Looked at his filter. He makes good points on prplhz and Sinensis. A lot of the same ones we are making here and that I agree with.

He's also suspicious of you marv, which I find interesting.

He hasn't posted much lately and I'd like to hear from him more, but so far I don't see anything scummy in his posts. He's trying to scum hunt.

Barbiero

Brazil5259 Posts

July 06 2012 23:29 GMT

#285

On July 07 2012 08:28 Zephirdd wrote:

Show nested quote +

who the fuck is bugs

I mean, bugs isn't in game. wtf u talking about

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

July 06 2012 23:30 GMT

#286

Zeph - NSH.

wiggles, all he said on Sinensis is that he was 'suspicious'

how is this a 'good point' ?

drwiggl3s

Canada167 Posts

July 06 2012 23:30 GMT

#287

Isn't NoSmurfHere = bugs?

drwiggl3s

Canada167 Posts

July 06 2012 23:31 GMT

#288

@marv

Because he feels the same way I do about Sinensis. What do you think of dangeresque? Am I missing something and you actually get a scum vibe from his posts?

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

July 06 2012 23:33 GMT

#289

saying someone is suspicious is not a 'good point', it's not a point at all because it's completely unexplained. How do you not understand this?

I've posted on Dangeresque. Do you read the thread?

drwiggl3s

Canada167 Posts

July 06 2012 23:39 GMT

#290

You were saying he posts a lot of fluff and no real context / no actual push for a vote on someone. I feel the same way as him. There's some suspicion on a few people. But not enough to really push a vote for.

Not much happening thus not much to talk about, thus any accusation on anyone will be filled with some "fluff" depending on how hard you want to push it.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

July 06 2012 23:41 GMT

#291

There's shitloads happening. Why do you keep saying not much happening? Why are you abdicating responsibility for actually doing anything??

drwiggl3s

Canada167 Posts

July 06 2012 23:43 GMT

#292

I don't think there's shitloads happening. That's why I said I want others to start posting (instead of stupid bickering between you and whoever - me or VE).

VisceraEyes

United States21171 Posts

July 06 2012 23:43 GMT

#293

Wait what? I wasn't bickering with anyone...

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

July 06 2012 23:45 GMT

#294

There's prplhz's behaviour, the cases made on him and the discussions surrounding it
there's mszontar's bizarre attack on me
there's sinensis' lurking / absence
there's slOosh's ninja vote/explanation/views on anything
there's dangeresque being weird
there's you posting a lot BUT SAYING NOTHING

there's plenty going on bro.

drwiggl3s

Canada167 Posts

July 06 2012 23:46 GMT

#295

We can accuse whoever. And read into whoevers post as much as we want. Comming up with as much reasoning as we can. Maybe even with some WIFOM thrown in there. But fact is, not enough has happened. Not enough has been said.

Sure we can make a best guess. But if we want to increase our chances of finding something significant, and maybe finding a scum to lynch, we need others to post.

Bluelightz

Indonesia2463 Posts

July 06 2012 23:46 GMT

#296

[b]prplhz[b]

Let's see, he opens this game with this post:

On July 06 2012 20:03 prplhz wrote:
##Vote: slOosh

A vote with no reason which is explained with a reason that

Bluelightz

Indonesia2463 Posts

July 06 2012 23:47 GMT

#297

On July 07 2012 08:46 Bluelightz wrote:
[b]prplhz[b]

Let's see, he opens this game with this post:

Show nested quote +

A vote with no reason which is explained with a reason that

oops....... real post is not this...

drwiggl3s

Canada167 Posts

July 06 2012 23:48 GMT

#298

I don't think dangeresque is being weird. I think slOosh gave good reason after his initial post and "ninja vote". I am suspicious of sinensis. MsZontar's actions don't seem out of the ordinary to me. I'd attack you to if I didn't just get out of a game with you where you were playing just like this (but were town). And yes I also think prplhz behavior is scummy.

Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk.

Bluelightz

Indonesia2463 Posts

July 06 2012 23:50 GMT

#299

On July 07 2012 08:48 drwiggl3s wrote:
I don't think dangeresque is being weird. I think slOosh gave good reason after his initial post and "ninja vote". I am suspicious of sinensis. MsZontar's actions don't seem out of the ordinary to me. I'd attack you to if I didn't just get out of a game with you where you were playing just like this (but were town). And yes I also think prplhz behavior is scummy.

Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk.

why?

also why are you piggybacking other's in lynching? if you want to lynch X then go and fucking vote him. You don't wanna take the blame or something?

drwiggl3s

Canada167 Posts

July 06 2012 23:52 GMT

#300

Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk.

I don't want to throw blame around on behalf of weak cases when I'm actually waiting to see more. I was just stating my opinions so far on what's happened D1.