EPTNewbie Mini Mafia IX - Page 29
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Pure-SC2
United Kingdom1440 Posts
| ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
If you do at least have the decency to include a spoiler. If its questionable spoiler it, for those of us who might have touchy bosses. | ||
|
Lorant
Hungary112 Posts
| ||
|
Lorant
Hungary112 Posts
Town alligned player: But, but but this has nothing to do with how well I do my job. Boss: YES IT DOES, You have just proved to me that you're a moron now gtfo + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EWI0zNQzm1k/TqCEuP4-JWI/AAAAAAAAAOc/9Munt66QWcY/s320/okay.JPG) | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
| ||
|
Lorant
Hungary112 Posts
| ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
3 people. and seeing as nobody really posts shit anymore, thats a lot. | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
Daymor is a possibility. we will see i guess. Lynch Bluey if/when i die. Farewell | ||
|
TheRavensName
United States911 Posts
| ||
|
BlueyD
Canada437 Posts
Therapist’s vote is suspicious. Guy gives the stupidest reason for a vote I’ve ever seen, and the timing just happens to be 30 minutes before day ends? His past posts had no real analysis in them, it’s a bunch of talk about lynch vs no lynch day 1 and then nothing of substance. If we lynch a lurker, it should be this one. I want to turn to our friendly neighbourhood Daymor for a second, to point out that after going from “lurker lynch” to “no lynch” day 1, his call on day 2… was “lurker lynch” again! It’s true that we had a massive lurker problem on day 2, but that wasn’t less true on day 1. On the plus side, it did get macheji to post. But I’m seeing another advantage for Daymor himself here: He gets to delay his real vote until he sees where the wagons go. His strange lurker list at the very start of day 2 where, in a very questionable read, therapist did not get placed in the top category: Lurking particularly badly - Macheji - Solohan50 Lurking but posting enough to get by - Therapist - TheRavensName Contributing, but want more - BlueyD - Lorant The case on macheji: I’ll note this contradiction by Daymor: I would be happy to lynch Macheji based off this information as between not contributing and the alarm bells in regards to his case against Nova_Terra I feel comfortable enough sticking with it. But afterwards, he backs off (admittedly after Macheji contributes) and says his case was not worthy after all: Macheji is not my strongest scum read, nor do I believe the case was strong enough to lead a lynch, so I do plan on ending the day with my vote on someone else. Note he does not switch his vote off immediately to either another lurker or a more supported case. That takes another 11 hours. Daymor’s vote was also the safety vote on Lazer, which helped keep Pure alive, but I don’t know if that has any significance. Anyway I think it’s possible we have a Daymor-Therapist duo here. Don’t know who would be the third yet. --- I cannot be here sunday afternoon due to a large student protest and will in all likelihood not be back at my computer in time for the vote, so I’ll have to put a vote I’m comfortable with as my final vote Sunday morning, at most. I should be here most of saturday, though. | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
Nova out | ||
|
Pure-SC2
United Kingdom1440 Posts
Therapist is either very suspicious or just highly inactive town who loves Nova. I'm leaning suspicious. Nova I'm leaning town on, but damn he has said a lot of scummy things. Lorant, keep the scum analysis coming. Daymor's my strongest town read, but thats just based on the fact he seems to think like me. TheRavensName, slight town read. | ||
|
Lorant
Hungary112 Posts
Same thing with Daymor + Show Spoiler + On April 16 2012 10:53 Daymor wrote: I would also like to add, that although the discussion regarding lynch v no lynch may not mean anything if indeed you cannot vote for a no lynch. It does however provide the opportunity for people to comment and add their perspective as to what they feel about the policy. This provides us with information which we can analyse nd to help show the motivation and logic behind their arguements. So it is far from fruitless. Personally, I didn't get shit out of the nolynch discussion. So what did you two get.. it sounds to me that you were just faking enthusiasm for the perspective of an analysis source. I knew right away that nothing about it is going to matter discussion-wise. Unless you can provide us with some valuable insight that you've gained from it I suggest you explain yourself, why did you both say that when it's clearly not true? And don't even think about telling me you've honestly believed that you could make reads upon taking in consideration who was pro / against a lynch, lynch a lurker / scummy player etc because that's just manure. It also sounds to me like some sort of shifty justification for the bluefishing that has been going on, judging by the first nightkill. it is far from fruitless but only for scum.In case I die tonight, I want to urge my fellow townies not to trust a case if it's not backed up by scum agenda analysis. Scum is organized and always has some tactic or gambit to win the game. Town is not and if you're a new player and have never read a scum QT before you can't imagine what to look for. You'll have to improvise and imagine how you would've reacted if it was you chatting in the scum QT To give an example of a good scum agenda analysis... with me as subject of investigation. Now that we know that Lorant is FourFace, by accident or not, we can imagine a probable scenario where he could've walked into the scumQT like this: "Aloha scumteam. I am Lorant, a smurf. My aka is FourFace and I've played 3 games thus far, VT 3 consecutive times. If I out myself as Fourface.. I will most likely not get banned and receive a warning instead and then my meta allows me to say whatever the fuck I want. I can clog up the thread, I can say the craziest shit about anyone and I can troll without anyone seriously considering me a primary lynching candidate, they'll most likely even consider me confirmed town for it. This being a newbie game, people are actually going to take me seriously and I have a good chance to infiltrate the leading circle of respected players, where my deceptions - cleverly disguised as scum agenda analysis - will throw town off of suspecting our lurker and our average Joe. I will also discredit any case, regardless of whether it's on one of us or not, by saying there's no scum motivation to it, thus demoralizing the most active players and seed discontent when they are involved in a mislynch." Question is .. would he have outed himself as FourFace if he had been town. In previous games he got pissed off when people didn't take him seriously due to his trollish nature, so as town he would've been better off being plain ol' Lorant the newbie. As scum however he had all the meta he needed to do whatever he wants. The simple fact alone that he is smurfing would be enough to convince people that it's the usual FF play doing his thing. What crazy things did he do besides smurfing anyway. His play up to this point seems rather mild when compared to his first game where he practically went apeshit with doc claim, rickroll, editing his posts twice and more. Lorant. Could have deliberately ordered the killing of Crossfire, his nr1 contester, and then make it look like this genius ploy to frame him. Calling his own actions genius .. doesn't that sound just like what a multiple personality troll would do to get his kicks out of the game. He was after all the first one to mention bluesniping, what a flashy word for something that could've been pure luck and left at that if it wasn't for FF with his 4 giant egos. He could've gone through Crossfire's filter afterwards just to find some tiny indication that he has in fact given himself away as blue and that FF is oh' so intelligent to have noticed this. Nova clearly stated even before the game that he is going to get mad and retaliate if someone insults him. FF has done just that, deliberately to provoke him and cause chaos. ........... and so on. Think out of the box guys. | ||
|
Lorant
Hungary112 Posts
| ||
|
Lorant
Hungary112 Posts
| ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
On April 21 2012 08:00 Lorant wrote: I don't think nova is cop .. I'm absolutely sure he's not cop. HE'S NOT COP! Ikr! like, it totally hasnt been obvious! | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Daypost ![[image loading]](http://www.cksinfo.com/clipart/society/police/murder-scene.png) Day 3 Sorry, no flavor! Daymor the townie has been killed! Day ends in 48 hours! | ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
| ||
|
Nova_Terra
Switzerland1190 Posts
| ||
|
Lorant
Hungary112 Posts
| ||
| ||
