EPTOn February 13 2013 13:51 Oatsmaster wrote:
How is this scummy?
Again, how is this scummy?
How is this scummy?
Again, how is this scummy?
Did I ever call you scum? Why so defensive?
Themed Game Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
Did I ever call you scum? Why so defensive? | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 14:00 Oatsmaster wrote: You didnt say it outright no, but the way you have been asking questions, is making me think you have a scum read on me. Why does it matter, if ME as town, has a lousy and innaccurate read on BH? Just ignore it/correct it and move on. However, if Me as scum, has a unsupported town read on BH, does it make BH scummier? Or townier? In conclusion, the only reason to be asking me questions like these is if you think I am scum No, the only reason for me to be asking questions like these is to figure out if I think you are town or scum. If I already had a solid scum read on you, I wouldn't need to ask questions. And if you are scum (and even if you are town, for that matter), then your read on BH means absolutely NOTHING about BH's alignment. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 14:16 iamperfection wrote: this game reminds me of rockband mini when bh made a shitty case as town and then proceeded to tunnel the fuck out of the guy and just gauged reactions. I do not think oats actions so far in anyway are largely alignment indicative and i would probally say he is more likely to be town. Bh case can be summed up as well he thought slightly different about the pyp. big deal all it really tells us is that oats thinks it from more than one point of view. I think the fact that oats didn't run away and asked questions about why people had scum reads or scum feeling instead of just calling people stupid is constructive and shows a town mindset. This makes no sense. You simplify it way, way too much. Scum: Gives up and pouts when questioned. Town: Answers questions. That's such a ridiculous dichotomy. Would you apply that heuristic to me? To marv? To BH? To DP? Then why are you applying it to Oats? | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 14:22 iamperfection wrote: do you have a point to your question or are you just questioning my logic for shits and giggles. i have a town read on oats deal with it Do you read nothing I post? I'm not interested in your read of Oats. I don't give a shit if you think he town or if you think he is scum. I give a shit WHY you think those things. A case (town case, scum case...doesn't matter) says much more about the person making it than the person it is about. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 14:24 Oatsmaster wrote: Keirathi, why are you so confrontational this game? Are you scum? [sarcasm]Yes, you caught me. Damn.[/sarcasm] Why are you asking questions that have no possible answer? | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 14:27 iamperfection wrote: all you said was what i think makes no sense you said nothing of my alignment. you afraid to say what you think bro ? What is there to think? Honestly, you said something I disagreed with, and I told you why I disagreed with it, while asking you a question about it. No, I have no read whatsoever on you. Yes, you are generally easy to read, but you haven't posted much. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 14:32 Oatsmaster wrote: Avioding the question Keirathi. The main question is what I wanted answered. That's the part that has no answer. What am I supposed to say to it if I'm town? What am I supposed to say to it if I am scum? (Hint: The answer to both of those questions is the same thing. Meaning your question is bad.) | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 14:36 Oatsmaster wrote: (Hint: Avioding questions isnt good) Then why dont you answer it? Like why not? Because its your super secret playstyle? Super secret. Yes. Anyways, I'm not going to respond to this anymore. I'm not answering the question because it is a pointless question that has absolutely nothing to do with my alignment and will tell you nothing about my alignment no matter what I say. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 14:42 Oatsmaster wrote: So Keirathi, do you have any reads? And what do you think about Dandel Ion No, I have no reads that I am confident enough to vote for or make a case about. Same applies to Dandel. He was trolling then sheeped BH, but hasn't really said anything of substance to judge him on. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 13 2013 23:53 Oatsmaster wrote: So he talked to 1 or 2 people before the game started and they can confirm that he planned this pregame? I dont get that meaning from the sentence at all. Yes, that is exactly what that sentence meant. Marv told me a week ago or so that he was going to play this game to have fun and relax, no matter what his alignment was. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 14 2013 00:33 Oatsmaster wrote: Marv, is Keirathi's and Iamp's statments correct?? Yes I am curious. And yes this is a useless post. Also, I wouldnt post like that to have fun, too much work :/ Lol do you really think I am lying about it? [02/08][10:46:55] <marv|work> i'll probably be quite laid-back and not doing that much in Themed Look at the time stamp. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 14 2013 01:00 Hassybaby wrote: Good afternoon gentlemen, I hope you're all well I've been reading everything while at my internship, and this comment caught my eye: Justify this, because that's the last thing that a townie should be worried about imo I agree with Dandel. Having amazing reads is good and all, but the reality is that most of us mere mortals are wrong as often (and sometimes even MORE often) than we are right. Proving that you are town is way more beneficial to town as a whole than any individual day's reads. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 14 2013 02:09 Hassybaby wrote: Dammit Keir, I wanted him to answer. Oh well...  I am really failing at that this game. But, the way you phrased it made it sound like you disagreed. And I disagreed with your disagreement. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 14 2013 03:16 jcarlsoniv wrote: And see, to me, that's a bit odd. Dandelion expresses how important it is that townies establish town cred (which I personally somewhat disagree that that's not necessarily #1, but that's a whole different discussion) and yet he has done nothing at all in my mind to try to establish his own townieness. If anything, his behavior thus far has led me the other way. Right, I agree that Dandel hasn't done much towards proving his innocence if he does in fact believe that that should be your #1 priority as a townie. But I was only commenting on Hassy's statement, not whether Dandel was "practicing what he preached". | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 14 2013 06:52 austinmcc wrote: It should be plane to the reader that my word choice has been coordinate(d) with some kind of goal. And what goal is that? Johnny up and say what you mean. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 14 2013 08:11 Dandel Ion wrote: I decline. When I say no effort, I mean no effort. What I wrote on gonzaw, it was already too much, it seems. I must buckle down, and do less. Thanks for reminding me. Then I shall have fun lynching you, because I honestly don't give a rats ass what you think is fun. I want to win, and someone not putting in any effort is detrimental to that. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:19 Oatsmaster wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: Hassybaby This is a serious vote. Considering what happened with Hassybaby in Parallel where he was really active, this is disturbing. Really active? He had 5 pages of filter (across both worlds) and survived until LYLO (which was day 6). | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
##Vote: Oatsmaster This is the second time you've made a bullshit "read" with terrible reasoning. If you were town, you would be voting/giving town reads for real reasons, not something you just made up that sounded good. Also, while I'm on the subject of Oats, a question for Marv: (From the post-game of LVIII) On January 12 2013 01:53 marvellosity wrote: I became incredibly suspicious of Djo right around where I ragequit. Witness the following posts: All these questions/points are useless, and serve no direction. He's asking all the wrong questions. So why is it that when Oats does this same thing (asking irrelevent questions that serve no direction or purpose), you give Oats a town read? | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:47 marvellosity wrote: Hello, gentleman Keirathi. Simply enough, young Oats and Djodref are not the same gentleman. So Djo is known for not asking irrelevant questions, but Oats does? I wasn't aware of that. Please, some examples. On February 15 2013 01:52 marvellosity wrote: Perhaps to elaborate a little for you, gentleman Keirathi. To me it is a sign of young Oats' good intent if he is willingly "making bullshit reads with terrible reasonining." As you are probably aware, sir, I was able to discern young Oats' bad intentions in the establishment named 'LIX', for the reasoning that he had no reads at all, 'bullshit' or otherwise. Truly it can be argued that young Oats does not make arguments rigorously or perhaps even correctly; yet I have not seen the evil intentions that I have been able to discern before. Fair point. But I would endeavor to take it a step further. If young Mr. Oats was caught so handily by yourself in LIX, wouldn't the natural human instinct be to try something different? As a great scientist once said, it is the height of folly to keep repeating the same experiment hoping for different results. And I don't see the transition from No Reads -> No Reads That Can Be Backed Up With Facts to be a big jump in playstyle. | ||
| ||
