On July 13 2012 10:27 Hopeless1der wrote:
and Evul:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=351398

that game is currently open for signups. Make sure to read through the OP again. You too Jingle for that matter

I do read the OP's. Hence knowing during D1 that we were on Plurality, not Majority.

Evulrabbitz

Sweden134 Posts

July 13 2012 01:30 GMT

#1102

I WAS READING IT ALL WRONG. WHY THE HELL IS QT BACKWARDS?!

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

July 13 2012 01:31 GMT

#1103

Is there going to be a post-game analysis?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36158 Posts

July 13 2012 01:31 GMT

#1104

to trick animals who are up to no good, obviously

Hopeless1der

United States5836 Posts

July 13 2012 01:32 GMT

#1105

Don't worry you wont make that mistake again Evul. Also, I haven't a clue why they choose to backwards it.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36158 Posts

July 13 2012 01:32 GMT

#1106

On July 13 2012 10:31 Hopeless1der wrote:
Is there going to be a post-game analysis?

Coaches/Radfield probably will... I have too much mafia shizzle on my plate at the moment. I'll try find out

Evulrabbitz

Sweden134 Posts

July 13 2012 01:36 GMT

#1107

Just out of curiosity. Did any person who voted for BassInSpace do it because of my case against him, or was it solely based on the red read?

YourHarry

United States1152 Posts

July 13 2012 01:39 GMT

#1108

red read

YourHarry

United States1152 Posts

July 13 2012 01:40 GMT

#1109

Bass, did you role block TMG first day?

Also, why did you RB medic? This guaranteed one investigation, which three out of five times would have lead to "no guilty", which would have guaranteed town the victory.

Hapahauli

United States9305 Posts

July 13 2012 01:42 GMT

#1110

As previously stated, I really didn't like your case against Bass, and thought it took him out of context quite a bit. Upon re-reading his filter, I think there were a lot of stronger points against him that I missed on my initial readthrough:

When he bussed hopeless, he left himself open to change his mind - he said he wanted to see Hopeless's defense before he locked in his vote.
Him never voting or FOSing Mackin was a really strong point that you didn't mention until I brought it up later. He hounds Mackin without ever committing to his case.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36158 Posts

July 13 2012 01:44 GMT

#1111

Yeah, I hadn't realised that a green check would be so good for town.

Problem is if he doesn't roleblock medic then tracker/dt might get saved

tracker getting a negative result is effectively the same as a green check, so...

YourHarry

United States1152 Posts

July 13 2012 01:44 GMT

#1112

Once we know who the scums are, their actions, in retrospect, seem scummy.

YourHarry

United States1152 Posts

July 13 2012 01:47 GMT

#1113

On July 13 2012 10:44 marvellosity wrote:
Yeah, I hadn't realised that a green check would be so good for town.

Problem is if he doesn't roleblock medic then tracker/dt might get saved

tracker getting a negative result is effectively the same as a green check, so...

Ya, he had to take a chance and RB tracker and NK DT, or vice versa.

Half of the times, he should be able to kill DT and RB tracker. Other half of the times, he will lose his NK and townies would get one investigation.

But taking this chance, I think, would have been better than ensuring tracker NK and one guaranteed investigation.

In fact, evul should have checked whoever is least scummy (rather than most scummy), since he doesn't want to get a guilty report. Maybe he thought Bass was least scummy, I dunno.

Evulrabbitz

Sweden134 Posts

July 13 2012 01:51 GMT

#1114

If you want I can clarify why I investigated BassInSpace.

BassInSpace

Australia165 Posts

July 13 2012 01:57 GMT

#1115

I'll respond to questions about night actions when I can, on my phone right now.

Evulrabbitz

Sweden134 Posts

July 13 2012 02:23 GMT

#1116

Him never voting or FOSing Mackin was a really strong point that you didn't mention until I brought it up later.

You really said that? It must've slipped past me. As I recall it I was disproved on some of my points, or they were not good enough, but I never backed down on his indecisiveness. It wasn't until he tried to defend his actions against Mackin I realized that you two had come to two different conclusions based on the same information, with his conclusion being scummy.

Please don't read this in a condescending tone. It is honest curiosity. Can you provide the link where you mentioned him not committing to Mackin?

Hapahauli

United States9305 Posts

July 13 2012 02:34 GMT

#1117

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=349066&currentpage=47#938

(You don't sound condescending at all, no worries! ^^ )