Liquid City Mafia - Page 105
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
| ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 10 2012 15:37 VisceraEyes wrote: ZBos what did you hope to accomplish with your switch to Coag D1? Not lynch node. I didn't think the wagon was justified, I felt like I was stupidly sheeping and I didn't want to switch to SS because I thought he was town. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On October 10 2012 15:37 VisceraEyes wrote: ZBos what did you hope to accomplish with your switch to Coag D1? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On October 10 2012 15:40 Z-BosoN wrote: Not lynch node. I didn't think the wagon was justified, I felt like I was stupidly sheeping and I didn't want to switch to SS because I thought he was town. Why did you "stupidly sheep" in the first place? If it's such an aberrant playstyle to you, why did you jump onboard in the first place? | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
On October 10 2012 15:41 VisceraEyes wrote: Why did you "stupidly sheep" in the first place? If it's such an aberrant playstyle to you, why did you jump onboard in the first place? tbh because I wasn't really giving this game any time at all, and automatically played passively. I was giving the other game much more attention. Now that game is over and I'm participating much more, see | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Take the leap of faith that this is true :/ If I was scum it'd be stupid to join the wagon in the first place. Are you having issues with the time of when I left his wagon? I don't remember if it actually made a difference. I've also been playing a lot differently since day1, especially now, where I've actually read the entire game. | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
So yeah, it kinda made a difference. And I wouldn't go around yelling about how you ruined town's chance on D1 of lynching scum "based off of one post". People might get the wrong idea. | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Also, I'm going to check this, because I remember some shenanigan from annul as well. It really has to be some shitty luck for me to end up being the main unvote to not lynch a confirmed scum. | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Just because I was the first to unvote Node doesn't mean shit. Why the hell would I do that 40-50 minutes before the actual lynch time if my true goal was to save Node? If you wanna use that as an argument, include the other 5 (?) people who changed their vote. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
kushm4sta, ZBoson I know I said the focus on the BC thing was a bad idea, but I've been thinking about it and the whole Mementoss/BC thing is...strange. On the one hand I can't understand Mementoss' assumption that BC is third party - I mean, we don't know if medic saves are informed (to my knowledge) so why would Mementoss assume BC was lying about thinking he was medic saved. On the other hand, I can't understand BC's assumption that Mementoss is scum based on a role not functioning the way he's used to in a closed setup game where the roles are obviously fucked with. That's everyone's homework assignment for tomorrow (or today if your brain can take it). Go back over Mementoss and BC's filters. See if their play matches up with the claims. Is passive-ass BC really a veteran? Is Mementoss convenient claim of a flipped role just a bit TOO convenient? The truth is in this thread. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
There's a world of difference. The fact that you're not even acknowledging that fact is pretty scummy. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On October 10 2012 16:13 Z-BosoN wrote: O come the fuck on. The vote was 12 shady 5 node at the end. Just because I was the first to unvote Node doesn't mean shit. Why the hell would I do that 40-50 minutes before the actual lynch time if my true goal was to save Node? If you wanna use that as an argument, include the other 5 (?) people who changed their vote. But you literally JUST SAID that was was your true goal. So was that now not your true goal? What are you talking about sir? | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
| ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
It wasn't my true goal, were I scum, as that would be stupid. clear difference, no? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
So were you trying to save Node or not? You just said that was the reason for your switch. Why did you switch if not to save Node? | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
And my point is that you wanted to save Node by killing a townie. Your unvote, WHENEVER it was timed, ensured the lynch of someone you had a town-read on. Verily, someone who you're claiming is THE REASON you had a town-read on Node in the first place. Can you see the logic breakdown? Can you see how in telling me all of this you've basically claimed scum to me and anyone paying any kind of tertiary attention? | ||
Z-BosoN
Brazil2590 Posts
Let me try harder, then, since it seems like you actually care about what I have to say I did not want Node to die to this wagon. I thought it was unjustified. I decided this after I put my vote on Node and ever since I've been playing a lot differently. I also did not want to kill shady. Therefore, I changed to someone else. What I said later was: If I were scum (ok assume I'm scum) and I my unvoting was actually an attempt to save Node, why the HELL would I have done that 40-50 min prior to the lynch? I feel that this wouldn't accomplish shit, and would probably throw my ass on the line (as is what's happening). I'm arguing that it would be completely ridiculous for me, as scum, to want to save Node in such a manner. Why? Because I'd be sticking my neck out and for what? No guarantees? I'd most likely wait until actual lynch time to see if my switching of votes would make a difference. I'm add something new here. YOU are probably thinking that I unvoted because I realized that Node was actually maybe gonna get lynched for real. My post in the thread came 9 minutes after the 7/7 post on the vote thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=371260¤tpage=29#573 So for this theory to be true, I've had to instantly refresh the voting thread, quickly as hell change my mind, write a post and 9 minutes later, BAM, post that I had changed my mind. That supports the fact that I got unlucky right? Because 9 minutes to make the post I made and to make a decision of this caliber, AND assuming I read the vote tally right after it came off is a bit too much, no? Hopefully that makes my claim more believable | ||
| ||