EPTLook at what I was thinking at the end of the night. Figured there's a good chance you're the SK.
I still think there's a good chance you're the SK, btw.
Acme Mini Mafia, Inc - Page 70
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
Look at what I was thinking at the end of the night. Figured there's a good chance you're the SK. I still think there's a good chance you're the SK, btw. | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
| ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On November 09 2012 05:00 Acrofales wrote: I played suboptimally. Sue me. Also, have you even looked at my filter? Do you really think you could find a crumb in there? Assuming I wasn't making it blatantly obvious I was crumbing, at least? It isn't that I doubt that you are town, I just want to be clear about all of the information we have and a BCc would be extra information. I've read your filter a couple of times. Yes. Could I have found one, probably not I'm notorious with myself for how bad I am at finding crumbs. I would never, as a blue role, leave the target of my action uncrumbed though (I think, though I have never rolled blue). | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
On November 09 2012 05:10 Acrofales wrote: Look at what I was thinking at the end of the night. Figured there's a good chance you're the SK. I still think there's a good chance you're the SK, btw. I was literally asking for any posts: i take that it's a no? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
If you're asking me what made me want to roleblock you, then clicky! | ||
|
Release
United States4397 Posts
On November 06 2012 14:17 Release wrote: Yo. I'm back. Obviously, my conspiracy theory has been proven incorrect, especially the part about Kush, which brings to this: At the time i said Acro was my most tentative not-townie, but as of now, I'm taking drazak of that sheet. Kush, stop fucking trolling around. It makes it legitimately hard for me (and others) to determine whether you are scum. This is a scum trait, as townies are trying to establish their innocence. All of this flavor theory and trolling around bullshit has been your excuse for otherwise deplorable play all game. I don't believe for a second that you actually believed in your theory or that you unvoted because of your theory. The green check has allowed you to coast through this game scotch free and I say this is the time it stops.I will consider any flavor comment or other trolling comment from you from now on to be a wish to be dead. Very much would I feel annoyed if the you were the reason we lost after finding the Godfather of all people. I think the whole Drazak pulling a last minute vote switch is a null read. Anything more is way too far into wifom (for me at least) to read into. Personally, if I had been there, I too would probably have pulled a vote-switch to dare/bait someone to switch but afaik, I am the only person who does such a thing as that, so no townie points to drazak for that. fawking hell. More of this damage limitation stuff. I find it scum-motivated. We kill (whether by lynching or vigging) to kill scum. Not for information, not for removing a townie that isn't particularly conducive to scum-hunting. Already made a case against you for this on day 1 and i don't feel like repeating myself. + Show Spoiler + (yes, i know you think he is almost certain scum, i did read that before you storm in here. My point is that these clauses you use to say that we kill him regardless of alignment are scummy as fawk.) Something about Acrofales on the way.... Well, i have a feeling that this is the post that got me RBed. out of time. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
| ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On November 09 2012 05:21 Release wrote: Well, i have a feeling that this is the post that got me RBed. out of time. So why did you bc vigi? Was it a lie? If so why? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
1. It came in N2. Anybody who is going to crumb their role does that D1 or N1. They don't wait for night actions to resolve, another day to pass and THEN crumb their role unless it's a 1-shot vig claim, but then we are missing 3 KP, not 2 on N2. 2. Additionally, if it's a 1-shot vig claim, there's a target missing. 3. If it was a TRAP, it was so obscure that I wonder what the point of it was. Now I am someone who could miss a breadcrumb even if it was written in rainbow colours using blink tags, but this one was just really well hidden. So what the hell was this crumb? It is clearly deliberate: for the hell of it, I tried to put together an IRB in my filter and didn't manage. IVIG is even less likely with a V and a G. Also, the (in hindsight) strange permutation of words and capitalized Godfather leave 0 chance that it wasn't placed there on purpose. However, he explicitly claimed not-vig earlier. I am highly confused. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
I want release to give his reasons for that BC and it irks me to no end that he shows it and leaves. I guess he could be a VT trying to suck a scum shot but with claimed blues who can still act (Acro) and much townier looking players I don't see why he thinks that he would even be able to take that. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
IF so then I'm 100% sure release is sk or scum. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18488 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
Day 3 Vote Count drazak(6): Acrofales, Release(1): kushm4sta(1): Release risk.nuke(1): drazak drazak currently set to be lynched. | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
##vote drazak preventing no lynch | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
On November 09 2012 07:11 kushm4sta wrote: ##unvote release ##vote drazak preventing no lynch Would you still be good with lynching release? I haven't completely decided yet | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
##vote release | ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
his story in d3 doesn't add up - has 3 people that aren't drazak as top scumreads during N2 - because drazak doesn't show up for N2 deadline, releases makes drazak his top scumread - votes for kush even though draz was his top read after I questioned a weird FOS he made against kush wtf was that vigi claim. I NEED to see an explanation for why he did it. As everyone else demonstrated, it is not a "fake" crumb, it was done intentionally. but it was so well hidden, what town purpose could it server? me thinks it's a scum hiding fake claims didn't vote for hopeless innocent wabbit is a scum name - lol hopeless - this post - other than that no mention of release ever again in hopeless filter - he was roleblocked and we have missing night kills | ||
|
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
| ||
|
thrawn2112
United States6918 Posts
kush you can always change your vote if it doesn't work out | ||
| ||
