|
On January 15 2013 23:44 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2013 23:42 supersoft wrote:On January 15 2013 23:39 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 15 2013 23:37 supersoft wrote:On January 15 2013 23:35 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 15 2013 23:28 supersoft wrote: hey scumteam, hapahauli is the serial killer! better shoot him tonight. :-) If Hapa is the serial killer, wouldn't it be quite bad to shoot him tonight....? For several reasons. what's your motivation behind this post? Oh, nvm. Didn't see you wrote scum team, thought you meant Vigi. Well, I'm cool with that then : ). noone buys this explanation. Are you serious or joking? I have a hard time to figure actually : /.
and what is this? why would scum super or town super be joking about this accusation?
|
xatalos, nothing to say about lazer? anyone coming into the thread right now should
|
|
yes your answer matters, because i'm having a hard time believing you think i might not want to lynch you
|
but that's beside the point now because i've already answered the question. so yes, I do
|
On January 16 2013 07:31 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2013 07:27 thrawn2112 wrote: yes your answer matters, because i'm having a hard time believing you think i might not want to lynch you Lol, how does me not thinking you are willing to lynch me make scum?
I think if you were town, it should be obvious
|
On January 16 2013 07:35 Lazermonkey wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2013 07:33 thrawn2112 wrote:On January 16 2013 07:31 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 16 2013 07:27 thrawn2112 wrote: yes your answer matters, because i'm having a hard time believing you think i might not want to lynch you Lol, how does me not thinking you are willing to lynch me make scum? I think if you were town, it should be obvious How would me being scum making it less obvious? You see even here you are WIFOMing.
actually your right, it doesn't make it any less obvious. it should be equally obvious in both situations. but you posted:
On January 16 2013 07:23 Lazermonkey wrote: Thrawn, do you sincerely think I am scum because of this? If yes, am I your highest scum read?
which is implying that you are trying to work out whether I am scum or not because I'm pushing you. that's a pointless post to make because whether you are town OR scum, you should know that I want to lynch you. So those questions are fake scumhunting.
|
it's not a scumslip. what happened is that LM thought that he had been caught in a scumslip, and then lied to try and make the 'scumslip' not seem like a scumslip. his attitude towards super doesn't make sense either
|
On January 16 2013 08:03 iamperfection wrote:Show nested quote +On January 16 2013 07:59 thrawn2112 wrote: it's not a scumslip. what happened is that LM thought that he had been caught in a scumslip, and then lied to try and make the 'scumslip' not seem like a scumslip. his attitude towards super doesn't make sense either what do you mean just because he was somewhat friendly to his scum read. Thats pretty weak thrawn. Hell in liquid city i talked openly to confirmed scum in the thread as town.
it wasn't 'somewhat friendly.' it was more like a "hey there's nothing between us to disagree on about this issue, isn't that great?" reply. to his top scumread.
Talking to confirmed scum is a completely different scenario. if they are actually confirmed scum then there is no need for any aggression at all and joking around would be natural.
|
seriously bugs? I said it wasn't a scumslip. I said jay thought he had slipped, then lied about it in order to get super to back down.
|
so wbg and sloosh call each other scum, but then make a truce to vote hopeless? no, i'm not voting for hopeless
|
|
On January 16 2013 17:31 jaybrundage wrote:Do you think that one of SloOsh or WBG are scum? You seem to avoid the entire interaction between them. Also whats your read on Hopeless1der?
I had a town read on wbg during most of n1 and hadn't decided on sloosh but was leaning scum. Watching them fight and then peacefully agree to lynch hopeless has made me more suspicious of both of them. Sloosh's is position is harder to understand so I'd bet on at least sloosh being scum.
On January 16 2013 12:54 slOosh wrote: The vote thing is an alignment null point, something a town WBG would totally be keen on. By this point whenever I place my vote WBG is gonna misconstrue it as "this is what scum slOosh would do". I never even intended to push him this cycle, so he is trying to goad me into doing it, taking the pressure off hopeless.
In fact, if he agrees that hopeless is scum, as do Hapa, iamp, then there is no reason to give hopeless another cycle to survive. There is no reason to lynch me today, lynch hopeless next cycle. More preferential treatment. WBG, put your money where your mouth is. If I'm obviously scum, then surely you can convince town that I'm scum later right?
##Vote: hopeless1der
In the first paragraph sloosh calls wbg scum. In the second paragraph sloosh turns "wbg is scum" into "we should lynch hopeless." How does that make any sense?
My guess is that either they are both scum (least likely and kinda dumb) or one of them is scum and is backing down by lynching the other's scumread
|
|
On January 17 2013 02:01 Xatalos wrote: Not to mention that you absolutely owned the lategame in British Mafia. Can't you play like that now? And not just at LYLO?
what do you think of his alignment?
|
what about stuff other than meta?
|
On January 17 2013 02:19 Xatalos wrote:MrZentor is really a special case, since he always plays in a weird and slightly trollish way. It's proven time and time again that it's no use judging him by normal standards. I tried to do that in Paranoia Mafia and failed... It's better to read him with mostly meta. If this wasn't MrZentor, I'd be quite worried about him at this point. Not to the same extent as someone like WBG or Jay though.
that's too simplistic of an approach. can you actually tell me what you think of the specific things he's done this game?
|
lazermonkey it's time for you to take a stand. show us your vote
|
|
kush and lazermonkey are both scum btw
|
|
|
|