EPTMark me as /obs for now, but I might in later, depending on various undisclosable circumstances.
Newbie Mini Mafia XXIX
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Mark me as /obs for now, but I might in later, depending on various undisclosable circumstances. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Confirmed. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
So inconsitent.... Scum imo. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Probably. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
/in  | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
I also know next to nothing about street fighter. Fighting games are kinda for wussies. Or black people. Sadly, I don't qualify for either category. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 23 2012 12:33 debears wrote: Nah that'd be wayyyy to ez. Anyways. I'm the logical choice for SK, with this being my last newbie. Thrawn would definitely pass on the torch of last newbie game as SK since it's the most fun :D It's my last newbie too. Tho, I don't really want to be SK, so go on ahead. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
 | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
Should be the same for you, if you're in France, no? Better than pretty much ANY deadline I had in mafia so far :/ Staying up 'til 4 AM can get tiring. I usually stay up until ~2 AM, so this is much better for me. I threatened thrawn to do unspeakable things to him if he makes the deadline any later. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
I played in 3 games so far, all newbies. Got carried by Hapa in the first one (check out his coaching, he's boss), played a really bad scumgame the second time, and replaced into XXVII where we lost by kind-of-mislynching thrawn. Thanks to XXVII I am now left with a severe trauma concerning lurkers. Cue policy discussion: Don't lurk. Period. I shall not be afraid to lynch you if you do. Seriously, don't lurk. I will be around for deadlines, but not for long after that, they are at 2 AM for me, after all. Depending on how the deadlines fall, I might miss a single one next week, my mother has her birthday then.. But other than that I'll be there. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 25 2012 09:16 Rad wrote: oh, re-reading #2 question, I've never /obs'd, not even sure what that gets you other than just reading the thread. All I did was open the last newbie thread and get hooked. You get to gobble up the insights into things, from people that are better at mafia than you are. Or something. Why it's relevant for the thread to know how many games you've obs'd, I don't know. It doesn't really matter imo. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 25 2012 09:29 debears wrote: Dandel do you agree with the noobie-card policy? I don't think it's bad to point out it's your first game at the beginning, but not as a substitute for a real defense. Or scumhunting. Which I suppose is what you were getting at. So I'd say I agree, yes. If you're new, ask Hapa what to do, instead of excusing with the newbie card. You shouldn't ask Jingle though. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
| ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 25 2012 10:02 Inigmaticalism wrote: For lurking I think it seems even more of an issue in Newbie games than regular games because too many lurkers results in mafia wins most of the time in the Newbie games I looked at. That said, if we get any confirmed mafia I'll always vote confirmed mafias over suspicious lurkers. Btw Im a noob ...  That goes without saying. Having a confirmed scum can be hard though.. And is next to impossible day 1 (since no possible DT checks) unless there is a serious slip. That is why policy lynches day 1 can end up being a necessity. That said, I'm going to sleep. See you in a few hours. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
To start off On October 25 2012 18:40 Djodref wrote: Regarding Roco, I understand your hunch but he reminds me your first weird posts last game. He is suspicious but he doesn't deserve red bold font yet imo ^^ I kind of disagree. Right now, Roco looks a bit suspicious to me. On October 25 2012 16:21 Roco69 wrote: 3/ what about killing guys who speak too much, can it be a strategie ? just to think out of the box On October 25 2012 17:57 Roco69 wrote: @djodref To keep it simple, "lurker policy on D1" seems to be a well known and basic strategy so I will do the exact opposite,=>so I will never be suspected. Those statements, they imply that he wants to lynch people that are "too active". That's nonsense. He doesn't want to follow lurker policy, so he doesn't seem suspicious. Nonsense too. @Roco: Are you planning to lurk? (by your posts, it doesn't look like you plan on being active) Care to explain to me how (probably) lurking yourself and lynching the most active players will help you find scum? Also, answer Djo's questions pls. (especially the second one) Until he manages to clarify that: ##FoS Roco I know it's possible he's just... well, a noob, that's why I didn't straight up vote for him. In my first game, I suggested a No-lynch day1 (though I'd like to think that I was more logical about it) But remember that we talked about playing the "newbie-card" in the beginning? Same goes for other people. I get a scummy feel off Roco, and I'm not going to ignore it because it's his first game. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 25 2012 18:30 da0ud wrote: How would you already I am town ? From you role and a first early read ? Please explain this statement. Why would he 'know' you to be town from his role?? | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 25 2012 20:10 Alsn wrote: Hey everyone, I can see the thirteenth player must have confirmed. Will start reading the thread soon but would just like to start off with some information: I'm Alsn and I've played in two mafias here on TL as well as a bunch of times using the SC2 custom map. My filters for those games can be found here(first game) and here(second game). I was an active observer in XXVII and the obs QT for that can be found here. With that out of the way, gl hf! Methinks you wanted to link this game: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=361579 instead of XVIII twice. Now what do you think about: Lurker policy Other policy Your thoughts on the developments in this thread so far Not only you, but other people should address those 3 things too. Talking about poilcy is not exciting, I know, but we don't have much else to talk about right now, and I'd really prefer everyone to take a definite stance on things earlier instead of later. | ||
|
Dandel Ion
Austria17960 Posts
On October 25 2012 22:10 sylverfyre wrote: @ Dandel Ion - you've basically said something anti-policy and pro-policy at the same time. What? How exactly does opposing Lynch a Lurker policy give off a town read? For me it gives off a 0.1% scum read to oppose a reasonable, but not infallible, Day 1 strategy. And if we get to the end of the day and there are still people who have only made the minimal of posts despite people accusing them (example: Roco if we were close to lynch time), then I think that's a perfectly solid lynch candidate. I don't really understand this post. Please clarify how I am anti and pro policy at the same time. I don't see it. | ||
| ||
