I can't tell you why I used it so soon.
Parallel World Mafia: iGrok's Strange Land - Page 12
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
I can't tell you why I used it so soon. | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
| ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On December 13 2012 16:45 Clarity_nl wrote: I'm not going to NOT use my abilities because they might have hidden downsides or responses. We'll never find out about these things until people use some abilities. Information is good. Fine. It's just frustrating that not a single other person in that world has been talked about aside from Foolishness and now there's not a ton of time or content to base a decision on. | ||
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On December 13 2012 16:55 Keirathi wrote: Fine. It's just frustrating that not a single other person in that world has been talked about aside from Foolishness and now there's not a ton of time or content to base a decision on. I agree. | ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
I just looked back over the player list of each world before the swaps. Foolishness was the player above me on the player list. Maybe his role latches onto the player below him? There was a similar sort of mechanic in Aperture 2 (JingleHell, I think?) | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
Not to mention your actions resulted in another scum, Foolishness, coming over here. Now there exists the likelihood that all four scum are in this thread and the other thread is going to lynch into only town. And then there's that red text about destabilization. Ugh. So much weird shit to make sense of. | ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On December 13 2012 17:54 yamato77 wrote: The hell, Clarity. Why would you swap a town read out and a scum read in? Not to mention your actions resulted in another scum, Foolishness, coming over here. Now there exists the likelihood that all four scum are in this thread and the other thread is going to lynch into only town. And then there's that red text about destabilization. Ugh. So much weird shit to make sense of. Do YOU think I'm scum? Regardless of if Clarity did or not. How likely do you think it is that all 4 of the scum are in this world now? | ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
I think it's some sort of scum ability to permanently separate the threads once some sort of condition is filled. | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
So if my discussion with austin was useless, which I agree it was, who are your scum reads? As I said earlier I don't like Mementoss' play but that doesn't particularly make him scum. On the other hand, Blazinghand was rather active early in the thread with pretty low-content posts and has afterward been fairly AFK. His contributions to the discussions were pretty meaningless, he never really put forth his own ideas. Classic scum D1 blending. Since then he has contributed nothing about potential scum reads or anything of that nature. I'm fairly confident in calling him scum. But as I asked earlier, sand, who are yours? You said earlier you would share but I'm not sure if you think it is the right time. | ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
On December 13 2012 17:59 Keirathi wrote: Do YOU think I'm scum? Regardless of if Clarity did or not. How likely do you think it is that all 4 of the scum are in this world now? I just pointed out that the possibility exists, and that if he found you scummy and foolish scummy then his actions basically put the two scum reads from that thread into this one regardless of his intent or not. I still don't see why he would want to mess with the balance of scum/town in each realm by swapping players he actually had a read on. Too much dumb shit has been done this game with the excuse of "generating discussion" | ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
![]()
yamato77
11589 Posts
I believe I made a similar point at some point in my discussion with him and that was his reasoning. Seemed pretty stupid to me at the time. I guess I just talked myself out of actually reading him scum because of how I had been an equal participant in the discussion. But now he is in the other thread. Obviously you think Marv and Palmar are town, do you think those two are enough to get him lynched? They did have a good herd of sheep on the Foolishness vote. And what about Foolishness? I'm leery of him. I called him scum earlier but I'm not super confident in that the longer I think about it. He could have, as I said, been making a dumb play in the name of discussion. I don't think scum would be ballsy enough to draw that much attention to themselves that early in the game. But unfortunately it has allowed the scum in that thread to hide among the flock that Shepherd Marv is tending to. | ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
| ||