|
On July 18 2012 07:48 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 06:12 Bill Murray wrote:On July 18 2012 06:08 marvellosity wrote: I'd much rather off someone like GGQ or BM. yeah, since i've posted sooo much for you to get a read on if you're pushing a d1 policy lynch that's just ridiculous policy =/= alignment hehe, you're pro. I'd be fine with policy lynching you!
I missed you.
No really, your posts are actually a nice departure from other players' lol.
You still think sandro is scum? Thoughts on layabout?
|
I'm not confident gonzaw is scum, but I don't have time to argue this. I have a HW deadline in 5 hours and I'm about to head out to finish it.
Since it's extended majority, voting for BH is probably not a great idea, even though I want to keep him on the table -_-
Takes 14 to lynch, yeah?
##unvote ##vote gonzaw
|
##unvote
##vote Blazinghand
I don't like the gonzaw lynch. Last minute switch to BH anyone?
|
I don't have time to explain but I just feel more confident in BH.
|
RoL you are by far the worst player I have ever played with.
Seriously, you've fucked every game I've been in.
This is ragemode WBG
|
every game we've been in together, anyway.
|
On July 18 2012 14:39 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 14:31 wherebugsgo wrote: every game we've been in together, anyway. lol you remember the couples-game where RoL and Kurumi were together in your scumteam and they just did absolutely nothing? like 3 posts total or something like that :-D ah yes, well it's not optimal, but i am not unhappy about RoLs decision. I mean with kurumi as a sure lynchtarget, we probably wouldn't have been discussing other lynchtargets and stuff in this extend. It sucks that we had a nolynch, but even from a no-lynch we can get a lot of information. we haven't lost this game yet, that's for sure.
same thing happened in Storm with RoL -_- (but Kurumi was on town)
also I have been doing HW. My vote was on BH. Nothing anyone could really do, honestly. We all thought Kurumi was dead.
|
On July 18 2012 15:21 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 14:27 sandroba wrote:On July 18 2012 14:25 Foolishness wrote: God dammit I was playing league of legends then had to step out quickly. What the heck happened Basically your team probably won the game. Gratz. You were the one behind 3 wagons within a 10 hour period. Instead of just staying on syllogism and Blazinghand from the start you and bugs and others had to run around with the votes. Good job.
no one wanted to kill syllo today except you
|
On July 18 2012 15:33 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 15:30 wherebugsgo wrote:On July 18 2012 15:21 Foolishness wrote:On July 18 2012 14:27 sandroba wrote:On July 18 2012 14:25 Foolishness wrote: God dammit I was playing league of legends then had to step out quickly. What the heck happened Basically your team probably won the game. Gratz. You were the one behind 3 wagons within a 10 hour period. Instead of just staying on syllogism and Blazinghand from the start you and bugs and others had to run around with the votes. Good job. no one wanted to kill syllo today except you What's your point? So Blazinghand would have gotten lynched anyways, and definitely a lot of people did not have an issue with that. Then you decide to switch to austin. Then you decide to switch to gonzaw. Then you decide to switch back. All in a 10 hour period. You know better than that.
I didn't decide to switch to gonzaw. I wasn't even here when people started calling gonzaw scum. I only switched my vote to ensure there was a lynch. When I saw that gonzaw was still behind I switched back.
Here you are pointing fingers when your vote was wasted most of all.
|
On July 18 2012 15:50 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On July 18 2012 15:35 wherebugsgo wrote:On July 18 2012 15:33 Foolishness wrote:On July 18 2012 15:30 wherebugsgo wrote:On July 18 2012 15:21 Foolishness wrote:On July 18 2012 14:27 sandroba wrote:On July 18 2012 14:25 Foolishness wrote: God dammit I was playing league of legends then had to step out quickly. What the heck happened Basically your team probably won the game. Gratz. You were the one behind 3 wagons within a 10 hour period. Instead of just staying on syllogism and Blazinghand from the start you and bugs and others had to run around with the votes. Good job. no one wanted to kill syllo today except you What's your point? So Blazinghand would have gotten lynched anyways, and definitely a lot of people did not have an issue with that. Then you decide to switch to austin. Then you decide to switch to gonzaw. Then you decide to switch back. All in a 10 hour period. You know better than that. I didn't decide to switch to gonzaw. I wasn't even here when people started calling gonzaw scum. I only switched my vote to ensure there was a lynch. When I saw that gonzaw was still behind I switched back. Here you are pointing fingers when your vote was wasted most of all. Hardly. There were two non-voters (one of which is still alive) and still three people on Austin. And in the grand scheme of things everyone's vote was wasted because nobody got lynched. You can't honestly expect to sit there and pin this on me or anyone else with a "stupid" vote. I know I was gone right after the austin thing came up and didn't come back until just now. You and everyone else here knows that when the votes switch from person to person in the hours before deadline a no-lynch is the usual outcome. It's practically written in the mafia guide. And what I know is that you and sandroba were the initial force behind the austin switch. You might have not been here for the gonzaw switch initially, but juding by the voting thread you were one of the starters on the wagon back towards Blazinghand (you were the first person to vote off of gonzaw onto him).
I'm not pinning this on anyone specifically, you accused me of wasting my vote first. Yes, everyone is to blame for the failure. Some are just more culpable than others. What's the point of saying myself and sandro were the cause of it? I tried to get people to consolidate repeatedly. I was somewhat successful but when I was afk things changed. I can't control that. (not to mention I'm one member of town out of 18 or whatever it is)
We can play this childish game all you want but it's not what I expect of you as town. Your behavior right now is incredibly strange.
|
Okay, several things:
I can confirm that there is at least one messaging power that can be used on townies. I received this after the daypost:
Congratulations! You tripped down some stairs and hit your head. When you woke up, you realized that you were actually a member of the House Chezinu!
That's right! You are now part of the third party, House Chezinu! The first order of business is to get out there and make it known to the world! You'll need some more members to get this really rolling, so spread the word and get recruiting! Once a cycle, you may recruit someone. Simply type "##Recruit: <name> in the thread, and you will be able to recruit a new member! You may use this ability once per day! (Once per cycle, at night) However, you may only have a total of three members besides yourself.
You're part of House Chezinu, so you're above win conditions. (You're already part of House Chezinu, what more do you need to win?) But maybe you can unite the workers in a glorious revolution!
P.S., There's no House Chezinu like a house with Chezinu. Just sayin.
And I confirmed with the host that this is a player-sent message.
Secondly we have two near-confirmed scum in Kurumi and Zealos. If you're a vig or you have any sort of night KP it might be a good idea to kill them given that tomorrow will likely be a wash if they're alive.
|
That seems like a message Foolishness would send me. He's probably scum. The other possibility is Chezinu or someone who wants me to think Foolishness sent me that message.
As for scum given how blatant their behavior seems I think the simplest route is to kill the confirmed ones first and then the scumreads that multiple people agree upon.
Right now ignoring Zealos and Kurumi that looks like:
Foolishness GGQ Meapak Layabout
And potentially: Katina
These are among my strongest reads as I've gone back and reexamined things. I was likely wrong about both BH and Austin (or they've been given ample warning into changing their play -_-).
I personally would also consider killing BM and Qbert because they're useless, but all of the named above are likelier to flip scum IMO (katina included; I lean scum but not confident)
|
And no, I'm not going to use that command. In fact I'm suspicious of you for asking because it's possible scum rigged that as a keyword for a bomb placed on me.
|
It's foolishness, or someone who played in PYP:Interesting. That could be almost anyone given that this game has a lot of players from that one.
|
On July 19 2012 06:58 Q-bert-Z wrote: My fellow workers, it seems you have all been busy. I must take full responsibility for all of this spammy play, I forgot to hang the motivational posters, and encourage smart working, instead of hard working!
To answer those of you who asked for an explanation, I shall oblige you, and aqueous to your request for more information on my whereabouts before the lynch.
Long and short, traveling. I spent a good portion of my time in the air yesterday, and wasn't able to participate. I did put my vote on Sir Blazing once I saw that the only two likely lynches were the aforementioned Sir Blazing, and Gone Zzz. At that point I had landed but was still in transit, so I was able to monitor the thread to some extent in case my vote was needed elsewhere, but Sir Blazing remained the best place for my vote. Hope that clears things up for you.
Now, onto business. If the Mafia indeed have KP as Kurumi's existence would suggest, I have no doubt that the town will also have KP of it's own. People have suggested a night shot on Kurumi, however I must protest against such an action as it has denies the primary function of a vigilante type role: That of being able to shoot those scum you cannot lynch. Save Vig shots for lurkers, and people you can't build cases on. Save the lynch for obvious scum. (Unless you want to no-lynch tomorrow too.)
Yes, you want to leave the guy with A CONFIRMED NUKE POWER alive for another day, on the off chance it is one shot use.
No, you and your stupid roleplaying has no use here. Kurumi dies tonight if there is a vig.
|
On July 19 2012 06:53 marvellosity wrote: bugs, you don't agree with Palmar re: layabout then?
No: on the simple basis that if layabout were town and he were having difficulties he'd have replaced out by now
Scum layabout is pretty lazy, and that's the #1 word that comes to mind when I think of his play this game
|
On July 19 2012 07:02 HiroPro wrote:Show nested quote +On July 19 2012 06:58 wherebugsgo wrote: It's foolishness, or someone who played in PYP:Interesting. That could be almost anyone given that this game has a lot of players from that one. I wouldn't assume this. I never read PYP:Interesting yet even I've heard of House Chezinu.
Yes, but for the message to come to me specifically most likely points to Foolishness or someone who was with me in that game, because that was the origin of House Chezinu (and I was one of the three in it)
I recall reading in Holy Roman people were speculating about it and most noninvolved players didn't know the whole story.
|
Who cares? Vigis should shoot scum, and anyone that's confirmed scum should die immediately.
This is a closed setup, speculating about whether the nuke use is one shot or not is pointless. We don't know and we can't know. Telling vigis to shoot elsewhere is a recipe for a townie getting shot.
|
I agree with syllo and sandro about Palmar. His play this game reminds me of Liar Game.
|
##cover butt
....
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
|
|
|
|