EPTBureaucracy Mafia!
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
I hope I don't regret this later :p | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 10 2012 08:48 Chezinu wrote: Hey Guys, I'm Chezinu! Chezinu you are mighty | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 10 2012 09:33 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm setting up print files going "Man, I FEEL mighty!" Totally relevant. Finally: What I love so deeply... + Show Spoiler [wtf] + + Show Spoiler [norly] + + Show Spoiler [stopclickingthese] + You are my friend. Except that trust part. Cause you're crazy as scum. e: WTF LINKS DON'T WORK IN SPOILERS | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 10 2012 10:20 gonzaw wrote: lol the player rooster is awesome. Occupy TL Mafia! Those CEOs must fall! On July 10 2012 10:20 gonzaw wrote: lol the player rooster is awesome. On July 10 2012 10:20 gonzaw wrote: lol the player rooster On July 10 2012 10:20 gonzaw wrote: player rooster On July 10 2012 10:20 gonzaw wrote: rooster ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/q8PGc.jpg) | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 10 2012 15:19 Ver wrote: Do whatever you want pregame but remember once the game begins the bureaucracy will strike down your spam! ##rooster: Ver | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 12 2012 03:17 gonzaw wrote: Considering usual smurf play these last few games he'll most likely just smurf-fail and post from his real account soon after the game starts, so we'll get to know who he is. or you're like me and you smurf in a game only to realize no one cares what you think until you claim who you are, then you get called scum based on identity no really | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 12 2012 03:45 austinmcc wrote: Hey now. Granted, one of your posts got ninjaed and so that contradiction wasn't there, but I was paying attention to what you said. this is true! However, even when I revealed myself I had to tunnel scum for like 24 hours to get a correct wagon lol. Enough ongoing game talk for now, though. We can discuss it in PMs if you wish :p | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 13 2012 09:27 Probulous wrote: I be sad.. There is no Ace There is no Radfield There is no Palmar  There is no Prob.. oh fuck | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 16 2012 14:24 Protactinium wrote: [/blue][/b]As a reminder, spam and BM will not be tolerated. If you have any questions if a behavior is acceptable, feel free to PM me. If you have complaints about other players' behavior, feel free to PM me about that too. 8. Bill Murray oh shit! btw guys I'm town. I'll be back at a more decent hour. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
##vote Meapak_Ziphh | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
Hahahahahaha I love you ##unvote ##vote Kurumi | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
Since Kurumi is basically confirmed scum we kill him today. Any objections? | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
The desperate flailings and failings of a caught scum, too funny. Also marv is a good scumhunter, an honorable scumhunter, let no harm befall him. Marv if you're town don't go afk, just ignore Kurumi. You can help me and sandro and whoever else is on town side. I'm still reading, but thoughts to come in a few hours after my lab. Barring Kurumi I'd like to hear who Katina, Palmar, sandro, and syllo would kill right now. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 17 2012 07:52 Katina wrote: Palmar mostly. Wouldn't mind syllo, or Mattchew. <3 I believe you're the only one who even acknowledged my question. I agree with all three kills but I'd rank them differently. Wouldn't mind killing Blazingscum and layabout too, they're all scum. All scum, god damn them. Oh and Wiggles is AFK. Just thought I'd throw that out there, he hasn't posted yet. Possibly rolled scum again, the bastard. OH and BM is afk too. Wtf? Well hell, half the players are afk. W/e. Let's focus on one player first: Shit that makes layabout scummy: Read his filter first, it's not long at all. Keep that in mind for a second. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349678&user=233798 He does nothing but shed doubt on sandro's claim. He instantly disbelieves it without considering other evidence. He knows the caliber of sandro's town play yet he doesn't even acknowledge the possibility that sandro could be town. In addition he's stayed toward the back of the discussion, as he does when he is scum. When he is town he is out in front if he thinks people are being stupid. He will kick and scream and call people retarded if they're doing something he disagrees with. Clearly he disagrees with us sheeping sandro on his catch of Kurumi (otherwise why else would he shed doubt on it?) but notice that he actually doesn't do anything to stop the wagon. i.e. his doubt is unfounded and he wants to undermine sandro without taking heat for the action itself. Scum tactic. Kurumi is going to die at the end of the day. Thus, we should kill someone else. Let's kill this guy for now. Make the bad man fly. ##unvote ##vote layabout | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 17 2012 10:06 Q-bert-Z wrote: Understood. I am once again humbled by your wisdom. Perhaps with time I will to be able to see through the lies that cloud my vision. Creating an atmosphere where participation is encouraged is very important. We must strike a balance between comfort, and discomfort, bringing chaos to the mafia while drawing out order for the town. A difficult task indeed. I will think on it further and let you know my thoughts at a later time. Hmm. I seem to have forgotten something...what could it....b...AH. That's right. ##Vote: Kurumi die evil meany. you're illiterate, are you? Read the thread before voting Kurumi. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 17 2012 10:08 marvellosity wrote: wbg, Wiggles isn't in the game sweetheart damn me On July 17 2012 10:11 Q-bert-Z wrote: Forgive me, I am not gifted with my fingers and must type slowly. I had not seen the launch when I typed up that post. Please though, do not take such a harsh tone, it will only serve to scare the shy ones away from contributing! We musn't have that. you should claim so that I don't kill you Are you mafia? On July 17 2012 10:12 Probulous wrote: Hmm I thought layabout was completely AFK. I didn't even realise he had posted. I agree that he is undermining Sandro for no reason. It is also a really strange place to start. He pops in to doubt something that makes 0 sense to doubt and then disappears. No comment on Syllo, Foolishness, MZ, or anyone for that matter. I could get down with his lynch but I still prefer Syllo. Bugs, your thoughts on Syllo? syllo is probably scum. I don't think he's lost his touch at scumhunting, so it's unlikely he's rolled town and is just super rusty. However, I don't find him scum for the same reasons other people find him scum (such as Foolishness.) While those reasons have merit, what popped out to me were these things: On July 16 2012 18:11 syllogism wrote: Really? That's the last person I would expect him to be, how do you figure? Anyway, you don't usually mind role playing (or trolling? which is it?) so do you just have a problem with sinani in particular doing that? On July 17 2012 03:26 syllogism wrote: Why do you "know" that you are an easy target to be "mislynched"? Has this been a common occurrence? Why do you keep mentioning WBG and comparing mattchew's play to his, it's not relevant at all. I agree with mattchew in the sense that some parts of your palmar "case" were weak and perhaps suspiciously so, but at the same time Palmar is clearly 100% trolling so far so he could very well be mafia. I think the only thing about his play that could point towards him being town is the fact he outed sinani's smurf, which isn't very smart to do in this setup if you are mafia as the person whose smurf you are outing may also be mafia. What do you think about meapak's play so far? Syllo almost immediately takes Palmar's claim that q bert is sinani seriously. As town he would at least question this initially. Palmar indeed says that he believes qbert to be sinani based off a /whois on IRC tracing to a Verizon IP, which is in itself rather unreliable because Verizon is a pretty popular ISP in the United States. I myself didn't find Palmar's "evidence" quite convincing given that qbert doesn't even sound like sinani. However, syllo apparently trusts Palmar's word based on the "if he were mafia he would have no interest in doing this" which is obviously false in this setup. I don't think syllo is that stupid as town to come to such a faulty conclusion on relatively flimsy evidence. So yes, I do think he's likely to be scum. However, I would very much like to give him the benefit of the doubt for now because I am more confident that layabout is scum (or at least I'd like more time to study the thread and other players as well) and as sandro has said it would be prudent to leave syllo alive for at least another cycle in the case that we are wrong. Even if he is scum syllo has the capability of catching other scum for us (in this setup particularly). It would be a bit foolish to let go of such a useful tool. Why not make mafia kill each other? | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
Given that I only read the latter half of the thread (I'm still missing a lot of information given how long I've been gone) it's only a gut read for now. I'm reading everything now, but I wanted to get those thoughts I had written down first so that I can personally compare my gut reads to the reads I have based off objective evidence. Gut tells me you're scum. Could be wrong, gotta cement it first. On July 17 2012 10:24 marvellosity wrote: That last paragraph bugs... makes no sense :x Or, at least, if it did make sense, it no longer makes sense now you said it tell me what part doesn't make sense to you and I'll elaborate. On July 17 2012 10:26 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: so bugs, a tl;dr of that post would be "syllo is scum but let's not kill him." nope, tl;dr is: "I think syllo is scum but layabout is more likely to be scum. Therefore I'd like to kill layabout over syllo." | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On July 17 2012 10:30 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I think the part where probulous and I got hung up is how you focus most of your post on syllo and provide reasons why he's scum, then tell us we should actually kill layabout and give no reasons. whoa, why are you speaking FOR probulous? holy shit are you scum with Probulous? Probulous never mentioned that post, he hasn't replied to it yet. Also I already elaborated on why layabout is scum in the post before that. So, #1. You're talking for someone else #2. You're not reading the thread you really are scum! | ||
| ||
