EPTYou just won't be able to see it.
Movie Star Mini Mafia! - Page 71
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
You just won't be able to see it. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On June 29 2012 03:32 marvellosity wrote: rastaban: a tidbit for you to consider. Post your thoughts as you please. When Snarfs voted for Mattchew yesterday, he was leaving the thread and it seemed like there was zero danger of Mattchew getting lynched. Except I voted Mattchew over risk.nuke in part because I felt he had a better chance of being lynched than risk did :/ - VE was willing to switch to either Mattchew or risk.nuke - Could have gone either way - Probulous had said he wasn't going to vote for you - Could maybe have gone either way - I thought for sure prplhz was going to vote Mattchew (him and risk.nuke were on a similar page about you) - risk.nuke obviously wasn't going to vote for either himself or you - rastaban was more willing at that point to vote Mattchew than risk.nuke I mean, go back and read that entire section. People were going to kill Mattchew and I would have been absolutely more pleased with that than the no lynch that VE caused. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On June 29 2012 03:32 marvellosity wrote: rastaban: a tidbit for you to consider. Post your thoughts as you please. When Snarfs voted for Mattchew yesterday, he was leaving the thread and it seemed like there was zero danger of Mattchew getting lynched. Hmmm His case comes moments after I switch my vote to you. If he was scum bussing Matt b/c he felt he wouldn't actually be lynched at that point then there is a possibility of a Matt, Snarfs, X team. I was thinking he votted matt when I was pushing for matt as well, but I checked and it actually occurs after I switched my vote to you. Ok time to reread how that went down a few times and see what I can learn. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On June 29 2012 03:48 rastaban wrote: Hmmm His case comes moments after I switch my vote to you. If he was scum bussing Matt b/c he felt he wouldn't actually be lynched at that point then there is a possibility of a Matt, Snarfs, X team. I was thinking he votted matt when I was pushing for matt as well, but I checked and it actually occurs after I switched my vote to you. Ok time to reread how that went down a few times and see what I can learn. This isn't even logical. If I wanted to bus Matt, it would make more sense to have done it while your vote was on him. I basically reinvigorated the voting on Matt! I made it so that anyone who was online at the time had to choose between marvellosity and Mattchew and people were not sold on lynching marv. Please tell me you can see that... | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
2 reasons. The first I've already stated: On June 24 2012 01:51 Snarfs wrote: Hmm RE: MrZentor lynch, I get what slOosh is saying about it feeling wrong. Something seems off about prplhz and how he sort of spearheaded this lynch by first starting with a vote on MrZentor and then his case just kept getting stronger and stronger. Normally when you're hunting scum you: 1) Find evidence that someone might be scum 2) Vote said person 3) If you're really sure, try to convince others that he's scum However, what I'm seeing here from prplhz is: 1) Vote said person 2) Try to convince others to vote said person 3) Find evidence that he might be scum I would appreciate some others looking over prplhz again and telling me what they think. The second is because if he was following the thread at all before he voted you yesterday he would have realized it was unlikely you were actually going to be lynched despite the number of votes on you; therefore, his vote on you does not match his reasoning at all and he should have been voting Mattchew if he wanted to avoid a no lynch. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 Anyone else? | ||
|
Shraft
Sweden701 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
thx | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On June 29 2012 04:24 marvellosity wrote: ok. rastaban/risk/matt opinions too please! thx Working on it, reviewing his play in Pick Your Poison right now to see how it matches up. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
His play seems slightly different that in his previous game where he contributed more but he does seem to try to break up the conflict between you and VE which he said in previous games is what causes town to lose when their isn't an atmosphere of teamwork. It is possible he isn't scum but it is a pretty long shot, perhaps if risk faked the block he could be scum but I don't think it is a high probability. I lean scum but at this point I think Snarfs is a better choice. | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
only risk/matt to go :o | ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
| ||
|
rastaban
United States2294 Posts
On June 29 2012 04:48 marvellosity wrote: hurray! only risk/matt to go :o Gratz on Ghost :D sorry you had to use it here. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
 | ||
| ||
