EPTAcme Mini Mafia, Inc - Page 73
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:40 mkfuba07 wrote: Guys, who roleblocked kush? there's been no town claim, so definitely not a town. so either kush lied about being rb'd and he is the last scum, or mafia rb'd him thinking he's sk. if I were mafia I'd probably think he;s sk too because of all the VT claiming nonsense | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
On November 02 2012 20:17 drazak wrote: I'm just... I'm gonna go fine a corner to cry in, this game. 2 town fake claims on day one that are already admitted fake claims? fucking serious? Not sure what to make of all of it Still fucking lol at this scumslip. I saw it yesterday as well, but the case was strong enough and someone had already pointed it out on D1. If we hadn't been distracted by Muso (and me by prplhz), Drazak would've been so dead. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:40 mkfuba07 wrote: Guys, who roleblocked kush? Could the scum roleblocker please stand up and claim! Risk, want to save us the trouble of lynching you? | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
oh whoops for some reason I thought release was lynched and flipped red. nvm | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:43 thrawn2112 wrote: oh whoops for some reason I thought release was lynched and flipped red. nvm Thank you for making me THINK at last. Conclusive final proof that Release is NOT SCUM (still SK though): Release was fucking ROLEBLOCKED A roleblocked roleblocker can't roleblock. Kush claimed roleblocked. Either this is a remarkable magic mix of circumstance, or Kush was in fact roleblocked. That means the scum roleblocker was not roleblocked. Ergo, Release is not the scum roleblocker, and thus not the final scum. Q to the fucking ED. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:47 Acrofales wrote: Thank you for making me THINK at last. Conclusive final proof that Release is NOT SCUM (still SK though): Release was fucking ROLEBLOCKED A roleblocked roleblocker can't roleblock. Kush claimed roleblocked. Either this is a remarkable magic mix of circumstance, or Kush was in fact roleblocked. That means the scum roleblocker was not roleblocked. Ergo, Release is not the scum roleblocker, and thus not the final scum. Q to the fucking ED. This is so wrong. all roleblocks are resolved at the same time. So if release was the roleblocker his roleblock would go through. and he would also get the notification that he was roleblocked. | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:47 Acrofales wrote: Thank you for making me THINK at last. Conclusive final proof that Release is NOT SCUM (still SK though): Release was fucking ROLEBLOCKED A roleblocked roleblocker can't roleblock. Kush claimed roleblocked. Either this is a remarkable magic mix of circumstance, or Kush was in fact roleblocked. That means the scum roleblocker was not roleblocked. Ergo, Release is not the scum roleblocker, and thus not the final scum. Q to the fucking ED. what if he's scum and lied about being rb'd, or if there's not a scum rb? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
If A and B are roleblockers and C is some random joe, WHO is roleblocked in the following situation? A roleblocks B B roleblocks C PS. The answer is: only B. | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:50 thrawn2112 wrote: what if he's scum and lied about being rb'd, or if there's not a scum rb? If Kush is scum then how the fuck did you get a greencheck on him?! Or you claiming SK here? There clearly IS a scum roleblocker, because both Prom and I were roleblocked N1 and see HiroPro/WBG's incoming answer to see that that means there is another roleblocker (I only asked Hiro like 3 times to make sure my roleblock on Prom did not happen). | ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:51 Acrofales wrote: And for anybody doubting that roleblockers can be roleblocked, I have the answer in my PM from Hiro, but: If A and B are roleblockers and C is some random joe, WHO is roleblocked in the following situation? A roleblocks B B roleblocks C PS. The answer is: only B. Really? this is not how it has worked in previous games. Ie. NMMXXIV in which the manner in which roleblocks worked came up in detail. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:52 DarthPunk wrote: Also. There may still be a framer. I am not sure how likely that is in comparison to them having a roleblocker. But it is certainly an option. You people all fail miserably at logic. Or there are 4 scum. That seems way outside the realm of C9++ games, though. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
The purpose of the breadcrumb was to see whether i would be role blocked for wanting to vig kush. A side effect is that it drew RB away from other town (i was assuming that if i were RBed, it would be a mafia RB). | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:54 kushm4sta wrote: Why would scum role block me though? Wouldn't it be beneficial for them for sk to kill someone? Not if they think the SK is gunning for them... and we did our very very best to make them think the SK should be gunning for them. Also, the SK should totally NOT have been gunning for them, lol, but I assume the SK already knew that. | ||
|
mkfuba07
United States1151 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:54 kushm4sta wrote: Why would scum role block me though? Wouldn't it be beneficial for them for sk to kill someone? Claiming sk bro? | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
| ||
|
DarthPunk
Australia10859 Posts
On November 09 2012 08:54 Acrofales wrote: You people all fail miserably at logic. Or there are 4 scum. That seems way outside the realm of C9++ games, though. YOu do not have all the information and you are on the wrong track with your assumptions. I would not continue making these assumptions until you have all the information. | ||
| ||
