EPTOn May 10 2012 22:40 Forumite wrote:
I voted thus:
Acrofales for Emperor
Hassybaby for Empress
I voted thus:
Acrofales for Emperor
Hassybaby for Empress
You are mafia or not reading the thread
Holy Roman Mafia - Page 33
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
You are mafia or not reading the thread | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On May 10 2012 22:40 Forumite wrote: I voted thus: Acrofales for Emperor Hassybaby for Empress So you voted a campaign with BM for chancellor? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On May 10 2012 22:40 Mattchew wrote: Carolus how do you feel about marrying me? Another topic that I will have to discuss with sandroba first | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18441 Posts
On May 10 2012 22:28 Carolus Magnus wrote: No, this is bad even if he is town, which I think he is. I have to say I'm suspicious of your rationale there regarding framers; a DT role that is used erratically can be close to worthless and the point about framers is very weak. Perhaps I've missed it, but I would hope that it's not announced in public who is appointed as the channelor and such. If it hasn't been said anywhere, and you didnt even consider the issue, you look quite bad. So you're saying BM can never improve at playing mafia? If you look over his posts this game, he actually seems to be playing surprisingly coherently. I can make sense of most of his posts. His ability to read players? Well, that is untested. I disagree that erratic is "close to worthless". If he keeps confirming town, then yeah, that's pointless, but I'd still prefer a townie BM to get a power role than a scummy someone who may or may not use it better. His ability as a cop is, imho, completely unproven. I did take into account that the appointment might be secret. It has not been stated that that is so and I kinda assumed it would be made public, but if it is kept secret I think making it public is still good. I thought of keeping it a secret and masoning my chancellor in order to act as his mouth (would not even delay the check, because I could marry on D1). However, I decided that in this case, transparency is actually useful. I will be held accountable for my actions, including who I appoint as chancellor. It means that person becomes a target for shooting by scum, but if the empress does the same, there are 4 public power roles, which is not a pleasant situation for mafia (unless they control 1 or more of them). | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
| ||
|
Carolus Magnus
France172 Posts
| ||
|
Carolus Magnus
France172 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
Fucking hell. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18441 Posts
On May 10 2012 22:47 Carolus Magnus wrote: Okay, acrofales is either mafia or intentionally suggesting wildly anti-town strategies. Elect us; it should be by now, or will be later, abundantly clear that we are town, and we won't be making such mistakes. Instead of saying that my plan is anti-town, please say what is anti-town about it. I clearly stated why I think publically announcing who is chancellor is a good idea. I have a slightly expanded version of that, which I do NOT want publicized, because it's useful information to mafia and what I have said should be good enough. All you say is that you disagree. That is VERY useless, without saying why. An appeal to authority (oh mighty sandrogism) is dumb. I CAN point out all the errors in appointing a chancellor in secret. Specifically if we're not sure the emperor is town, which, in your case, I'm not. A secret chancellor with a scum emperor allows scum to control 2 power roles in an absolute manner without even giving away who the scum chancellor is. Transparency in the chancellor role puts pressure on scum if the emperor is town (as in my case) and allows less wriggle room if the emperor is scum. Your plan for secrecy is bad. | ||
|
Carolus Magnus
France172 Posts
| ||
|
Carolus Magnus
France172 Posts
| ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Emperor goes to Carolus, the syllogism is strong in this one. Empress goes to Bill Murray, I like his posting (I hope all of you do as well) I am unvoting Acrofales as I trust syllogism with his reads (lol). Syllo, if you are elected please kill Mattchew, Mattchew isn't being any helpful, at this point he's only saying: "Him, him, and him maybe I will lynch if I get elected k?" He is not explaining his reads, this denies us more information about people (or potential lynch candidates). | ||
|
Carolus Magnus
France172 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18441 Posts
| ||
|
blubbdavid
Switzerland2412 Posts
On May 10 2012 22:51 prplhz wrote: Will Chancellor and Arch-Bishop be kept secret? ye | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18441 Posts
On May 10 2012 22:53 Carolus Magnus wrote: Confirming townies as the DT isn't a problem, the problem is confirming players who do not need to be confirmed, because they have already played towny. That is why having an "erratic" dt, as you say, is not good at all I would trust BM to not squander his cop power on that kind of stuff. And I disagree that confirming townies is ever useful. A red check is useful regardless of framers: because there are few reds, lynching a red check is almost always a good idea, thereby confirming the scum (or that there is a framer in the game). A green check is pointless because of framers/godfathers. "Confirming town" is thus never very useful. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18441 Posts
On May 10 2012 22:56 Carolus Magnus wrote: I'm not sure if acrofales is mafia as I'm not quite seeing his mafia play elements here, but he is clearly proposing strategy that is not optimal. Some of the things he has said are suspicious, however. Stop throwing wishywashy accusations at me, and counter my arguments for why publicly announcing the chancellor is bad. | ||
| ||
