|
On June 29 2012 22:17 iamperfection wrote:
Im torn between fencer and anceltus. I dont like the way fencer tried to bandwagon onto someone elses logic. On anceltus i dont really know i think he just posts a lot and he kind of clamed up when some of the suspicion came up. Im leaning more twoards fencer but im new at this so i will wait for more of discussion before casting my vote. Sorry my views are the same as Umlaut's, and he can say them much better than I can, AND he posted before I was even awake.
|
On June 29 2012 22:28 Fencer710 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2012 22:17 iamperfection wrote:
Im torn between fencer and anceltus. I dont like the way fencer tried to bandwagon onto someone elses logic. On anceltus i dont really know i think he just posts a lot and he kind of clamed up when some of the suspicion came up. Im leaning more twoards fencer but im new at this so i will wait for more of discussion before casting my vote. Sorry my views are the same as Umlaut's, and he can say them much better than I can, AND he posted before I was even awake.
My proof here is that I'm posting at 6:28 AM pacific time, and many times during the night before. Check my post history.
|
On June 29 2012 22:29 Fencer710 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2012 22:28 Fencer710 wrote:On June 29 2012 22:17 iamperfection wrote:
Im torn between fencer and anceltus. I dont like the way fencer tried to bandwagon onto someone elses logic. On anceltus i dont really know i think he just posts a lot and he kind of clamed up when some of the suspicion came up. Im leaning more twoards fencer but im new at this so i will wait for more of discussion before casting my vote. Sorry my views are the same as Umlaut's, and he can say them much better than I can, AND he posted before I was even awake. My proof here is that I'm posting at 6:28 AM pacific time, and many times during the night before. Check my post history.
I dont understand what you are trying to prove? Once the game started you did latch onto another opinion. Even if you were "asleep" you still latched on.
|
My point is that unfortunately for me, my opinion is the same as Umlaut's and I appeared as a lurker, and that there was no way to pretend otherwise. Would you rather I have said something else to not appear as scum? :/
|
EBWOP: I mean, posted a different opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
I know that the day is still young, but I think that it's in the best interests of town that everyone be forced to express an opinion and back it up. I suggest that everyone cast a vote, and that we continue the discussion using those votes as a basis. Votes aren't binding for quite a while yet, but
##Vote Analectus
I've explained my thinking above, and Analectus has done nothing to defend himself. Fencer could be scum, or he could just be bad (I'm leaning toward the latter; the mafia have a chat room of their own, and I can't imagine no one would have stopped him posting like this by now), either way we can ignore him for the time being.
|
On June 29 2012 23:30 Fencer710 wrote:
##Vote Anacletus
This was posted while I was writing my above post. Fencer, can you explain why your every action appears to be a bandwagon in whatever direction you think town opinion might be swinging?
|
ALLEYCAT BLUES50612 Posts
##Vote Analectus
going with what little we have, hes been the most scummy so far.
|
On June 29 2012 23:36 AmericanUmlaut wrote:This was posted while I was writing my above post. Fencer, can you explain why your every action appears to be a bandwagon in whatever direction you think town opinion might be swinging?
To clarify what I'm getting at: Fencer posted nothing for 20 minutes, then the instant someone cast a vote he jumped in and agreed with it. Anyone else have thoughts on this?
|
Anacletus makes me edgy right now, but I can't justify a vote on him quite yet. I don't like the idea of policy lynching, in particular, since it's something the scum can work with.
AmericanUmlaut is also making me a touch nervous, because he's leaning in the direction of getting early bandwagon votes on someone, and trying to make it sound like a justifiable policy, and leaving room to get a scapegoat if Anacletus is mislynched.
FoS AmericanUmlaut
|
I'm not trying to create a policy, or encourage bandwagoning; I'm trying to encourage people to cast a vote so that we can force people to put their thoughts on the table. Without people voting and explaining their votes, it's very difficult to have a basis for getting solid reads on people.
What's FoS, by the way? I'm not familiar with that.
|
Finger of Suspicion. It's like saying "I'm watchin you".
|
On June 29 2012 23:36 AmericanUmlaut wrote:This was posted while I was writing my above post. Fencer, can you explain why your every action appears to be a bandwagon in whatever direction you think town opinion might be swinging?
Because I'm bad and this situation, or anything like it, isn't listed/covered in the General Guide to Mafia.
Since my stance is very precarious at the moment, I was scared to vote. I need to be more bold in the future.
|
OP says that we're playing on a 48-hour day cycle. Does that mean 48 hours per day, or do we only have 24 hours per day?
Asking because I was assuming we had two days to come to our conclusions, but if days are only 24 hours long we've only got another six and a half hours.
|
48hrs for the Day portion of the cycle, and 24hrs for the Night portion. Currently ~30hrs until the end of Day 1.
|
United States8476 Posts
On June 29 2012 08:38 Anacletus wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2012 08:28 Promethelax wrote:On June 29 2012 08:16 Myles wrote:On June 29 2012 08:12 Intact wrote:
I know it's a bit early to try and make a read, however my short list of possible scum is topped by Myles atm. Primarily because it seems like he wants to promote inactivity. It's a loose read but someone had to get this started. I guess you can call trying to be a little more selective than randomly picking people to start accusing is promoting inactivity, but I was trying to be a little more prudent. The game started 2 hours ago so it seems a bit early to start accusing people. I think Myles is right here, we need to think this through. I'm certainly not opposed to a lurker lynch but if we are going to start targeting a single player it should be for a good reason. Intact, if you think Myles is scummy you should keep a close eye on him and see how he acts see what he does and build a case. We as townies need to work together though we have the deductive power of nine smart (I hope) people on our side, we should try to use that power. I have 3 pages of notes already. And I wrote all of those notes in red ink. Only people who are guilty have note pages written about them in red ink. He must be scum!
I'm not too familiar with this game, so is this normal, or plausible, or is this just a joke?
Just to clarify, from his new posts, I don't think JH was trying to instigate chaos but rather was doing a good job inciting discussion. It was partly due to his comments that we've gotten this far.
|
On June 30 2012 00:58 NrGmonk wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2012 08:38 Anacletus wrote:On June 29 2012 08:28 Promethelax wrote:On June 29 2012 08:16 Myles wrote:On June 29 2012 08:12 Intact wrote:
I know it's a bit early to try and make a read, however my short list of possible scum is topped by Myles atm. Primarily because it seems like he wants to promote inactivity. It's a loose read but someone had to get this started. I guess you can call trying to be a little more selective than randomly picking people to start accusing is promoting inactivity, but I was trying to be a little more prudent. The game started 2 hours ago so it seems a bit early to start accusing people. I think Myles is right here, we need to think this through. I'm certainly not opposed to a lurker lynch but if we are going to start targeting a single player it should be for a good reason. Intact, if you think Myles is scummy you should keep a close eye on him and see how he acts see what he does and build a case. We as townies need to work together though we have the deductive power of nine smart (I hope) people on our side, we should try to use that power. I have 3 pages of notes already. And I wrote all of those notes in red ink. Only people who are guilty have note pages written about them in red ink. He must be scum! I'm not too familiar with this game, so is this normal, or plausible, or is this just a joke? Just to clarify, from his new posts, I don't think JH was trying to instigate chaos but rather was doing a good job inciting discussion. It was partly due to his comments that we've gotten this far.
I think its pretty obvious its a joke.......
|
United States8476 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
