EPTTL Mafia 'Area' LIII - Page 4
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 08:42 Mementoss wrote: I was wrong. I was sure last night while we were in the thread, you said ##Unvote and then said, can someone convince me why lynching BM is better than VE Apology accepted. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
Upon further analysis you thought I was scum? What, where I was making extremely similar points to you and was similarly bemused that we were going to save a rage-quitting no-sense claimer? If that's your defence, then it sucks, and you are still scummy | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 08:46 johnnywup wrote: I think the "Sorry, your case is weak. Too weak. And when a case is so weak, it is usually wrong. Food for thought." was referring to me and my case against him, marv Sigh, it's called sarcasm/irony dear. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 09:06 layabout wrote: He seemed unsure of himself. At the time of voting VE i was unsure of myself because his play made next to no sense as either alignment*. It was his refusal to answer questions that was the eventual tipping point for me. It seems that this was also the case for zeph. *Also that is why i hate these it makes no sense as mafia arguments. It made no sense as town either, we shouldn't give a player the benefit of the doubt for being anti-town. Right layabout. But my case basically hinged on how he acted after he voted for VE, not before. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 09:18 layabout wrote: I think nearly everything you have quoted reinforces the notion that he was unsure of himself, and it does not change my opinion of him by much. He says he is tempted to switch, he says that people have pointed out reasons to vote for you and mention's risen. Presumably he then goes and reads through your posts. He then concludes. "i don't see anything too bad except the scumslip Risen pointed out" but he doesn't seem to be sure of it. I fail to see how this makes zeph scummy. And now again he's sure, because I went after VE. He's sure, unsure, unsure, sure, unsure. He's not making a case against anyone. Marv is guilty then he isn't then he is then he isn't then he is. Oh, and MG might be guilty coz he kinda doesn't like his posts. Oh and jdub too, let's omgus him a little. Wishy washy scum. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 13:12 MidnightGladius wrote: Zephirdd's behavior throughout the night, along with his continued attempts to justify his earlier play, reinforce my earlier scumread on him. I haven't looked at Sentinel in as much detail. That said, I still think that you're scum, johnny. You have zeph as your strongest scumread, but refuse to vote for him, and ask for town consensus first, when we've just started the day, and you have the most time to convince others? You have yet to actually push your own scumreads, outside of your earlier sheeping. Your unwillingness to actually put your vote where your voice is very suspicious, and I think that you're trying to gently push for a bandwagon without actually committing. This behavior is just like zeph's list earlier, which is why I'm of the opinion that you're bussing him. ##Vote: johnnywup Oh, and BJ, do you still insist on tunneling marv? MG - I'd really like an answer to the points I raised in my answer to sloosh about you (others have raised it too) I'm sure I'm not the only one with a comment written down on you like mine - "MidnightGladius seemed townie but very odd VE voter shenanigans" + Show Spoiler + On April 24 2012 06:52 marvellosity wrote: I'll make a separate post on Zephirdd, as it is I've just gone over MG's filter so a few of my thoughts. Might as well start with the bit about me. His vote for me after BH's case and subsequent withdrawal of his vote after I continued posting seemed genuine. It is basically what I expect from a rational player. His case against johnny seems solid. I liked that he wasn't wishy washy about it, and the fact he subsequently tried to push it a little when there was little support also seemed genuine. There is something strange about his posts on the VE issue. Is VE and his claim scummy? Yes, apparently it is. Although he can't believe how town let the ridiculously scummy guy die. MG asks how town let this happen, with a sense of righteous indignation. But, given he's supposedly 'town' himself, what did he do about it?: So the question then - why was he willing to blame the rest of the non-VE voters for allowing the VE lynch when he wasn't willing to take action himself? Is it because he in fact tacitly supported it? Quick summary: reasonable vote and rescind on me. Reasonable case on jdub without being wishy washy. Some pretty dodgy stuff with the VE vote. I really don't like how he's shown he wants to gun for VE voters when he himself called VE ridiculously scummy and also did nothing to prevent the VE lynch. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 21:17 Mattchew wrote: Ottox lynch is fine for tommorrow today we should lynch confirmed scum in bm Mattchew: I would like you to elaborate a little. Why is BM confirmed scum? He's been posting more actively since Day 1. I also think both Zephirdd and Sentinel make better lynches than Ottox. What do you think of these? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 21:35 Mattchew wrote: He ninja voted the most well known scum hunter in the game... To me that's like saying hi I'm Scum lynch me... And he hasn't said anything of value if you think he has you are reading something I'm not I asked more than one question. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 22 2012 16:44 St.Daniel wrote: I do have a case for Marv and I'm not sure how I feel about Ghost, but it's 3:40 and I'm dead tired. I'll post tomorrow on those two so please understand. Bold is my emphasis. On April 23 2012 08:58 St.Daniel wrote: On April 23 2012 11:11 St.Daniel wrote: On April 23 2012 11:41 St.Daniel wrote: The three timestamps above are his posting in SNMN X. But absolutely nothing here since the first post I quoted. Promise to post, then doesn't post, despite clearly being online at various other times the next day. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 23:19 Mattchew wrote: Oh right... Forgot about st Daniel... Yeah we need to lynch him too if a vig doesn't get to shooting Yup, we can't forget the lurkers. Especially ones with broken promises like St. Daniel. Speaking of lurkers, BroodkingEXE - what do you think of current lynch favourites, Zephirdd/Sentinel/Ottoxlol? Or do you still think I'm scum, and if so why? We need to hear from you. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 24 2012 23:31 ghost_403 wrote: Also, I'm in tears because now, even if Marv does flips town, I might not get to see blzinghand eat his hat T_T I don't believe his statement included 'unless I get mod-killed or die'. So, we will still get us some hat-eating. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On April 25 2012 00:57 Ottoxlol wrote: Ok, post it when you got it drawn. I feel like the pressure is on me because I did not make any useful post d2, and i feel its really unfair when no one really did so. I am thinking on the line of who should we lynch that gives us info. VE wagon seemed like a good start to look at, I made 3 pairs who seems to defend each other/attack the same persons. If we lynch anyone from that we can get information about the other half of the pair. Because we're looking for you to actually have/push a scumread at this point, rather than wishy-washy connections that may or may not mean something and aren't even accurate, e.g. laya attacking marv, defending zeph I don't see layabout attacking me at any point, in fact he was one of the most vocal critics of BJ for his case on me. layabout just wasn't sure of my case on Zephirdd. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
That was 3 days ago. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
But with regards to any recent posting, your line doesn't make much sense. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ejfdd.png)
