|
On February 14 2013 10:56 Kurumi wrote:
Dandel, I asked him/her about amount of the games played. His/her fear seems irrational for me, like, that game had "experienced" tag over it I think?
Well, IIRC he only played 4 newbies so far or something in that direction.
I have no idea what would make him so "overwhelmed" though. That's for him to explain.
|
So no matter what I say your going to call it "neutral" and label me scum.
Posts relatively long, but not too specific post agaisnt BH. Too neutral.
Posts concise reads on two players that stood out to him. Too neutral.
I don't like your reasoning at all. Either you are honestly think I'm scum, which would make you wrong, or you are purposely trying to interpret me in a negative light which only mafia would do. So that said
##vote gonzaw.
|
Well, this game is small and not exactly based on any twist out of the gate, I am wondering what's so "overwhelming". Sounds like terrible excuse. I've also touched Cheesecake topic, it seems like he is an extreme troll this game or has some kind of posting restriction (people went for those anyway?) I think we had some scum shenanigans going for dog restriction one time in these?
|
It might possibly be possible that certain some people have posting restrictions or roles revolving around that, but HOW SHOULD I KNOW?
Also I like Cheesy's early posting. Too bad he vanished.
|
On February 14 2013 10:58 randombum wrote:
So no matter what I say your going to call it "neutral" and label me scum.
Posts relatively long, but not too specific post agaisnt BH. Too neutral.
Posts concise reads on two players that stood out to him. Too neutral.
I don't like your reasoning at all. Either you are honestly think I'm scum, which would make you wrong, or you are purposely trying to interpret me in a negative light which only mafia would do. So that said
##vote gonzaw.
I never said I was 100% sure you were scum. Those were the things that caught up from your posts, and out of everybody would make me want kill you the most.
But with this OMGUS you are certainly getting there faster.
Also by "neutral" I mean "agreeable" basically.
1-Post that Instant lynch is good
2-Say that BH is acting weird and his case is bad
Now you go against me, which is what's "cool" at the moment apparently.
Tell me, why exactly are you voting me for? Do you agree with what BH said? I didn't see you mention anything about it.
You are OMGUSing, and hell you are even posting how I could be town yet conclude I'm scum with no other additional reason
Either you are honestly think I'm scum, which would make you wrong...
So tell me, why am I not a "townie that is wrong about you" ? You don't post any reasoning other than apparently some sarcasm with the "too neutral" shit up above.
|
meh
Randombun is scum.
He is sheeping BH. Its so obvious.
Guys LYNCH HIM.
##Vote: randombum
|
Sheeping BH is totally not scummy.
Also, randombum has my role so pls don't lynch, kk?
|
Its the fact that he ONLY sheeped BH and has not done anything else of note today.
No original thought. And it looks like he is just voting for the heck of it. Doesnt care who gets lynched.
|
Yeah that is correct.
But my advice is to not lynch him until it's at least day 2 though.
Don't woray.
I has plan.
|
On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote:
I never said I was 100% sure you were scum. Those were the things that caught up from your posts, and out of everybody
On February 14 2013 04:57 gonzaw wrote:
Kay im back
I would like to kill randombum today. Stuff he posted seemed too "neutral" and shit, specially that "wall of text" about BH.
Other than that maybe kill BH, he's being his usual trolly scum self, specially with that bad case on Oats.
On February 14 2013 08:31 gonzaw wrote:I still kind of want to kill randombum, but not many people have done enough stuff for me to get a good scum read on someone. Stuff like this and this seem too neutral and trying to blend in.
So basically. I don't think your scum, but I want to kill you?
On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote:
Tell me, why exactly are you voting me for? Do you agree with what BH said? I didn't see you mention anything about it.
I posted it not three posts before, are you even reading my filter?
On February 14 2013 10:09 randombum wrote:
Just got back. I'm currently dis-liking oats and gonzow. Marv too.
[snip]
Gonzow. He called me scum. Seriously though, his play has been lacking focus. He has self admitted that he mainly cared for the role creation part. That might be true, or a mafia excuse to lurk. There's also his reasoning "too neutral" what does that even mean? Is he referring to the part that marv also mentioned where I praise BH after spending a really long post calling him wrong? That's just being polite.
Or in the quote you are responding to.
On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2013 10:58 randombum wrote:
So no matter what I say your going to call it "neutral" and label me scum.
Posts relatively long, but not too specific post agaisnt BH. Too neutral.
Posts concise reads on two players that stood out to him. Too neutral.
I don't like your reasoning at all. Either you are honestly think I'm scum, which would make you wrong, or you are purposely trying to interpret me in a negative light which only mafia would do. So that said
##vote gonzaw.
Are you purposely reading my posts the wrong way or are you just bad at this game? Either way its not a very good reason to keep you around.
On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote:You are OMGUSing, and hell you are even posting how I could be town yet conclude I'm scum with no other additional reason
Notice I never called you scum, I just think you are not contributing which can be bad town or scum. That's better than the null reads I have on almost anybody else.
On February 14 2013 11:12 gonzaw wrote:
Also by "neutral" I mean "agreeable" basically.
1-Post that Instant lynch is good
2-Say that BH is acting weird and his case is bad
Now you go against me, which is what's "cool" at the moment apparently.
Right, the fact that my first 2 posts playing the game isn't argumentative or coming to conclusions on who is scum on day 1 is alignment-indicative. It's like you are trying to read me the wrong way.
Also how is it "cool" to go against you at the moment. The only other person really making a case on you is BH who I disagreed on oats with.
|
Wait I'm sheeping BH? My reasons are completely different.
|
Everybody's sheeping BH.
Okay, well actually just me.
BUT
It's the thing to do!
|
Also what's omgus? By context I can tell its calling out the person who called you out. But what does the acronym stand for.
|
On February 14 2013 11:51 randombum wrote:
Also what's omgus? By context I can tell its calling out the person who called you out. But what does the acronym stand for.
Oh my God, you/you're suck/scum, I believe
|
why couldn't i have been given a nuke as my role.
I wish i could kill half the players in the game right now.
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
|
On February 14 2013 12:58 Blazinghand wrote:
which half am i in
you would currently be in the shelter with me right now
|
Sorry for the absence guys, first day of work at the New job. Catching up now
|
Kurumi, since you're voting for me right now, can I ask you to let me perhaps share with you the fact I'm innocent tonight?
|
On February 13 2013 23:36 Stutters695 wrote:
Marv just lurked through MtG mini as town (compared to his crazy posting in LIX). I think Oats meant it as in its a null tell rather than a blatant scumtell. Not sure I agree with that but I had the same thought when reading your discussions on Marv.
Gonna catch up really quick.
Your next post was:
On February 14 2013 14:38 Stutters695 wrote:
Sorry for the absence guys, first day of work at the New job. Catching up now
It has been about 2.5 hours since that last one. Are you ever going to post on what you think or just "catch up" forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
