EPTBeyond that WBG is suspicious to me, his posts are just not particularly contributory, his only real substance is his attack on NT who really was just the easy person to accuse at that point, after that there are just some questions and pointless discussion, no real reads or pushing people even as he comments on the lurking.
Magic: The Gathering Mini Mafia - Page 13
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
Beyond that WBG is suspicious to me, his posts are just not particularly contributory, his only real substance is his attack on NT who really was just the easy person to accuse at that point, after that there are just some questions and pointless discussion, no real reads or pushing people even as he comments on the lurking. | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
How confident are YOU that Nova is scum? I feel like he went limp kinda quick, but aside from that has at least quit posting scummily. Whether that's just because he's quit posting is obviously up for debate. Combined with the fact that he's got so many people going "Meta him bro" and the fact that he's all "Meta me bro" and it just looks really bad. But something doesn't feel right - like, he seems like TOO easy a target, ya know? | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On May 22 2012 14:16 EchelonTee wrote: so who are we going to lynch? nothing's organized. I'd try to organize things but that never turns out well lmao VE, this is about the time where you take control and stuff | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Patience is a virtue. Night TL. | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
I hate people who post with self-imposed restrictions. Of course this doesnt apply when people are actually able to remain clear - Foolishness in Aperture for instance. However, when it gets plain irritating and difficult to infer (maybe its bad reading comprehension but w/e) its a complete pain in the ass. What this obviously means is that I dont like Mattchew and want to lynch him. Yes its a policy lynch but I dont care. Nova's posting is horrible, I agree. So he votes VE because VE is supposedly a bitch to play with and because hes a vet. As pointed out, terribad logic. But of course its a first vote, and its day one, probable joke vote, so lets just let that slide. A little more of bad logic on the Tunkeg point - if you really believe people are going to follow you reads AFTER they mislynch you for being disruptive.... okay. And town doesnt neccessarily have to be "sure" unless you are a mafia god/hacker who never doubts his reads. The philospohy of "Guilty until proven innocent" is useful but that doesnt mean that you can lynch everyone day 1 because you feel they havent proved their innocence day 1 enough wtf. Since I dont feel like going through the rest of it ill stop here. I agree with VE that this lynch just seems so... easy? His actions are pretty disruptive though, and Im fine with killing him for the continious pushing of bad logic. Im fine with either of this two today | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 10:18 VisceraEyes wrote: Attn: Zelblade, Acid and MouldyJeb It has come to my attention that you signed up for a game only to post one time and then disappear for half a day. In keeping with my meta, I'm in favor of lynching lurkers if no scummy candidate presents himself, so consider this my final warning. I will not hesitate to vote to have you lynched today, as all three of you have exhibited at least tertiary interest in this game since it has started and all three of you are now absent. I find this to be far scummier than Nova's posting (who my vote is on now). I'm here (just on a different time zone). The questions I wanted to ask have been asked and answered by other people. I want to read the thread one more time before voting. | ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
On May 22 2012 10:24 EchelonTee wrote: Of those three I would most support Acid dying, just chiming in . Why? Because of all the lurkers, I'm the only one who posted content? Did I finger one of your pals in my suspicions? | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
| ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
| ||
|
Acid~
Thailand442 Posts
##Vote marvellosity | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
| ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
On May 22 2012 16:27 VisceraEyes wrote: Bugs, I loathe to talk about my reads with you for balance reasons, but everyone else has forsaken us. How confident are YOU that Nova is scum? I feel like he went limp kinda quick, but aside from that has at least quit posting scummily. Whether that's just because he's quit posting is obviously up for debate. Combined with the fact that he's got so many people going "Meta him bro" and the fact that he's all "Meta me bro" and it just looks really bad. But something doesn't feel right - like, he seems like TOO easy a target, ya know? I quit posting "scummily" because i was asleep, i'll be posting a bunch again in just a few hours, dont worry | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
On May 22 2012 17:44 zelblade wrote: About my lack of activity: I was quite busy yesterday. I'll probably be more active today. I hate people who post with self-imposed restrictions. Of course this doesnt apply when people are actually able to remain clear - Foolishness in Aperture for instance. However, when it gets plain irritating and difficult to infer (maybe its bad reading comprehension but w/e) its a complete pain in the ass. What this obviously means is that I dont like Mattchew and want to lynch him. Yes its a policy lynch but I dont care. Nova's posting is horrible, I agree. So he votes VE because VE is supposedly a bitch to play with and because hes a vet. As pointed out, terribad logic. But of course its a first vote, and its day one, probable joke vote, so lets just let that slide. A little more of bad logic on the Tunkeg point - if you really believe people are going to follow you reads AFTER they mislynch you for being disruptive.... okay. And town doesnt neccessarily have to be "sure" unless you are a mafia god/hacker who never doubts his reads. The philospohy of "Guilty until proven innocent" is useful but that doesnt mean that you can lynch everyone day 1 because you feel they havent proved their innocence day 1 enough wtf. Since I dont feel like going through the rest of it ill stop here. I agree with VE that this lynch just seems so... easy? His actions are pretty disruptive though, and Im fine with killing him for the continious pushing of bad logic. Im fine with either of this two today Did you just say you have a problem with being open to lynching many people on day 1? after saying that you would let a vote on VE slide because its day 1? Whatever you think bro I never said i was open to lynching everyone, please make correct judgements | ||
|
Tunkeg
Norway1235 Posts
- He lurked through the entire start of the game. - When he bothered to post it was all trollposts. - I see his play as totally anti-town. And I can't see a reason to why a townie would behave this way, unless they don't care about the game at all. Am I sold on the fact that he is scum. Not necessarily. But together with NT and Zealos he is the one I have the scummiest feeling about. The difference between Mattchew and these guys is that they are actually posting thing that you can analyse, and this can either strengthen the suspicioun on them or lessen it. For Mattchew he will probably keep this up the entire game, and whether town or scum really mess up the scumhunting environment. So I want to lynch Mattchew because he is as likely to be scum as the other two, but losing him if he is town is far better than losing the other two if they are town. There is one arguement for not lynching him though, and that is: Would really scum draw this much attention to themself? Most likely not, but in TL Mafia where disruptive players never get lynched it would be a viable strategy. ##Vote Mattchew | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
| ||
