|
On November 13 2012 10:50 debears wrote:
Does S&B normally act like this?
Just curious :D
Feel free to answer that S&B
Well it's weird for sure. I'm used to seeing scum SnB be a lot more "wordy" when he posts. Atleast this was the case in Mafia LVII and Death Note Mini. Howwwwwweva, this post really sets off my scum alarms:
On November 13 2012 10:48 strongandbig wrote:Show nested quote +On November 13 2012 10:01 debears wrote:On November 13 2012 09:59 Hapahauli wrote:On November 13 2012 09:50 DarthPunk wrote:On November 13 2012 09:47 Hapahauli wrote:On November 13 2012 09:44 DarthPunk wrote:On November 13 2012 09:41 Z-BosoN wrote:Hello, sirs. First of all I´d like to claim miller. There are two very viable options now, regarding my alignment on this game. I am fakeclaiming as mafia. I am in fact a miller. My claim here would be fairly risky as scum, and as town it makes more sense to claim so as to not waste detective checks on me, but of course this is WIFOM. I hope to show my alignment in this game through brilliant, stellar townie play, and hope town uses this factor and this factor alone when scouting my alignment. The only thing I hope to achieve with this claim is to not be checked by an eventual cop, as that check will be guaranteed to turn red. That being said, I look forward to playing this game. Lot's of familiar faces around, and I am curious to hear more from people I haven't played yet. Regarding DarthPunk, don't worry, if he's scum, I'll figure it out  HI ZB <3. Yeah ZB will figure me out If I am scum, and Vice Versa. Hapa will figure marv out and marv will figure everyone out. GG scummers But what if me, ZB, and marv are all scum o_O Then Blazinghand, Debears and I will rip you all a new arsehole. <3 Oh noes! Well fortunately I'm not scum. + Show Spoiler +On November 13 2012 09:55 iamperfection wrote:On November 13 2012 09:52 Hapahauli wrote:On November 13 2012 09:45 iamperfection wrote:
i guess theirs no reason not to believe zbos right? has to be to risky to do if he was scum right. Woah woah hold-up. I'm not liking how you're trusting this claim right away. Claiming miller is a pretty much a riskless play here. We don't know how many millers are in the setup, and as far as I'm concerned, the claim is null until Z-Bo proves otherwise. its what i think so whatever. Zbos scum is gone put himself out there like that i dont think so. It's not "so whatever" - I'm pretty skeptical how you're so willing to think Z-Bo is town off what looks to me like a completely null action. Hapa, last time you did that little spoiler trick (GsL III), you were the role that you put in the spoiler. Here, you put bowser. Now why would you put bowser out of all the scum roles? It seems to me like you were actively thinking of bowser, which you shouldn't be if you are town. I would expect you to put a town role in that spoiler this is stupid
He calls debears argument/suspicion on me stupid, when he himself has his vote on me. It's not consistent at all with his suspicions so far, and I can't wrap my head around a townie thought process here.
## Vote StrongandBig
|
On November 13 2012 10:53 Hopeless1der wrote:
What good did that question do for town?
I'm trying to figure out wtf you are doing coming in out of nowhere and lecturing someone early d1. In fact, lecturing everyone for their scumhunting.
What have you done?
##Unvote
##Vote Hopeless1der
|
shhh no one tell him
its ruined if you tell him what it is
|
On November 13 2012 10:53 DarthPunk wrote:Show nested quote +On November 13 2012 10:24 DarthPunk wrote:On November 13 2012 10:16 Clarity_nl wrote:
Bandwagon time! Please answer why you claimed.
##Vote Strongandbig ##Unvote ##Vote Clarity_NL I'm going to expand on this a little because it seems to have been lost in the noise. Why did you jump on the S&B bandwagon so quickly and with little explanation? What do you find scummy about S&B and Why?
He "VT claims", then disappears. He just answered and his answer was "I claimed on accident"
I explain my reasoning my 2 posts before my vote.
|
Oh goddamnit I got sniped by the "kenpachi rule" apparently, but my post still stands since he had his vote on me at the time of the post I reference.
|
On November 13 2012 10:55 strongandbig wrote:
shhh no one tell him
its ruined if you tell him what it is
no come on really i googled it and didnt see anything
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 13 2012 10:55 Hapahauli wrote:
Oh goddamnit I got sniped by the "kenpachi rule" apparently, but my post still stands since he had his vote on me at the time of the post I reference.
this makes no sense. the post was stupid, and that's irrelevant of your alignment.
|
On November 13 2012 10:55 Hapahauli wrote:
Oh goddamnit I got sniped by the "kenpachi rule" apparently, but my post still stands since he had his vote on me at the time of the post I reference.
i want to be included god damn it tell me what you know.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
kenpachi rule is the first to put doubt on a VT claim is scum
|
On July 06 2012 21:47 marvellosity wrote:
First person to attack the VT claim is scum.
Only works for ken though. So we're not lynching BL. Especially as he's one of the only players actually making an effort.
(This is from an old game)
|
On November 13 2012 10:56 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On November 13 2012 10:55 Hapahauli wrote:
Oh goddamnit I got sniped by the "kenpachi rule" apparently, but my post still stands since he had his vote on me at the time of the post I reference. this makes no sense. the post was stupid, and that's irrelevant of your alignment.
Why doesn't it make sense? I'm just saying that SnB changed his vote to someone else before I made my vote on him (in which I reference his vote on me). Perhaps an unnecessary clarification, but it should make sense.
|
I am but a Votecounting Man:
strongandbig (3): Z-BosoN, Clarity_nl, Hapahauli
Clarity_nl (1): DarthPunk
debears (1): strongandbig
Hopeless1der (1): debears
Not voting (7): iamperfection, marvellosity, thrawn2112, Blazinghand, Hopeless1der, Kickstart, Crossfire99
Currently, strongandbig is set to be lynched! 48 hours remaining in Day 1.
Full version:
+ Show Spoiler +strongandbig (3): DarthPunk, Z-BosoN, Clarity_nl, Hapahauli
Clarity_nl (1): DarthPunk
debears (1): Z-Boson, strongandbig
Hopeless1der (1): debears
Darthpunk (0): Hapahauli Hapahauli
Hapahauli (0): iamperfection, strongandbig
marvellosity (0): debears
Not voting (7): iamperfection, marvellosity, thrawn2112, Blazinghand, Hopeless1der, Kickstart, Crossfire99
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 13 2012 10:59 Hapahauli wrote:Show nested quote +On November 13 2012 10:56 marvellosity wrote:On November 13 2012 10:55 Hapahauli wrote:
Oh goddamnit I got sniped by the "kenpachi rule" apparently, but my post still stands since he had his vote on me at the time of the post I reference. this makes no sense. the post was stupid, and that's irrelevant of your alignment. Why doesn't it make sense? I'm just saying that SnB changed his vote to someone else before I made my vote on him (in which I reference his vote on me). Perhaps an unnecessary clarification, but it should make sense.
so what if he had his vote on you? the post he commented on was stupid, what does him having his vote on you have anything to do with that?
|
@ Marv
Let us into your mind a little bit - any thoughts/suspicions thusfar?
|
On November 13 2012 10:55 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On November 13 2012 10:53 Hopeless1der wrote:
What good did that question do for town? I'm trying to figure out wtf you are doing coming in out of nowhere and lecturing someone early d1. In fact, lecturing everyone for their scumhunting. What have you done? ##Unvote
##Vote Hopeless1der
DP calls out marv because multiple people were actively lurking and you singling out clarity was unfair. I was also lurking, and DP implies you were "trying your hardest", whereas you have said:
On November 13 2012 10:48 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On November 13 2012 10:46 Hopeless1der wrote:
I think debears is just mucking up the thread hard, but that's apparently just what he does? pretty much what marv said again for myself on the active lurking. Eh. It's early d1. Give me about 10 more hours before the good stuff comes out. And yeah guys didn't realize it's only 2 hours at this point.... And yeah marv that's why my vote is still on u!
Did we catch the scums yet? Did 10 hours pass when I wasnt looking?
|
it doesn't only work for kenpachi though
that doesn't even make sense, he can't be a town all by himself
srsly lets dooooo eeeeeeet
|
okay im going to sleep now it's like three am
kiiiiill some scuuuuuuuums doods
|
On November 13 2012 11:00 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On November 13 2012 10:59 Hapahauli wrote:On November 13 2012 10:56 marvellosity wrote:On November 13 2012 10:55 Hapahauli wrote:
Oh goddamnit I got sniped by the "kenpachi rule" apparently, but my post still stands since he had his vote on me at the time of the post I reference. this makes no sense. the post was stupid, and that's irrelevant of your alignment. Why doesn't it make sense? I'm just saying that SnB changed his vote to someone else before I made my vote on him (in which I reference his vote on me). Perhaps an unnecessary clarification, but it should make sense. so what if he had his vote on you? the post he commented on was stupid, what does him having his vote on you have anything to do with that?
Because it's strange. He was far too willing to dismiss the argument of someone who was taking his side on an issue. He didn't attempt to explain anything about his reads in that post.
|
|
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On November 13 2012 11:00 Hapahauli wrote:
@ Marv
Let us into your mind a little bit - any thoughts/suspicions thusfar?
not a lot worth sharing. I think the s&b wagon is a bit silly, but s&b's last two posts are a little too... try-hard for my liking.
"look how casual i am guise!!!!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
