Okay that's a fair point. Constant pestering is bad. I'll revise it: Don't give other people the benefit of the doubt if they have weird meta changes.

Furerkip, I want to hear what you think of me. I mean, I want to hear almost anything out of you at this point, but that's a good enough starting point, isn't it? We haven't seen you in 2 days, and you ended the day with your vote on... VE. Overall you were profoundly, deeply unhelpful.

Where you at?

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 21:19 GMT

#356

Oh man, then shooting furerkip was a bad move on my part.

I'm the vigilante. I pushed for pandain's lynch after he claimed because I knew he wasn't. I didn't claim because of the potential RB. I shot furerkip.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 21:28 GMT

#362

On June 08 2012 06:23 VisceraEyes wrote:
I don't suppose you breadcrumbed that shit did you? Just to set my mind at ease...

Well, I didn't breadcrumb the shot. I figured I'd just say it during this phase when you can talk and people can't change their night actions.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 21:31 GMT

#363

Here's my role crumb:

On June 05 2012 08:11 Blazinghand wrote:
There's no need to get all moody about it. The point is, there are mechanics in this game to confuse cops other than miller.

get all [b][/b]moody about it

Moody = Mad Eye Moody from the Harry Potter series, whose catch phrase was "constant vigilance" = vigilante

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 21:59 GMT

#371

I don't like that we haven't heard from Hyaach in a day, and before that he's barely posted at all. He hasn't made any cases, except to say he's null on VE. He makes a vague case on pand:

On June 06 2012 22:45 Hyaach wrote:
Late to the party but did no one thought that Pand was fishing for information when he asked Masons to claim?
He could very likely be a SK as well but either way his scum.

The rest of it is bad excuses and unhelpful justification for his actions:

+ Show Spoiler +

On June 07 2012 06:47 Hyaach wrote:
Shouldn't you see how the lynch works out before you decide to pressure someone base? you FoS on someone other and random vote on me makes me think you wanna fish for information rather than pressure me given the number of lurkers at the time when you vote me ?

On June 07 2012 06:57 Hyaach wrote:
Its called time zone difference.

So I cannot not vote because I was not around when the case was pushed? I actually thought him to be a serial killer rather than most who thinks his mafia.
The flip do matters i tell you. You are saying like you know his scum/town before lynch. Time of vote matter but I agree its not applicable in my case because I was just not around when the case was pushed through.

On June 07 2012 07:00 Hyaach wrote:
I urge town to double read the case against me. It is just because I did not respond to a very shady vote on day one.

On June 07 2012 07:10 Hyaach wrote:
Not that good of a lynch but I believe it was still the best lynch last night.
Mainly because claiming vig on day one is the safest blue.
I believe Pandain was playing with the fact that townies are rather reluctant to lynch blues but burnt his finger doing so.

Along with the vaguest of pressures on Furerkip.

Hyaach is a guy who has failed to make any sort of case or contribute in any major way since the start of the game. He's no Furerkip in terms of inactivity, but I don't like it, and I don't like him.

I was thinking G_403 was scummy, but really he hasn't been interacting much with anyone but MrZ. This caught my eye though, near the end of D1:

On June 07 2012 03:02 ghost_403 wrote:
B) I don't like how this Pandain lynch is going along. I don't believe his claim, but I'm not convinced he's scum. He could simply be an idiot townie trying to draw mafia shots toward himself for whatever reason. I'm not comfortable lynching him today.

I'm actually not sure what I think about this. What we have here is G_403 basically calling exactly what's going to happen to pandain. He either had a great read or was scum. I guess my question is, G_403, where was the attempt to convince us that this was the case? You can't just plop your vote down on MrZ and bail and hope we all just follow you.

I don't like Katina's play this game. I mean, obviously I don't like the play that targets me, but there's some really suspect stuff imo. A lot of leaps in logic and mis-characterizations. I'm really unfamiliar with Katina's meta but check it:

On June 07 2012 07:16 Katina wrote:
He comes out of nowhere with this post because he knows that people love to kill him and/or check him night 1. This is an attempt to divert suspicion from him and to ignore any evidence suggesting otherwise because he made it known early on.

This is just wrong. VE gets a ton of suspicion since we know we can't check him...

On June 07 2012 07:16 Katina wrote:
VE is over emphasizing his Millerness. It reminds me of Bill Murray in jubjub where he got checked before the mafia converted him, and he just kept emphasizing that he was innocent cause he got checked.

VE has been posting a lot and never mentioned his millerness after that initial claim and some questions.

On June 07 2012 07:16 Katina wrote:
Also we should kill blazinghand.

._.

How much of this is just false? How much of it is misleading? Answer: yes. yes it is.

Hope to see tomorrow <3 where I will be pressuring these 3 if I'm alive.

No posts on furerkip because he's scum and will die like scum.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 22:00 GMT

#372

especially hyaach. ugh.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 22:02 GMT

#374

._. I was RBed

Well I look like shit now don't I

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 22:05 GMT

#375

So my theory is that either A) mafia has an RB which they used on me, and then either their target or their shooter got JKed, or B) I got JKed, blocking my shot and the mafia shot that was on me.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 22:06 GMT

#376

OH, or, alternatively, someone JKed Furerkip, who was both the mafia shooter and my target, stopping both shots.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 22:07 GMT

#377

Whatever. Ok so we all know Furerkip needs to die. Do I need to reiterate why?

##vote: Furerkip

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 23:48 GMT

#382

On June 08 2012 08:46 zelblade wrote:
Does rb stop mafia's night kill?

Since bh didn't get a rb notification (I am assuming this since he was speculating on a town jk), We either have a medic who doesn't know what he is doing, an offensive jail from a jk which might have led to the no kill (assuming hats how it works) or bh is lying about his claim. I don't think that the claim is fake, nor do I think that we have a dumb medic, so

##vote:furekip

Either way bh do you have your bullet or is it gone?

I got an rb notification, which is the same as I would have gotten if it were a jk.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 07 2012 23:55 GMT

#384

Oh yeah that's true! I was definitely either RBed or Jailed, then.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 08 2012 00:07 GMT

#386

Assuming he deigns to grace us with his presence.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 08 2012 00:46 GMT

#387

Didn't notice this before:

On June 08 2012 08:46 zelblade wrote:
Either way bh do you have your bullet or is it gone?

I don't have my bullet any more. It's gone.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 08 2012 01:14 GMT

#393

Yes clearly my sinister scum plan was to fakeclaim vigi then lie about whether or not I can shoot on the next night

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 08 2012 01:17 GMT

#396

On June 08 2012 10:16 MrZentor wrote:
Does anybody else find it suspicious that BOTH the mafia's shot and the supposed vigilante's shot got blocked?

It would be just as suspicious if there was only one flip with the daypost of furerkip.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 08 2012 01:19 GMT

#399

On June 08 2012 10:18 Katina wrote:

Show nested quote +

It's a good way to derail the thread and switch the focus from scumhunting though. You never asked the host though. If I read correctly zelblade was the one that did.

I didn't ask the host because I already knew. I responded to zelblade's question, then zelblade asked the host. If you read correctly you'd know this.

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 08 2012 01:23 GMT

#402

So Katina your only thought on Furerkip is

On June 08 2012 10:00 Katina wrote:
From the contents in furerkip's filter I don't think we should lynch him today. I would like to see more from furer before we decide to make him a lynch candidate.

Even though he hasn't spoken in days?

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 08 2012 01:25 GMT

#405

On June 08 2012 10:23 MrZentor wrote:

Show nested quote +

Yes, it would be. What's your point?

Your implication is that I'm the scum guy who sent in the kill, right, and I got blocked, and if not, I, scum, would have shot furerkip?

Blazinghand

United States25557 Posts

June 08 2012 01:30 GMT

#407

On June 08 2012 10:24 Katina wrote:
Which is why I would like to see more from him. As with the Pandain lynch. I'm not completely comfortable with furer's lynch and would rather see you or VE lynched instead.

I'd like to see more from furerkip too. And until I do, I won't unvote him.