• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:05
CEST 19:05
KST 02:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202560RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Post Pic of your Favorite Food! The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 925 users

Acme Mini Mafia, Inc

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-29 17:25:36
October 27 2012 18:32 GMT
#36
/in I will not be modkilled
E: let it be known that I am signed up for WLIIA Mafia if you want to work that into you signup selection process.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
October 31 2012 22:38 GMT
#76
Needed this


sup prplhz. Lynch all bullshitters then?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
October 31 2012 22:46 GMT
#77
In case people feel the need to argue with prplhz on miller claims:

On October 26 2012 02:31 wherebugsgo wrote:

Notes


If two roleblockers target each other, they are both informed.

Masons who are roleblocked will not be prevented from communicating with their partner(s).

Masons are confirmed town to each other.

One person on the mafia team may carry out the kill each night. The mafia can choose not to kill. The mafia can kill each other. If the mafia member chosen to kill on a particular night is roleblocked, no kill will occur.

Millers are self-aware.

There are no hit notifications in this game.

All roleblocks will result in the target being notified.

If a serial killer is present he/she will be able to choose between investigation immunity and one shot bulletproof when the roles go out and before day 1 starts. If no choice is sent in then I will flip a coin and choose for the player.

If there are any questions about the setup, they may either be PMed to me or posted in the thread in bold green text

There will be post-game analysis and potentially other types of recognition from me. Stick around after the game is over if you want to do the post-game discussionings.

100% the right course of action. If you're OP does not contain a miller claim in it, I'll policy lynch you if you claim it later on. (Catching-up to thread post leeway if you claim in your 2nd or 3rd post that's fine)
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
October 31 2012 22:57 GMT
#79
I agree and I'm trying to give it a name. Quick, quick, call me scum for sheeping your idea!
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
October 31 2012 23:06 GMT
#81
Yeah, being facetious is awesome.

Okay, prplhz I agree with the concept of your idea, but what would you propose we do to get the game actually started. At some point we end up accusing lurkers or calling something/someone stupid if no one pulls a stupid case out of their ass. Or else, it'll be VERY weak reads based on making the littlest out to be scummy. Would that be okay with you?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
October 31 2012 23:07 GMT
#82
EBWOP: "littlest thing out to be scummy"
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 01 2012 00:52 GMT
#99
On November 01 2012 09:00 Release wrote:
to everyone:

Are we asking Millers or Masons to claim? prplhz (the origin of the idea) said millers and now kushmasta has asked for masons to claim (although he does avoid saying mason).

I have to say already that kshmasta is looking scummy.

Since i don't see the advantage of a miller claim, i'd like to know why a miller should claim (from both prplhz and hope in particular).
I'd also like to hear from kushmasta why you avoided saying mason.


Well, it's going to end up keeping them alive through the nights, at least from NK's. Claiming/fakeclaiming miller is confirming that you will return red if you are investigated, so it saves the DT's a target to check in that sense. Miller's are likely to end up vigged or lynch just before lylo, because we can't take the risk at that point, but it could also compel them to scum-hunt a bit harder if people are always nursing suspicions about a fakeclaim.

The biggest thing is that if any mafia want to fakeclaim miller, they have to do it NOW. It cannot be in response to a DT check or if you're about to be lynched (and to be honest, I wouldn't believe an "omg i'm about to be lynched" miller claim anyways).

On November 01 2012 08:35 kushm4sta wrote:
OK maybe mass claim is a bad idea because of blues.. I wasn't thinking that.
How about they name claim anyway though and we can all judge the validity of their name claim without revealing ours.

I guess that could be useful? It's at least something to go by to help solidify a read. However...
Do scum get fake/safeclaims?

Mason Claims - I think are a bad idea. Mason's get stronger as the game goes on. I'd rather they write last wills of some sort to confirm each other in case on dies/is about to be lynched, and their pm logs are going to be proof enough in most cases.

Miller Claims - I think are a good idea.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 01 2012 01:49 GMT
#112
On November 01 2012 10:40 Acrofales wrote:
Hi Mattchew. On the one hand I agree with you, although for different reasons. However, I have seen this kind of finger pointing go terribly wrong too often. It is entirely possible Release is a newbienoob (which I kinda suspect given that I have no clue who he is) and is simply jumping on the first bad play of the game, in what I will happily call the second bad play of the game.

My main problem with Release is this post:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 10:09 Release wrote:
On November 01 2012 09:05 kushm4sta wrote:
On November 01 2012 09:01 Release wrote:
EBWOP: those are three separate ideas, although kushmasta is looking scummy for both trying to change who should claim and being deceitful about it.

I'm not being deceitful about it, I just got their names mixed up.
I think they should probably both claim actually.

@release
Are you suggesting that I'm trying to trick power roles like vig, dt, etc into mass claiming?

Are millers' true alignment revealed upon death?

well, you were assigning Mason traits to the miller, which led to the confusion that it did between who should claim.

Also, you didn't mention mason but the "town who can talk to each other." You avoided saying mason. Mason is clear. "town who can talk to each other" could be mason, but could be miller if someone assumed you were talking about who YOU thought "could talk to each other."

Mafia is a game in which posts can't be editted. People tend to check their posts for any dubious or tentative information. I highly doubt that you "mixed up" their names because things like that tend to get checked, which leads me to believe you said such things on purpose.

I wasn't talking about the mass claim. That was rather obvious.

This is pathetic and reaks of scum. While I was willing to write off his first post as one derp of accusing another derp, this one just seems malevolent. He is trying to paint a scum reason for making a mistake and dreaming up wild unprovable theories in the process. This is not a town move. It's an easy way for scum to (try to) get a mislynch bandwagon going. Nevertheless, it's a terrible scumplay. Holding off on my vote to see where this goes.


Zealos is being Zealos. I have nothing much to say about him yet.


Acro, I just want to confirm that you think Kush derped (i.e. is probably town) and that Release might have derped but it was very scummy and you'd lean towards him being scum. Is that correct?

On November 01 2012 10:47 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 10:30 Release wrote:
On November 01 2012 10:17 thrawn2112 wrote:
On November 01 2012 10:09 Release wrote: I highly doubt that you "mixed up" their names because things like that tend to get checked, which leads me to believe you said such things on purpose.


and I highly doubt you would actually think this

I was confused about whom we wanted to claim and which each were.
So i checked the OP and the thing Hope posted and asked for clarification.

Kush posted things based on a misunderstanding and i don't understand why he would not check the OP or ask for clarification. I mean, in Hope's post-quote, there was clearly a miller AND a mason. So it appears that Kush is
setting himself up for a defense ( as I have said), and overeager to contribute.


I guess you have never played with me before. Most of the time I don't think before I post and I'm quite capable of derps as town.

About your suspicion of me: Let me get this straight. You think my scumplan was to convince the masons to claim then cover my ass by pretending I mixed up masons and millers?
That does not sound like a realistic scumplan!

I grudgingly agree that kush derps pretty consistently.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 01 2012 03:19 GMT
#139
On November 01 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 11:26 Mattchew wrote:
release what do you think of zealos's posts

First post agrees with the general consensus. Has a point in that he can't be blamed for not agreeing.

Second post reinforces the miller not mason claim. Clarifies part of the problem.

Third post seems to allude to that fact that he thinks I'm town or that my posts are insignificant.
If he had posted something more, i would think of it as "there are more important things to do" but he has yet to make a further contribution. I honestly have no idea what he trying to do with this post because his filter is rather meager, so this doesn't seem like fluff.

Zealos, please explain in detail what you mean by this post because there seems to be ambiguity surrounding it.

_____________________________________________

Personally, i'd like to hear from someone who has not yet posted to get another perspective on this, and the case on me.

Well, I haven't properly commented on you yet Release. Based on what I've seen, really scummy push against kush.
However, I'm going to read those newbie games you posted seeing as I was in two of them and then come back to this. We'll see how some meta analysis holds up. Also, I doubt I get that done tonight since I need to be up really early for work; Going to bed in a bit so I'll post my findings in an approximate 15 hours from now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 01 2012 17:56 GMT
#208
Release's first game ever on TL, opening postTown:

+ Show Spoiler +
On May 22 2012 09:08 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2012 08:44 Mordanis wrote:
So my last game began with a discussion of whether to vote or not that wasn't very productive. We got lucky and scored a good D1 lynch, but it felt very, well, luck based. So I'll start this out by saying that if we don't lynch today, we'll probably be in a really shitty situation. In short, I am for a vote today. Also, it's good to be working together with Golden again! For Liquidia!

Is this day cycle going to be an extra couple of hours? I only ask because it was in my first game and I'd like to make sure what the situation is. Thanks

You say that you are for a vote, but you state that your other vote was luck based. Considering you said "very luck based", doesn't that mean to say that we are not going to experience the same luck? If we don't experience the same luck, we will very much end up lynching a townie, which makes your "for a vote" seem like you want to lynch a townie.

Also, why are you talking about the last game? You should be more concerned with this game and find out ways for pointing out scum rather than ways not to. This seems more like filler.

The useful part of your post can be summarized by:
We should have a lynch today. A no-lynch would be detrimental.



##FOS: Mordanis


Fairly similar to his attack on kush this game.



2nd game Town, he spends most of the game tunneling grush. Way more 1-liners, inconclusive to the current situation


3rd game Vig, he gets in my face pretty early, but generally tried to keep talking. Also cited activity issues due to school?


4th game Town,
+ Show Spoiler +
On July 05 2012 08:58 Release wrote:
I think YourHarry is Grush's new alias.

Show nested quote +
On July 05 2012 06:39 Lazermonkey wrote:
YOYO GUYS. I AM Vanilla Townie

On a more serious note, we want this ship rollin' as fast as possible. Discussing policy is not scumhunting but it does at least help us get the discussion going. First off, something we want to avoid as town is Vanillas claiming blue roles. In both my last game and Newbie Mini Mafia XVIII there were Vanillas who claimed blue roles(DTs). Both times town ended in an bad spot (although not as bad as it could've been due to luck). But this should still be avoided at all costs as it can cause massive damage to town. Why? Well let's say a vanilla townie claims DT, and then the real DT claims because the vanilla is lying. As it doesn't make sense for vanillas to claim blue roles, we must assume that one of theese players is scum and the other one is the real DT.Two following scenarios can occur here
1). The townie gets lynched. which means that the other person is probebly the real DT, this must however not be true.
2). The DT gets lynched, which means that the vanilla townie will 100% get lynched the next day.
While 2 is far worse than 1 they are still both very bad for town. There really isn't a situation you want to fakeclaim as a townie. If you don't agree with this please let me know. If noone disagrees I will assume that no townie is ever fake claiming a blue role. Obviously there are situations where you might want to claim as blue.

I will also copy a part of my first post from my last game(where I was DT) since I am lazy.

Regarding lynches: I really really dislike nolynching for three reasons.
1. because the information that we are able to get out of it is very limited. Yes, we avoid a potential misslynch but on the other hand scum will score a more or less a free-kill during night. Essentially, we are back on D1 but this time we are in a 6-2 instead of a 7-2.
2. If we agree to nolynch then what is there to discuss? It's like asking for people to lurk even more.
3. With no vigilante in the game the only way we can win is to lynch scum. Kinda obvious but still.
We require 5+ votes in order to get a lynch done. With that in mind I hope that people are willing to vote for someone who isn't their top 1 scum. Obviously, if you REALLY don't think there is any chance that the person that is about to be lynched can be scum, then sure, don't vote him. But if it seems like your target hardly gets any votes and your second highest scumread is at 4 votes with 30 minutes untill deadline, then I think you should swap your vote onto him.

Lurkers!: There are two types of lurkers. The ones who doesn't post anything and the sneaky ones, who posts ALOT but nothing of value. The first category could either be bad town play or scum play. But the second category is almost exclusivly scum play. If you are a townie, speak your mind, don't make a super duper long post when you could've said it on just a few lines. Keep it simple. With that being said, post!


Ignoring the copy-pasted policy stuff for now,

Why on earth did you even post that scenario stuff about a VT fake-claiming a DT or blue? There was absolutely no indication that anyone had even planned on that (especially considering you had the first post). If anything, you have just shown people something they can do (to the detriment of the town). And why go through the casework? It's just fluff and you know it. This is very much a post looking like a contribution, while being a non-contribution, or even an anti-contribution.

Im pretty sure, again, that no one was even remotely close to voting in a way to force a nolynch.

I love the bolded line; you could have kept this post simple and concise. But you decided to make it "super-duper long."

##vote: Lazermonkey

Yourharry, you should do more than OMGUS. You are definitely rivaling, for scumminess, against lazer.

Fos: yourharry
Fos: lazermonkey



Keep in mind, he's already spent a game tunneling grush, from what I can tell, it was related to fake-claims. Opens with hostility and a vote.



To be fair, I don't think he's ever rolled scum, but his jumping out of the gate fighting looks like hes town yet again. He's never played with kush before. He also explained that he expects people to NOT derp all over the thread when they post here:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 01 2012 10:09 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 09:05 kushm4sta wrote:
On November 01 2012 09:01 Release wrote:
EBWOP: those are three separate ideas, although kushmasta is looking scummy for both trying to change who should claim and being deceitful about it.

I'm not being deceitful about it, I just got their names mixed up.
I think they should probably both claim actually.

@release
Are you suggesting that I'm trying to trick power roles like vig, dt, etc into mass claiming?

Are millers' true alignment revealed upon death?

well, you were assigning Mason traits to the miller, which led to the confusion that it did between who should claim.

Also, you didn't mention mason but the "town who can talk to each other." You avoided saying mason. Mason is clear. "town who can talk to each other" could be mason, but could be miller if someone assumed you were talking about who YOU thought "could talk to each other."

Mafia is a game in which posts can't be editted. People tend to check their posts for any dubious or tentative information. I highly doubt that you "mixed up" their names because things like that tend to get checked, which leads me to believe you said such things on purpose.

I wasn't talking about the mass claim. That was rather obvious.

(seebolded)

Sadly, kush is unable to meet that requirement. My "meta" read is that this strong aggression is in fact representative of town release. Keeping in mind that there are no scum games to compare with, I'm not willing to vote Release for his posts against kush.

i also agree with this from Zealos:
On November 02 2012 01:41 Zealos wrote:
--SNIP--
That being said, I do think releases later posts have a townie attitude about them. He is saying what he appears to think without hiding anything or pushing a mafia agenda as far as I can tell.
--SNIP--





I think I have a handle on this mason claim shitfest. I'm rereading this through more carefully because I just kind of glanced the thread over, but I think I'm going to be voting Muso in a moment.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 01 2012 18:20 GMT
#210
Okay, ignoring the possibility of two mason pairs:

I could actually quote every single one of Muso's posts to help make my point...
- He "lied" about his game history
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 01 2012 13:25 Muso wrote:
Oh sorry guys I didn't know there was a difference between Mason and Miller.

I know I said I'd played hundreds of mafia games before but I actually lied just to get in to the game. This is my first one, but I watched a few youtube videos so I thin I get it.

Sorry if I'm bad :S


- He "lied" about reading the game setup
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 01 2012 13:25 Muso wrote:
Oh sorry guys I didn't know there was a difference between Mason and Miller.

I know I said I'd played hundreds of mafia games before but I actually lied just to get in to the game. This is my first one, but I watched a few youtube videos so I thin I get it.

Sorry if I'm bad :S

On November 01 2012 13:41 Muso wrote:
I am a mason, I didn't know there was a miller too



Are the lies because he's new and quite frankly, stupid? Or because his fake-claim was TERRIBLE and he's banking on the pity card to save him somehow?

##Vote: Muso

Acro has provided an encrypted 'claim post' and I don't see the benefit to a 1-1 trade if Acro was scum. This situation makes way more sense if Acro is telling the truth.
Technically, 2 mason pairs is possible, but quite frankly I think we're going to be lynching Muso regardless now, even if a "partner" claims. His filter is just too wrong for me to be willing to let him live.


Here is what I would suggest:
Muso, if you are in fact a mason, write a last will for your partner to use to confirm themselves.
Muso's Partner - Unless you think you can save him, do not claim until after the 1hr resolution period starts at the end of the night phase. There is no good reason to out yourself before that time (unless you can save him).


Could someone comment on that suggestion, and perhaps if they would even believe someone claiming to be Muso's mason-partner? I really don't think revealing the other halves is a good idea right now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 01 2012 18:36 GMT
#213
On November 02 2012 03:22 Mattchew wrote:
Lol if muso has a town partner he should claim now to avoid a mislynch... Anything else would be brain dead logic


And then I turn around and say SCUMBUDDY!! And then we argue, probably lynch muso anyways. Do you not see that as a potential outcome? I see that as the more likely outcome at this point.

If a mason flips, is their partner revealed?
Also, unanswered questions:
On November 01 2012 09:05 kushm4sta wrote:
Are millers' true alignment revealed upon death?

On November 01 2012 09:52 Hopeless1der wrote:
Do scum get fake/safeclaims?




On November 02 2012 03:29 Zealos wrote:
I really hate this encryption thing, it just doesn't make sense for the point of the game imo.

...He creating "proof" that he is a mason. If he dies, his partner decrypts the message, becomes confirmed town. There are games that explicitly do not allow it, this one made no distinction. Do you think it makes Acro scummy?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 02 2012 16:05 GMT
#319
On November 03 2012 00:15 kushm4sta wrote:
I don't want to lynch either muso or prpl.

Prpl was mislynched as town in his last several games. He looks very scummy as town. So keep that in mind.
Your case on him is very bas. The only scummy thing is giving a bunch of town reads which isn't that scummy.
So what if he thought there was 2 mason pairs. Not everyone knows the probability of that. Also I thought the same thing.

Muso, I think it would be very hard for scum to come up with that vt role name.

Review the spoiler. Information is deliberately missing. I don't know how "hard" it would be for scum to come up with a VT name.
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 02 2012 03:36 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 02 2012 03:22 Mattchew wrote:
Lol if muso has a town partner he should claim now to avoid a mislynch... Anything else would be brain dead logic


And then I turn around and say SCUMBUDDY!! And then we argue, probably lynch muso anyways. Do you not see that as a potential outcome? I see that as the more likely outcome at this point.

If a mason flips, is their partner revealed?
Also, unanswered questions:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 09:05 kushm4sta wrote:
Are millers' true alignment revealed upon death?

Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 09:52 Hopeless1der wrote:
Do scum get fake/safeclaims?




Show nested quote +
On November 02 2012 03:29 Zealos wrote:
I really hate this encryption thing, it just doesn't make sense for the point of the game imo.

...He creating "proof" that he is a mason. If he dies, his partner decrypts the message, becomes confirmed town. There are games that explicitly do not allow it, this one made no distinction. Do you think it makes Acro scummy?

On November 02 2012 04:47 HiroPro wrote:
Millers flip miller on death.

If a mason dies, their partner is not revealed.





On November 03 2012 00:31 thrawn2112 wrote:
kush i cant believe you're trying to make d1 cases based on the flavor claimed by two people... just absurd

On November 02 2012 01:15 wherebugsgo wrote:
You may claim your role and character name, but I will be modkilling for flavor text (although the game should not be breakable with flavor, it's rule 11). Let this be your last and only warning.

He's doing things that are apparently 'allowed' as far as mod rules go. That said, I don't think kush is being particularly helpful, but its not scummy to me. This is kush legitimately trying to contribute and reason out whether or not the lynch candidate is who he says he is (i.e. is Muso really VT).
On November 03 2012 00:52 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 00:31 thrawn2112 wrote:
kush i cant believe you're trying to make d1 cases based on the flavor claimed by two people... just absurd

It's not just based on 2 people claims. It's based on the lack of claim from ALL the vts, AND the claims of two people.

Acro seems really upset by my theory.
drazzak, acro, and thrawn have all shat on my theory now.
Why don't you guys actually EXPLAIN why it's such a bad idea instead of just SAYING it's bad.
Do you really believe that all VTs have non character role names except for one named Jessica Rabbit. I do not believe that is likely.

He only ever claimed NOT Mason. Granted, green text, but that's inconclusive.
However, the reason I think your theory is bad is that I think scum have fakeclaims. My question never got answered and I think it's clear that Hiro was replying to the posts I quoted.



Promethelax hasn't checked in yet, but even if it was still prplhz in the game I'd rather lynch Muso. I find his noob act highly incriminating. He knew what he was doing when he fakeclaimed and tried to weasel his way out by playing stupid at first. When that didn't work, he tries to pass it off as a gambit to lure scum NK fire. He keeps putting up more smoke and mirrors every time his last plan didn't work. I'm not comfortable leaving that kind of player around. I'm leaving my vote as it is.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 02 2012 16:57 GMT
#326
On November 03 2012 01:34 Muso wrote:
It's 3am here and I doubt I'll be awake for the end of day.

It doesn't look like Promethelax is coming, and unfortunately lynching him is the only viable option here. Some of you believe otherwise, and I can't stop you. I urge you to trust Acro though (at least for today). He makes sense.

If the lynch on me does go through, I implicitly urge you to revisit these last 6 hrs and look at players who were opposed to shifting attention off of me. Hopeless1der is one such player. If in the future Promethelax rolls town, I highly suggest interrogating Hopeless1der. In fact this kind of resistance just strengthens the case against Promethelax.

Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 01:05 Hopeless1der wrote:Promethelax hasn't checked in yet, but even if it was still prplhz in the game I'd rather lynch Muso. I find his noob act highly incriminating. He knew what he was doing when he fakeclaimed and tried to weasel his way out by playing stupid at first. When that didn't work, he tries to pass it off as a gambit to lure scum NK fire. He keeps putting up more smoke and mirrors every time his last plan didn't work. I'm not comfortable leaving that kind of player around. I'm leaving my vote as it is.


I sincerely hope I get to revisit this post on Day 2, and if I don't please somebody else do it for me. Hopeless1der cannot be trusted.

##vote Promethelax





This post just strengthens my resolve to lynch you Muso.

"If in the future Promethelax rolls town, I highly suggest interrogating Hopeless1der."
In this scenario, I'm scum for NOT wanting to lynch a townie. Please clarify what you mean if you're still around.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 02 2012 21:15 GMT
#399
Got tied up at work. Rereading, back in 5-10.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 02 2012 21:27 GMT
#408
I skimmed so I don't have any details yet. Off the bat:
No to lynching Prom
Yes to lynching Muso
Almost yes to lynching draz

(Facepalm to kush in general)
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 02 2012 21:32 GMT
#416
Muso never came back when I questioned this, and I found this last post of his really scummy:
On November 03 2012 01:34 Muso wrote:
It's 3am here and I doubt I'll be awake for the end of day.

It doesn't look like Promethelax is coming, and unfortunately lynching him is the only viable option here. Some of you believe otherwise, and I can't stop you. I urge you to trust Acro though (at least for today). He makes sense.

If the lynch on me does go through, I implicitly urge you to revisit these last 6 hrs and look at players who were opposed to shifting attention off of me. Hopeless1der is one such player. If in the future Promethelax rolls town, I highly suggest interrogating Hopeless1der. In fact this kind of resistance just strengthens the case against Promethelax.

Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 01:05 Hopeless1der wrote:Promethelax hasn't checked in yet, but even if it was still prplhz in the game I'd rather lynch Muso. I find his noob act highly incriminating. He knew what he was doing when he fakeclaimed and tried to weasel his way out by playing stupid at first. When that didn't work, he tries to pass it off as a gambit to lure scum NK fire. He keeps putting up more smoke and mirrors every time his last plan didn't work. I'm not comfortable leaving that kind of player around. I'm leaving my vote as it is.


I sincerely hope I get to revisit this post on Day 2, and if I don't please somebody else do it for me. Hopeless1der cannot be trusted.

##vote Promethelax




If it was 3AM at time of post, its around 8AM now. He might be back before the deadline but I won't hold my breath. He's already said he probably wont make it. That's not scummy, thats needing sleep.

The scummy part is where he says me continuing to push his lynch is scummy and that it makes the case on promethelax look stronger. This suggests we're both scum. However, if Prom flips town, we should interrogate me. So I'm scum no matter what, basically because I still want to lynch his lying ass.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 02 2012 21:49 GMT
#432
On November 03 2012 06:48 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 06:41 Release wrote:
7 is the magic number so i ask someone who is tentatively voting muso to switch to promethelax.
It isn't too hard to understand why. Please don't act braindead.

Huh? Why do you want the vote to be easily manipulatable by scum? 8 is a good number. You are pretty much condoning last-minute shenanigans with this bullshit. Two people switch at the last second and claim they were doing what you wanted, but didn't see the other's switch. It's stupid. 8 is fine, 9 is better for consolidation.

Is that a short answer for "fuck it, lynch Muso"?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 02 2012 21:51 GMT
#436
On November 03 2012 06:50 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 06:48 Acrofales wrote:
On November 03 2012 06:41 Release wrote:
7 is the magic number so i ask someone who is tentatively voting muso to switch to promethelax.
It isn't too hard to understand why. Please don't act braindead.

Huh? Why do you want the vote to be easily manipulatable by scum? 8 is a good number. You are pretty much condoning last-minute shenanigans with this bullshit. Two people switch at the last second and claim they were doing what you wanted, but didn't see the other's switch. It's stupid. 8 is fine, 9 is better for consolidation.

If two people switch, and neither switches back and prome turns up town, we have 2 confirmed scum. Sounds nice.

I'd do it too, except
a) i don't think prom is scum
b) i think muso is scum
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 02 2012 22:10 GMT
#440
Did anyone else find TL unavailable for the last 10-15 minutes?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 04 2012 16:33 GMT
#575
My activity is bad and I should feel bad. Reading Prom, Acro and risk.nuke's filters first, as they're being angry with one another.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 04 2012 18:04 GMT
#582
On November 05 2012 02:23 Acrofales wrote:
Oh, that's great news. I was just looking into Kush closer, but with this info I am inclined to skip him over and look closer into DP.

Yes, that means I believe Thrawn.

I still think it very likely we have an SK, so here are the options:

TTT = 2 Goons + Roleblocker, Serial Killer (Investigation Immune OR 1-Shot Bulletproof)
T = Goon + Roleblocker + Godfather, Serial Killer (Investigation Immune OR 1-Shot Bulletproof)

That means we are at mylo.


Acro, I'm reading you as town. I think Occam's razor is in your favor with faking a mason claim and risking yourself like that against Muso's claim. Given your case on Promethelax, how are you reading risk's decisions to withhold his other reads in favor of focusing on Prom. He's hinted that they exist, but he doesn't want to disclose them.


I don't like Prom's filter anymore. I had a town read on him, but he keeps saying he's town, which is something he did as scum in NMMXIX, and I never picked up on during that game (I'd forgotten until I clicked the link he so graciously provided).
ghost analyzed one of Prom's posts here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15585521

Prom kept trying to 'trap' Acro into revealing the number of scum (most likely 3 if I read the C9++ setup correctly). He`s also spent a long time defending himself. Since today started, he's been here but hasn't put down a read on who he'd actually like to lynch.

- Fed kush more role information, I guess to get him to unvote?
- Questioned DP about having a townread on him, implies scummy behavior from DP.
- Argues with risk about the case against him.

He is pushing for more activity from town, but he's not actually hunting scum himself from the looks of things, and he's had lots of time with which to do it.

Activity =\= scumhunting.

##Vote: Promethelax


Going to check out zealos and Matt for breadcrumbs
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 04 2012 18:12 GMT
#583
I didn't find any breadcrumbs. However, I have a question:

On November 03 2012 23:54 Mattchew wrote:
If WBg balanced this game then one of me/acro/risk/prplhz are scum... I don't think acro is cause he woulda known Muso was town and that would be a crazy fucking move for a scum to make

Any merit to this statement from Mattchew? Would wbg handpick roles?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 04 2012 18:19 GMT
#584
On November 05 2012 02:39 mkfuba07 wrote:
I'm still looking through Acro and Prome's filters, since I had a town read on both of them and apparently many people disagree. Glad to hear thrawn and Kush are both reasonably confirmed town.

One question: if there is an SK is it definitely mylo? Can't scum and SK kill each other?

I think that's right, but does it really matter? With the exception of deciding to No-Lynch, what does that information change about your reads?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 04 2012 19:01 GMT
#591
On November 05 2012 03:59 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 03:56 Release wrote:
My final post was on prome. Just saying.
Does that change your case at all?

More to come.

LOL. Lurking much? Thanks for confirming my point about you only showing up when accused of being scum, scum.

That was uncanny...Release, scumreads if you please. Despite reading Prom as scum, he's at least talkative. What do you have going on?
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 04 2012 20:35 GMT
#606
He thinks he found 4 scum and the connection theory is strong with this one. Kush is the ringleader?! That's a stretch. However, I would be interested in lynching drazak out of his list.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 05 2012 16:06 GMT
#652
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 05 2012 23:54 Acrofales wrote:
Not much to go on for Hopeless1der. I will thus make the case both ways, as I did for Muso. On Muso I felt the town case was stronger (as I said at the time). This time I am leaning towards scum:

The case for Hopeless1der

The scum mindset
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 10:49 Hopeless1der wrote:

<snip>

On November 01 2012 10:47 kushm4sta wrote:
On November 01 2012 10:30 Release wrote:
On November 01 2012 10:17 thrawn2112 wrote:
On November 01 2012 10:09 Release wrote: I highly doubt that you "mixed up" their names because things like that tend to get checked, which leads me to believe you said such things on purpose.


and I highly doubt you would actually think this

I was confused about whom we wanted to claim and which each were.
So i checked the OP and the thing Hope posted and asked for clarification.

Kush posted things based on a misunderstanding and i don't understand why he would not check the OP or ask for clarification. I mean, in Hope's post-quote, there was clearly a miller AND a mason. So it appears that Kush is
setting himself up for a defense ( as I have said), and overeager to contribute.


I guess you have never played with me before. Most of the time I don't think before I post and I'm quite capable of derps as town.

About your suspicion of me: Let me get this straight. You think my scumplan was to convince the masons to claim then cover my ass by pretending I mixed up masons and millers?
That does not sound like a realistic scumplan!

I grudgingly agree that kush derps pretty consistently.

Why grudgingly? Why would a townie grudgingly admit to knowing something about a fellow townie that exculpates him. Would this not be a good thing? However, from a scum viewpoint, it makes sense: he does not want to admit that Kush derps pretty consistently, but feels compelled by the general direction of the game, and the need to make a good impression at the start of it to grudgingly admit to this information.

Regarding Muso:
Show nested quote +
On November 02 2012 03:20 Hopeless1der wrote:
Okay, ignoring the possibility of two mason pairs:

I could actually quote every single one of Muso's posts to help make my point...
- He "lied" about his game history
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 01 2012 13:25 Muso wrote:
Oh sorry guys I didn't know there was a difference between Mason and Miller.

I know I said I'd played hundreds of mafia games before but I actually lied just to get in to the game. This is my first one, but I watched a few youtube videos so I thin I get it.

Sorry if I'm bad :S


- He "lied" about reading the game setup
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 01 2012 13:25 Muso wrote:
Oh sorry guys I didn't know there was a difference between Mason and Miller.

I know I said I'd played hundreds of mafia games before but I actually lied just to get in to the game. This is my first one, but I watched a few youtube videos so I thin I get it.

Sorry if I'm bad :S

On November 01 2012 13:41 Muso wrote:
I am a mason, I didn't know there was a miller too



Are the lies because he's new and quite frankly, stupid? Or because his fake-claim was TERRIBLE and he's banking on the pity card to save him somehow?

##Vote: Muso

Acro has provided an encrypted 'claim post' and I don't see the benefit to a 1-1 trade if Acro was scum. This situation makes way more sense if Acro is telling the truth.
Technically, 2 mason pairs is possible, but quite frankly I think we're going to be lynching Muso regardless now, even if a "partner" claims. His filter is just too wrong for me to be willing to let him live.


Here is what I would suggest:
Muso, if you are in fact a mason, write a last will for your partner to use to confirm themselves.
Muso's Partner - Unless you think you can save him, do not claim until after the 1hr resolution period starts at the end of the night phase. There is no good reason to out yourself before that time (unless you can save him).


Could someone comment on that suggestion, and perhaps if they would even believe someone claiming to be Muso's mason-partner? I really don't think revealing the other halves is a good idea right now.

At this point all Muso had done wrong, as far as anybody knew was lie about his experience in the game. If a mason claimed to be his partner, then his claim would be more believable than mine. However, hopeless wants to go ahead and lynch him REGARDLESS of any further developments. Now, hopeless may be a townie making an error of judgement and believing my claim unconditionally. However, at this point I see no real reason to say we should lynch Muso regardless unless you're scum and want to push strongly for that townie lynch. At this point, my claim was by far the more believable one (as evidenced by everybody voting Muso), so he picked Muso to bandwagon on, rather than me.

Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 01:05 Hopeless1der wrote:

<snip>
On November 03 2012 00:52 kushm4sta wrote:
On November 03 2012 00:31 thrawn2112 wrote:
kush i cant believe you're trying to make d1 cases based on the flavor claimed by two people... just absurd

It's not just based on 2 people claims. It's based on the lack of claim from ALL the vts, AND the claims of two people.

Acro seems really upset by my theory.
drazzak, acro, and thrawn have all shat on my theory now.
Why don't you guys actually EXPLAIN why it's such a bad idea instead of just SAYING it's bad.
Do you really believe that all VTs have non character role names except for one named Jessica Rabbit. I do not believe that is likely.

He only ever claimed NOT Mason. Granted, green text, but that's inconclusive.
However, the reason I think your theory is bad is that I think scum have fakeclaims. My question never got answered and I think it's clear that Hiro was replying to the posts I quoted.

Suspicious minds would say that you are paying way too close attention to the wording and that you are, in fact, bluehunting. I thought this was worth mentioning, because the tone rubbed me the wrong way at the time. I am still not quite sure why though. If I had to say, it is because Hopeless seems to be puzzling rather hard over whether my claim means I'm claiming VT or not. Something townies shouldn't be worried about (except that Kush got everybody riled up about it).

The OMGUS
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 01:57 Hopeless1der wrote:
On November 03 2012 01:34 Muso wrote:
It's 3am here and I doubt I'll be awake for the end of day.

It doesn't look like Promethelax is coming, and unfortunately lynching him is the only viable option here. Some of you believe otherwise, and I can't stop you. I urge you to trust Acro though (at least for today). He makes sense.

If the lynch on me does go through, I implicitly urge you to revisit these last 6 hrs and look at players who were opposed to shifting attention off of me. Hopeless1der is one such player. If in the future Promethelax rolls town, I highly suggest interrogating Hopeless1der. In fact this kind of resistance just strengthens the case against Promethelax.

On November 03 2012 01:05 Hopeless1der wrote:Promethelax hasn't checked in yet, but even if it was still prplhz in the game I'd rather lynch Muso. I find his noob act highly incriminating. He knew what he was doing when he fakeclaimed and tried to weasel his way out by playing stupid at first. When that didn't work, he tries to pass it off as a gambit to lure scum NK fire. He keeps putting up more smoke and mirrors every time his last plan didn't work. I'm not comfortable leaving that kind of player around. I'm leaving my vote as it is.


I sincerely hope I get to revisit this post on Day 2, and if I don't please somebody else do it for me. Hopeless1der cannot be trusted.

##vote Promethelax





This post just strengthens my resolve to lynch you Muso.

"If in the future Promethelax rolls town, I highly suggest interrogating Hopeless1der."
In this scenario, I'm scum for NOT wanting to lynch a townie. Please clarify what you mean if you're still around.

Now I think that Muso did not word himself properly here, but his main point was that hopeless1der was unwilling to even consider the possibility that Muso was town. Hopeless skipped right over that part and made a jump of bad logic: Muso knows he'll flip town and is talking about AFTER his death, when everybody else will know he flipped town too. He thinks Prom is scum and Hopeless is trying to keep the lynch focused on Muso to protect his scumbuddy. However, regardless of what Prom flips, he urges us to look into Hopeless.

The mere fact that Hopeless is unwilling to consider a town Muso is what he is finding scummy. This is indeed scummy behaviour. Hopeless' way of dealing with this is to discredit it and OMGUS someone who is already about to die anyway.

He shows absolutely NO willingness to even consider the possibility that Muso is town. That may be because he already knows Muso is town and he has absolutely no reason to reconsider his thoughts given the rather large amounts of new information.

The lurk
After 18 hours of inactivity (all through the night, I might add, which is when scum is busy deciding whom to shoot in their own little QT) we get:
Show nested quote +
On November 05 2012 01:33 Hopeless1der wrote:
My activity is bad and I should feel bad. Reading Prom, Acro and risk.nuke's filters first, as they're being angry with one another.

This is an utterly useless post, which just emphasizes his lurkiness. I don't see this as "too bold to be scum". People had noticed his absense and were commenting on it. He needed to say something about it. This is all we get.

Since then his activity has been limited to a rather bad meta-case against Promethelax, and a throwaway statement that he wants to lynch Drazak. If anything they feel like testers: if somebody bites and starts ramping up a case against Release or Drazak, he is ready to jump on it. However, he is completely noncommittal and happy to do no scumhunting of his own.

This also ties into his earlier behaviour (see below): he showed commitment and activity in the game, but once people started reading him as town (me in my night post, for instance), he dropped off the map. Also, lets not forget Mattchew[/green's opinion. Mattchew is actually a pretty good scumhunter, despite him claiming otherwise, and it is always a good idea to listen to what he says (although moreso when he's scum )
Show nested quote +

I think hopeless has a pretty decent chance of flipping scum. His posts are long but usually contain a lot of summary with very little opinion on a lot of things, and barely any thought process sharing






The case for Hopeless1der

Keeping discussion from derailing
Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 01:05 Hopeless1der wrote:
On November 03 2012 00:15 kushm4sta wrote:
I don't want to lynch either muso or prpl.

Prpl was mislynched as town in his last several games. He looks very scummy as town. So keep that in mind.
Your case on him is very bas. The only scummy thing is giving a bunch of town reads which isn't that scummy.
So what if he thought there was 2 mason pairs. Not everyone knows the probability of that. Also I thought the same thing.

Muso, I think it would be very hard for scum to come up with that vt role name.

Review the spoiler. Information is deliberately missing. I don't know how "hard" it would be for scum to come up with a VT name.
<snip>

Why would scum be afraid of kush running rampant with his crazy theory. Fake claming seems particularly easy.. and all that is needed to placate Kush is a silly VT claim like Paint Bucket or Boulder if push really comes to shove and town starts mass claiming. And that's assuming scum isn't given a list of safeclaims in the first place (a fairly common thing for normal games).

However, as town, this whole discussion was a giant distraction from what we should have been doing: scumhunting. Hopeless seems to be trying to keep the town on track.

Keeping promises
Too often scum make a promise to be active and then forget about it. It's one of the things I like to look for when reading filters. Hopeless makes a promise and delivers on it. This put him on my town list initially, as it shows a certain consistency. Not a big tell, though, especially given his later behaviour. See above.
+ Show Spoiler [Hopeless1der's promise] +

On November 01 2012 12:19 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 12:09 Release wrote:
On November 01 2012 11:26 Mattchew wrote:
release what do you think of zealos's posts

First post agrees with the general consensus. Has a point in that he can't be blamed for not agreeing.

Second post reinforces the miller not mason claim. Clarifies part of the problem.

Third post seems to allude to that fact that he thinks I'm town or that my posts are insignificant.
If he had posted something more, i would think of it as "there are more important things to do" but he has yet to make a further contribution. I honestly have no idea what he trying to do with this post because his filter is rather meager, so this doesn't seem like fluff.

Zealos, please explain in detail what you mean by this post because there seems to be ambiguity surrounding it.

_____________________________________________

Personally, i'd like to hear from someone who has not yet posted to get another perspective on this, and the case on me.

Well, I haven't properly commented on you yet Release. Based on what I've seen, really scummy push against kush.
However, I'm going to read those newbie games you posted seeing as I was in two of them and then come back to this. We'll see how some meta analysis holds up. Also, I doubt I get that done tonight since I need to be up really early for work; Going to bed in a bit so I'll post my findings in an approximate 15 hours from now.

15 hours later:
On November 02 2012 02:56 Hopeless1der wrote:
Release's first game ever on TL, opening postTown:

+ Show Spoiler +
On May 22 2012 09:08 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2012 08:44 Mordanis wrote:
So my last game began with a discussion of whether to vote or not that wasn't very productive. We got lucky and scored a good D1 lynch, but it felt very, well, luck based. So I'll start this out by saying that if we don't lynch today, we'll probably be in a really shitty situation. In short, I am for a vote today. Also, it's good to be working together with Golden again! For Liquidia!

Is this day cycle going to be an extra couple of hours? I only ask because it was in my first game and I'd like to make sure what the situation is. Thanks

You say that you are for a vote, but you state that your other vote was luck based. Considering you said "very luck based", doesn't that mean to say that we are not going to experience the same luck? If we don't experience the same luck, we will very much end up lynching a townie, which makes your "for a vote" seem like you want to lynch a townie.

Also, why are you talking about the last game? You should be more concerned with this game and find out ways for pointing out scum rather than ways not to. This seems more like filler.

The useful part of your post can be summarized by:
We should have a lynch today. A no-lynch would be detrimental.



##FOS: Mordanis


Fairly similar to his attack on kush this game.



2nd game Town, he spends most of the game tunneling grush. Way more 1-liners, inconclusive to the current situation


3rd game Vig, he gets in my face pretty early, but generally tried to keep talking. Also cited activity issues due to school?


4th game Town,
+ Show Spoiler +
On July 05 2012 08:58 Release wrote:
I think YourHarry is Grush's new alias.

Show nested quote +
On July 05 2012 06:39 Lazermonkey wrote:
YOYO GUYS. I AM Vanilla Townie

On a more serious note, we want this ship rollin' as fast as possible. Discussing policy is not scumhunting but it does at least help us get the discussion going. First off, something we want to avoid as town is Vanillas claiming blue roles. In both my last game and Newbie Mini Mafia XVIII there were Vanillas who claimed blue roles(DTs). Both times town ended in an bad spot (although not as bad as it could've been due to luck). But this should still be avoided at all costs as it can cause massive damage to town. Why? Well let's say a vanilla townie claims DT, and then the real DT claims because the vanilla is lying. As it doesn't make sense for vanillas to claim blue roles, we must assume that one of theese players is scum and the other one is the real DT.Two following scenarios can occur here
1). The townie gets lynched. which means that the other person is probebly the real DT, this must however not be true.
2). The DT gets lynched, which means that the vanilla townie will 100% get lynched the next day.
While 2 is far worse than 1 they are still both very bad for town. There really isn't a situation you want to fakeclaim as a townie. If you don't agree with this please let me know. If noone disagrees I will assume that no townie is ever fake claiming a blue role. Obviously there are situations where you might want to claim as blue.

I will also copy a part of my first post from my last game(where I was DT) since I am lazy.

Regarding lynches: I really really dislike nolynching for three reasons.
1. because the information that we are able to get out of it is very limited. Yes, we avoid a potential misslynch but on the other hand scum will score a more or less a free-kill during night. Essentially, we are back on D1 but this time we are in a 6-2 instead of a 7-2.
2. If we agree to nolynch then what is there to discuss? It's like asking for people to lurk even more.
3. With no vigilante in the game the only way we can win is to lynch scum. Kinda obvious but still.
We require 5+ votes in order to get a lynch done. With that in mind I hope that people are willing to vote for someone who isn't their top 1 scum. Obviously, if you REALLY don't think there is any chance that the person that is about to be lynched can be scum, then sure, don't vote him. But if it seems like your target hardly gets any votes and your second highest scumread is at 4 votes with 30 minutes untill deadline, then I think you should swap your vote onto him.

Lurkers!: There are two types of lurkers. The ones who doesn't post anything and the sneaky ones, who posts ALOT but nothing of value. The first category could either be bad town play or scum play. But the second category is almost exclusivly scum play. If you are a townie, speak your mind, don't make a super duper long post when you could've said it on just a few lines. Keep it simple. With that being said, post!


Ignoring the copy-pasted policy stuff for now,

Why on earth did you even post that scenario stuff about a VT fake-claiming a DT or blue? There was absolutely no indication that anyone had even planned on that (especially considering you had the first post). If anything, you have just shown people something they can do (to the detriment of the town). And why go through the casework? It's just fluff and you know it. This is very much a post looking like a contribution, while being a non-contribution, or even an anti-contribution.

Im pretty sure, again, that no one was even remotely close to voting in a way to force a nolynch.

I love the bolded line; you could have kept this post simple and concise. But you decided to make it "super-duper long."

##vote: Lazermonkey

Yourharry, you should do more than OMGUS. You are definitely rivaling, for scumminess, against lazer.

Fos: yourharry
Fos: lazermonkey



Keep in mind, he's already spent a game tunneling grush, from what I can tell, it was related to fake-claims. Opens with hostility and a vote.



To be fair, I don't think he's ever rolled scum, but his jumping out of the gate fighting looks like hes town yet again. He's never played with kush before. He also explained that he expects people to NOT derp all over the thread when they post here:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 01 2012 10:09 Release wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 09:05 kushm4sta wrote:
On November 01 2012 09:01 Release wrote:
EBWOP: those are three separate ideas, although kushmasta is looking scummy for both trying to change who should claim and being deceitful about it.

I'm not being deceitful about it, I just got their names mixed up.
I think they should probably both claim actually.

@release
Are you suggesting that I'm trying to trick power roles like vig, dt, etc into mass claiming?

Are millers' true alignment revealed upon death?

well, you were assigning Mason traits to the miller, which led to the confusion that it did between who should claim.

Also, you didn't mention mason but the "town who can talk to each other." You avoided saying mason. Mason is clear. "town who can talk to each other" could be mason, but could be miller if someone assumed you were talking about who YOU thought "could talk to each other."

Mafia is a game in which posts can't be editted. People tend to check their posts for any dubious or tentative information. I highly doubt that you "mixed up" their names because things like that tend to get checked, which leads me to believe you said such things on purpose.

I wasn't talking about the mass claim. That was rather obvious.

(seebolded)

Sadly, kush is unable to meet that requirement. My "meta" read is that this strong aggression is in fact representative of town release. Keeping in mind that there are no scum games to compare with, I'm not willing to vote Release for his posts against kush.

i also agree with this from Zealos:
On November 02 2012 01:41 Zealos wrote:
--SNIP--
That being said, I do think releases later posts have a townie attitude about them. He is saying what he appears to think without hiding anything or pushing a mafia agenda as far as I can tell.
--SNIP--





I think I have a handle on this mason claim shitfest. I'm rereading this through more carefully because I just kind of glanced the thread over, but I think I'm going to be voting Muso in a moment.


Incidentally, I also liked the content of this post as it agreed rather largely with what I found based on Release's meta. However, scum has an easy time making town reads look right, because they already know that the player is town.

My short responses to Acro's case on me:

"grudgingly" - kush derps regardless of alignment. As much as I'd have loved to call him scum for saying or doing dumb things, kush derping is a null tell, not a scum tell as it is with other people.

"muso claim" - I was all but convinced muso would flip scum. A 'partner' was in quotes because I would have continued to tunnel muso and either confirm a mason partner or a scum partner. In doing so, it would have likely (at the time) confirmed you, Acro, as a mason.

"OMGUS" - I think you have this backwards. He called me scum for pushing my scumread, and then said if the townie I was defending flipped, to come after me. Re-reading that, you're probably right in that he intended to say "if promethelax flips scum..." but as written that post didn't make sense and was trying to incriminate me for stupid reasons.

The mere fact that Hopeless is unwilling to consider a town Muso is what he is finding scummy. This is indeed scummy behaviour. Hopeless' way of dealing with this is to discredit it and OMGUS someone who is already about to die anyway
Being wishy-washy is town behavior? I realize that's taking things out of context a bit, but that's the rough translation. I had a scumread and I pursued it.

"Lurk" - I can't really argue this one other than to say many of us are guilty of this as well.
Also:

all through the night, I might add, which is when scum is busy deciding whom to shoot in their own little QT
cute
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 05 2012 16:20 GMT
#653
@mkfuba:
Day1, Promethelax replaces in and is immediately active. He initally has Matt as a scumread, but does nothing to push that read and then finally swaps over to draz. He tries ONCE to get people to look at Matt after his vote and then gives it up as a bad job when Acro tells him no.

Posts where I feel Prom isn't scumhunting:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 03 2012 04:23 Promethelax wrote:
School is out mother fuckers. I'm here until I go to work.

Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 02:34 syllogism wrote:
/replacement

You made me laugh. Thanks Syllo.

Kush man, stop with the talk of Role names. You might be right but just saying the same thing over and over again doesn't help. You have provided that one thought, get out there and provide some more. It pains me when you do this because I know that you actually do know better you just get carried away.

Draz: great, I love having no reads d1. That helps town. /sarcasm. Now sit down, shape up and tell us what you think about at least these three players (in detail): Matt, Muso, Acro. If you have time I would like to hear about Kush, Release and anyone else you would care to give an opinion on as well.

Show nested quote +
On November 03 2012 03:18 thrawn2112 wrote:
On November 03 2012 03:10 kushm4sta wrote:
On November 03 2012 03:06 thrawn2112 wrote:
I don't want kush to get lynched today. Yes, he's said dumb stuff and he's on my radar but that's usually how it goes with him. Imo we need more information to make a kush read.


I have 0 votes for me. Why would you even say that...
Also thanks for a totally useless post. Who do you want to lynch?
What do you think of drazzaks scummy filter?


You have 0 votes but I wouldn't say that you being lynched is out of the question.

If I knew who I wanted to lynch......... + Show Spoiler +
I'd tell you


His filter is scummy, his initial vote on muso was full of denials of responsibility such as things along the line of "if he's town then he's not helping."

But much like you.... his town filters are always at least a little scummy so I haven't decided yet.


Thrawnn...you are better than this. You have reads and you share them. This is scummy, you are too neutral on everyone. I don't care that we are in day one. You are one of the people, like me, who believes in trying d1 and think that people who don't are scummy so get it together. I'm watching you.

Everyone: remember that Acro is NOT confirmed town at this point. His gambit was just that and it could have either scum or town motivation. What he says is true, he is one of the better players in this game and if he is alive later in the game he had better be looked at. If I'm alive I'll do the looking, if not one of you had better remember this.



+ Show Spoiler +
On November 03 2012 05:16 Promethelax wrote:
where fuba at? He ahsn't posted in 18 hours. This is not a boy who usually lurks so hardcore. Fuba, don't go fubar on us. Come on back and get in here. Last thing we heard form his was a question. Usually I want to know the answer to questions I ask...

Risk, what do you feel about release now? You were voting him earlier with what I read as a pressure vote. This is why I assume that:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2012 23:44 risk.nuke wrote:
He's one of the better lynch candidates in the thread right now. Additionally there is a lot of boiling in the release is mafia cauldron. I want to find out is all talk and who's not.

Was that a pressure vote and what do you feel about Release now?

Zealos: the hell are you doing? You are voting near the deadline. And not here now. Come on back and get involved, if this is a lynch that matters to you (i.e. you are town) you should be around.


He's putting pressure on people to be more active but that's all he seems to be doing. Calling out players for the way they are posting and then moving right along.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 05 2012 22:42 GMT
#800
Well shit. Are people really just sheeping Acro's case or did the hatred for lurkers skyrocket after the way the day went? For the record, I was in meetings all afternoon. I also can't believe Prom just isn't running with this.

##Unvote
##Vote: No-Lynch

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 05 2012 22:45 GMT
#809
On November 06 2012 07:43 Promethelax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 06 2012 07:42 Hopeless1der wrote:
Well shit. Are people really just sheeping Acro's case or did the hatred for lurkers skyrocket after the way the day went? For the record, I was in meetings all afternoon. I also can't believe Prom just isn't running with this.

##Unvote
##Vote: No-Lynch



what does this even mean?

I really thought you were scum. Easy scum out to just...lynch the shit out of me since you're the only other person with votes. Now, you're clearly willing to do that but I would have thought you'd have hammered me already.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 05 2012 22:47 GMT
#816
I think I explained that post, and why I don't think your scum right now.

Scumreads: Acro for making a billion cases and finally getting one to stick. Draz for being useless and OMGUS'ing everyone. I don't have a third right now.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 05 2012 22:51 GMT
#823
On November 06 2012 07:49 thrawn2112 wrote:
"I also can't belive that prom just isn't running with this"

what did that part mean

I thought he was scum and would have just hammered me

On November 06 2012 07:49 kushm4sta wrote:
hopeless claim

punch clock

##Unvote: No-Lynch
##Vote: Acrofales
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 05 2012 22:56 GMT
#843
Would you rather I continue to tunnel you Prom? Acro has made a case on Release, you, me , fuba, and thats just today (If Im remembering wrong sorry, I'm a little rushed here).
On November 06 2012 07:05 Promethelax wrote:
Yeah, I'll be writing up the Acro case before this day is over. He just called me townie and left his vote on me saying he might not be here before the lynch. He also mentioned earlier how he plays scum, by looking like a strong townie and making huge cases. I'll be doing the full filter dive but I'll be watching the thread too.

Guys, Vote either Fuba or Acro. That is where my vote will be today with two other consolidation options.

Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 05 2012 23:07 GMT
#863
[image loading]

MeepMeep
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 17 2012 02:36 GMT
#2220
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 18 2012 00:42 GMT
#2249
I am like the worlds biggest tard
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 18 2012 00:52 GMT
#2254
On November 18 2012 09:51 Keirathi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 09:42 Hopeless1der wrote:
I am like the worlds biggest tard

?

I lurked this thread without thinking, release was right when he called it out, I almost got DP to concede by accident in the QT..
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 18 2012 05:13 GMT
#2276
I guess its pretty obvious why you had to go Matt.
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 18 2012 23:02 GMT
#2292
Kush I fucking told you we had fake claims and you continued to go on about it after I'd died. I just don't even....
Hopeless1der
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5836 Posts
November 19 2012 03:40 GMT
#2310
Setup speculation does have its merits from time to time
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
14:00
King of the Hill #219
davetesta14
Liquipedia
Esports World Cup
11:00
2025 - Final Day
Serral vs ClassicLIVE!
EWC_Arena22225
ComeBackTV 5080
TaKeTV 1206
JimRising 864
Hui .780
3DClanTV 514
Fuzer 353
EnkiAlexander 309
Rex254
Reynor158
CranKy Ducklings148
SpeCial95
BRAT_OK 18
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena22225
JimRising 853
Hui .761
Fuzer 353
Rex 254
UpATreeSC 174
Reynor 158
SpeCial 95
BRAT_OK 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 4297
Shuttle 2502
Larva 955
Mini 629
actioN 539
EffOrt 345
Soma 254
ggaemo 249
Rush 136
TY 122
[ Show more ]
Snow 93
JYJ77
Shine 76
Hyun 57
sorry 52
Aegong 33
sas.Sziky 22
zelot 19
JulyZerg 16
Terrorterran 16
yabsab 13
NaDa 8
Sacsri 7
soO 7
Dota 2
syndereN652
420jenkins597
XcaliburYe468
Counter-Strike
fl0m3471
sgares413
oskar201
Other Games
gofns8617
FrodaN1813
Beastyqt716
KnowMe144
ArmadaUGS115
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV814
League of Legends
• Nemesis4918
• TFBlade201
Other Games
• Shiphtur308
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
16h 55m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
20h 55m
CSO Cup
22h 55m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 15h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 20h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.