|
On January 30 2013 09:08 EmileZola wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2013 09:03 jaybrundage wrote:On January 30 2013 08:54 EmileZola wrote:On January 30 2013 08:51 jaybrundage wrote:
Ok after rereading Sharrant I still want him to post more but. My vote is gonna go on JieXian as he has also been lurking a bit and his post dont have much clear thoughts he just seems to be trying to from opinions and stumbles alot.
##UnVote
##Vote JieXian This, right here: given your play in Dessert this post just caused your name to be colored in a darker shade of red for me. I should be worried you have a bad habit of lynching townies  no, I have a habit of lynching people who play like scum, and then having them flip town 50% of the time. You need to either read the thread or die. Show nested quote +On January 30 2013 09:04 Vivax wrote:
Well claiming to save a guy from getting lynched just before he truly gets lynched usually gets the guy still lynched cause people want to see if the claim is true. You got to stop the bandwagon before it gains steam.
To be honest I didn't want to believe my check. I was believing I hit the godfather initially. But got to go with what one gets. He wasn't in any danger of being lynched. Learn to convince people without claiming your goddamn role, cause you won't roll cop every game.
Maybe you should redefine what "playing like scum means" If people who fill the criteria flip town 50% doesn't it make you think your doing something wrong.
Its easy to blame other townies but how about you just play better. Palmar gets killed very early in the game as town cause he can find scum Period. Maybe the reasoning you are always getting kept alive as town WBG is your inability to find scum. As opposed to lynching people playing like scum.
Also what is your reading the thread or die bullshit. And the fact that you think xskds wasnt gonna get lynched wasn't so true. I could of seen us killing him today.
|
On January 30 2013 09:08 EmileZola wrote:
actually yeah why am I still talking about this shit
##vote jaybrundage
This is your pressure vote are you fucking srs? Or do you actually think im scum
|
On January 30 2013 09:16 EmileZola wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2013 09:14 jaybrundage wrote:On January 30 2013 09:08 EmileZola wrote:On January 30 2013 09:03 jaybrundage wrote:On January 30 2013 08:54 EmileZola wrote:On January 30 2013 08:51 jaybrundage wrote:
Ok after rereading Sharrant I still want him to post more but. My vote is gonna go on JieXian as he has also been lurking a bit and his post dont have much clear thoughts he just seems to be trying to from opinions and stumbles alot.
##UnVote
##Vote JieXian This, right here: given your play in Dessert this post just caused your name to be colored in a darker shade of red for me. I should be worried you have a bad habit of lynching townies no, I have a habit of lynching people who play like scum, and then having them flip town 50% of the time. You need to either read the thread or die. On January 30 2013 09:04 Vivax wrote:
Well claiming to save a guy from getting lynched just before he truly gets lynched usually gets the guy still lynched cause people want to see if the claim is true. You got to stop the bandwagon before it gains steam.
To be honest I didn't want to believe my check. I was believing I hit the godfather initially. But got to go with what one gets. He wasn't in any danger of being lynched. Learn to convince people without claiming your goddamn role, cause you won't roll cop every game. Maybe you should redefine what "playing like scum means" If people who fill the criteria flip town 50% doesn't it make you think your doing something wrong. Its easy to blame other townies but how about you just play better. Palmar gets killed very early in the game as town cause he can find scum Period. Maybe the reasoning you are always getting kept alive as town WBG is your inability to find scum. As opposed to lynching people playing like scum. Also what is your reading the thread or die bullshit. And the fact that you think xskds wasnt gonna get lynched wasn't so true. I could of seen us killing him today. so why is it that you get lynched in all of your games and never find any scum? Why are you accusing me of doing things wrong when a 50% lynch rate is better than 0? You could have seen killing him because he was an easy bandwagon. Oh look, you didn't answer any of my questions nor show me why JX is scum. You suck at this game.
Lol WBG you dont play well when your angry.
I stopped playing for a year. When i started again. Three games won my last 2/3 66% not so bad if i say so my self. Oh and the games I won. I was in both end games. I got better brah.
But regardless in THIS game I think JX is the best lynch atm.
Also you talk about mudflinging yet your the king of that.
|
On January 30 2013 09:15 Vivax wrote:
Yeah jay you should step up. I didn't like your attack on the probably miller:
##Unvote
##Vote jaybrundage
You were also a bitch in Dessert. Only scum I didn't guess.
I explained my attack on Yamato I was fishing for a reaction. Also on the last part not sure If i should take it as a compliment or an insult.
But regardless I have been doing a bit of rereading this game of filters. And JX just seems like hes not constructing his posts and thoughts well I dont think hes been very transparent. And his posts seem to not have real content. They are just comments mostly with out any thought out posts and reads on people
|
On January 30 2013 09:24 EmileZola wrote:what's mind boggling is that you entered the thread attacking sharrant, even voted him at one point, but just randomly flipped to JX. Sharrant did a very similar thing with Hapa by calling him a scummy/null read despite saying the only thing he could do to read him was mindgame the hosts. Neither behavior made any sense. Show nested quote +On January 30 2013 09:21 jaybrundage wrote:On January 30 2013 09:16 EmileZola wrote:On January 30 2013 09:14 jaybrundage wrote:On January 30 2013 09:08 EmileZola wrote:On January 30 2013 09:03 jaybrundage wrote:On January 30 2013 08:54 EmileZola wrote:On January 30 2013 08:51 jaybrundage wrote:
Ok after rereading Sharrant I still want him to post more but. My vote is gonna go on JieXian as he has also been lurking a bit and his post dont have much clear thoughts he just seems to be trying to from opinions and stumbles alot.
##UnVote
##Vote JieXian This, right here: given your play in Dessert this post just caused your name to be colored in a darker shade of red for me. I should be worried you have a bad habit of lynching townies no, I have a habit of lynching people who play like scum, and then having them flip town 50% of the time. You need to either read the thread or die. On January 30 2013 09:04 Vivax wrote:
Well claiming to save a guy from getting lynched just before he truly gets lynched usually gets the guy still lynched cause people want to see if the claim is true. You got to stop the bandwagon before it gains steam.
To be honest I didn't want to believe my check. I was believing I hit the godfather initially. But got to go with what one gets. He wasn't in any danger of being lynched. Learn to convince people without claiming your goddamn role, cause you won't roll cop every game. Maybe you should redefine what "playing like scum means" If people who fill the criteria flip town 50% doesn't it make you think your doing something wrong. Its easy to blame other townies but how about you just play better. Palmar gets killed very early in the game as town cause he can find scum Period. Maybe the reasoning you are always getting kept alive as town WBG is your inability to find scum. As opposed to lynching people playing like scum. Also what is your reading the thread or die bullshit. And the fact that you think xskds wasnt gonna get lynched wasn't so true. I could of seen us killing him today. so why is it that you get lynched in all of your games and never find any scum? Why are you accusing me of doing things wrong when a 50% lynch rate is better than 0? You could have seen killing him because he was an easy bandwagon. Oh look, you didn't answer any of my questions nor show me why JX is scum. You suck at this game. Lol WBG you dont play well when your angry. I stopped playing for a year. When i started again. Three games won my last 2/3 66% not so bad if i say so my self. Oh and the games I won. I was in both end games. I got better brah. But regardless in THIS game I think JX is the best lynch atm. Also you talk about mudflinging yet your the king of that. So despite the fact that we both think Sharrant is scum, you prefer JX all of a sudden. Sharrant was taking suspicion, and you magically don't find him scum anymore. Is that correct? Also, living to endgame is not proof you are getting better. The hallmark of a good townie is getting consistently shot on n1.Also, winning a game as scum because everyone thinks your bad play is indicative of you being town doesn't exactly help you in this situation.
Yes WBG rereading filters does change reads on people. While I still think Sharrant's lurking is scummy. I believe that JX has done more scummy things.
Why does it matter that we both think Sharrant is scummy I fail to see any reason this matters at all.
Btw That bolded part is irony that is what i was just talking about earlier.
I think earlier EZ was townie.
ATM im not sure I have a bad habit of forming town reads on people that try to kill me. Like an antiOMGUS i have no idea why so trying to avoide that. And my read is kinda shifting to more null.
I still think Sharrant is a decent lynch candidate but I would prefer JX.
Also Djo I see you voted me. Some reasoning would be nice.
|
On January 30 2013 09:53 EmileZola wrote:
which is why I accused jay of not reading the thread.
In fact, I consider him scum for the manner in which he switched away from Sharrant. He seemed to switch away from Sharrant when it was apparent Sharrant would gain traction.
Distancing is a scum tactic. He prefers JX over Sharrant and never qualifies the preference any more than "JX has done worse". Not good enough. Either qualify it with tangible evidence, or die.
What the hell are you talking about. God forbid I have more then one scum read. Sharrant and JX are both scummy. Yes JX voted thrawn early but it doesn't make all his scummy actions irrelevant. Also Iamp also had JX as a scummy read. I have Lamp as a town read and i give his opinion some weight in my decisions. That is primarily why I started rereading filters and such to see if i could see what he said about Sharrant and JX.
|
@Djo Umm at the begging of your you said Hapa/jay. But all i see is hapa and no jay.
Also as town i used to martry. Obvious it never works as i still got mislynched. I dont plan to get mislynched this game,
|
EBWODP
At the beginning of your post you said hapa/jay*
|
And your case is more or less Hapa doesnt jump on the thrawn wagon as if he knows the alignment of thrawn.
The reason being is he doesnt know thrawn's alignment. He was suspicious of thrawn and im sure if hapa didn't need ot get replaced he would of followed up and voted thrawn as well.
|
@Djo I have been actively posting. You act like I have been not posting at all till i saw your case. I have posted my reads atm of JX and Sharrant. As of yet JX has been lurking everyone wants to defend him but no one lets him defend him self. Why is that? Yes he was on thrawn early could this make him more likely to be town sure. Can he still be scum yes. I have had games when people bus someone as the first or second post. DocH did this one game as scum.
In regards to your second post yes hapa didnt vote thrawn. He had to get replaced and the mods stated hapa would stop posting and not partake in the voting. So whats your point.
|
Your case on hapa and his replacement hapa 2.0 is lacking.
Hapa saw thrawn lurking and was commentating on it and making his reads known. Then he had to get replaced. What do you think the next logical step woould be for town hapa if he didn't get replaced. To vote thrawn.
Your case is pretty weak. Go make a new one or find actual scum.
@Ziggler Sharrant or JX i keep waffling between the two. They have different play styles but I don't like there lurkiness.
What's your thoughts on who we should lynch.
|
On January 30 2013 12:59 Djodref wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2013 12:42 jaybrundage wrote:
Your case on hapa and his replacement hapa 2.0 is lacking.
Hapa saw thrawn lurking and was commentating on it and making his reads known. Then he had to get replaced. What do you think the next logical step woould be for town hapa if he didn't get replaced. To vote thrawn.
Your case is pretty weak. Go make a new one or find actual scum.
@Ziggler Sharrant or JX i keep waffling between the two. They have different play styles but I don't like there lurkiness.
What's your thoughts on who we should lynch. How do you know what Hapa would have done or not ? You shouldn't be concerned about defending my case against Hapa because you are not in a position to do so. I'm pushing your lynch for the moment. Present better cases against your targets and I might change my mind. Also I would like to know if you have any alternative ideas for the scum players ? There are still two of them...
Are you fucking kidding me. I have information that lets me know hapa's motives. Namly I know hapa is town. Me and hapa are the same entity for all intensive purposes. So i plan to defend my self against your shitty case. ALso your case doesnt have anything about me in it. Why not?
I said who I want to push. And I have also given two names. I don't have great cases on the people i posted. The biggest reason im pushing them is gut read/ they are lurking. Is it ideal no but its what i got. WHen i have a good case ill post it
|
On January 30 2013 13:29 Sharrant wrote:
Jay, I'm really disliking your play. You had me as a full blown scum read earlier. Then you started pussyfooting around it, saying JX was scummier. Then you moved me to solely "lurking". I understand that IamPerfection having a town read on me while you have a town read on him is going to change your view of me, but please show some of these scummy things. Your posts right now are looking like they're just there to look like you're doing something.
You're pushing two lurkers right now, I do think JX has about a 50% chance to flip scum, probably even a little higher than that. And I can tell you that I am town, so you better get another read in there. Hell, imagine I've already flipped and come up green, who are your two scum reads?
I think you both are scummy. However the one that is scummier and should be lynched today is the part that im having trouble with. I find nothing wrong with reevaluating my reads based on what i read in in the filter or based off other peoples opinion's
In the end I will consolidate on the wagon I think is mostly likely to flip scum.
In the event that you flip green then on to lynch JX. I dont feel comfortable lynching anyone else.
Out of the claimed roles we have
Lamp-Townie
xsksc-green checked
Prom-Null
EZ-Null
JX-Scummy
Sharrant-Scummy
If Sharrant and JX dont flip red then i would move on to my null reads while constantly changed my reads based on there posts.
|
On January 31 2013 01:34 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2013 01:22 iamperfection wrote:
can you just simplify it for me vivax
something like jx is scum because- .... etc You're bad. The evidence is laid out for you on the last few pages. Don't need to make a case for dummies, read the fucking thread.
Vivax thoughts on scum EZ. Could you draw any conclusions with out finding out if JX flips red.
|
On January 31 2013 01:43 EmileZola wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2013 01:40 JieXian wrote:On January 31 2013 01:34 Vivax wrote:On January 31 2013 01:22 iamperfection wrote:
can you just simplify it for me vivax
something like jx is scum because- .... etc You're bad. The evidence is laid out for you on the last few pages. Don't need to make a case for dummies, read the fucking thread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect hahaha pure gold man!!! :D (s)
Just so you know you prolly suffer from that too. I know WBG does
|
Reading up I still feel good about the JX lynch. And i agree with VIvax's point about EZ being a possible scum buddy if JX flips red. He has defended JX for the solo reason that he voted thrawn early.
Lamp lets kill JX
For Justice.
|
On January 31 2013 01:49 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2013 01:45 jaybrundage wrote:On January 31 2013 01:43 EmileZola wrote:On January 31 2013 01:40 JieXian wrote:On January 31 2013 01:34 Vivax wrote:On January 31 2013 01:22 iamperfection wrote:
can you just simplify it for me vivax
something like jx is scum because- .... etc You're bad. The evidence is laid out for you on the last few pages. Don't need to make a case for dummies, read the fucking thread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning–Kruger_effect hahaha pure gold man!!! :D (s) Just so you know you prolly suffer from that too. I know WBG does lol lol lol ....says the guy who was freaking proud of making it to the end of his mafia games
Yea see the difference is I know im not good. But I want to improve. Why shouldn't I be proud should i be ashamed of improvement.
Anyway Im gonna lynch you today unless you change my read of you. Also respond to this. Your unsure of Djo's alignment
On January 30 2013 23:38 JieXian wrote:
For the record I think scum is among : Vivax, Jay and xsksc
Unsure about : Djo, Yamato
Just in case it isn't obvious since I've given town reads to so many people
But then you say this Djo is one of the towniest pro townies.
On January 31 2013 00:04 JieXian wrote:
wth iamp?
prom, ez and djo are the towniest and most pro town guys here. I think you're town too but you are kinda trolly (I mean you've just admitted that you lynched people because they annoyed you)
Who are you willing to lynch?
Explain
|
On January 31 2013 01:56 EmileZola wrote:
let me explain that: vivax has no case against me a reasonable person could agree with.
you are reasonable, but you agree his case. therefor you're scum.
uh yeah
(s)
He's not making a case against you hes making a case against JX. Who you have hard defended on flimsy reasoning (that he put an early vote on thrawn) Thats all you have.
Also im commenting on JX"s Flip flop on djo.
/Also on what basis do you call me reasonable. I find it highly unlikly that im reasonable/joke
|
On January 31 2013 02:01 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2013 08:33 EmileZola wrote:
I'm going to assume Toad is dumb and rolled a setup without jailkeepers/medics.
1. He refers to jailkeepers in the OP but lists medics instead
2. He refers multiple times to RBs done by jailkeepers, but again, #1.
3. There were no RBs n1.
If he did indeed want medics then the balance of the setup might be a little bit off but we'll see, that's really only relevant postgame.
Sorry I copy / pasted a lot from Keirathi's set-up. He used Jailkeepers, I'm using medics. If it says Jailkeeper anywhere it's supposed to be a medic.
Catching up, sick 
Hope you feel better.
|
On January 31 2013 02:03 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2013 01:59 jaybrundage wrote:On January 31 2013 01:56 EmileZola wrote:
let me explain that: vivax has no case against me a reasonable person could agree with.
you are reasonable, but you agree his case. therefor you're scum.
uh yeah
(s) He's not making a case against you hes making a case against JX. Who you have hard defended on flimsy reasoning (that he put an early vote on thrawn) Thats all you have. Also im commenting on JX"s Flip flop on djo. /Also on what basis do you call me reasonable. I find it highly unlikly that im reasonable /joke LOL did you just say that it's highly unlikely that you're reasonable?
That is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
