|
On July 06 2012 11:58 Zephirdd wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote:
Yea I agree.
If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum.
Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any Good, so what's your opinion on the common policy lynches (lurkers, liars, specific players)?  (for the record, I pretty much agree with MrZentor)
Basically I just say all that lynch all liers lynch all lurkers etc.
But yea it's sircumstantual, I mean im not gonna just condem someone just because he breaks a rule period.
|
|
|
On July 06 2012 12:28 slOosh wrote:
##Vote: drwiggl3s
...am I missing something here? @_@
|
Why didn't I die in the day post marshie?
|
Questions!
On July 06 2012 12:28 slOosh wrote:
##Vote: drwiggl3s
Mr. SloOsh Dr.wiggl3s has not done anything yet why are you voting him?
On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote:
Yea I agree.
If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum.
Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any
Why do you agree?
Why is policy lynches good as any other topic?
On July 06 2012 12:10 Dangeresque77 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2012 11:58 Zephirdd wrote:On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote:
Yea I agree.
If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum.
Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any Good, so what's your opinion on the common policy lynches (lurkers, liars, specific players)? (for the record, I pretty much agree with MrZentor) Basically I just say all that lynch all liers lynch all lurkers etc. But yea it's sircumstantual, I mean im not gonna just condem someone just because he breaks a rule period.
What do you mean in this post?
Policies are stuff that are enforced (for example A lurks and because we are doing Lynch All Lurkers we lynch A correct)?
|
On July 06 2012 12:38 Bluelightz wrote:Questions!Mr. SloOsh Dr.wiggl3s has not done anything yet why are you voting him? Show nested quote +On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote:
Yea I agree.
If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum.
Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any Why do you agree? Why is policy lynches good as any other topic? Show nested quote +On July 06 2012 12:10 Dangeresque77 wrote:On July 06 2012 11:58 Zephirdd wrote:On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote:
Yea I agree.
If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum.
Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any Good, so what's your opinion on the common policy lynches (lurkers, liars, specific players)? (for the record, I pretty much agree with MrZentor) Basically I just say all that lynch all liers lynch all lurkers etc. But yea it's sircumstantual, I mean im not gonna just condem someone just because he breaks a rule period. What do you mean in this post? Policies are stuff that are enforced (for example A lurks and because we are doing Lynch All Lurkers we lynch A correct)?
As response to your first question on me. I don't know what to tell you. I figure that lynching policy is just a good conversation starter. It gets people talking and it helps scum hunt
In response to the second. what I ment was that I believe that we can't just kill someone without stopping to think about it first if he broke a policy.
99 percent of the time I'll be for it but I like to think about it a little bit before I just vote lynch
|
On July 06 2012 12:51 Dangeresque77 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2012 12:38 Bluelightz wrote:Questions!On July 06 2012 12:28 slOosh wrote:
##Vote: drwiggl3s Mr. SloOsh Dr.wiggl3s has not done anything yet why are you voting him? On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote:
Yea I agree.
If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum.
Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any Why do you agree? Why is policy lynches good as any other topic? On July 06 2012 12:10 Dangeresque77 wrote:On July 06 2012 11:58 Zephirdd wrote:On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote:
Yea I agree.
If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum.
Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any Good, so what's your opinion on the common policy lynches (lurkers, liars, specific players)? (for the record, I pretty much agree with MrZentor) Basically I just say all that lynch all liers lynch all lurkers etc. But yea it's sircumstantual, I mean im not gonna just condem someone just because he breaks a rule period. What do you mean in this post? Policies are stuff that are enforced (for example A lurks and because we are doing Lynch All Lurkers we lynch A correct)? As response to your first question on me. I don't know what to tell you. I figure that lynching policy is just a good conversation starter. It gets people talking and it helps scum hunt In response to the second. what I ment was that I believe that we can't just kill someone without stopping to think about it first if he broke a policy. 99 percent of the time I'll be for it but I like to think about it a little bit before I just vote lynch
Okay, thank you for answering, I agree with your thinking about not instantly lynching without thinking because thinking again might lead to new reads or perspectives
|
On July 06 2012 12:28 slOosh wrote:
##Vote: drwiggl3s
???
I guess it's an honour to be first voted lol but I'd prefer if we didn't waste a lynch on me.
|
I'll support the occasional policy lynch if there's someone I think should be banned from mafia in general and I don't want to deal with at all. There isn't anyone like that in this game though so for our purposes, I am opposed to policy lynches. Since that seems to be what we're talking about.
I am disappointed in sloosh for the random vote, would rather he at least said something about why. Maybe he'll come back later and clear it up; he would be wise to in my opinion.
|
sup guys I'm vanilla town
I go sleep now
|
|
|
On July 06 2012 17:49 NoSmurfHere wrote:
sup guys I'm vanilla town
I go sleep now
What the hell? What are you doing? trying to shit up town discussion? tell me a good reason why are you doing this please, I don't know why anyone should claim (except if their name is Kenpachi).
|
On July 06 2012 20:06 Bluelightz wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2012 17:49 NoSmurfHere wrote:
sup guys I'm vanilla town
I go sleep now What the hell? What are you doing? trying to shit up town discussion? tell me a good reason why are you doing this please, I don't know why anyone should claim (except if their name is Kenpachi).
EBWOP: should claim right now
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
So apparently the stronger the player, the weaker the contribution so far?
The person I'm most keen to hear from is MsZantor. If you're gonna smurf, you best play a pretty fucking pro town game or I'm going to wanna lynch your socks off. As a statement of intent:
##Vote: MsZantor
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
EBWOP, piss, it's Zontar, not Zantor. You all get the idea.
|
lol marv is scum
##Vote marvellosity
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
If you're going to keep playing like this prplhz, it's going to be a tedious game.
|
Haha, MsZontar isn't a smurf.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On July 06 2012 21:16 MrZentor wrote:
Haha, MsZontar isn't a smurf.
Then please enlighten me who this 2 post wonder is?
|
She's somebody I convinced to play forum mafia, who is also extremely jealous of my name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
