|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 23 2012 01:20 Mattchew wrote:EBWOP: Show nested quote +On May 23 2012 01:01 Nova_Terra should have wrote: Mouldy; you pointed out some serious wtf stuff. I'm leaning scummy on him. Zealos I think is just awful town. I don't think a scum could play like that. Hurts me inside "Your strategy is marvelous. I've just made a few minor adjustments." —Veris, watcher of Indi Keep
What in particular makes you lean town on one, scum the other?
|
On May 22 2012 23:15 Tunkeg wrote: Questions
@acid How do you think WBG, VE and Katina have played thus far? They are all in on a NT case, what do you read from this?
Nothing much to say. They make a good case against NT, but I'm tempted to agree with VE when he says that it feels too easy.
|
Much better guys.
I'm sad that Bugs didn't answer my question, but honestly not surprised. Someone asked what I meant about "balance"...I was referring to the fact that because I'm town, Bugs has to be scum (based on the playerlist) - an antiquated system of balance that used to be pretty common on TL. With the huge flux of players though, they've probably done away with it.
I'm reading a couple of filters, and I'll post thoughts in just a couple minutes.
|
On May 23 2012 01:29 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2012 01:20 Mattchew wrote:EBWOP: On May 23 2012 01:01 Nova_Terra should have wrote: Mouldy; you pointed out some serious wtf stuff. I'm leaning scummy on him. Zealos I think is just awful town. I don't think a scum could play like that. Hurts me inside "Your strategy is marvelous. I've just made a few minor adjustments." —Veris, watcher of Indi Keep What in particular makes you lean town on one, scum the other?
Zealos + Show Spoiler +On May 22 2012 23:15 Zealos wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2012 23:09 Mattchew wrote:On May 22 2012 22:41 Mouldy Jeb wrote: yeah i had a feeling (OOOH AAAH) that that wasn't going to be understood, to explain, originally he voted for me for a reason he has yet to conger up then because of that random vote i felt that he was having a random vote so i voted for him. as a result of this he is trying to incriminate me by the whole "it reeks of terror and chaos shit"~~short and simple i don't like him i think he's scum trying to save his ass. "In a town shaped by the subtle machinations and political intrigue of its guilds, it's reassuring to see a goblin waving his torch and screaming about some nonsense or other." —Agrus Kos Lol. Gotta say I agree, I just don't understand what he's talking about o.O Terrible town, or terrible mafia imo. ##vote: MouldyJeb On May 22 2012 21:30 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2012 21:22 zelblade wrote:On May 22 2012 21:08 marvellosity wrote:On May 22 2012 19:32 zelblade wrote:Also marv Hey marv who are you suspicious of at this point besides mattchew? Can you also clearly state why you think nova is town based off meta alone? Because I cant see it being similar. How is it different from LIV? Quite a few posts but generally not a lot of content, no? For now I'm going to answer 'who I'm suspicious of' as 'who I'd like to be dead'. So other than Matt, Nova, Acid, and to a lesser extent Jeb. So you think nova is town yet you want to kill him? I wouldn't mind him dead. I just came from playing scum in LIV where 3/5 of my team were mod-killed and we still scored a convincing victory with the entire fucking town voting with me to kill another townie at LYLO, making a total of 6 consecutive townie mislynches and 0 scum lynches. Why? Because useless townies are useless and make easy lynch bait. Ideally I'd want someone to shoot Nova tonight. "Um . . . oh . . . what was I saying?" —Reveka, wizard savant
Mouldy Jeb + Show Spoiler +On May 21 2012 18:37 Mouldy Jeb wrote: hi- now my presence is known. saying "get rid of a veteran" indicates that you are worried that an experienced Mafia player will either weasel you out~ if your mafia or kill you if you are not so due to this rash decision to get rid of competition so on that note #vote:Nova_Terra On May 21 2012 20:54 Mouldy Jeb wrote:tera~ this game is full of people jumping to conclusions so don't get a bit pissed On May 22 2012 07:59 Mouldy Jeb wrote: your doubts deceive you my friend i am indeed a noob but i never said i was voting for mattchew lol i mean i was simply stating that my indecision doesn't substantiate a reason for me to be voted for.
On May 22 2012 22:22 Mouldy Jeb wrote: early game i suspected nova because of rash decision making from his part and myself assuming the worst, matchew voting for me which wasn't given a viable explanation so i would be inclined to vote for matchew due to his random train of thought against others ## vote:mattchew
Some roads are paved with bad intentions.
|
marvellosity, I would like you to explain something.
At the start of the day, a couple players made a case against NT, and you (like Acrofales before you, whom you are replacing) jumped in to defend him, twice.
As soon as I called you on buddying with NT, you included him in a list of people you'd like to see dead, and justified that with something about him being a useless townie.
Now, to quote your own words :
On May 22 2012 02:46 marvellosity wrote: I don't think I'd agree to a Nova lynch unless something very particular came up. Atm he's playing to his not-very-useful town meta rather than his post-extensively scum meta
What is the particular something that came up? What did NT do exactly that prompted you to change your opinion to this :
On May 22 2012 21:30 marvellosity wrote: Why? Because useless townies are useless and make easy lynch bait. Ideally I'd want someone to shoot Nova tonight.
You're using the same argument in both cases, but resulting in different conclusions, and that swift reversal came mere minutes after being accused of buddying.
Seems to me like you're trying to distance yourself from NT now that prospects are looking grim. If that's not the case and you truly had an epiphany, please quote the exact post from NT that made you change your mind.
|
On May 23 2012 01:54 Acid~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 22 2012 23:15 Tunkeg wrote: Questions
@acid How do you think WBG, VE and Katina have played thus far? They are all in on a NT case, what do you read from this?
Nothing much to say. They make a good case against NT, but I'm tempted to agree with VE when he says that it feels too easy. "What is worse than a wolf in sheep's clothing?" —Wolfhunter's riddle
|
On May 23 2012 02:09 Acid~ wrote:marvellosity, I would like you to explain something. At the start of the day, a couple players made a case against NT, and you (like Acrofales before you, whom you are replacing) jumped in to defend him, twice. As soon as I called you on buddying with NT, you included him in a list of people you'd like to see dead, and justified that with something about him being a useless townie. Now, to quote your own words : Show nested quote +On May 22 2012 02:46 marvellosity wrote: I don't think I'd agree to a Nova lynch unless something very particular came up. Atm he's playing to his not-very-useful town meta rather than his post-extensively scum meta What is the particular something that came up? What did NT do exactly that prompted you to change your opinion to this : Show nested quote +On May 22 2012 21:30 marvellosity wrote: Why? Because useless townies are useless and make easy lynch bait. Ideally I'd want someone to shoot Nova tonight.
You're using the same argument in both cases, but resulting in different conclusions, and that swift reversal came mere minutes after being accused of buddying. Seems to me like you're trying to distance yourself from NT now that prospects are looking grim. If that's not the case and you truly had an epiphany, please quote the exact post from NT that made you change your mind.
*slow, punctuated claps crecendo into standing ovation*
##Unvote: Nova_Terra ##Vote: marvellosity
|
On May 23 2012 02:11 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2012 01:54 Acid~ wrote:On May 22 2012 23:15 Tunkeg wrote: Questions
@acid How do you think WBG, VE and Katina have played thus far? They are all in on a NT case, what do you read from this?
Nothing much to say. They make a good case against NT, but I'm tempted to agree with VE when he says that it feels too easy. "What is worse than a wolf in sheep's clothing?" —Wolfhunter's riddle
In a strange twist of fate, one of the most annoying creatures in the multiverse was brought to the place where it could cause the most damage.
|
On May 23 2012 02:25 Acid~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2012 02:11 Mattchew wrote:On May 23 2012 01:54 Acid~ wrote:On May 22 2012 23:15 Tunkeg wrote: Questions
@acid How do you think WBG, VE and Katina have played thus far? They are all in on a NT case, what do you read from this?
Nothing much to say. They make a good case against NT, but I'm tempted to agree with VE when he says that it feels too easy. "What is worse than a wolf in sheep's clothing?" —Wolfhunter's riddle In a strange twist of fate, one of the most annoying creatures in the multiverse was brought to the place where it could cause the most damage. "You're trespassing in my reality. Ask permission next time." —Simun the Quiet
|
I already pointed out why the meta analysis was faulty if that's what you mean, but I am unsure about the possibility of him doing that as a townie mistake hence this ##Unvote
|
Hey VE can you stop acting helpful by purely asking people questions, sheeping votes and suggesting scum based on non game related things and post some decent case with whatever you've learned with your questioning?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 23 2012 02:09 Acid~ wrote:marvellosity, I would like you to explain something. At the start of the day, a couple players made a case against NT, and you (like Acrofales before you, whom you are replacing) jumped in to defend him, twice. As soon as I called you on buddying with NT, you included him in a list of people you'd like to see dead, and justified that with something about him being a useless townie. Now, to quote your own words : Show nested quote +On May 22 2012 02:46 marvellosity wrote: I don't think I'd agree to a Nova lynch unless something very particular came up. Atm he's playing to his not-very-useful town meta rather than his post-extensively scum meta What is the particular something that came up? What did NT do exactly that prompted you to change your opinion to this : Show nested quote +On May 22 2012 21:30 marvellosity wrote: Why? Because useless townies are useless and make easy lynch bait. Ideally I'd want someone to shoot Nova tonight.
You're using the same argument in both cases, but resulting in different conclusions, and that swift reversal came mere minutes after being accused of buddying. Seems to me like you're trying to distance yourself from NT now that prospects are looking grim. If that's not the case and you truly had an epiphany, please quote the exact post from NT that made you change your mind.
Are you not capable of working out the difference between lynching someone and vig shotting them?
VE: I am dissapoint.
Having pressured Matt to try to get him to post normally (to no avail) I am now trying to lynch scum. This is in no way incompatible with wanting to see bad townies shot at night. Good god.
|
Hey, Nova, I'm gonna keep playing the way I'm playing. If you don't like it, you should probably vote to remove me...but I'll warn you that I won't go quietly and you're going to find yourself very lonely on a VE wagon.
The time for cases is almost upon us, you won't rush me into posting something half-assed just to appease you. How about instead of worrying about me posting a case, you do something productive other than prodding me? Don't worry about me.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
Alright, I'm going out for a chess match, and I should be back before deadline. If for some retarded reason I get lynched and VE is on the wagon at close, take a good hard look at him.
|
marvel: Meh - get used to it. I'm a giant wad of potential disappointment. How about this: you're still convinced Nova is town but you want a vig to waste their shot on him at night. In what way is that different from them being lynched? If he's town, it's still a loss for town (vig wasted his shot, lose a townie regardless of how "bad"), so what is the difference between lynching him and shooting him?
|
Promises, Promises
On May 22 2012 07:10 Mouldy Jeb wrote: mattchew, just because im considering that my vote may have been based on an ill judgement doesn't mean im scum just means ill have to wait till tomorrow to consolidate all the evidence from each persons posts to conjure up a decision on who to vote for.
Early on, Mouldy Jeb promises that he's going to make an analysis and vote the next day. But that's not actually what he does. Instead he votes for Mattchew. Not because Mattchew's posting style is unclear or disruptive for town (like some other people did). No, instead Mouldy Jeb votes for Mattchew because Mattchew VOTED FOR HIM.
I Just Want to Apologize
On May 21 2012 21:39 Mouldy Jeb wrote: an apt point, i was making a split second judgement I'm not saying I'm against you I'm just stating at that time you seemed to have the most random vote based only on the fact he was a vet. also my vote isn't by far final
On May 22 2012 22:15 Mouldy Jeb wrote: also not lurking just had school my mistake ill be reading over everything...
On May 23 2012 00:31 Mouldy Jeb wrote: this is my first game :S I never second read and my silly posts are getting me lynched I'm vanilla townie waste of a lynch but i cant argue with solid reasoning.
Throughout his posts, Mouldy Jeb maintains an apologetic, wishy-washy tone. He avoids taking responsibility for his votes, is constantly trying to provide excuses for his behavior, and ultimately doesn't give any actual reads, cases, or scumhunting.
##Vote Mouldy Jeb
|
Acid: You say that you suspect marvel because he initially defended N_T, and then tried to distance himself. But that would would mean that you think they are both mafia. So then, why is it that you feel that the case on N_T is "too easy", but Marvel is a good candidate to lynch?
|
Hiro why do you find him scum instead of bad townie?
|
that's 5 votes for me so far then seems like a gg is on the horizon
|
On May 23 2012 02:50 VisceraEyes wrote: Hey, Nova, I'm gonna keep playing the way I'm playing. If you don't like it, you should probably vote to remove me...but I'll warn you that I won't go quietly and you're going to find yourself very lonely on a VE wagon.
The time for cases is almost upon us, you won't rush me into posting something half-assed just to appease you. How about instead of worrying about me posting a case, you do something productive other than prodding me? Don't worry about me. If you dont end up being more useful then this my vote will certainly be going towards you, dont worryl.
|
|
|
|