EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXVII - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
On September 21 2012 13:10 thrawn2112 wrote: If the reasoning behind that is that he is trying to save his strongest town read then it would have gone to either of the 2 confirmed masons. Anyway there are tons of possible explanations of the roleblock and no reason to believe any of more than any other so I'd rather not speculate about it. He could have gone with a WIFOM theory though. However yeah discussing the role block possibilitys this early in the game doesn't exactly help. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + I’m getting more and more tired again however I will move onto kush. I don’t think anybody denies kush is hard to read. But I will list the things of meta that I know about kush. He posts a lot he tends to be spazzy and is highly illogical. That said don’t know what his mafia meta is like (I imagine it would be similar) and he seems to be more so strange than usual. For one he is more bi-polar than usual. (last game he was pretty sure on his reads and I had to force him to change) I am tired to I will just copy paste. I am looking to step up my play this game. Last game was quite humbling for me. I made a lot of bad calls, and d1 caused a mislynch >< IM SORRY CUBU Very next post If you write 1 post a day but it's a brilliant epic post then that's cool with me. I can be realistic about people's busy schedules. And that is WAY better than a few little posts with no content. .. and I'm looking at you STUTTERS, DRAZAK, and ESPECIALLY CUBU who were all town last game but pretty trash town. While this isn’t a read it goes from Sorry to YOU’RE TRASH. But I will get to the actual reads now. Oh lol, just ran into this by kush. You call me insincere because at first I say sorry cubu for bandwagoning him last game, then I call him out for lurking? I am not going to make a case against him for lurking, but I think a COUPLE words saying so and so are lurking we still need a post is fine. And yeah I will say cubu played really really bad last game. I wont apologize for saying that. I'm still sorry for lynching him. I was not trying to start a flame war for with cubu, I was just trying to get him to post. I think encouraging lurkers to post by calling them out or asking them questions is productive. Making cases against lurkers is not productive. (this part is from today) So with this I kinda stopped because his filter was large and I needed sleep, I still didn’t end up sleeping for a while after but in anycase. Ok this is where I left off my kush thoughts however now I will continue from a point I can analise just before the mason claim. Before the mason claim you write this. On September 20 2012 05:34 kushm4sta wrote: OK so as I see it here are our options atm: Sharrant, cubu, killing. Killing is not that much of a lurker. He's not lurker enough to even be considered a lurker IMO. Killing is scummy looking to me, but he looked that way last game too. Then when he realises another bandwagon is needed he says On September 20 2012 07:22 kushm4sta wrote: we need an alternate bandwagon and we need it fast. I like debears if people really don't want to lynch a lurker. I like another lurker as the best choice though I'm not sure which one I would pick now. drazak maybe? I want to here what other people think. we need an epic swift band wagon of justice or we are going to get a no lynch He dropped his killing idea entirely he said it was because he didn’t have time to read killings filter but assuming he didn’t leave there is a hour gap at least before the vote. Killings filter isn’t that large. and if he thought he was scummy before surely he wouldn't need to read that much filter to catch up... Also he says this On September 20 2012 09:14 kushm4sta wrote: yeah i don't consider drazak to really be a lurker. and yeah the only reason i voted for him was total 100% bandwagon ill admit it lol When just before he mentioned Drazak maybe? There must be some reason for this... He probably made a hint at a bandwagon and then pretended he jumped on it 100% bandwagon style because he “had no say in the matter” He didn’t jump on the bandwagon he planted the seed... He said to go for drazak over killing, The only mention I could find before this was sharrent saying he would go for drazak but then saying killing or drazak. So my theory is kush sees this jumps on drazak with the one line instead of killing (why?) Are they both scum? Who knows but in anycase it worked sonic went on drazak and sharrent went on drazak. Sharrent was on him already but he is almost 100% confirmed town now, sonic is confirmed town and kush looks to be the one who jumped in on the flow of things. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
Then I and sharrent would be the only active towns in the thread (I am getting more and more active as I finish assigments) and if one of us was to die in the night the thread would fall apart. I am still not buying the Atreides argument but I need to get more familar witht he case on regent. From what I can see it looks stronger thant he case on Atreides. Also I am still watching debears but his posts are getting better. Only problem can thrawn and Debears really both be town? | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
On September 21 2012 15:53 Sonic Death Monkey wrote: ***********dead************ Whacking me while I'm on vacation is so fucking rude. Town, avenge me death please. /obs ***********dead************ Well nobody else is posting I might have dinner and come back to it later. Sure thing, Sonic shall be our battle cry! We will destroy all Mario(get it mafia {im so funny}) fans and such. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
Why would you do that? What do you gain from it? (apart from a social life) Please elaborate. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
I am guilty of it as well but I was actually doing it on purpose. To be clear my defense against lurking is not "hey I did it on purpose", it's "hey I will not be lurking anymore now" k... oh I think I see what you mean now. You said you did it on purpose, but the actual defence is you won't anymore. Still saying you did it on purpose is a defence as well. I mean I guess time will tell but this was really strange the way you went about it. Going into a game thinking "hey lets lurk to test how lenient people are" is really bad. Also funny you mention if AFTER we start discussing that going after active people might be a bad idea. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
But it really seems that playing mafia is really not for me. Did I miss sarcasm or is this a scum slip? Or does he mean playing mafia would not be me. Or is he... Thrawn you seem to know what does he mean? lol. | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
Scum have plenty of reason to lie, town don't. Just say he was town.. he wouldn't see himself as more a target than anyone else who is lurking. I think guilt gave him away. Also if he is town and lies.... then he is playing the game very wrong... | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
Vote##: rethos | ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
|
JacobStrangelove
Australia1572 Posts
| ||
| ||
