woot
GG

I think I learned a lot this game.
My reads seemed to be pretty good though. Except for sn0_man.

Last day was pretty crazy though, and shz not voting JSL made me pretty paranoid.

kushm4sta

United States8878 Posts

January 23 2013 07:21 GMT

#1142

i was not trolling. I was 100% trying to play to my win condition the entire time.

Mocsta

Australia9389 Posts

January 23 2013 07:27 GMT

#1143

yeah i knwo u said it.. but u was ignoring my comments int he qt, it was safe to assume u was trolling me too

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

January 23 2013 09:08 GMT

#1144

Lol tbh I feel bad for Mocsta (calling him mocca was a soft town claim cause I don't know his name well ^^) He gets into a game as scum with two smurfs.

zebezt

185 Posts

January 23 2013 09:51 GMT

#1145

Well i think it might have been an advantage that you guys had so many replacements.
Makes reads much harder.
Mocsta kinda dug his own grave with his case against Omni.

Oatsmaster

United States16628 Posts

January 23 2013 09:53 GMT

#1146

Yeah Mocsta, that case wasnt bad townie bad, it was WTF noob scum fail bad.

zebezt

185 Posts

January 23 2013 10:13 GMT

#1147

Lol, reading the QT, seems I wasn't the only one who found sn0_man suspicious in first day

thrawn2112

United States6918 Posts

January 23 2013 10:38 GMT

#1148

On January 23 2013 19:13 zebezt wrote:
Lol, reading the QT, seems I wasn't the only one who found sn0_man suspicious in first day

Sn0_Man called out mocsta in his first few posts, but ended up not having the tenacity of Oatsmaster. Mocsta did a very good job of playing into his town meta and he managed to drown out a lot of useful discussion.

There was a large amount of townies making good posts throughout the game, but mocsta simply had too much control over the thread. His downfall was the case against Omni. From watching the scum qt, it was obvious that he was trying to misdirect the thread but he overdid it.

I'm sorry for the smurfing. Hosts should always check for smurfs in newbie games. It really sucks that that's the reality...what happened to common sense?

Kush, the rules say:

Smurfs:
No smurfs.

There is no interpretation of that which allows for smurfing.

thanks again to the people who were able to replace in, it takes a lot of work and makes the game much more enjoyable for everyone including the hosts

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

January 23 2013 10:41 GMT

#1149

It is an advantage in a way but it meant I wasn't able to set up a late game. If mocca hadn't slipped with that one major case we would have been set but it made me so scummy him not voting me twice. Although me being an easy mislynch later is still a valid reason in some respects.

I find it amusing that there was a point everyone was calling zeb scum or bad town considering at that point he was the only one of the right track. I think the main problem was you didn't argue the point in "the right way" or something.

zebezt

185 Posts

January 23 2013 10:42 GMT

#1150

Thank you and the other hosts as well.
I had a really good time, although I could have done without the mafia related dreams. :D

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

January 23 2013 10:44 GMT

#1151

Also no problem replacing in! My man DP hooked me up

(and spag messaged me on skype as well) Honestly if there was anybody in the thread that realised I knew both the scum coach and someone who was in the game I would have been screwed.

JacobStrangelove

Australia1572 Posts

January 23 2013 10:44 GMT

#1152

Dude you get over the mafia related dreams eventually.... maybe... I hope *cries*

zebezt

185 Posts

January 23 2013 10:50 GMT

#1153

On January 23 2013 19:41 JacobStrangelove wrote:
I find it amusing that there was a point everyone was calling zeb scum or bad town considering at that point he was the only one of the right track. I think the main problem was you didn't argue the point in "the right way" or something.

Yup.
I gotta work on that I suppose. Maybe longer posts. Long posts seem to be taken more serious.