|
|
|
On February 23 2013 03:04 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2013 22:39 Promethelax wrote:
are there body guards of any sort or, after day one, is the mayor simply a dude with two votes? There are no bodygaurds.
No bodyguards means I'm not going to run for mayor :3
|
On February 26 2013 08:52 Vivax wrote:
RAAAARRRR yesss. Thanks for saving the day hassy.
I'm town.
##Vote Toadesstern
I'd usually say that guy knows what he's doing for trying to make me mayor but I don't want to
|
milksuckler is apparently either an idiot or he's trying to look like one.
I am not going to lynch players D1 of whom I know that they are potentially very valuable townies, simply put: Vets. They deserve the right to have extra time, and mislynching them early is a huge loss for town.
Those who I know/heard of are: Sandroba and Chezinu.
If there are vets I don't know, please tell me. I expect these two to know other vets well.
If you are a vets' smurf, then tell me you are a vet.
I know someone who said the exact same thing (pretty much word for word) last time I played with a mayoral campaign.
Are you trying to imitate someone milksuckler or did you just copy & paste?
|
##vote Wade Fell
lynching MilkSuckler seems like the way to go.
|
okay actually screw that, I checked it. It's not pretty much exactly word for word, it IS word for word copy & paste. So it's not bullshit but supposed to be funny bullshit. Makes it decent and funny. From LIX: click me
##unvote
|
On February 26 2013 09:11 MilkSuckler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:09 Toadesstern wrote:okay actually screw that, I checked it. It's not pretty much exactly word for word, it IS word for word copy & paste. So it's not bullshit but supposed to be funny bullshit. Makes it decent and funny. From LIX: click me##unvote No shit Sherlock, thanks for admitting the humour in this. Vivax got it.
sorry I don't remember every post from some nobody. Of course vivax got it because he's the guy who did the post in the first place...
So how's it going bugs?
|
How likely is it that we can make it happen that we can get our lynch candidate come in as second in the votes?
We could get 2 flies with one stone that way.
Thoughts?
|
On February 26 2013 09:18 Restraining Order wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:
How likely is it that we can make it happen that we can get our lynch candidate come in as second in the votes?
We could get 2 flies with one stone that way.
Thoughts? As likely as the mayor is to do that, I'd wager.
Well the options we have are usually:
1) Vote the mayor and he decides the lynch on his own.
yes. That's all the options there usually are. The guys running for mayor are going to tell us their main reads / lynch candidates anyways and we could make sure to get make his/their reads come in 2nd.
On February 26 2013 09:18 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:
How likely is it that we can make it happen that we can get our lynch candidate come in as second in the votes?
We could get 2 flies with one stone that way.
Thoughts? Do you mean so that we can get rid of the pardoner role and make sure it doesn't stay in the game?
Yes. I'm thinking about combining the lynch with getting rid of the pardoner by making the most likely lynch come in 2nd on purpose.
|
On February 26 2013 09:23 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:22 JungleJorge wrote:On February 26 2013 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:
How likely is it that we can make it happen that we can get our lynch candidate come in as second in the votes?
We could get 2 flies with one stone that way.
Thoughts? That's a good idea if we could make it happen, but unless the person we are set on lynching is town, I find that unlikely to occur. No harm in giving it a shot though. I don't like the idea of sending a bunch of votes the way of our top scumread and strongly oppose this idea.
well everyone knows that the guy is voted to be lynched. What's supposed to happen? A mafia last second voteswitch to make him 1st instead of 2nd?
I'm perfectly happy with mafia outing multiple guys to make our lynchcandidate mayor instead lol.
There's not going to be anyone who's like "well I want to lynch him so we should make him come in 2nd!" and 5 minutes later ends up saying "well I liked him as a lynch candidate but I like what he's saying right now, so let's make him mayor instead!"
The only problem I see with it is that it is indeed hard to pull off and needs organization in terms of people knowing what's going to happen somewhat ahead of time.
|
On February 26 2013 09:33 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:30 layabout wrote:@jji dont know him but calling "neutral behavior" "scummy behavior" is "scummy". It is ridiculous to talk about somebody's alignment being clear at this point in the game. [...] Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:30 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2013 09:23 Wade Fell wrote:On February 26 2013 09:22 JungleJorge wrote:On February 26 2013 09:16 Toadesstern wrote:
How likely is it that we can make it happen that we can get our lynch candidate come in as second in the votes?
We could get 2 flies with one stone that way.
Thoughts? That's a good idea if we could make it happen, but unless the person we are set on lynching is town, I find that unlikely to occur. No harm in giving it a shot though. I don't like the idea of sending a bunch of votes the way of our top scumread and strongly oppose this idea. well everyone knows that the guy is voted to be lynched. What's supposed to happen? A mafia last second voteswitch to make him 1st instead of 2nd? I'm perfectly happy with mafia outing multiple guys to make our lynchcandidate mayor instead lol. There's not going to be anyone who's like "well I want to lynch him so we should make him come in 2nd!" and 5 minutes later ends up saying "well I liked him as a lynch candidate but I like what he's saying right now, so let's make him mayor instead!"The only problem I see with it is that it is indeed hard to pull off and needs organization in terms of people knowing what's going to happen somewhat ahead of time. I've seen a LOT of last minute shenanigans in recent games on TL Mafia. It's a disconcerting trend and you would be amiss to discount the possibility of that taking place here, led by either scum or town. People are bad. Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:32 MilkSuckler wrote:On February 26 2013 09:29 Wade Fell wrote:
Milksuckler who are you lynching right now
is it layabout
why/why not Not lynching him. Its early game, we have only minute details to contemplate. With that in consideration I thought he did a decent job of a cock-block. I still don't like you; but the cock-block is a null tell. So Im lynching you so far, simply because I don't like you.Reads subject to change obviously Dear. [...]
yeah I guess. I thought about it pregame a bit and came to the conclusion that it's too hard to pull off and at the same time is restricting us timewise because we'd have to set on a lynch way ahead of time to make sure everyone knows what's going on, which basicly makes the day a 24h day instead of a 48h day. Wanted to see people's thoughts though and I don't exactly like your response to it unlike other ones.
|
On February 26 2013 09:36 layabout wrote:
urgh do i have to keep reading his posts?
Toad, i want some sanity in here, are you sure your not running for mayor? It's not like you have bodyguards anyway...
very unlikely unless there's going to be mass smurf-slips. I'm a huge fan of lynching vets d1 and this smurffest is making that really hard.
|
On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS.
are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it?
Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are
|
prom could you respond to what I (and VE in response) said over here:
On February 26 2013 10:06 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:04 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are This is something I noticed too. It sparked discussion - I'm left wondering what kind of discussion he thought RNG was supposed to generate if it didn't generate the kind he wanted.
because again, the way you phrased that sounds awfully odd and I'm thinking of multiple explanations. None of them includes something you with a townie-mindset.
|
On February 26 2013 10:21 Promethelax wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:17 Toadesstern wrote:prom could you respond to what I (and VE in response) said over here: On February 26 2013 10:06 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 26 2013 10:04 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are This is something I noticed too. It sparked discussion - I'm left wondering what kind of discussion he thought RNG was supposed to generate if it didn't generate the kind he wanted. because again, the way you phrased that sounds awfully odd and I'm thinking of multiple explanations. None of them includes something you with a townie-mindset. Because I wanted it to gain some real traction. I had an idea about actually getting close and withdrawing my nomination since if scum was up for lynch they'd be pushing me as mayor where if there was a townie up for lynch they'd be pushing against me. It's a plan that only works if I get support on it. That was the discussion I wanted to spark.
why did you tell us about being just being a plattform to create talk with if you wanted it to get some real traction?
That kind of counters your idea.
I'd say you wanted to look like someone who wants to create discussion but wants to make sure he looks good. When it became too hot (and it didn't, the timing to go back on that was way to early if you wanted to achieve something, so you're overly defensive for whatever reason) for your idea you went ahead yelling GUYS GUYS, I BE TROLL LOL DON'T TAKE ME SERIOUS
Do we have a dayvig?
|
On February 26 2013 10:25 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:21 Promethelax wrote:On February 26 2013 10:17 Toadesstern wrote:prom could you respond to what I (and VE in response) said over here: On February 26 2013 10:06 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 26 2013 10:04 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote:
My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote:
It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to:
A. put in the time to read the thread
B. both make and evaluate other's cases
C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK
In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is:
Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are This is something I noticed too. It sparked discussion - I'm left wondering what kind of discussion he thought RNG was supposed to generate if it didn't generate the kind he wanted. because again, the way you phrased that sounds awfully odd and I'm thinking of multiple explanations. None of them includes something you with a townie-mindset. Because I wanted it to gain some real traction. I had an idea about actually getting close and withdrawing my nomination since if scum was up for lynch they'd be pushing me as mayor where if there was a townie up for lynch they'd be pushing against me. It's a plan that only works if I get support on it. That was the discussion I wanted to spark. why did you tell us about being just being a plattform to create talk with if you wanted it to get some real traction? That kind of counters your idea. I'd say you wanted to look like someone who wants to create discussion but wants to make sure he looks good. When it became too hot (and it didn't, the timing to go back on that was way to early if you wanted to achieve something, so you're overly defensive for whatever reason) for your idea you went ahead yelling GUYS GUYS, I BE TROLL LOL DON'T TAKE ME SERIOUSDo we have a dayvig?
On a different note: In case we don't have a dayvig I'll support anyone who runs of the platform of lynching Promethelax.
I'd bet VE's left ball that prom is mafia right now.
Anyways it's late, my english reads like a mentally handicapped writing because I'm really tired and make mistakes all the time (2:30 am over here) so I'll go to bed now.
|
On February 26 2013 10:31 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:31 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 26 2013 10:30 Wade Fell wrote:
Milksuckler is Marvellosity This is false. He uses the word "dear" to refer to people, the only person who ever does this is Marvellosity, right?
marv isn't that stupid.
|
good thing you apparently all think I'm awesome and sheep me on prom. Could you guys post a little less though? I'm wading through this bullshit and it's not funny...
|
On February 26 2013 19:44 Aquanim wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 19:19 Wade Fell wrote:
If Prom was really trying to raise discussion with his rng as he claims, he'd have actually gotten into discussions with people. Any townie would naturally get arguing and get involved as people disagreed with him, especially one who was taking a position specifically for the purpose of starting discussions. A town Prom, if he did this, would have a bunch of posts, quote chains of him discussing RNG with haters, drumming up support, etc, and forcing scum to take stances. That's what a town player bringing up discussion looks like. Prom does NOT do this. Prom is scum. OK, I buy this. ##Vote: Wade FellI'm still in favour of a lynch on Obvious because I feel like he overreacted to my pressure on him and since my interaction with him all he has is a filter page's worth of useless fluff. In fact, all of Obvious's filter is useless fluff. There's more than one scum in the game though and I agree, Prom's failure to actually try to make anything happen with his RNG gambit does not evoke towny feelings.
the most important thing is that a townie prom who really wanted to get more discussion out of it than he did; that's what he himself said was his intention was when asked about why he's so "mad" would not have backed out of this 1 hour into the game because he's so scared about looking bad.
A townie-Prom would have rode the train a little longer if his intentions was to create discussion instead of screaming like a I BE JOKING, PLS NO LYNCH ME like a little girl to, you know, create discussion instead of singlehandedly stopping all the discussion that could have been created that way by telling people his supposed to be intentions.
While that might be a nooby-grush-like trait for most people (people doing something without thinking it through and therefore not knowing how to do what they want to do) I don't think prom is that bad as town and the girlish, screaming overdefensive tone, trying to make sure he's not looking bad while trying to create discussion sure does the rest.
That begs the question why he's still alive. Perhaps we don't have a dayvig 
|
On February 26 2013 19:53 Wade Fell wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 19:51 Toadesstern wrote:That begs the question why he's still alive. Perhaps we don't have a dayvig If we did have one he wouldn't be able to fire day 1.
oh that's actually true
On February 26 2013 19:53 geript wrote:
Also is wade Marv?
very unlikely...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
