Vivax flips) Even though prome discussion to you is somewhat suspect Vivax clearly treats you differently when calling you scum.. compared to RO/Prome (where he calls them scum and then retreats to null). | ||
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:18 Mocsta wrote: (1) Vivax has precedent.. he has done it before (2) Vivax is known for acting rouge as scum; and casting doubt on scum team mates without consent (3) Look at the town cred he has.. everyone fighting it vehemently. (4) http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=204#4063 Do you really think.. "fail to submit action .. so fake RB on Aquanim" >>>> "shoot your own guy, who was contributing fuck all and was going to be under pressure the next day"? ======= I can guarantee you, i was looking to lead on RO >> Geript Day 3.. (but RO death, made me default to Geript) On March 09 2013 08:19 Mocsta wrote: I believe my association case clears you anyways..(when Vivax flips) Even though prome discussion to you is somewhat suspect Vivax clearly treats you differently when calling you scum.. compared to RO/Prome (where he calls them scum and then retreats to null). | ||
TestSubject893
United States774 Posts
On March 09 2013 07:43 MilkSuckler wrote: At least we agree it comes down to 2 scenarios Case A: Scum fake Vig-Hit Case B: Scum withhold NK Do you really think there is a 50/50 of this occurring? I suggest you read the scum QT from NMM37. I came up with the idea of withholding NK and pretending to be a veteran who got shot. My coach: VE said IMMEDIATELY, dont do it.. its stupid Mafia is a numbers game.. you need to remove town as often as possible, its not worth the gamble. So again... do you honestly think Case B >>> Case A? & Consider.. case A gives them the NK they need + gives vivax the town cred (which is why you so hard defending him) So what you're saying is that they can't afford to not shoot someone at night from a numbers perspective, so they obviously shot one of their own teammates instead? That's not sound reasoning. What I've had in my head is a situation where they forget to submit to oat and then try to make the best of it by claiming the RB. With that said, I'm starting to be convinced that your situation is more likely the more I think about. There's some time before we have to vote, so I'll try to put a little more thought into it. | ||
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
| ||
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:53 TestSubject893 wrote: So what you're saying is that they can't afford to not shoot someone at night from a numbers perspective, so they obviously shot one of their own teammates instead? That's not sound reasoning. What I've had in my head is a situation where they forget to submit to oat and then try to make the best of it by claiming the RB. With that said, I'm starting to be convinced that your situation is more likely the more I think about. There's some time before we have to vote, so I'll try to put a little more thought into it. Theres a lot of time. 24hrs to be precise. just keep in mind.. no other blues said they forgot to submit Scum have to pay attention to the thread.. it was obvious GreyMist said, post to both. JJ has been here and there, so it makes sense he didnt see it.. but scum dont have the same excuse. the reasoning is sound.. why do you think your defending him so hard... do you even have a case to support that the Aqua claim of RB is fake? There is so much more to vivax being scum, than just the fake town-vig claim.. you need to read everything in context.. its undeniable vivax is scum | ||
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:57 jcarlsoniv wrote: Yeah, milksuckler, I don't really agree with your case on vivax. I highly doubt scum would shoot scum from the position they were in. Right.. and that means everyelse is wrong? | ||
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:59 MilkSuckler wrote: Right.. and that means everyelse is wrong? It doesnt matte what you think is doubtful. scum have to constantly innovate themselves, or are too easily figured out | ||
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Day 5 ![]() Unit JungleJorge could not believe his good fortune! Not only has he somehow blended into the population despite being both malfunctioning and a robot, but he is fulfilling his mission! Even now he was heading to a house where he detected a gun, ready to throw the citizen into the safety of jail. As he opened the door he saw a shadowy figure. "So, you are what has been giving us all this trouble..." 2 sharp reports rang out into the night, to signal the coming of the day. JungleJorge, the Malfunctioning Protectron, was killed! It is now Day 5! the Day will end in 24 hours! With 12 Players alive it takes 7 to lynch! | ||
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
GG JJ ##Vote: Vivax | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On March 09 2013 08:05 DoctorHelvetica wrote: I don't see how Vivax's logic in that post proves he is scum, you failed to demonstrate scum motivation only associations. Let me look back through my filter to find out what I was thinking when I was actually caring about this game. oh. When Vivax said this, the points he mentioned for Prom being scum are the exact same that me and Toadesstern had already made. His original points were all intended to push Promethelax as a NULL READ. Yep, I'm ready to lynch Vivax. Note in his game in British Empire Mini (easy to pull up) he's immediately direct with his reads and arguments, logical, such a different game. He's been picking it up lately but that doesn't mean anything. The people who are serious at the beginning of games tend to be scum according to Vivax's big post. Vivax in British Empire Mini Mafia was serious from the get go and was town. In his huge post he only FoS'd JungleJorge and his logic for that call out has nothing to do with the logic he spent 1-2 paragraphs explaining. Here it is for good measure: + Show Spoiler + On February 27 2013 00:27 Vivax wrote: ![]() Early game has been known to me for being not much serious and not very posty by many players. This early game instead kickstarted. I think an effective way to find scum in these stages is to find people who are too serious in a trolly environment and trying to look like they're posting a lot there. Now there are voices that say that policy discussion favours mafia. Given the way people were still talking about the stupid mayor dozens of pages into the thread it also seems townies love to talk about policy just cause of the sheer amount of people talking about it. That will make it hard to identify mafia just based on policy talk alone. What is instead possible is to categorize people into multiple classes based on the tone of their posts and also about policy interest, although mafia probably won't be findable just cause of the latter while townies talk so much about that as well. Proceeding - chronological order: ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Me: Jokey start. MilkSuckler: Trolly start, bait post. WaveOfShadow: Motivational early post, announces he'll lay back and watch. Layabout: Posts a creepy drawing, proposes the policy to lynch policy proposers. Toad: doesn't want to be mayor. VE: Announces candidacy, asks if he should run against MS. Aquanim: Serious question to MS if he wants to run despite no bodyguards. Restraining Order: Says MS didn't read, subtly criticizes pre-written post. Toad: Talks bad about MS cause of prewritten post. Turns it into a WF support into lynching MS right after. Then unvotes and uncovers the posts' origin. ObviousOne: Candidacy of jokey nature. JJ: Mayor irrelevant, vote for the guy lynching the right guy. BH: Semi-jokey candidacy, attacks JJ for previous statement. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Prom: Candidacy with serious sounding post. BH: Explains implications of mayoral candidacy. JJ: Expresses doubts about WF's activity. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ That is enough material to extrapolate useful information for a start. The line indicates more or less the moment shit gets serious and the joke phase is over. Pretty quickly that was. Boring serious people: WoS, Toad, VE, aquanim, restraining order, JJ, Prom. In between people: Layabout, BH Jokey: Me, Milksuckler, ObviousOne Talks about mayoral election: Toad, VE, aquanim, OO, JJ, BH Doesn't talk about it: restraining order, me Let's get down to business then. First of all I would like to give you my opinion about the mayoral election: I didn't give it much importance. One lynch, two votes, that's it. A townie looking guy gets elected, either a townie looking guy gets confirmed if he hits scum or townie looking scum rides the wave to a mislynch and can shake off responsibility for it. My major interest laid in creating a nice atmosphere where we can have fun together and catch butterflies all day so that people who are scum actually feel safe to play like scum. What I've learned in past games is that people I read as scum got a valid reason to not answer questions when I actually read them as scum and called them like that. "Oh what you call me scum you idiot fine I'll ignore you" fuck that shit. To catch scum you have to let them feel cosy, when they think they didn't have the pressure to post for two days, then you will struck them with holy might knowing that they actually had the confidence to really play like lurky scum. When they don't know you will push for their lynch at deadline they will post more information, closer to their agenda than to the one made visible by townies. Since town doesn't seem to want to adopt such an innovative strategy, let's move on with standard play. Purely based on these early game interactions I've become wary of restraining order/marv given his early dead serious tone despite the comparatively low interest into the mayor candidates. He subtly shovelled shit at MS for that awesome post and fucked off ignoring most of the early opinions. However, given his later contributions to the pardoner talk, dissuading town from following Toad's terrible plan, my read switched back to a more townie one, especially when he suggested that WoS should be elected, which I agree with. I am curious to see what else he will contribute. ObviousOne first serious post was when he spat out his geript scumread that made me suspicious of him, I actually liked his answer, very townie cause bold along with his lighthearted early posts. aquanim I have a slight scumread on, his early contributions consist of asking MS a pointless question and then saying there's a voting thread. He likes to pick on people like WoS and OO, who I have townreads on and are at best guilty of lighthearted and at worst clumsy play. Most of his filter looks much artificial, his answers to reads look forced. I advise you to analyse him properly and I will support a mayor willing to lynch him. Layabout could be lurky scum. If he's town I'd like him to post more. I remember him being an aggressive pusher as town in fruity mafia. JJ is a good lynch candidate. His attack on me for playing casually is a scum trait, and he quit pursuing me asking me a weird question about what I think. Well, after the last refresh (23:40 TL time) I see he's actually back to get me. Saying I didn't follow up after calling him scummy for what he did, too bad that I went to sleep around 3 AM and I'm spending 2:30 hours with reading and writing this post, so his argument is again scummy and not thought out. The argument he's used didn't apply to me, but also to Toad and some other dudes. He seems to think people trying to guess smurf identities are scum, as pointed out in my earlier post. Last on in the chronology and hotly disputed in the thread: Prom. There's a lot to work on with him. What bothers me about Prom is his unusual lack of confidence. He came dead serious into the thread with his RNG lynch idea, but didn't actually RNG anyone at that point, and even said he would lynch himself, which is a retarded thing to do when you know you're town. When people criticized him for his behaviour regarding the RNG, he quickly switched to a WoS lynch preference. Then he votes VE, who wants to lynch him. Again, a point towards scumprom, who would probably not want to get lynched as town, it looks like a subtle buddying attempt. Then again, it confuses me that he's been interacting in a way with VE that suggests that he would rethink his townread on me if just VE convinced him. That was after VE said he thinks I'm scum based on association with Prom (stupid reason). Trying to see this from a scumprom perspective, this doesn't make sense to me. A scumprom would probably try to convince VE that there is an association and that he's null or town on me to frame me for later. Instead he expressed being content with changing his read on me if VE convinced him. I am null on Prom given how he's been handling his reads of me. Geript looked pretty scummy to me yesterday, but since he's a newbie that might just be a consequence of that. His attacks on me cause of me being casual made me pretty suspicious, and his blabber about an agenda linked to that as well, but I don't want to lynch a newbie this early, they can look scummy as either alignment. In retrospect I'm not really able to get proper reads out for the early behaviour since it seems that scummy people seem to be scattered across the categories, but I thought I'd make an on-the-go-attempt to use that type of analysis. NOTE THE LITTLE RETROFIT HERE Vivax started the game by trolling and then in his first serious post goes on to say that trolling is pretty much a definite towntell (as we can clearly see from Chezinu). After I started pressuring him he became extremely angry and insulting (check his filter). Compare this to his play, again, from British Empire Mini Mafia where he was not like this AT ALL. Also the fact that he came out with that huge post instead of just immediately attacking and pressuring JJ is scummy. | ||
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On March 09 2013 09:00 MilkSuckler wrote: It doesnt matte what you think is doubtful. scum have to constantly innovate themselves, or are too easily figured out That part of your case* I should say. I haven't been at my computer in ~12 hrs. I'll need to review when I can get back to my room. | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
On March 09 2013 09:04 jcarlsoniv wrote: That part of your case* I should say. I haven't been at my computer in ~12 hrs. I'll need to review when I can get back to my room. I am more than happy to discuss the case and convince who needs convincing. But I suggest that you read everything before shitting all over the idea. The important posts are for Vivax: scum MilkSuckler: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=202#4039 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=204#4063 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=204#4067 Dr.H: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=204#4074 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=205#4094 JJ (i.e. Sandroba) http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=91#1816 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=399294¤tpage=190#3784 | ||
Aquanim
Australia2849 Posts
1) If the only explanation for the observed events was that Vivax was scum why would scum do it in the first place? Answer: Should have been obvious. If JJ had actually done a JK that would have explained the lack of scum KP, which perfectly explains why they didn't roleblock him (which has been mentioned before). Fortuitous in hindsight. I think this was mentioned by JJ but it took me a while to get it through my head. 2) Vivax claimed vigilante Night 1 and scum would have had to "use" their roleblock on him to explain his lack of KP. Answer: Implies a fair bit of planning in advance but I suppose I can see it. Roleblock night 1 is a bit of a crapshoot 3) I had a townread on Vivax independent of vigilante claim. Answer: I've been wrong before and will likely be wrong again. Which leaves the question of "would scum really shoot themselves with their own KP?". I have doubts but it's the kind of plan Vivax and Chezinu would come up with. ##Vote: Vivax | ||
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
seriously.. have you played scum before (1) the host reads the QT, and often the NK is discussed there (2) the host typically will PM the scum team, if no actions have been given. Everything was made in the favour for scum to execute the NK... the argument that this chance is more likely than the logic i am explaining, is a strawman argument.. and implies you think aquanim is guaranteed scum. My filter dump of the FLIPPED scum players, suggests aquanim is clear as non-scum; which again is more evidence to the contrary of "fail to submit" actions. Just because *YOU* think its stupid to shoot your own, doesnt mean it can not happen. Scum play needs to be innovative.. town have been demolishing scum left, right and center. Shooting your own, whilst not innovative, is still a big deviation from the norm, and is acceptable play considering the position RO was in. | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
so why would you vote for vivax? | ||
| ||