|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 25 2012 09:22 prplhz wrote: meh marv why do you give a shit what risk and prob say
why don't you ask questions that make sense
the point was that if several people had expressed a townread on arguably the strongest scumhunter in the game, then assuming he was both shot and saved isn't very much of a stretch
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
slOosh, where have you gone?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
his emotion while arguing with me seemed spontaneous and not faked
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Why do you say you haven't played well?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I have a pretty decent idea who I'm going to be pushing, but it's going to have to wait for tomorrow when I'm more alive :x
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
one of those nights where you get texted the next day by someone but you don't know who they are, why they have your number, or when you might have given them your number
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
You didn't get a RB notification then VE?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
well. not gonna make a case on zephirdd then
back to le drawing board.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
wait, so prplhz AND Probulous were roleblocked. hrm de hrm
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 25 2012 19:49 prplhz wrote: If you guys read the thread then it should be pretty obvious that slOosh jailed me last night.
Tried to find what you were talking about, did not. Care to enlighten?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 25 2012 08:58 slOosh wrote: Since there is finally some thread activity going on, I'll be happy to sit down and think carefully what the heck is going on.
kinda irritating we never got to hear any more on this :/
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 25 2012 13:12 Probulous wrote:Show nested quote +On June 25 2012 07:05 slOosh wrote: Finally, something interesting. This also probably means no SK. Show nested quote +On June 25 2012 07:32 Zephirdd wrote: Also, the lack of a second kill(assuming the scum KP was blocked) means there is no SK... or he was jailed/roleblocked too. This is so annoying >< The only two people who mention the removal of SK as a possibility end up dying at the new deadline. The fact is, unless someone claims a night 1 vig shot, there is a SK. If either of these guys were alive, they would be pretty much guaranteed not to be the SK. Fate, why do you laugh at me 
Don't understand this line of reasoning at all. Just seems completely naive.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I know you've just replaced in, but this post is one massive regurgitation of what various other people have said in the thread. Safe easy explanations that have already been given. It looks impressive but really there's nothing there.
+ Show Spoiler +On June 25 2012 18:21 xsksc wrote:Well, first of all - since my predecessor went AWOL and I don't know what his thought process was, I might as well answer this instead. Show nested quote +On June 24 2012 06:23 slOosh wrote:On June 24 2012 02:40 vonKlaust II wrote: Right now though, my best bet would be Mr.Z I think. I don't really know about Rasta yet, but I'll check his filter out for myself and get back with my thoughts. But for now:
##Unvote ##Vote: MrZentor
Holding you accountable. I'll try to keep this short - I don't like rastaban's play on day 1. His case on risk was pure filler, and this early post definitely stood out to me. Show nested quote +On June 22 2012 16:46 rastaban wrote: Second, the focus of Marv makes me think of karma after seeing him do it to Gonzaw in our last game together. We need to be careful with tunneling though, when you push someone so hard day1, they will often come across as scum no matter what since the only content you have is them trying to defend themselves against accusations.He could be scum but I just want to say that we need to be cautious, as I feel the case against him is a bit biased. Now his day 1 "meta" is to spam 1 liners so I personally wouldn't mind him getting lynched if there isn't a better candidate but I feel like there is too much discussion on him this early in our day. Remember we have 48 hours, half that time hasn't even passed yet so I don't like the band wagoning on Marv so quickly.
That said I have a hard time getting anything from his filter right now. Some people analyze best when their quarry is under pressure but for me that introduces too many variables so I like to read posts where they aren't defending themselves. So marv would you mind answering the original question ( as leading as it may be) about what you feel are your tells, and second who do you feel is most likely scum? I don't like this at all. His opinion is extremely safe - he puts himself in a position where he could safely vote for Marv in the future, but he doesn't actually commit to anything. He doesn't really tell us anything, he just says marv COULD be scum. He also says he feels there's been "too much" discussion on the subject of Marv, but then he goes on to ask Marv some more questions, and he doesn't try to raise another subject, which completely contradicts what he just said.
What I find more concerning though, is his vote switch to MrZ. Here he says MrZ is null, and wants to give him more time. So he continues to push his #1 scum-read, fair enough. Show nested quote +On June 23 2012 03:47 rastaban wrote: I feel like Nuke hasn't just been a null, like MrZentor, by not contributing, but that his actions further scum agendas. There are legitimate reasons a town player may not contribute day 1, but I can't find legitimate town reasons for Risks actions.
This is his post between that and his vote-switch. Show nested quote +On June 23 2012 23:23 rastaban wrote: I disagree about risk, he defended himself but didn't actually contribute yet. However I doubt I am going to get enough people to vote for him today.
The reason I wanted to wait on on mr.Z untill tomorrow was because he stayed in, even after subbing out. now it isn't deffinate by any leas but it increases the likelyhood he got a blue or red role. I didn't mention this earlier because if he wasn't scum then it increased his chance of getting hit tonight. However I think his vote on marv after claiming both were probably town is pretty incriminating. So MrZ has gone from being null to LYNCH HIM, because he changed his mind (changing your mind =/= scum), and the absurd theory that he's scum or a blue because he didn't /out. If he's so sure about his scum-read on risk, he should ABSOLUTELY push it, instead of taking the easy out on MrZ. For reference, I think this is why MrZ changed his mind. + Show Spoiler +On June 23 2012 11:20 Zephirdd wrote:Holy shit. Look at pages 16 and 17. I just solved this game. VE, marv are both scum bussing the F* out of each other. When was the last time this happened? I remember someone saying it was an "OP strategy". Wasn't it Toad/VE doing it? I don't quite remember. Someone said LI, is that it? Either way, if one of them flips scum, I'm sure as hell attacking the other. I thought the initial "attacks" were terrible for both parties, but at this point this all feels fabricated to me. Show nested quote +On June 23 2012 12:09 MrZentor wrote:I don't know Zephirdd....it got pretty intense, but I do agree that we should kill one of them. ##Vote: marvellosity
TLDR I don't like Rastaman's day 1 play, I think it's downright scummy.
On June 24 2012 02:40 vonKlaust II wrote:
Right now though, my best bet would be Mr.Z I think. I don't really know about Rasta yet, but I'll check his filter out for myself and get back with my thoughts. But for now:
##Unvote ##Vote: MrZentor
On June 24 2012 02:56 vonKlaust II wrote: EBWOP: Voted for Marv without really saying why we should do it.
It wasn't you but your predecessor was dodgy. Practically the first time he mentions zentor and it's his 'best bet', votes him, no reasoning given. Later on condemns Zentor for voting me without saying why. Hypocritical play.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Indeed. I've replaced in to games a few times, always as town, and never felt the need to justify my predecessor's play or fulfil promises on what they did. I understand you're not me though.
Given you're around. What do you make of me? as slOosh died, what do you think of Probulous?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
xsksc: he was being pragmatic i think, as i wasn't getting lynched. I don't think he's done with me.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
:/ I've swung around again. I really think VE is scum, or actually quite possibly SK.
I'm making my town tell on his emotion to a null tell. He proved in LI he can get all 'emotional' as scum. Firstly I just can't get over the way he pushed me.
On June 22 2012 07:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Let's try and figure out a way to figure out if we're town right here and right now...
:/
Because it's going to help me a lot if I can trust you. I now know you're a fucking beast as scum. What do you suggest?
On June 22 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
This was his defense in LV, the Zim themed large we were just in. Marv DOMINATED that game as scum, and look at what his first act of the game was (upon replacing in)! It was using his "meta" as a personalized defense against my accusations. Look at his defense this game! Oddly enough, it's a personalized "meta" defense again!
Marv, your response?
Ok, so we've established he thinks I'm totes amazing scummer. It makes absolutely no sense to me how he thinks someone as good at scumplay as I am would get myself into this situation. xscsc summarised it quite nicely:
On June 25 2012 22:17 xsksc wrote:
Again, I'm gonna have to disagree with my predecessor here. People, including him, were pointing out that the way that you answered the question, and the argument following it, didn't make sense for a townie. However, it really doesn't make sense for scum either. Any remotely decent scum player is going to put 10x the thought into how they answer questions regarding their alignment and would never have answered that way, it draws wayyyyy too much negative attention, for no gain. I don't think you handled it the best way, but I think people need to realise that a bad play does not equal scum.
This is the crux of it, and xcksc hasn't even seen my scumplay, but he understands. Yet VE who saw me trash town in LIV and LV as scum does not see it.
On June 22 2012 09:51 VisceraEyes wrote: I don't underestimate you, which is why I know scumMarv wouldn't think twice about side-stepping the question. Take it as a compliment, not an affront.
This doesn't add up. Clearly sidestepping Matt's question WAS NOT the correct scumplay. Just look at what's happened. There's a mental disconnect going on.
On June 23 2012 00:21 VisceraEyes wrote: There are differences marv. For instance, townMarv is interested in finding scum. scumMarv is interested in lynching townies.
Also, both townMarv and scumMarv are good enough to realize that I'm very obviously town in this game, so the fact that you're calling me "dodgy" still (not scummy, not scum, not suspicious, not suspect....."dodgy") just confirms that you're not interested in finding scum today. For that, you're gonna die friend. Sorry. *shrug*
First paragraph is just trite, it says nothing. He's just explaining the wincon for a townie and scummer. I commented before on the 2nd part. Calling me out for finding him scummy, calling himself town. It's manipulative.
On June 23 2012 07:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, honestly. Marvel is much better than this. He knows that me targeting him if he's town does not automatically make me scum. This is literally the DEFINITION of OMGUS. He literally just said "I know I'm town, so because VE is targeting me, he's scum" and has fabricated some kind of fantasy to justify calling me such.
Marv is definitely my preference for lynch. He knows better. He's acting like he doesn't, but he does.
When I accused him before, I wasn't calling him scum because I was town. I'd said I had the perspective of 100% knowing I was town that others did not. I simply did not say he was scum because he was accusing me. Twisted my words.
On the day 1 lynch:
Realising he's not gonna get me through, he turns his attention to Zentor. Subsequently:
On June 24 2012 04:54 VisceraEyes wrote: risk do you think that scum only lurk? Because you're really only pushing people who aren't likely to push back. :/
Marv do your own meta research.
I'm also feeling strange about the ease of this lynch. I also don't want to lynch Zentor. Can we lynch either risk or prpl? maybe Marv?
This is where it all gets odd. He doesn't want to lynch Zentor, and lists 3 other people. Who doesn't he name? The other leading candidiate, rastaban. He is realistically the only alternative, but nothing. Compare - slOosh was trying really hard to get people to switch from Zentor to rastaban, but VE? nothing. Let's see if VE ever talks about rastaban:
On June 23 2012 08:26 VisceraEyes wrote:
@Snarfs Yeah, I'm null on rasta. He looks pretty townie to me too, but to be fair I've only skimmed the cases on him. I'll go read them in earnest and let you know what I think.
This is it. Nothing else. He never lets us know what he thinks of the alternative lynch candidate, despite promising to, and despite saying he didn't want to lynch Zentor. It's a half-assed, not-real attempt.
On June 24 2012 05:16 VisceraEyes wrote: Actually prpl, that post was good. I'm cool with a Zeph lynch if we can make that happen.
Except VE never tries to make ANYTHING happen. He says this and disappears.
I also feel like his pushing of prplhz is a sham. He came straight from LV where two townies pushed hard for a policy lynch on a player they disliked. He should know this isn't a scumtell. But it looks good to push someone on wanting a policy lynch like that, doesn't it?
Conclusion: All his scumhunting is a sham. He knows and states I'm an excellent scum player, but somehow then thinks I would come into this game as scum and play scummily. He twists my words. He never talks about rastaban despite promising to, despite saying he didn't want to lynch Zentor and rastaban being the main alternative. In fact he never pushes any alternative. Pushes prplhz because it's an easy thing to do.
I think VE is scum (or SK :D)
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Oh, and:
##Vote: VisceraEyes
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 26 2012 01:27 VisceraEyes wrote: Marvel's case boils down to...what? What is the main point you'd like me to answer for Marvel? Because it looks to me like a huge post just trying to justify voting for me. There's nothing scummy in there, there's nothing alignment indicative, it's all just a bunch of stuff that you're twisting to justify voting for me.
so yeah, if there's a specific problem you'd like me to answer for, feel free to clearly ask me while I'm around - if not, then you're obvious scum trying to appear contributory.
Not twisting anything. People will be able to see your behaviour around the lynch for themselves.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
It's not, he's sarcastically dismissing my case without addressing any of its points.
On June 23 2012 07:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, honestly. Marvel is much better than this. He knows that me targeting him if he's town does not automatically make me scum. This is literally the DEFINITION of OMGUS. He literally just said "I know I'm town, so because VE is targeting me, he's scum" and has fabricated some kind of fantasy to justify calling me such.
Marv is definitely my preference for lynch. He knows better. He's acting like he doesn't, but he does.
On June 26 2012 01:39 VisceraEyes wrote: Since Marvel has claimed scum by thinking I'm scum, everyone should be voting for Marvelosity. He clearly doesn't want to play, so let's oblige the poor chap shall we?
Hilarious stuff.
xsksc, I'd rather you read and commented my case rather than VE's trite responses to it.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
why don't you try actually commenting on my case, rastaban?
|
|
|
|