|
On June 04 2012 08:15 EchelonTee wrote: wbg/toad/MZ, pick up yo activity bros. We already lost a bunch of our buddies; they're going to be firing into us littler men soon, so you better continue to show your townieness.
don't tell me what to do
|
On June 03 2012 07:23 jaj22 wrote: I checked up a couple of older games and mayoral candidates were expected to submit their lynch choice by the deadline, although BC managed to dodge that by quarter of an hour in L.
Worth a try:
By what time were mayoral candidates expected to submit their lynch choice?
By D1 deadline. Just like voting, changes after deadline are not considered.
|
Kenpachi, reading through your filter again I saw that you fos me. Can you post some things I can try to defend against if you still find me scummy? I'll be out the rest of tonight, but I will respond as soon as I can.
|
On June 04 2012 12:57 papapanda wrote: Kenpachi, reading through your filter again I saw that you fos me. Can you post some things I can try to defend against if you still find me scummy? I'll be out the rest of tonight, but I will respond as soon as I can.
based on this post I'm going to assume you are scum and that kenpachi is town.
Thanks for making it that easy.
|
On June 02 2012 10:31 Manason wrote: ##Vote Kitaman
I will post a case later.
liar
|
On June 04 2012 10:53 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 08:15 EchelonTee wrote: wbg/toad/MZ, pick up yo activity bros. We already lost a bunch of our buddies; they're going to be firing into us littler men soon, so you better continue to show your townieness. don't tell me what to do ok
|
Manason, Papa, Maju, Kita
Could that be all 4? I'm going to dig into them right now...
|
On June 04 2012 10:38 Probulous wrote:Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 15:13 MajuGarzett wrote: ##Vote:VisceraEyes
MZ's case contained some valid points and that breadcrumb makes absolutely no sense. A lynch of VE would also be much more informative than the lynch of gambit or zealos. Lynches on Kita and Hyaach are to me less well substantiated as well as unlikely to materialise. Maju what is this? You hardly mentioned VE before this post and then suddenly he gets your vote? You don't even wholeheartedly agree with MZ's case rather it just has some valid points? You also give youself a nice excuse not to vote for either Zealos or Gambit. As far as a I can tell from your filter you thought VE was scum because MZ said so and you didn't understand why VE breadcrumbed the way he did. Then comes this post Show nested quote +On May 31 2012 15:41 MajuGarzett wrote:On May 31 2012 15:33 VisceraEyes wrote: No one is SUPPOSED to glean that I'm a vigilante from it...crumbs are for determining targets posthumously....not for proving claims Maju. On May 31 2012 15:34 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On May 31 2012 15:26 VisceraEyes wrote: What do you want to know about it? MZ knew exactly which post I was talking about. If he's town, and if I died overnight, I'm pretty sure he'd have said something about that very post considering how hot to trot I was about Zealos N1. It's not supposed to make sense to everyone Maju, it's only supposed to be picked up by very observant and by people knowing what they're looking for. That's what a breadcrumb is. No I wouldn't have said anything about zealos because it wasn't a breadcrumb. A breadcrumb is where you spell out who you're hitting or the name of your role using the first letters of each post or name your role in a certain manner or something clever like that (that's a tip kids write it down). That way there's no ambiguity when you say "hey guys I'm an ___ and I breadcrumbed here." What you did was post a little symbol which means nothing, allowing you to tell us how to interpret it however you need. I only knew which post you were gonna reference because with the amount of time I've spent reading your filter I knew there wasn't anything remotely close to a real breadcrumb. I and apparently MZ would disagree. I have to sleep now so perhaps you'll be able to prove your innocence by morning. Which you never follow up on. In fact you don't even post before VE flips. You had no real reason to vote for VE whilst there was plenty said about Zealos or Gambit but you conveniently found a way to slip your vote in without making a stand. You don't even call VE mafia, rather his flip would provide more information? Well what information did you glean that you wouldn't have gleaned from an actual mafia flip of Zealos or Gambit? I know some people have looked at Maju but the rest take a look and let me know what you think. I did think VE was mafia, I just never explicitly stated it. I agreed with MZ's case and therefore said it made valid points. I didn't mean that to be taken as me not agreeing with parts of the case. I think you make my decision to vote for VE seem less thought out than it was. I didn't just vote because MZ said VE was scum, I voted because MZ constructed a logical argument that I agreed with. I never followed up on the second quote as I saw no reason to change my vote. This argument seems to stem from the diction used to phrase my thoughts but I assure you that I did agree with MZ's case and I did think VE was mafia. I assumed people would see that I thought VE was mafia as posts such as "I have to sleep now so perhaps you'll be able to prove your innocence by morning" made it quite obvious that I thought that way.
|
Maju: opinion on Marv and Manason pls. Lynch or no?
Gotta get those M's in place.
|
On June 04 2012 13:51 MajuGarzett wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 10:38 Probulous wrote:On May 31 2012 15:13 MajuGarzett wrote: ##Vote:VisceraEyes
MZ's case contained some valid points and that breadcrumb makes absolutely no sense. A lynch of VE would also be much more informative than the lynch of gambit or zealos. Lynches on Kita and Hyaach are to me less well substantiated as well as unlikely to materialise. Maju what is this? You hardly mentioned VE before this post and then suddenly he gets your vote? You don't even wholeheartedly agree with MZ's case rather it just has some valid points? You also give youself a nice excuse not to vote for either Zealos or Gambit. As far as a I can tell from your filter you thought VE was scum because MZ said so and you didn't understand why VE breadcrumbed the way he did. Then comes this post On May 31 2012 15:41 MajuGarzett wrote:On May 31 2012 15:33 VisceraEyes wrote: No one is SUPPOSED to glean that I'm a vigilante from it...crumbs are for determining targets posthumously....not for proving claims Maju. On May 31 2012 15:34 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On May 31 2012 15:26 VisceraEyes wrote: What do you want to know about it? MZ knew exactly which post I was talking about. If he's town, and if I died overnight, I'm pretty sure he'd have said something about that very post considering how hot to trot I was about Zealos N1. It's not supposed to make sense to everyone Maju, it's only supposed to be picked up by very observant and by people knowing what they're looking for. That's what a breadcrumb is. No I wouldn't have said anything about zealos because it wasn't a breadcrumb. A breadcrumb is where you spell out who you're hitting or the name of your role using the first letters of each post or name your role in a certain manner or something clever like that (that's a tip kids write it down). That way there's no ambiguity when you say "hey guys I'm an ___ and I breadcrumbed here." What you did was post a little symbol which means nothing, allowing you to tell us how to interpret it however you need. I only knew which post you were gonna reference because with the amount of time I've spent reading your filter I knew there wasn't anything remotely close to a real breadcrumb. I and apparently MZ would disagree. I have to sleep now so perhaps you'll be able to prove your innocence by morning. Which you never follow up on. In fact you don't even post before VE flips. You had no real reason to vote for VE whilst there was plenty said about Zealos or Gambit but you conveniently found a way to slip your vote in without making a stand. You don't even call VE mafia, rather his flip would provide more information? Well what information did you glean that you wouldn't have gleaned from an actual mafia flip of Zealos or Gambit? I know some people have looked at Maju but the rest take a look and let me know what you think. I'm scum, scummy scum scummy scummy scum scum I'M SCUM PLEASE KILL ME I'M SO SCUMMY IT HURTS
thanks for the info mate
|
On June 04 2012 14:02 EchelonTee wrote: Maju: opinion on Marv and Manason pls. Lynch or no?
Gotta get those M's in place. Has there been a case made on Marv to look at by any chance? I don't think I saw one. I've felt pretty safe about him though. I'd not vote for his lynch unless I've missed some really obvious scum tell.
Manason would be a good lynch I think. Marv's case on him was pretty sensible though I hope that Mana comes back to reply to it fully and also to present the promised case on Kita. I also found it strange that Mana never really commented on other cases on Kita and just went and said he'd construct his own case. It would make sense to do this if he had different reasons for suspecting Kita than others do but from what I can see he has only expressed agreement with the cases. He could be trying to avoid looking like he's blindly agreeing with people by saying he'll make his own case.
|
On June 04 2012 14:28 MajuGarzett wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 14:02 EchelonTee wrote: Maju: opinion on Marv and Manason pls. Lynch or no?
Gotta get those M's in place. Has there been a case made on Marv to look at by any chance? I don't think I saw one. I've felt pretty safe about him though. I'd not vote for his lynch unless I've missed some really obvious scum tell. Manason would be a good lynch I think. Marv's case on him was pretty sensible though I hope that Mana comes back to reply to it fully and also to present the promised case on Kita. I also found it strange that Mana never really commented on other cases on Kita and just went and said he'd construct his own case. It would make sense to do this if he had different reasons for suspecting Kita than others do but from what I can see he has only expressed agreement with the cases. He could be trying to avoid looking like he's blindly agreeing with people by saying he'll make his own case.
answer one question:
what's the single most important thing marvellosity did this game?
|
On June 04 2012 14:39 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 14:28 MajuGarzett wrote:On June 04 2012 14:02 EchelonTee wrote: Maju: opinion on Marv and Manason pls. Lynch or no?
Gotta get those M's in place. Has there been a case made on Marv to look at by any chance? I don't think I saw one. I've felt pretty safe about him though. I'd not vote for his lynch unless I've missed some really obvious scum tell. Manason would be a good lynch I think. Marv's case on him was pretty sensible though I hope that Mana comes back to reply to it fully and also to present the promised case on Kita. I also found it strange that Mana never really commented on other cases on Kita and just went and said he'd construct his own case. It would make sense to do this if he had different reasons for suspecting Kita than others do but from what I can see he has only expressed agreement with the cases. He could be trying to avoid looking like he's blindly agreeing with people by saying he'll make his own case. answer one question: what's the single most important thing marvellosity did this game? *waves hand in the air*
"ooh ooh, pick me, pick me!!!"
|
On June 04 2012 14:39 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 14:28 MajuGarzett wrote:On June 04 2012 14:02 EchelonTee wrote: Maju: opinion on Marv and Manason pls. Lynch or no?
Gotta get those M's in place. Has there been a case made on Marv to look at by any chance? I don't think I saw one. I've felt pretty safe about him though. I'd not vote for his lynch unless I've missed some really obvious scum tell. Manason would be a good lynch I think. Marv's case on him was pretty sensible though I hope that Mana comes back to reply to it fully and also to present the promised case on Kita. I also found it strange that Mana never really commented on other cases on Kita and just went and said he'd construct his own case. It would make sense to do this if he had different reasons for suspecting Kita than others do but from what I can see he has only expressed agreement with the cases. He could be trying to avoid looking like he's blindly agreeing with people by saying he'll make his own case. answer one question: what's the single most important thing marvellosity did this game? Start a case on Mana?
|
On June 04 2012 15:13 MajuGarzett wrote:Show nested quote +On June 04 2012 14:39 wherebugsgo wrote:On June 04 2012 14:28 MajuGarzett wrote:On June 04 2012 14:02 EchelonTee wrote: Maju: opinion on Marv and Manason pls. Lynch or no?
Gotta get those M's in place. Has there been a case made on Marv to look at by any chance? I don't think I saw one. I've felt pretty safe about him though. I'd not vote for his lynch unless I've missed some really obvious scum tell. Manason would be a good lynch I think. Marv's case on him was pretty sensible though I hope that Mana comes back to reply to it fully and also to present the promised case on Kita. I also found it strange that Mana never really commented on other cases on Kita and just went and said he'd construct his own case. It would make sense to do this if he had different reasons for suspecting Kita than others do but from what I can see he has only expressed agreement with the cases. He could be trying to avoid looking like he's blindly agreeing with people by saying he'll make his own case. answer one question: what's the single most important thing marvellosity did this game? Start a case on Mana?
cool, you're not reading the thread so that affirms my suspicion you're scum.
|
You didn't pick me
|
yeah cause I don't think you're scum.
You know the answer?
|
Well MY answer would be that he has been right when he didn't have to be.
He was right about Zealos He was right about supersoft He was right about SnB He was right about VE
But I guess that is more than one thing. Oh and he proposed to me. I'm a sucker for a girl on her knees.
|
Ok I am about to head home so if I die before I get back to post here are my last wishes
We kill the Kitaman27.
Then we take a good look at Hassybaby, Maju and Manason as the next lynch targets.
|
I have found a problem
|
|
|
|