EPTTL Mafia 'Area' LIII - Page 86
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
##Vote: Ottoxlol | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 27 2012 19:27 Risen wrote: I'm going to sleep. Will look through Mt's filter tomorrow to see if he was trying to point something out to us from his night 1 tracking result. Um, we want youir best cases and reads as promised first | ||
|
Mementoss
Canada2595 Posts
 | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
If he flips scum, we get almost confirmed scum in Risen and like 75% scum in Brood. If he flips town, Risen is confirmed as being confused townie or REALLY REALLY stupid scum. Idk what this means for brood. Either way, we kinda direct the scum team with this and I firmly believe we also have a high chance of hitting a goon in Ottox if he is scum. This is our best course of action. ##vote: Ottoxlol | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
But before this, the lurker problem. Let's go. BroodkingEXE: Spoilered below is his one significant post over the last few days. + Show Spoiler + On April 26 2012 02:19 BroodKingEXE wrote: @Marvel It seems like your posting has gotten a lot better since you started so I am going to take my scum suspicions off you. I still have mixed feelings on your scattershot accusations, but they seem to be based off real facts. You asked me about Zephirdd/Sentinel/Ottoxlol. Out of the three of them I find Zephirdd pretty scummy, his last minute vote seemed rushed to me as if he was a Mafia trying to jump a bandwagon. Regardless of the fact that he mistimed the vote he made a post like this: I see this post as quite scummy, what does he mean by will reconsider? That statement leads me to believe that he bandwagoned the vote(which he in fact admitted) and is trying to set up a situation where he can say that the vote was rushed later. This post is also very scummy, what is the point of creating a scum list based on no evidence? He says not to take it seriously, but then why did he post it? He then says that he would have put his vote on marvel, one of the people on this "emotion-based" scum list, seems pretty fishy to me. He easily could have made a scumslip, and is trying to make up a hypothetical situation which makes him look better. He then flips around the idea of him making a case/analysis, and proceeds to say that he doesn't need to make a strong case against anyone. Recently he has been using more of his hypothetics to convince people to not vote for him. This is WIFOM reasoning and leads me to believe he is trying to mislead the town. I only see one useful post (the one about his reads on the town), but it even has a lot of unsupported conlclusions and blatant contradictions. I'll have my thoughts on Uon and Ottoxol in my next post. Where he calls Zephirdd scummy without apparently being sure. This is to be followed by his last-minute vote on Zephirdd that layabout absolutely hated. Also as noted before he promised us his thoughts on Sentinel and gave us nothing. Need more atm. St. Daniel: Mr Lurky himself. Food poisoning or not, I will requote my earlier post, spoilered below, showing how he posted 3 times in another game and 0 in this one despite promising to: + Show Spoiler + On April 25 2012 21:04 marvellosity wrote: First of all - sorry if you were ill, that sucks. Nonetheless I will point this out This post in no way explains the post below. You were well enough to post at 3 distinct times in a different game yesterday yet not at all in this one. Excuse or not, that is still dodgy. Further this we have a ninja and hitherto totally unexplained vote on Zephirdd. Anyway, we have a bunch of totally meaningless posts from him of late. On April 25 2012 11:29 St.Daniel wrote: Sorry guys. To make a long story short, I was retarded and I had food poisoning. I sincerely apology. I'll try my best to dedicate to this games. Alright, although as mentioned it didn't explain the inconsistency in my spoilered post. On April 25 2012 11:55 St.Daniel wrote: Why are you retracting your statement? What made you think that your previous analysis on Marvellosity was lacking or invalid? There must be a reason why you are not as sure as you were before. Also, "for now?" Do you still think Marv is a scum? PS - I'm trying to get back into the game. Ok, asking Zephirdd about his stance on me, fair enough I guess. Again mentioning how he's trying to get back into the game. On April 27 2012 08:51 St.Daniel wrote: I agree. We should also consider who someone voted with. For sample, if 2 or more people casted the lynch vote on same person for multiple lynches, thst's something we need to take a look at. Note that my theory doesn't work 100% of times but it is something to think about. Speculation that doesn't actually help anything. On April 27 2012 08:56 St.Daniel wrote: What's up, Paqman  Wow. Glad he posted this nugget of wisdom. On April 27 2012 09:07 St.Daniel wrote: Alright. It seems I'm back before BM. This is what happened: I was playing two games of mafia like a total idiot and I got a food poisoning on Monday. I was sick as a dog for a couple days and I had dropped the other game because I just couldn't keep up. First and foremost, I apologize to all of you for being inactive. It was all my fault to join two games at the same time. I've learned my lesson. Also I'm so grateful to iGrok for correcting me of my mistake and understanding of my situation. YET ANOTHER POST apologising for his absence. If he spent half the bloody time scumhunting as apologising we might be getting somewhere. But no. On April 27 2012 12:26 St.Daniel wrote: It's ok, iGrok. I hope your job interview went well. I swear I didn't think Mementoss would die. Also, we don't have Vig? That's rather unfortunate, because we spent good chunk of first day talking about it (leading up to VE's claim). My guess are now MG, Sentinel, Mattchew and PaqMan. More wishy washy crap on job interview, Mementoss dieing, vigi, followed by totally unsubstantiated finger pointing. And still absolutely no explanation of his vote on Zephirdd. No, I don't like any of this at all. I'm very much leaning scum on him at the moment. Bill Murray: the 'wildcard' as it were. Bad vote and explanation on VE day 1. 'Had a busy life' day 2. Alright alright. But at some point he needs to start contributing with actual cases. Janaan: My only lurky person who I'm leaning on the town-side of null. I'd simply like to hear a lot more from him. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On April 27 2012 23:28 johnnywup wrote: marv your whole argument is that he doesn't say anything with his post, which I can say about your argument against him too. you're "commentating" his posts but you're not making an actual argument on why he's scum He's saying absolutely nothing. He has completely blanked the fact that he posted 3 times in another game on a day and not in this one. He has completely blanked and failed to explain his vote on Zephirdd. He's giving a list of scum without any reasoning at all. What more do you want me to say? | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
##vote ottoxlol | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
| ||
|
BroodKingEXE
United States829 Posts
##Vote: St. Daniels | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
On April 28 2012 03:00 BroodKingEXE wrote: OMG. St. Daniels voted for Zeph without posting in this thread or using reasoning. If he was town he would have provided some sort of reason or even a vote in the thread. ##Vote: St. Daniels I agree completely. Which is why ##vote MidnightGladius jk, back from classes. Gimme a while since I'm playing eve atm | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
On April 28 2012 03:00 BroodKingEXE wrote: OMG. St. Daniels voted for Zeph without posting in this thread or using reasoning. If he was town he would have provided some sort of reason or even a vote in the thread. ##Vote: St. Daniels yeah we know but his flip isn't going to help us catch other scum On April 28 2012 03:36 Risen wrote: I agree completely. Which is why ##vote MidnightGladius jk, back from classes. Gimme a while since I'm playing eve atm what do you mean jk? you don't think mg is scum? also neither of you posted your vote in the voting thread. . . | ||
|
ghost_403
United States1825 Posts
On April 28 2012 03:54 johnnywup wrote: I don't like this push on ottox. he may be scum but i don't think his lynch is beneficial today tbh. this feels like a scum attempt to push a lynch. + Show Spoiler + On April 28 2012 03:00 BroodKingEXE wrote: OMG. St. Daniels voted for Zeph without posting in this thread or using reasoning. If he was town he would have provided some sort of reason or even a vote in the thread. ##Vote: St. Daniels yeah we know but his flip isn't going to help us catch other scum On April 28 2012 03:36 Risen wrote: I agree completely. Which is why ##vote MidnightGladius jk, back from classes. Gimme a while since I'm playing eve atm what do you mean jk? you don't think mg is scum? also neither of you posted your vote in the voting thread. . . Johnnywup, this post is so scummy, I can't even stand it. You state "he may be scum" and "i don't think his lynch is beneficial to us today" in the same sentence. Protip: Lynching scum is always beneficial to town. If you think he's not scum, prove it instead of making baseless and contradictory comments. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
On April 28 2012 00:56 ghost_403 wrote: Hey guys, let's lynch Ottoxlol. ##vote ottoxlol | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On April 28 2012 04:19 johnnywup wrote: Stop trying to put blame on me. That quote isn't scummy at all. I'm unsure about his alignment so I don't think his lynch will be good today. The statements aren't contradictory at all. I meant it in the sense that he may or may not be scum, not the matter-of-fact saying "even though he's scum". If you think ottox is scum, prove it. as far as i'm concerned your vote is super scummy, with no argument at all. Have you been reading the thread? | ||
| ||
