EPTI won't have much time today, so here's hoping we extended round B by 24 hours....
Liar Game Mini Mafia - Page 22
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
I won't have much time today, so here's hoping we extended round B by 24 hours.... | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On May 01 2012 13:41 VisceraEyes wrote: Wait, I want to be walked through why "we're" doing a circle-jerk here. I need to know why people think that it's a good idea, and I need to know what they hope to accomplish with it. I've been reading the thread, so please don't ask me to go read it again. I can assure you, I'm reading it as you read this. I'm preparing a post on who of the available lynches I do not wish to continue playing with and why. I hope everyone, regardless of how they intend to spend their votes, will do the same. Time is short, and I want to be informed. I'm so tempted right now, I actually want to kill VE with sandro. If you take a quick glance through VE's posts, you'll see a whole lot of mostly nothing at all. VE constantly talks of scumhunting and really does none of his own. He calls syllo scum for being "overly aggressive" (which is not a scumtell for syllo) and he calls me scum for not telling him who I thought was scum at a juncture where talking about reads very openly would have been rather dumb. He also calls chaoser scum; not sure why, but it could be because of any of a number of factors (for example, because other people said so) Also, he says he'll explain why he's called the three of us scum if any of us show up in the majority. Note that the explanation for chaoser was never given. Finally, there's this: On May 01 2012 13:41 VisceraEyes wrote: Wait, I want to be walked through why "we're" doing a circle-jerk here. I need to know why people think that it's a good idea, and I need to know what they hope to accomplish with it. I've been reading the thread, so please don't ask me to go read it again. I can assure you, I'm reading it as you read this. I'm preparing a post on who of the available lynches I do not wish to continue playing with and why. I hope everyone, regardless of how they intend to spend their votes, will do the same. Time is short, and I want to be informed. I'm pretty sure VE was never preparing a post on who he was okay with lynching and why, because it never came. Indeed he somehow became "okay" with a sandro lynch despite never once mentioning his name or addressing him before, and suddenly chaoser dropped off his list of suspects. In addition he provided no reasoning for anything he had posted, unlike what he had promised to do earlier. If anyone disagrees with this let me know and why. + Show Spoiler + hopefully I'm not setting myself up for a thread bomb/tantrum here | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1934 Posts
--------------------People I would prefer my votes going to: VisceraEyes Meapak_Ziphh Liquid`Sheth --------------------People I am ok voting for: Radfield --------------------People I can vote for if really necessary: Mr. Wiggles EchelonTee --------------------People I will not be voting for today: prplhz chaoser sandroba + Show Spoiler [If I was able to vote for the minority] + --------------------People I would prefer my votes going to: Bloodyc0bbler wherebugsgo --------------------People I am ok voting for: Foolishness gonzaw --------------------People I can vote for if really necessary: Palmar Ace --------------------People I would not be voting for today: Katina syllogism On May 01 2012 16:31 syllogism wrote: Don't give Cephiro anything until he posts his suspicions in public and explains why that information couldn't be made public before. It's quite difficult to believe town cephiro genuinely believes that sharing his scum reads in public is detrimental and his excuses are just making him look worse. You're way too expectable. There's not much of you I haven't been able to know you'd do in advance. If you had spent any time reading, I have explained "why that information couldn't be made public". It's not about not being able to make them public, it's about not wasting everyone's time on pointing fingers without anything to back it up. You'll have my current opinions soon enough, although my vote lists should be able to tell you something already. About voting: I am fine with spreading my votes, or concentrating them on one person mostly, depending on how the persons I find trustworthy would like to act. I'd like to point out the possibility of voting in "circle", in smaller groups or pairs. For example, let's say everyone agreed that Radfield & Meapak should in no circumstances be lynched today, they could be allowed to simply vote each other to reach the 5 votes. I'd personally suggest groups of 3 & pairs. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1934 Posts
On May 01 2012 21:42 syllogism wrote: No, all you have provided so far is a completely nonsensical explanation and if everyone followed your logic, the game would be impossible to analyze. No one cares if you don't have sufficient evidence yet, just knowing your suspicions and having some sort of basic justification for them is sufficient. Talking to you appears to be a waste of time, however. Well you seem to be in a hurry. Running out of time for something? If talking to me is a waste of time, then you might as well not. So you think that no-one cares if I go pointing fingers at every smallest suspicion I have? I think I would have covered like 80%+ of the players in that case. Very useful no? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On May 01 2012 14:30 VisceraEyes wrote: I mean, it looks good with 1 person in the minority - it fails to expand on how to proceed with a minority of like 8 people. All you say on the matter is "See, I told you" which doesn't explain anything chaoser. As far as I'm concerned, with 8 people in the minority, the cycle isn't viable. Am I wrong? I thought about it and we can try to do a double cycle. I'm not 100% sure if it'll work out since I haven't done all the math for it but basically all the people in the minority follow a cycle as well. So Ace give to Prp and palmar gives to cephiro and so on. But instead of only 4 points they give all 5. This would require a lot of freedom being given up though and knowing the other players, I doubt they'll agree... | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
As I told some people already I believe foolishness is wrong about chaoser, based purely on meta. Chaoser's way of posting stuff is very different when he is mafia, he is way more careful and neutral. This game, while saying mostly things I don't agree with, he is pretty out there and doesn't show fear. VE on the other had is playing pretty much on par with his scum meta. Posts are short, promisses scum hunting then busts out arbitrary reads based on nothing. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Your fucking ALL scum. The hosts trolled me and you're all scum. This game is imba. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I have reads, but I'm holding them hostage until after I flip. Bring me back, and we'll kill all the scums. They're gooooooooood too. | ||
Liquid`Sheth
United States2095 Posts
On May 02 2012 01:38 VisceraEyes wrote: Anyway, I have a sneaking suspicion that there will be some sort of reentry into the game for some, so assuming Sand is scum and you guys kill us both, if it's a town-related power, you should bring me back. I have reads, but I'm holding them hostage until after I flip. Bring me back, and we'll kill all the scums. They're gooooooooood too. I can't tell if you just aren't caring if you die or if you're just confident you'll get enough votes to live. This isn't the VE that is quiet conserved and waiting to hear others out before judging. As nice as it was for you to say I'd get a vote I'm quite worried about you personally. I'm happy with having the situation be give 4 votes to someone and 1 to someone else. I think its a cool idea especially because we'll see the people who just won't follow it at all. And we'll see those who are just following lemming like. Anyway as of now I'm going to give my 4 to Cephiro and 1 to Meapak because I don't know if others will vote for him and I have liked him so far. Cephiro gets my 4 based on my meta reads of him. I'm not completely sure hes town, but he seems it to me from posts here and in PM land. I geuss its obvious no1 is completely sure of anything yet ^^ | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
I am disappoint town. I thought we were going places together. I thought we were going to kill all the scums...together. | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1934 Posts
VE - Stop acting like you are dead already. If you think the scum can get rid of you that easily, then I'd almost say we're better off without you. All it requires is for one or two townies to show the middle finger to scum and mass vote you. Tada, you didn't die. 90 votes = 10 votes and you are safe with 100% certainty. I am fairly sure that in reality 7-8 should be enough as well. To everyone using "meta": What on earth is wrong with you people? Are you seriously saying that the TL players are so poor that you can just metagame them? How about playing based on what people do this game instead of comparing it to other games. I am starting to get fed up seeing the words "based on meta" come up in every few posts. I hope someone hosts a game where I can be a "meta vig", and kill anyone doing decisions based on meta. Do you all think you can outsmart players just with meta? I thought the experienced players here knew better than that. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
also, thanks for making my job of killing you easier by being obvscum | ||
|
Cephiro
Finland1934 Posts
On May 02 2012 02:01 Palmar wrote: why do you think there are ways of re-entering the game? also, thanks for making my job of killing you easier by being obvscum By the way, "King". I recommend that you're a bit more careful with your current allies, it seems you are leaking information somewhat easily.. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
If we had to choose one person to kill, I think VE would be it. All it seems like he's doing is running through the thread aggravating people and opposing any sort of organization and causing dissent on principle. He hasn't even said who he thinks scum is now that he's chimed in on Round B. His case on WBG was laughable, and besides that, I don't see any reads from him. Even when he talks about the Sandroba lynch, he doesn't say that he thinks Sandroba is scum, just that he's fine with his lynch. Also, just looking at what was posted recently, it looks like VE has given up. The lynch seemed like it would be between him and Sandroba, but instead of fighting it, he's just kicking dirt around. This is pretty uncharacteristic, and doesn't sit well with me. @VE: So if you have super good reads and have been scumhunting, and that's why scum want to kill you, what are they? Also, I see no scumhunting in the thread, so it must have happened in PM land. Obviously if you're telling the truth then, scum have them, but town doesn't. Withholding them does nothing for town, and is in fact an anti-town behaviour. Also, I thought you said you weren't playing the game in PMs, so why are you scumhunting there supposedly, and not in the thread? Or, you're just scum and I'm wasting my time. =/ | ||
| ||
