Pick Your Poison Mafia - Page 4

On June 04 2012 05:30 Radfield wrote:
Oh yeah, no one should be voting yet. We've got our lynch lock on.

If you want to show you're voting for someone, just write your votes in this thread, but don't put them in the voting thread.

On June 04 2012 05:31 prplhz wrote:
Funny how Kurumi wants to lynch me because I didn't care about the lynch and Toadesstern wants to lynch me because I argued too furiously about it.

@Toadesstern You didn't read Navilus' filter from Resistance 2 did you? Really, just read the 5 first posts and you'll see where I'm coming from with the whole Navilus deal. Here you go. I don't expect you to come around (at least not on your own) but I'm going to try to make it hard for you not to.

Also, I'm not going to respond to your response 'cause I wouldn't achieve anything by it and I don't want to text wall this place up. Most of it is how you disagree with me and the stuff that I do and trying a little too hard to interpret it as scummy instead of keeping a neutral POV. It's really that simple and it never required a text wall from either of us to begin with.

On June 04 2012 01:57 Kurumi wrote:
##### Encrypted: decrypt with http://www.fourmilab.ch/javascrypt/
ZZZZZ CMVBW HPUWK SWBSQ MUNRS KVNSU WBDFH UWMTR VLUPF HUBHV AAVRI
BVLJM GGARH OFUWC GFLVN CDUIR KDVNP SDAXO DUAIJ TQALV XOHAW GXGCQ
LRBUD RNVUJ DQUES GOTAI CLMJS XCVPT LIQAB PRHAD XELUF HJSJU KKTJV
BGTUF KJLOH XRQDO SJLSA MWDHN GBGUH FKPAE FTEEO NTLQL BGNEA UVTIX
FQQUV ASWFZ YYYYY
##### End encrypted message

On June 04 2012 05:45 prplhz wrote:
Really Kurumi, you're just spamming the thread by now. I never promised any cases within a couple of hours. I have suspicions but I intend to see this day through before posting anything substantial. I might do it sooner though.

It would really work a lot better if you had the patience to wait until I was clearly not going to do what you though I needed to do if I was town. If I'm town and I make a case now you'll just say "Hah! It was only because I reminded you!" while if I'm scum you'll say "Hah! It was only because I reminded you!". You can only achieve something by actually being quiet for just one moment and then see if I do what I promised like townies would be prone to do or if I get lazy like scum would be prone to do.

Mafia is like quantum physics; you can't prod shit without also changing it and possibly rendering it completely useless.

On June 04 2012 06:08 Radfield wrote:
I'm fairly certain Toad is scum. Case incoming ~30-45. Hold on to your hats.

On June 04 2012 06:12 Radfield wrote:



I reread your filter is what changed my mind.

There was something funny going on with your posts though, and you voted Navillus real quick after defending him for a bit. I think Kurumi wrote something that swayed me a bit as well. I'm really not sure why I was leaning scummy on you right there, I even had you written down as PROB TOWN in my notes. I could go back and reread and tell you my thought process, but I really don't feel like it right now, though your question is a valid one.

I also don't really feel like writing about talismania, though I will at a later date. Right now I want to build my case.

On June 04 2012 19:29 Radfield wrote:
Also, who said anything about Kurumi being Town....

On June 05 2012 04:56 prplhz wrote:
@slOosh You are voting Toadesstern more so because of his defence than because of Radfield's case. You point out that he is focusing too much on the scumslip even though people aren't taking that seriously and that he is rambling about irrelevant stuff such as team balance.

I think these are poor reasons for voting Toadesstern.

Townies will explain their actions, and if the scumslip just requires more explanation than the rest then so be it. You seem to think that it's a scum tell that he didn't analyse the thread for what people were mostly angry with him about, and then address that the hardest. I would say that that would be a scummy thing to do. He addressed all points in Radfield's case, and it's not like the scumslip isn't convincing anybody, it's convinced Radfield, Kurumi, and you. The rambling about team balance is a bit weird but it looks genuine enough to me. Townies don't want to get lynched either.

Fact is that even if he is scum, it was a slip. He didn't intend on it himself. He even has a story about how he considered that very line several times and how something someone else said in another game convinced him about whatever. This looks quite townie to me. I think that if scum are worried about a line, then they just god damn delete it, problem solved. He obviously dwelt at that line for some time and yet he ended up writing it even though scum are usually very paranoid. They think everything they write is scummy because they're inherently biased because they know that they're scum!

So, do you really think that Toadesstern is scum just because he apparently addressed the scumslip a little harder than the rest of the points and because he started rambling a bit? What about everything else he did in this game, has that been scummy or is that null to you?

On June 05 2012 14:12 HiroPro wrote:


Are you really a vig, lol. Like really. Because then there's no point in voting "majority+1" and we should just do the mayoral election.