|
On May 21 2012 05:27 wherebugsgo wrote:
Whether or not advice is good has nothing to do with the alignment of a player, just the same as making a plan, regardless of how good it is, is generally not indicative of alignment.
If the advice makes sense, follow it. If not, don't. The question of "is this guy scum" has nothing to do with that.
I never said that it has anything to do with indicacating the alignment of the player,i said that general advice seems to be contributing but isnt really. and that its just as likely mister helpful is scum, etc.
|
And i bet tunkegs cute post is one that he had constantly been setting up for when he would role red and then have to change his meta which was apparently good for his scumhunting but not for town? wut?
|
EBWOP: Roll red, not role red, derp
|
Hey everyone, I agree with a policy VE lynch off the bat gogogo. ##Vote: VisceraEyes
|
Hey WBG, you're one of 2 vets in this game that I recognize from my last games here like half a year ago, and the other already has 2 votes on him. Also everyone knows that giving advice is scummy so ##Vote: Wherebugsgo
|
Hrmmm, Navillus, that's pretty interesting. Did Bugs give good advice or bad advice?
|
Does it matter?
No but seriously I'd say it's generally advice, I'm not sure that I agree on the DT advice but then if all the other stuff is him actually trying to help that probably is too and I'd defer to his judgement on that over my own.
|
EBWOP: *generally good advice*
|
I fail to see how giving advice as a means to begin the way is in any way scummy.
|
You guys are cute.
I disagree with a VE policy lynch for several reasons, not the least of which being that I'm VE and I don't want to die. Also, I'm town and want to lynch scum instead of town. Also, I think lynching a vet first is a bad idea anyway, for reasons which are stated at the beginning of every game ever.
If you guys want to continue on with a VE wagon because you think it's "funny" or whatever, then be my guest. I intend to find scum and get scum lynched.
|
On May 21 2012 05:59 Nova_Terra wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 05:27 wherebugsgo wrote:
Whether or not advice is good has nothing to do with the alignment of a player, just the same as making a plan, regardless of how good it is, is generally not indicative of alignment.
If the advice makes sense, follow it. If not, don't. The question of "is this guy scum" has nothing to do with that. I never said that it has anything to do with indicacating the alignment of the player,i said that general advice seems to be contributing but isnt really. and that its just as likely mister helpful is scum, etc.
Your style has so far been laced with an air of giving advice to the other players - in what way is Bugs' post giving advice any different from, say, you warning that "players trying to give advice could be scum"?
|
Hi guys
vanilla townie here
|
dont kill ve, he'll be dead by tomorrow if he's town or scum
Wbg I thought you lurked d1s
|
On May 21 2012 05:38 Acrofales wrote:
Also, if all I had were town games in my history, discrediting any meta-analysis off the bat seems like a pretty good idea for scum. If you thought your playstyle was working, why change it up?
of his last 3 games, he lost 2 of them, and was nearly mislynched in the other. I wouldn't define that as "his playstyle working". what kind of crappy misformulated discreditation is this?
On May 21 2012 05:30 Acrofales wrote:
Yo Tunkeg. Glad to see you got that first post out of the way. Always a bitch as scum. You wrote a wall of text which says jack diddly squat. Bugs posted some decent advice, Nova and I indicated who we're keeping eyes on. You just posted a load of nonsense about yourself that I for one am not interested in.
his first post had 50x the content you had. then you try and buddy to nova saying you two are "keeping eyes on people"; all you posted was a joke accusation on Mattchew.
On May 21 2012 07:23 Acrofales wrote:
Hrmmm, Navillus, that's pretty interesting. Did Bugs give good advice or bad advice?
Navilus also posted a semi joke accusation on bugs ("i only recognize 2 vets so i vote the one who has less votes")
Found scum. that was easy. you play exactly like forumite's scum: ask tons of questions, do diddly squat
##Vote: Acrofales
|
EBWOP: woops missed a line on my last quotation
On May 21 2012 07:23 Acrofales wrote:
Hrmmm, Navillus, that's pretty interesting. Did Bugs give good advice or bad advice?
Navilus also posted a semi joke accusation on bugs ("i only recognize 2 vets so i vote the one who has less votes") but you take it seriously for some reason. You're all like "hmm I'm taking this joke accusation seriously to see if it's an angle that I can use to accuse WBG later on". what a joke.
|
this game is proceeding boringly and slowly. we need moar people talking.
mattchew / mouldy jeb where you at?
|
On May 21 2012 12:00 EchelonTee wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 05:38 Acrofales wrote:
Also, if all I had were town games in my history, discrediting any meta-analysis off the bat seems like a pretty good idea for scum. If you thought your playstyle was working, why change it up? of his last 3 games, he lost 2 of them, and was nearly mislynched in the other. I wouldn't define that as "his playstyle working". what kind of crappy misformulated discreditation is this? Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 05:30 Acrofales wrote:
Yo Tunkeg. Glad to see you got that first post out of the way. Always a bitch as scum. You wrote a wall of text which says jack diddly squat. Bugs posted some decent advice, Nova and I indicated who we're keeping eyes on. You just posted a load of nonsense about yourself that I for one am not interested in. his first post had 50x the content you had. then you try and buddy to nova saying you two are "keeping eyes on people"; all you posted was a joke accusation on Mattchew. Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 07:23 Acrofales wrote:
Hrmmm, Navillus, that's pretty interesting. Did Bugs give good advice or bad advice? Navilus also posted a semi joke accusation on bugs ("i only recognize 2 vets so i vote the one who has less votes") Found scum. that was easy. you play exactly like forumite's scum: ask tons of questions, do diddly squat ##Vote: Acrofales
I'm inclined to agree with you here. Add to the fact that the last game I played with him as scum, he was almost caught right off the bat on day 1, only for us to change last minute. Seems to like playing scummy when he's scum. ##Vote: Acrofales
|
Wait, gotta unvote first.
##Unvote
##Vote: Acrofales
|
On May 21 2012 12:00 EchelonTee wrote:Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 05:38 Acrofales wrote:
Also, if all I had were town games in my history, discrediting any meta-analysis off the bat seems like a pretty good idea for scum. If you thought your playstyle was working, why change it up? of his last 3 games, he lost 2 of them, and was nearly mislynched in the other. I wouldn't define that as "his playstyle working". what kind of crappy misformulated discreditation is this? Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 05:30 Acrofales wrote:
Yo Tunkeg. Glad to see you got that first post out of the way. Always a bitch as scum. You wrote a wall of text which says jack diddly squat. Bugs posted some decent advice, Nova and I indicated who we're keeping eyes on. You just posted a load of nonsense about yourself that I for one am not interested in. his first post had 50x the content you had. then you try and buddy to nova saying you two are "keeping eyes on people"; all you posted was a joke accusation on Mattchew. Show nested quote +On May 21 2012 07:23 Acrofales wrote:
Hrmmm, Navillus, that's pretty interesting. Did Bugs give good advice or bad advice? Navilus also posted a semi joke accusation on bugs ("i only recognize 2 vets so i vote the one who has less votes") Found scum. that was easy. you play exactly like forumite's scum: ask tons of questions, do diddly squat ##Vote: Acrofales
1. I haven't actually read Tunkeg's games. All I read was his post in which he said he thought it was working well. If he thinks it was working to hunt scum, then why change?
2. Trolololol? THAT is content according to you? Let me summarize his post:
Hi, I'm Tunkeg. I'm gonna play differently from my previous games, so don't bother reading my meta.
3. If that is buddying with Nova and Bugs, then what you're doing is buddying with Navilus and Tunkeg. Clearly scum. I should disagree with EVERYTHING said and done in the thread ever, or am scum, because buddying. /facepalm
So, in closing, your case is horrible and I am only responding because I agree with you that this game is moving terribly slowly and needs something to happen.
|
gimme like 2 seconds, playing dota 2
you ignored my points against you just saying
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
