EPTWell good thing grush kept his vote on someone who thought was going to flip town -_-
TL Mafia LIV - Page 50
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
Well good thing grush kept his vote on someone who thought was going to flip town -_- | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
Aka, voting someone who has no chance of getting lynched and not trying to actively push that player, or convince anyone else why they are scum/to vote them. I guess having your vote have no influence on the outcome at all is good for keeping away from a WIFOM vote analysis paper trail. >_> | ||
|
papapanda
Taiwan326 Posts
I don't get grush at all. He seems to be not too great of a player but so far he has been making good calls, a little too good. FoS grush | ||
|
DoYouHas
United States1140 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
On May 08 2012 06:34 papapanda wrote: Very weird... I don't get grush at all. He seems to be not too great of a player but so far he has been making good calls, a little too good. FoS grush Nah he was just copying my act, I felt him brohan. Plus, I thought the day was over so he wasn't lieing. | ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
| ||
|
papapanda
Taiwan326 Posts
| ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
| ||
|
papapanda
Taiwan326 Posts
 well heres my neck. | ||
|
grush57
Korea (South)2582 Posts
On May 08 2012 07:01 papapanda wrote: gnarly. Hang ten "scum" | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
On May 08 2012 06:32 Mementoss wrote: Also cheers to I10f, Nova_Terra, and Paqman for wasting there votes! Aka, voting someone who has no chance of getting lynched and not trying to actively push that player, or convince anyone else why they are scum/to vote them. I guess having your vote have no influence on the outcome at all is good for keeping away from a WIFOM vote analysis paper trail. >_> So you're telling me that I should have taken my vote off someone I think is scum and sheep/wagonhop/board the train on someone I didn't think was that much scummy? No thanks, I want to win. I made a case, the only problem was that it was 11 at night, I had to wake up early to take a college exam, and had class the rest of the day. Obviously I didn't have time to push it. layabout your hard defense of kenpachi is yucky. Also, he's allowed to purposely play anti-town just because he's KP? (Sounds familiar, BM @ LIII) layabout isn't that the reason you pushed BM's lynch? Yeah don't even get on my ass about KP. I don't believe that he's been sooooooo busy to play, yet he's spamming the thread with so many 1-liners and "coincidentally" shows up after I put out my case on him and vote. I also don't believe that he's asked for a replacement because, guess what, there isn't anyone signed up to be a replacement. I didn't waste my vote. I didn't think NT was that much scummy anymore and I'm not going to lynch someone that I'm not confident is scum. If I was scum I could have easily left my vote on him, especially since I was THE FIRST PERSON TO EVEN VOTE NT, and I could have easily gotten away with it. Kenpachi's my scummiest read and if pressuring him makes me scum, that's coolbeans. I just wont understand your logic. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
"Lil' Pyro L got smashed by Foolishness' Southern Hospitality. Lil' Engineer Foolishness got burnt by L's Degreaser. Oh well." What happened? O_o | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
| ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=44#872 | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On May 08 2012 07:16 PaqMan wrote: So you're telling me that I should have taken my vote off someone I think is scum and sheep/wagonhop/board the train on someone I didn't think was that much scummy? No thanks, I want to win. I made a case, the only problem was that it was 11 at night, I had to wake up early to take a college exam, and had class the rest of the day. Obviously I didn't have time to push it. layabout your hard defense of kenpachi is yucky. Also, he's allowed to purposely play anti-town just because he's KP? (Sounds familiar, BM @ LIII) layabout isn't that the reason you pushed BM's lynch? Yeah don't even get on my ass about KP. I don't believe that he's been sooooooo busy to play, yet he's spamming the thread with so many 1-liners and "coincidentally" shows up after I put out my case on him and vote. I also don't believe that he's asked for a replacement because, guess what, there isn't anyone signed up to be a replacement. I didn't waste my vote. I didn't think NT was that much scummy anymore and I'm not going to lynch someone that I'm not confident is scum. If I was scum I could have easily left my vote on him, especially since I was THE FIRST PERSON TO EVEN VOTE NT, and I could have easily gotten away with it. Kenpachi's my scummiest read and if pressuring him makes me scum, that's coolbeans. I just wont understand your logic. Don't twist my words, I never said bandwagon. I said it was wasted if you don't push why you think someone is scummy, obviously don't place your vote on someone you think is town, just because the cool kids are doing it. I'm saying wasting a vote is when you as a townie, truely believe you got scum, to the point that it is better than every case out there and you don't push people to try and consider it. Clearly if you really thought Kenpachi was scum, you would have been all over people asking them why they prefer the current lynch over Kenpachi, and try to strengthen your own case on Kenpachi. Also, if your going to stick with your guns to a vote that never is going to happen, at least explain why the other cases are bad or why you think they are town. But, I guess anyone can play the I was too busy/wasn't here card. | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
On May 08 2012 07:22 PaqMan wrote: We all need to seriously look into everyone that joined the blubb wagon, starting with right after DYH posted his big case on him. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=44#872 I agree with you here. The only thing that crossed my mind when I was first reading the thread is how Kenpachi and Blazinghand looked to try to be burying the post. Need to re-read and re-analyze how this late day lynch came about and how people explained their reasoning for voting Blubby. | ||
l10f
United States3241 Posts
On May 08 2012 06:32 Mementoss wrote: Also cheers to I10f, Nova_Terra, and Paqman for wasting there votes! Aka, voting someone who has no chance of getting lynched and not trying to actively push that player, or convince anyone else why they are scum/to vote them. I guess having your vote have no influence on the outcome at all is good for keeping away from a WIFOM vote analysis paper trail. >_> At least I voted for scum. Sorry I missed the deadline to vote, but neither N_T or blubb looked scummier than Eiii to me, so I wouldn't have known which of the two to vote for even if I was here. Especially with that last second switch that makes no sense... | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
DYH posts his case against blubbdavid: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=45#898 SomethingAwesome reposts the case 3 times. It's obvious he supports the case, although he makes no comment in the thread of laying down his vote. 4 hours later layabout composes a weak case against blubb and a PbP analysis in which he narrates blubb's posts. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=46#905 Froggynoddy is the fourth to vote, but only after being pressured by layabout. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=46#917 johnnywup posts a one-liner to justify his vote on blubb. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=47#922 grush makes his vote next. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=47#926 followed by ghost, who gets into an argument with grush. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=47#940 And finally, Eiii sporadically makes a voteswitch onto blubb. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=331187¤tpage=49#966 And there is all the people who voted and their in-thread vote. Now we won't have to dig through all the one-liners and spam that cluttered the thread during that time. Out of all those voters, layabout and jdub look like the most suspicious to me. I'll post a little something on layabout and why I think he's suspicious in a bit. | ||
| ||
