On June 29 2012 03:32 marvellosity wrote:
rastaban: a tidbit for you to consider. Post your thoughts as you please.

When Snarfs voted for Mattchew yesterday, he was leaving the thread and it seemed like there was zero danger of Mattchew getting lynched.

Except I voted Mattchew over risk.nuke in part because I felt he had a better chance of being lynched than risk did :/

- VE was willing to switch to either Mattchew or risk.nuke - Could have gone either way
- Probulous had said he wasn't going to vote for you - Could maybe have gone either way
- I thought for sure prplhz was going to vote Mattchew (him and risk.nuke were on a similar page about you)
- risk.nuke obviously wasn't going to vote for either himself or you
- rastaban was more willing at that point to vote Mattchew than risk.nuke

I mean, go back and read that entire section. People were going to kill Mattchew and I would have been absolutely more pleased with that than the no lynch that VE caused.

rastaban

United States2294 Posts

June 28 2012 18:48 GMT

#1403

Hmmm His case comes moments after I switch my vote to you. If he was scum bussing Matt b/c he felt he wouldn't actually be lynched at that point then there is a possibility of a Matt, Snarfs, X team. I was thinking he votted matt when I was pushing for matt as well, but I checked and it actually occurs after I switched my vote to you. Ok time to reread how that went down a few times and see what I can learn.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

June 28 2012 18:58 GMT

#1404

##unvote

Snarfs

Canada1006 Posts

June 28 2012 18:58 GMT

#1405

On June 29 2012 03:48 rastaban wrote:

Show nested quote +

This isn't even logical. If I wanted to bus Matt, it would make more sense to have done it while your vote was on him. I basically reinvigorated the voting on Matt! I made it so that anyone who was online at the time had to choose between marvellosity and Mattchew and people were not sold on lynching marv. Please tell me you can see that...

prplhz

Denmark8045 Posts

June 28 2012 19:00 GMT

#1406

I'm not going to unconditionally sheep you on some case you're not going to show. I have no idea what this secrecy is about but you keep playing weirder and weirder. You don't even know how many people will be around before deadline when you post it, I am going to be busy tomorrow as I was today and I don't know how much I can post or if I'll even be able to.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

June 28 2012 19:02 GMT

#1407

well, if all town and SK don't vote with me then mafia control the lynch, so... your choice really.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

June 28 2012 19:11 GMT

#1408

prplhz tell me exactly why you're town please? serious question.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

June 28 2012 19:12 GMT

#1409

this goes to anyone else: is prplhz town or scum? for either answer, why?

Snarfs

Canada1006 Posts

June 28 2012 19:19 GMT

#1410

scum.

2 reasons.

The first I've already stated:

On June 24 2012 01:51 Snarfs wrote:
Hmm RE: MrZentor lynch, I get what slOosh is saying about it feeling wrong. Something seems off about prplhz and how he sort of spearheaded this lynch by first starting with a vote on MrZentor and then his case just kept getting stronger and stronger.

Normally when you're hunting scum you:
1) Find evidence that someone might be scum
2) Vote said person
3) If you're really sure, try to convince others that he's scum

However, what I'm seeing here from prplhz is:
1) Vote said person
2) Try to convince others to vote said person
3) Find evidence that he might be scum

I would appreciate some others looking over prplhz again and telling me what they think.

The second is because if he was following the thread at all before he voted you yesterday he would have realized it was unlikely you were actually going to be lynched despite the number of votes on you; therefore, his vote on you does not match his reasoning at all and he should have been voting Mattchew if he wanted to avoid a no lynch.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

June 28 2012 19:21 GMT

#1411

Alright

Anyone else?

Shraft

Sweden701 Posts

June 28 2012 19:23 GMT

#1412

Scum. He wants to kill townies.

marvellosity

United Kingdom36161 Posts

June 28 2012 19:24 GMT

#1413

ok. rastaban/risk/matt opinions too please!

thx

rastaban

United States2294 Posts

June 28 2012 19:29 GMT

#1414

On June 29 2012 04:24 marvellosity wrote:
ok. rastaban/risk/matt opinions too please!

thx

Working on it, reviewing his play in Pick Your Poison right now to see how it matches up.

rastaban

United States2294 Posts

June 28 2012 19:47 GMT

#1415

If I am right in my earlier assessment then he is scum by process of elimination. however your recent post has me thinking about the possibility of it having been a buss which makes me less sure

His play seems slightly different that in his previous game where he contributed more but he does seem to try to break up the conflict between you and VE which he said in previous games is what causes town to lose when their isn't an atmosphere of teamwork.

It is possible he isn't scum but it is a pretty long shot, perhaps if risk faked the block he could be scum but I don't think it is a high probability.
I lean scum but at this point I think Snarfs is a better choice.