Magic: The Gathering Mini Mafia - Page 15
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Mouldy Jeb
United Kingdom37 Posts
| ||
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
On May 22 2012 22:31 Mouldy Jeb wrote: mhhhmm... whereas your accusation of me earlier was unjustified, you are now using my accusation of you due to your unjustified accusation to change the minds of others into thinking i am scum thank you for planting the seed of doubt in peoples minds, you are just making me more suspicious of you as time goes by. wut? | ||
Mouldy Jeb
United Kingdom37 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 21 2012 18:37 Mouldy Jeb wrote: hi- now my presence is known. saying "get rid of a veteran" indicates that you are worried that an experienced Mafia player will either weasel you out~ if your mafia or kill you if you are not so due to this rash decision to get rid of competition so on that note #vote:Nova_Terra I don't understand this. An experienced mafia player would kill nova as a prime target? Unlikely. On May 21 2012 20:54 Mouldy Jeb wrote: tera~ this game is full of people jumping to conclusions so don't get a bit pissed ![]() This implies that his previous post was 'jumping to conclusions'. Basically admitting his last post was rubbish. On May 21 2012 21:39 Mouldy Jeb wrote: an apt point, i was making a split second judgement I'm not saying I'm against you I'm just stating at that time you seemed to have the most random vote based only on the fact he was a vet. also my vote isn't by far final He's voting for him, but he's not against him? A final sentence indicating he's happy to back down from his vote. Then why make it? Just because other people are doing so? On May 22 2012 07:10 Mouldy Jeb wrote: mattchew, just because im considering that my vote may have been based on an ill judgement doesn't mean im scum just means ill have to wait till tomorrow to consolidate all the evidence from each persons posts to conjure up a decision on who to vote for. Ok, we're gonna have evidence consolidated from each person's post leading to a reasoned vote. Glad to hear it. On May 22 2012 22:22 Mouldy Jeb wrote: early game i suspected nova because of rash decision making from his part and myself assuming the worst, matchew voting for me which wasn't given a viable explanation so i would be inclined to vote for matchew due to his random train of thought against others ## vote:mattchew Gonna have to disagree with Mouldy on what consolidated evidence means I think. "inclined" to vote based on "random train of thought against others" - what does this even mean? It rather seems he's jumping on an easy wagon that's already started, because he's been voted against by said player, with a nonsensical reason. On May 22 2012 22:41 Mouldy Jeb wrote: yeah i had a feeling (OOOH AAAH) that that wasn't going to be understood, to explain, originally he voted for me for a reason he has yet to conger up then because of that random vote i felt that he was having a random vote so i voted for him. as a result of this he is trying to incriminate me by the whole "it reeks of terror and chaos shit"~~short and simple i don't like him i think he's scum trying to save his ass. ??? Overall - votes for Nova and admits it wasn't a proper vote, wishy washy about what the vote meant - basically his posts are just setting himself up to back down from the vote on Nova. A promise of consolidated evidence instead followed by a vote with a barely understandable explanation. Also going back to my earlier posts, he is hard to understand and does not post his thoughts clearly (well, actually he seems not to have clear thoughts anyway). At this time I would prefer a Jebjeb lynch. His posting both seems scummy while at the same time hard to understand. ##Unvote: Mattchew ##Vote: MouldyJeb | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On May 22 2012 22:41 Mouldy Jeb wrote: yeah i had a feeling (OOOH AAAH) that that wasn't going to be understood, to explain, originally he voted for me for a reason he has yet to conger up then because of that random vote i felt that he was having a random vote so i voted for him. as a result of this he is trying to incriminate me by the whole "it reeks of terror and chaos shit"~~short and simple i don't like him i think he's scum trying to save his ass. "In a town shaped by the subtle machinations and political intrigue of its guilds, it's reassuring to see a goblin waving his torch and screaming about some nonsense or other." —Agrus Kos On May 22 2012 15:34 wherebugsgo wrote: Katina, for the third time: how confident are you that nova is scum? On May 22 2012 17:36 VisceraEyes wrote: If I haven't taken control yet, then it's not about that time. Patience is a virtue. Night TL. The bigger they are, the harder they avoid work. | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On May 22 2012 23:01 marvellosity wrote: + Show Spoiler + Just had a good go over Mouldy and I think he might actually be a pretty good lynch. On May 21 2012 18:37 Mouldy Jeb wrote: hi- now my presence is known. saying "get rid of a veteran" indicates that you are worried that an experienced Mafia player will either weasel you out~ if your mafia or kill you if you are not so due to this rash decision to get rid of competition so on that note #vote:Nova_Terra I don't understand this. An experienced mafia player would kill nova as a prime target? Unlikely. On May 21 2012 20:54 Mouldy Jeb wrote: tera~ this game is full of people jumping to conclusions so don't get a bit pissed ![]() This implies that his previous post was 'jumping to conclusions'. Basically admitting his last post was rubbish. On May 21 2012 21:39 Mouldy Jeb wrote: an apt point, i was making a split second judgement I'm not saying I'm against you I'm just stating at that time you seemed to have the most random vote based only on the fact he was a vet. also my vote isn't by far final He's voting for him, but he's not against him? A final sentence indicating he's happy to back down from his vote. Then why make it? Just because other people are doing so? On May 22 2012 07:10 Mouldy Jeb wrote: mattchew, just because im considering that my vote may have been based on an ill judgement doesn't mean im scum just means ill have to wait till tomorrow to consolidate all the evidence from each persons posts to conjure up a decision on who to vote for. Ok, we're gonna have evidence consolidated from each person's post leading to a reasoned vote. Glad to hear it. On May 22 2012 22:22 Mouldy Jeb wrote: early game i suspected nova because of rash decision making from his part and myself assuming the worst, matchew voting for me which wasn't given a viable explanation so i would be inclined to vote for matchew due to his random train of thought against others ## vote:mattchew Gonna have to disagree with Mouldy on what consolidated evidence means I think. "inclined" to vote based on "random train of thought against others" - what does this even mean? It rather seems he's jumping on an easy wagon that's already started, because he's been voted against by said player, with a nonsensical reason. On May 22 2012 22:41 Mouldy Jeb wrote: yeah i had a feeling (OOOH AAAH) that that wasn't going to be understood, to explain, originally he voted for me for a reason he has yet to conger up then because of that random vote i felt that he was having a random vote so i voted for him. as a result of this he is trying to incriminate me by the whole "it reeks of terror and chaos shit"~~short and simple i don't like him i think he's scum trying to save his ass. ??? Overall - votes for Nova and admits it wasn't a proper vote, wishy washy about what the vote meant - basically his posts are just setting himself up to back down from the vote on Nova. A promise of consolidated evidence instead followed by a vote with a barely understandable explanation. Also going back to my earlier posts, he is hard to understand and does not post his thoughts clearly (well, actually he seems not to have clear thoughts anyway). At this time I would prefer a Jebjeb lynch. His posting both seems scummy while at the same time hard to understand. ##Unvote: Mattchew ##Vote: MouldyJeb "We plant the seeds of doubt to harvest the crop of wisdom." | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
On May 22 2012 23:09 Mattchew wrote: "In a town shaped by the subtle machinations and political intrigue of its guilds, it's reassuring to see a goblin waving his torch and screaming about some nonsense or other." —Agrus Kos Lol. Gotta say I agree, I just don't understand what he's talking about o.O Terrible town, or terrible mafia imo. ##vote: MouldyJeb | ||
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
@ET: Why do you want acid, jeb or katina lynched? Give me some reasons. On May 22 2012 14:18 EchelonTee wrote: acid, jeb, katina, or no lynch i think one of those should happen @VE: Please elaborate on why sharing your reads with Bugs is bad for balance reasons. If you are town why wouldn't you do anything in your power to win the game regardless of what you think is balanced or not? On May 22 2012 16:27 VisceraEyes wrote: Bugs, I loathe to talk about my reads with you for balance reasons, but everyone else has forsaken us. How confident are YOU that Nova is scum? I feel like he went limp kinda quick, but aside from that has at least quit posting scummily. Whether that's just because he's quit posting is obviously up for debate. Combined with the fact that he's got so many people going "Meta him bro" and the fact that he's all "Meta me bro" and it just looks really bad. But something doesn't feel right - like, he seems like TOO easy a target, ya know? @HiroPro: Who is your number one scumread and why? If it is me, who is the next biggest and why? @zelbade Care to answer the same question as I asked HiroPro? @acid How do you think WBG, VE and Katina have played thus far? They are all in on a NT case, what do you read from this? | ||
Mouldy Jeb
United Kingdom37 Posts
| ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
![]() 7 hours and 30 minutes to go: Navillus (0): Wherebugsgo (0): VisceraEyes (0): Froggynoddy (1): Nova_Terra Katina (1): froggynoddy Mattchew (3): Tunkeg, Mouldy Jeb, Navillus, Nova_Terra (3): VisceraEyes, wherebugsgo, Katina Mouldy Jeb (3): Mattchew, Marvellosity, Zealos Not voted yet (2): HiroPro, Zelblade With the current votes, Nova_Terra would be lynched for reaching 3 votes first. Once again, tell me if I've made a mistake in the count. HiroPro and Zelblade still need to vote before the deadline, or they will be modkilled. | ||
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
Care to answer the same question (strongest scumread) as I asked HiroPro?[quote] My suspicions currently are rather weak. My strongest scumread if you would call it that would be zealos, who has been quick to jump on every wagon (VE, Marv, and now mouldy jeb). Whilst sheeping isnt neccessarily a scumtell, I dont like how jumpy his vote has been, going from person to person. I would want to lynch him, but I kind of need to go and sleep soon and introducing a new candidate at this point will probably result in a no-lynch which I would rather avoid. | ||
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
On May 22 2012 23:51 zelblade wrote: @zelbadeCare to answer the same question (strongest scumread) as I asked HiroPro? My suspicions currently are rather weak. My strongest scumread if you would call it that would be zealos, who has been quick to jump on every wagon (VE, Marv, and now mouldy jeb). Whilst sheeping isnt neccessarily a scumtell, I dont like how jumpy his vote has been, going from person to person. I would want to lynch him, but I kind of need to go and sleep soon and introducing a new candidate at this point will probably result in a no-lynch which I would rather avoid. You seriously think that my vote on VE was serious? :O Also, I have given perfectly valid reasoning for my change of heart on Acro/Marv. I am still suspicious of him, but it wouldn't be fair to vote him as a new player in the game, as he can't explain why Acro said what he said. The vote on mouldy seems pretty reasonable at this point, considering his posting. I don't understand what the problem is with changing your vote as the day goes by, as new things happen. Maybe I should wait till later in the day to make my first vote, so I avoid changing it over and over, but eh. I don't plan on changing my vote unless something pretty major were to change my mind. | ||
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
| ||
Zealos
United Kingdom3571 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On May 22 2012 23:15 Zealos wrote: Lol. Gotta say I agree, I just don't understand what he's talking about o.O Terrible town, or terrible mafia imo. ##vote: MouldyJeb Do you not have an opinion which? And presuming you do, why? | ||
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
Eh I just realised its pluarity lynch lol. I am considering if I should dump my vote on zealos and see if it gains any traction or onto one of the three leading candidates. Kind of a hard decision since I wouldnt mind all of them dying. Mattchew is still being a pain in the ass, though his posts are starting to get understandable, and he actually has more content than say, mouldy jeb. Probably not the best lynch today, think hes town. I still think nova is scummy. But mouldy more so. Agree with marv's case generally. ##vote: Mouldy Jeb Also I am going to sleep soon (school) so I probably cant change my vote (deadline sucks for me as usual -_-). | ||
| ||