Newbie Mini Mafia XXV - Page 19

On August 26 2012 05:30 Lvdr wrote:
@Thrawn You hold the lynch in your hand.

On August 26 2012 05:35 Lvdr wrote:
Shady, do you do any behavioral analysis at all? Having a town read on thrawn and mkfuba is good play. If you don't make any reads how can you decide who to lynch?

On August 26 2012 05:36 Shady Sands wrote:


I don't want to waste my vote, and my prior read on WeeTee still stands. I'll hammer him if you're still not sold on Lvdr.

On August 26 2012 05:39 thrawn2112 wrote:


My strongest scumread remains at WeeTee.

Where the fuck did all the other players go

On August 26 2012 05:40 Shady Sands wrote:


If Mkfuba doesn't vote WeeTee nobody gets lynched. And shouldn't WeeTee be in this thread?

On August 26 2012 05:37 Shady Sands wrote:


It's not bad play, but the way you're phrasing it means you assume 100% that they agreeing with you means green townies agreeing with you. You were saying "because mkfuba and thrawn agree with me then that adds weight to Dandel's case."

On August 26 2012 05:29 mkfuba07 wrote:
##Unvote

Naturally, I'm currently looking at Dandel lon or WeeTee. As far as Dandel lon goes, I'm ignoring the fact that he's voting for WeeTee, because that is basically his only viable option. WeeTee's vote, on the other hand, I find to be one of his most suspicious actions. He votes for kush for the same reasoning that he uses to defend himself. Also, though I know there's a lot of speculation as to whether or not the JK claim was real, saying "I'd rather lynch him and know if he was JK than keep wondering" (paraphrased) is scummy. Whether or not you believe kush's role claim, WeeTee's reason for voting for him is anti-town.

For Dandel lon, his main defense against the accusations is that the main point of Lvdr's argument is that he's experienced and should be posting better. I don't think that that's the strongest aspect of Lvdr's case. The fact that until just recently everything Dandel lon's said was policy (acceptable to a point), comments that appear to be contributing (slightly suspicious), and wishy-washy reads (suspicious) with about 17 hours of lurking following it, is the heart of the matter for me. It's not just the lurking, it's the active lurking before that.

##vote Dandel lon

On August 26 2012 05:42 thrawn2112 wrote:

Your candidate is lvdr who has less votes than WeeTee.

This is really frustrating... it's hard to come to a consensus when less than half the town is posting.

On August 26 2012 05:45 mkfuba07 wrote:
I am willing to switch to WeeTee, as I've stated that I still find him suspicious, though we need three more votes on him for a lynch. Can we get that?

##unvote