|
On September 25 2012 02:13 Dandel Ion wrote:You probably didn't find enough examples, so you have to mention him twice, huh?
No, you went from a remedy, to stutters, then back to remedy while making a case against debears that you dropped as soon as stutters started picking up votes... and you've said almost nothing about debears since. I asked you about it when it happened and you even said debears was actually your strongest read.
|
And now you're on another popular bandwagon
I'd like to know what you think about kush and killing
|
So why your vote on me? You told atreides that it didn't come out of nowhere but looking at that post all I see is a scum list and scumteam speculation.
|
If I get lynched then come back to this post
There will be 7 people left. Subtract sharky. (sharky for mason) So the list is: 'jacob kush atreides dandel killing debears' And don't be stupid, there are probably not less than 3 scum. 2 scum would be ridiculously unfair out of 13 players and 3 has always been standard in newbies. There have been 4 votes for me from: 'kush dandel atreides debears' and since you take away the mason, and me after lynch, 3 scum will be in that original list of 6 meaning at least 1 of them absolutely for sure is among the list of kush, dandel, atreides, and debears. So if I get lynched then look at those guys. And that means right now I know at least one of them is scum.
|
On September 25 2012 04:05 KillingTime wrote: can I get a vote count -[b]sorry guys but I did say I would be pretty inactive in this period[b]. I will be on the thread tomorrow afternoon when I will hopefully actually have time to post cases in plenty of time for the lynch. But Thrawn & jacob are scummy scum scum IMHO.
Steps in to defend himself from being accused of lurking when nobody has recently, and he gives popular scum reads with no explanations.
|
## Unvote
really thinking about killing right now. His last post shows signs of guilt (defends himself against an accusation that nobody has made in a pretty long time,) and listed popular reads without justifications. I also know that there is at least 1 scum out of kush, debears, atreides, and dandel but not sure which yet.
|
On September 25 2012 05:58 kushm4sta wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2012 05:42 thrawn2112 wrote: If I get lynched then come back to this post
There will be 7 people left. Subtract sharky. (sharky for mason) So the list is: 'jacob kush atreides dandel killing debears' And don't be stupid, there are probably not less than 3 scum. 2 scum would be ridiculously unfair out of 13 players and 3 has always been standard in newbies. There have been 4 votes for me from: 'kush dandel atreides debears' and since you take away the mason, and me after lynch, 3 scum will be in that original list of 6 meaning at least 1 of them absolutely for sure is among the list of kush, dandel, atreides, and debears. So if I get lynched then look at those guys. And that means right now I know at least one of them is scum. apart from Jacob this is the most words I've seen for such little meaning. This is just obvious math thrawn, but you say it all dramatic like you figured.something out.
you don't like maths? hopefully you'll appreciate it it later
|
Everyone see how easily the bandwagon against me has formed? From my perspective I know through math that one of the people who voted for me is scum. The case against me that debears made looks genuine town scumhunting so I don't think it's him. The wording atreides used made me suspicious but he has been going at me all game so nothing other than that to indicate that his vote wasn't genuine. That leaves kush and dandel. Dandel gave absolutely 0 explanation of his vote for me and when asked to provide one he just said that his vote didn't come out of nowhere. I've since asked him again and no response. Then there's kush. I can see a town kush voting for me because I was his #2 scumread but his explanation when he voted wasn't that great either. So out of those 4 right now I'm thinking it's dandel.
|
##Vote: Dandel lon
My top two scum reads at this point are rethos and dandel lon
|
yep. voting for my top 2 scum reads at the same time
|
yeah... and? I'm voting for people who are the most suspicious with their votes for me
|
dandel please tell me why you think I'm scum
|
On September 25 2012 02:51 Dandel Ion wrote: The thing is that you try to make it sound as if Remedy was two bandwagons, but it really was just one. I have mentioned debears often enough, methinks. Nobody is interested in debears being scum, and with my current theory, debears actually ISN'T scum. Which is a shame, I had a pretty strong read. But you know what? I am willing to admit I was most likely wrong about debears.
I think that Kush is town. In fact, he is the most town.
I'm still null on Killing. How that's possible given the gamelenght? It's the magic of lurking. Story of this game.
All of those you could've found out if you actually paid attention. Or maybe you did pay attention and just want to discredit me as a "bandwagoner". Who knows
You say you're null on killing, but then throw in a suggestive statement that there might be something suspicious about him... yet you have a null read on him. Time to grow some balls and stop subtly hinting at things that might be scummy. Is your read on him really null?
|
And what about that quote I made well before the game had started makes you think I'm scum? It's a nice little contradiction for you to point out but do you have any explanations for why it makes me scummy?
|
Everyone should vote this guy who bandwagons onto popular cases, doesn't like to give explanations for his reads, and is always dropping little remarks hinting that things might be scummy
|
On September 25 2012 08:26 Dandel Ion wrote: Because it was a lie, obviously. You know who lies? Scum You know who doesn't? Town -> You must be scum
Logic A+
so your argument is that I was scum before the game started? previously kush was the only person silly enough to make that argument
|
speaking of liars, who remembers rethos?
|
So you don't have an explanation for why it's scummy? Here you are yet again avoiding explaining reads
|
ok nvm forgot about your post a few min ago. but do you think that's not a dumb argument?
|
bleargh i'm way too heated for this atm
|
|
|
|