EPTBureaucracy Mafia! - Page 8
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 21 2012 07:00 Kurumi wrote: Buy yourself a cake. So now I know that we're ok if something funky happens. Thanks HiroPro. Don't worry. I still have some radpie  If only you were town  I won't be there at deadline, but I doubt that matters today. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
I'd rather lynch Zealos or BH than people who I have less strong reads on just because "the hosts are more likely to pick them as executives". | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
Palmar should die. There is no way he actually believed that BH was town. And he has not been doing anything this game - syllo is right. We can kill Zealos later. The fact that GGQ hasn't been modkilled yet pretty much confirms that he's mafia for me. ##Vote Palmar | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 22 2012 12:05 rastaban wrote: Who was it, VE I think, who even said Vt would be enough. Over compensation. Lynch Zealos I like the way you think  But it does look like the hosts actually tried to pick certain people to be executives. So we should kill Palmar. My read isn't as strong on him, but I'm fairly certain he's mafia. I'm not a huge fan of using connections as broadly as you have, Probulous. Foolishness only knew 2 mafia (one of whom I think is Palmar). Additionally, Foolishness would have realized during night 1 just how much danger he was in. It's entirely possible that certain reads he made were just to throw off town when he died. Compare the difference between his behaviour around Palmar and around Syllo, BM. The vehemence of his defense versus the pussy cat attack suggests he doesn't really want to lynch Palmar. This is something I really agree with though. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
Any breadcrumbs - ss/sloosh? And what does the delayed mean sloosh are you claiming you shot foolishness night 1? Marv, 1 for 1 is not a bad trade for scum depending on who they get. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
Ill read a bit more closely when im on my computer but i think sloosh is lying. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 22 2012 21:36 supersoft wrote: So he's a vig that can shoot from night 2 on? mhm sure. This role fits perfectly into the setup. Who else has an ability you can only use from night2 onwards? Oh the delayed could mean that. But i still dont buy the claim. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
| ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 24 2012 10:34 marvellosity wrote: Quick pre-question then; given Palmar flipped non-executive, do you find it more likely that below CEO roles were randomised? Else there would be 2 players still left 'above' Palmar Eh idk. I didn't think it was likely for them to be specifically picked, but Foolishness's PM was personalized for him... And thing you have to remember is we had 2 replacements. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
Yea, that's what I'm reading through right now. | ||
|
HiroPro
United States2624 Posts
On July 24 2012 11:11 Probulous wrote: My running theory is to distance himself as much as possible from his original Foolishness defense. Night 1 had no vigs so mafia assume there are no vigs, or they are delayed. Then when Foolishness flips they know someone will claim that shot, so they claim first. Remember this is a closed setup so we don't know if there are multiple vigs, his claims adds nothing to the discussion because we cannot verify it. All it does it give him a shot at town cred. Unfortunately for him, it was supersoft not someone like Zealos, who counter claimed. The claim itself is my sticking point as well and anyway I look at it, I come up with a null. It doesn't say anything really. What does the rest of his filter say? Yea, this is kinda what I was thinking initally too. But thinking about it now, no one knew that Foolishness was the CEO. So defending him isn't really much of a connection - I don't think that alone would be enough for slOosh to decide to fakeclaim. And I don't remember Foolishness ever talking really about slOosh (other than that mass useless list), so not much connection there either to damn slOosh. Don't see why as mafia he would really feel extreme pressure. I say, wait and see on slOosh. Lynch Zealos tomorrow. | ||
| ||
