EPTChrono Trigger Mafia - Page 62
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
| ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:19 marvellosity wrote: All my questions have a point, I'm always somewhat spammy, and I never get mislynched. Why did you even say that? On November 22 2012 23:19 Oatsmaster wrote: Stop posting 1 liners Clarity or you'll be deemed useless/spammy/scummy. :D which you already are kinda on the verge of :D Oats answered for me. Hence the bitter part. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
You're latching on to minor points about things and pursuing them quite hard. What do you think your primary goal of today is? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18109 Posts
Both. His posts make a lot of sense, but his alignment is puzzling me. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:26 Acrofales wrote: Both. His posts make a lot of sense, but his alignment is puzzling me. You dissected his reads post well enough yourself. Presumably you do not characterise that post as "making a lot of sense", then. Was it just an anomaly? | ||
|
Clarity_nl
Netherlands6826 Posts
My goal for today is to scumhunt. I think the election thing is important but I don't have to post much for it, just have to find my biggest townread who is running and look at their reads and see if I agree. If I do, that's great, back to scumhunting. I haven't been as succesful, or I guess felt as succesful, as I did last game. I'll definitely have some reads ready before resolution period though. I'm just bitter that you get away with playing the way I want to play, but I don't, I guess. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18109 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:27 marvellosity wrote: You dissected his reads post well enough yourself. Presumably you do not characterise that post as "making a lot of sense", then. Was it just an anomaly? Well, I don't disagree with any of his reads, so in that sense it makes a lot of sense. What doesn't make a lot of sense is why that post even exists and why there is so little explanation in it... Before I talk more, I would like to hear from Kita himself, though. I want to hear what he has to say, and if I talk more then he will know what to say to make me feel good about him. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:29 Clarity_nl wrote: I like questioning people, and I think it works best if it's like a conversation rather than me post a blurb of text followed by a single question, when that method of gets shut down as being called spammy or useless I guess it got me down. My goal for today is to scumhunt. I think the election thing is important but I don't have to post much for it, just have to find my biggest townread who is running and look at their reads and see if I agree. If I do, that's great, back to scumhunting. I haven't been as succesful, or I guess felt as succesful, as I did last game. I'll definitely have some reads ready before resolution period though. I'm just bitter that you get away with playing the way I want to play, but I don't, I guess. You've played what, 3 games? I have built up credit and reputation that you cannot have, regardless of how good you might be. Plus it implies a mis-characterisation that all short posts/questions are the same, which they are not. Obviously I'm biased, but mine are more useful than yours  What worries me about the underlined is that you simply sheeped me on to syllo. This is fine in itself as my ego loves to have players sheeping me. But I see little interaction with syllogism after this to either cement or sway away your vote. Given you are voting for syllogism I would expect that you would be more proactive in getting information from him. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
I think we should be voting Kita. I love voting Kita. ##vote Kita | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
 It took like 15 minutes to actually type it out..Our vote for party leader has to be cast before the 47 hour limit right? And 47 hours from the start is around 9 hours from now right? I dont want to wake up too late and miss the vote time. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18109 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:29 Clarity_nl wrote: I like questioning people, and I think it works best if it's like a conversation rather than me post a blurb of text followed by a single question, when that method of gets shut down as being called spammy or useless I guess it got me down. My goal for today is to scumhunt. I think the election thing is important but I don't have to post much for it, just have to find my biggest townread who is running and look at their reads and see if I agree. If I do, that's great, back to scumhunting. I haven't been as succesful, or I guess felt as succesful, as I did last game. I'll definitely have some reads ready before resolution period though. I'm just bitter that you get away with playing the way I want to play, but I don't, I guess. <coaching mode> I think the main difference between Marv's questions and your questions is that Marv's always seem to lead somewhere. They are poignant things that, when read, make one think "hey, I would like to know that". For instance, his questioning me just now made me actually think MORE about my own posts and Kita, and analyze my own thought process. Me being forced to post that, gives everybody an insight into how I think and that is an incredibly important tool for scumhunting. However, your questions seem to be more sidetracks. Something like this: On November 21 2012 12:02 Clarity_nl wrote: So you're saying that you deduced that scum will know hp by flavor claims, or anything for that matter? Please explain to us idiots. Questions like this are not scumhunting, they are questions about setup, and Sandro's thought process will not be laid bare in this way. A couple of questions like this is fine. Too many and people get tired and label you as unproductive. Questions/statements like this: On November 21 2012 13:16 Clarity_nl wrote: But if we put up our strongest townread, doesn't that defeat the purpose? I think we should play more to our wincon when it comes to missions and just scumhunt like it's a regular game. are somewhere between meaningless and stating the obvious. There seems to be quite a lot of that in your filter. In general, going through your filter it is hard to find what you are trying to accomplish with your questions. That is not a good thing. The disconnectedness and one-liners make your filter hard to read and seem very fluffy. I think that is probably what Marv is getting at when he asks what you are trying to accomplish. </coaching mode> I have no clue what to think of you atm, Clarity, which is why I'm bothering with the coaching. If I thought you were scum that would be pointless. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18109 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:43 Oatsmaster wrote: Acro you cant ignore my response to your post It took like 15 minutes to actually type it out..Our vote for party leader has to be cast before the 47 hour limit right? And 47 hours from the start is around 9 hours from now right? I dont want to wake up too late and miss the vote time. I acknowledge that you made a response. Does that make you warm and fuzzy inside? Why do you need me to respond? | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
. well. Also how hard is it to delete irrelevant parts of a quote if you are not going to address/answer them? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18109 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:38 Toadesstern wrote: A finally TL is working for me again, back to what I was saying earlier in the morning when I wasn't able to open the votingthread or this thread anymore. I think we should be voting Kita. I love voting Kita. ##vote Kita If I read your train of thought straight, then your only reason for voting Kita is because there is no bandwagon on him. That is a supremely shitty reason to vote for Kita and you know it. What do you think of Kita? What do you think of the things Marv and I pointed out? What do you think of his team suggestion? Do you agree with him that Prom, Dieno and I are town? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:38 Toadesstern wrote: A finally TL is working for me again, back to what I was saying earlier in the morning when I wasn't able to open the votingthread or this thread anymore. I think we should be voting Kita. I love voting Kita. ##vote Kita If I understood correctly, you base your vote on nothing other than the fact two players already have a few votes and this third person does not. Is this correct? I don't see anything in your filter that indicates you care about alignments or figuring things out, besides your initial post in which you randomly called someone mafia. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18109 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:51 Oatsmaster wrote: RIght.. so you asked certain questions and when I answer them you dont care . well. Also how hard is it to delete irrelevant parts of a quote if you are not going to address/answer them? Oh, I care. I just don't see what my answering your answer would accomplish. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
Yeah kind of. I really think that the most likely scenario is that either Sandro or Syllo is mafia. And I am trying to figure things out, hence the Kita vote :p | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:56 Toadesstern wrote: @both: Yeah kind of. I really think that the most likely scenario is that either Sandro or Syllo is mafia. And I am trying to figure things out, hence the Kita vote :p What about goodkarma? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18109 Posts
On November 22 2012 23:56 Toadesstern wrote: @both: Yeah kind of. I really think that the most likely scenario is that either Sandro or Syllo is mafia. And I am trying to figure things out, hence the Kita vote :p What if Kita is the actual scum, but they're waiting for some gullible town, so their bandwagon seems less suspect when it utterly fails the first event? What if you and Kita are scum together and your feigned naiveté is a calculated ploy? Why Kita, and not GK? Hell, why not Dieno? If your entire reason for voting is that he has no bandwagon behind him, Dieno seems by far the best choice. What is your reason for voting for KITA? And not your reason for voting against Sandro and Syllo, which is a different question. | ||
| ||
