| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
I'm a pretty big fan of lynching lay because this On April 11 2012 07:31 layabout wrote: Well i only have 2 is not consistent with what little I know about the game. Between that, the other slipups people have dug up, and him not being on *my* list... ##vote layabout | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
On April 11 2012 09:40 Eiii wrote: It's kind of blowing my mind that people are so excited to post their wincon when there are probably other parties out there interested in keeping them from winning :X I'm a pretty big fan of lynching lay because this is not consistent with what little I know about the game. Between that, the other slipups people have dug up, and him not being on *my* list... ##vote layabout You are terrible | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On April 11 2012 09:42 VisceraEyes wrote: E3 have we ever been in a game together? I believe we have! How did you know to call me E3? :o  | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On April 11 2012 08:16 johnnywup wrote: how hilarious would it be if there was a town wincon to keep a mafia member alive Wouldn't be a first. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On April 06 2012 18:07 Forumite wrote: Voting rules: [...] 5. The player with the most votes at the deadline is lynched. In the event of a tie the person with the most votes first wins (or loses as it were). 6. Voting is mandatory. You may NOT abstain. There is no majority needed. The guy with the most votes gets lynched, even if he only has 2 and almost everyone else has one vote. So currently layabout would get lynched. | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
##vote Layabout | ||
|
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 16:38 johnnywup wrote: oh, figured it was majority. Then to keep layabout more likely to be lynched: ##vote Layabout sheep | ||
|
BagManager
Canada30 Posts
I don't understand lol. I want to kill GreYMisT though. And potentially Hassybaby. | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
On April 11 2012 18:12 BagManager wrote: why are we killing layabout? Did you actually read the thread? It has been explained pretty well why some people want layabout dead. On April 11 2012 18:12 BagManager wrote: I don't understand lol. I want to kill GreYMisT though. And potentially Hassybaby. And why whould you want that? Care to elaborate before you go hardcore lurking again? | ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 18:43 phagga wrote: Hey Bagmanager, where have you been? Did you actually read the thread? It has been explained pretty well why some people want layabout dead. And why whould you want that? Care to elaborate before you go hardcore lurking again? Explained pretty well? There's hardly anything worth mention... Why are you trying to excuse peoples sheeping? | ||
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
People (mainly Drazerk and sbrubbles) have stated several times why they want layabout dead. Note that I do not agree with them. Also note that I never meant to excuse the sheeping of others. Also, you are aware that BagManager (who asked the question) is pretty much the biggest lurker in this game? That's why I wrote this sentence. If You or GM would have asked it, I would have answered differently, or not at all. | ||
|
Macheji
Romania103 Posts
 . Hmm, it's weird cuz i'm defending myself right now, tought proving innocence would be easier ... between a rock and a hard place huh... | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On April 11 2012 19:18 Macheji wrote: @ Cyber_Cheese . This is the first time i play this game, just tought i have to make a defence after bluelightz "attacked" me. Maybe cuz of excitement, to talk , interact or something. But the first one was really legit, right after he accused me. The second one was because i used some arguments somebody else used before me ( so that my new added details can be understood easier ) and i felt like bluelightz will have another go at me. I just wanted to make my intentions clear. If argumenting my posts and actions when someone accuses me on various reasons is "suspect", and "incriminating" then i don't really know how to act in such a situation . Hmm, it's weird cuz i'm defending myself right now, tought proving innocence would be easier ... between a rock and a hard place huh...Sup pulling newbie card huh? | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
Cyber_Cheese
Australia3615 Posts
On April 11 2012 19:18 Macheji wrote: @ Cyber_Cheese . This is the first time i play this game, just tought i have to make a defence after bluelightz "attacked" me. Maybe cuz of excitement, to talk , interact or something. But the first one was really legit, right after he accused me. The second one was because i used some arguments somebody else used before me ( so that my new added details can be understood easier ) and i felt like bluelightz will have another go at me. I just wanted to make my intentions clear. If argumenting my posts and actions when someone accuses me on various reasons is "suspect", and "incriminating" then i don't really know how to act in such a situation . Hmm, it's weird cuz i'm defending myself right now, tought proving innocence would be easier ... between a rock and a hard place huh...Newbie card, entirely defensive play, no accusations/original thoughts... A much more solid lynch than layabout. This time, you've been caught already, but next time you roll scum, you don't have to defend yourself from everything like this. If the argument is you defend yourself too much, form some opinions and state them. | ||
|
Macheji
Romania103 Posts
Explained pretty well? There's hardly anything worth mention... Why are you trying to excuse peoples sheeping? Anything worth mention .... What are you talking about... He has the most things worth mentioning about. I'll summerise it for you one last time. 1. He proposed 4 people to get lynched so far. The last one beeing me for "missuse" of Occam's Razor ( in reality it's because i'm making a case against him ) 2. He lied about posts timing in his "kill bluelightz" posts 3.When people were starting to make a case against him he done this : Can we be clear, serious and transparent for a while? The thread is trash. 4. Then think Strongandbig is a third party. Ok, am i the only one tottaly confused by this... What exactly prooves he's a third party... I find that post bullshit. AND it's 20 minutes after the "thread is bullshit " post. I think that post was made in order to distract the topic from " let's lynch layabout" to ... are there third parties, who is this strongandbig guy etc.His posting History this game is the following: I want to /in /in I am going for "bastard meta" /confirm Is Darzek claiming broken shell? oh btw i haven't seen lost 37 "!" you a sleeper cell? Contrived twitpic nonsense "Im Tovn" dont trust ppl I looked at the lsot wiki, maybe everyone in town is a survivor? I think BM is a smurf and he is lurking, so i am going to pressure him, aren't i useful | ||
| ||
|
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
PiGosaur Monday
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
