EPTcalling it now, we lynch these players and win. scum surrender gg
Normal Mini Mafia IV - Page 39
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
EmileZola
France202 Posts
calling it now, we lynch these players and win. scum surrender gg | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
| ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:17 Djodref wrote: Because you don't get much information from a lynch like this. I think VE lynch would have been more controversial and would have gave us more info. That's why I was pushing VE over thawn. wut? you'd rather lynch for information over someone you think is UNMISTAKABLY SCUM? | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9646 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
You cannot reproach to come late on his bandwagon. On January 26 2013 11:18 Djodref wrote: I'm also suspicious of thrawn because he is not as spammy as usual in the beginning of the game and I know that thrawn likes to hang out in the scumQT when he is mafia. I didn't like his joke as well. His joke in Hero Mini Mafia was a useful and light-hearten joke. Useful because it provoked reactions and light-hearten because he didn't care how he was going to like like after a fakeclaim. This joke is a reminder of what he did in Hero, and I see it as a soft-town claim, which could be mafia motivated. Like, "hey guys, I'm behaving like in this game where I was town ! What gives ?". | ||
|
EmileZola
France202 Posts
it's day 1, you lynch for scum, not for info. every noob knows that. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:27 iamperfection wrote: i was just making fun of you for saying lynching the role blocker was bad. Everything is easier now in hindsight, but we couldn't be sure that it was such a good lynch before. | ||
|
Vivax
22338 Posts
We have to ask ourselves: Was there resistance from scum to lynch thrawn or was it a neat bus and scum tried to fully avoid interactions with him? Can't jump at people just cause they had doubts about a thrawn lynch. The whole lynch seemed to be justified with meta and it was more or less a lurker lynch, so it's natural to not be sure about thrawn as townie. Look for people who looked immediately sure that he was scum after a certain amount decided to lynch him. I think that would be a good tell. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:30 EmileZola wrote: djo you just said you'd rather lynch for info over someone who you think is scum it's day 1, you lynch for scum, not for info. every noob knows that. I think VE is scum, I thought thrawn was scum as well. But VE lynch was more interesting to push. Also I need you to contribute in a better way starting from now ^^ | ||
|
Vivax
22338 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:26 xsksc wrote: wut? you'd rather lynch for information over someone you think is UNMISTAKABLY SCUM? xsksc, explain how the heck he should have known that thrawn was "unmistakably" scum. Maybe he was for you. Remember when you agreed on lynching him after claiming that you read someone else as scum? *wink wink* Remember that, Prom? That's when you voted for xsksc. | ||
|
Vivax
22338 Posts
"Sure, I'm fine with lynching lurkers". Now you say UNMISTAKABLY SCUM? | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:20 Promethelax wrote: so, back to that scumslip from djo... I would like you to present your case against me ASAP. You already said I had a scumslip and that my case was the worst ever, but you are sure reluctant to call me scum directly. I'm town so you are not going to be killed by the mafia for it  | ||
|
Vivax
22338 Posts
| ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:34 Vivax wrote: Oh, and you said something along the lines of : "Sure, I'm fine with lynching lurkers". Now you say UNMISTAKABLY SCUM? In hindsight, I'm saying unmistakably scum. Check my he post I've just quoted, it's quite different from the support of a lurker lynch. To be fair, the first one to have called thrawn scum is VE. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:36 Vivax wrote: Djo, stop panicking. Give me some feedback about what I just wrote please. I'm not panicking at all, I'm excited ^^ Were you talking about the post I had already quoted ? | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:33 Vivax wrote: xsksc, explain how the heck he should have known that thrawn was "unmistakably" scum. Maybe he was for you. Remember when you agreed on lynching him after claiming that you read someone else as scum? *wink wink* Remember that, Prom? That's when you voted for xsksc. On January 28 2013 08:34 Vivax wrote: Oh, and you said something along the lines of : "Sure, I'm fine with lynching lurkers". Now you say UNMISTAKABLY SCUM? Read what I said again. On January 28 2013 08:05 Djodref wrote: Thrawn scum meta is unmistakable ! I know it's difficult vivax, but please don't jump to the wrong conclusions because you didn't read properly. | ||
|
Djodref
France3332 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:26 xsksc wrote: wut? you'd rather lynch for information over someone you think is UNMISTAKABLY SCUM? I think it was pretty clear that we were heading to lynch thrawn today and that I was willing to consolidate on him. But, yeah, it was better to push another lynch in the meantime. | ||
|
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
|
EmileZola
France202 Posts
On January 27 2013 10:34 iamperfection wrote: what you think of thrawn ghost? are You scum ghost? | ||
| ||
