• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:17
CEST 02:17
KST 09:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202547RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams4Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread RSL Season 1 - Final Week The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion
Tourneys
CSL Xiamen International Invitational [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 588 users

The Sum of All Fears Mafia - Page 6

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:09 GMT
#581
Of course, the other reason scum can't shoot you is you could be scum instead of a terrible townie. There IS that possibility.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:10 GMT
#583
But seriously, the thought of scum shooting you is utterly preposterous. What, are they afraid of you using your iron fist of terror to lead the town into more worthless full-wagon mislynches?
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:10 GMT
#584
On March 30 2012 02:10 VisceraEyes wrote:
An "utterly worthless townie" eh?

Cool. Good luck sir.


Luck is for people who lead the town on random shitty lynches.

I use skill.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:15 GMT
#586
On March 30 2012 02:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yes, because this one lynch (of a blatantly anti-town player) is indicative of my skill in finding scum overall.

No, go fuck yourself BH. If you're town, find scum without me. I'll be trollin and votin. Good luck


Really VE? You don't think there was any mistake in the C_C lynch? Pull your head out of your hat and take a look at the facts. You lead a lynch that had no opposition except me and the guy getting lynched. You strongarmed everyone into joining your wagon. You said I claimed scum when I stood against you. You said "instant town cred" for anyone who jumps on your wagon. You're the single least effective town leader I've encountered, and I've seen a LOT of ineffective town leaders

Why won't scum shoot you?
1) You were their greatest Ally D1 with your C_C lynch. You pushed that shit HARD and you know it.
2) You could be scum.

In fact, let me picture for you what scum probably felt like as you took control of the town and led the C_C lynch all D1:
[image loading]


You know what the odds are of scum shooting you tonight?

Basically zero.

You're their bro, wittingly or unwittingly.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:18 GMT
#588
It's also the truth, and you know it.

If you are shot by scum tonight I will literally eat my hat. IRL.

[image loading]
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:21 GMT
#590
I'm sorry, are you getting mad and OMGUSing me?

Temper, temper, Mr "town leader"...
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:22 GMT
#592
I kinda like it, it's hilarious. I don't think it's good news for "VE as a town-aligned player" or "VE as a useful player, assuming he is town-aligned.

But it IS hilarious.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:25 GMT
#594
On March 30 2012 02:22 VisceraEyes wrote:
Meh.

I don't even care anymore. If scum don't shoot me, BH is scum, as is zelblade and cccalf. Find the last and we win.

gg



I hope you're still willing to post your thoughts close to the deadline:

On March 30 2012 02:07 VisceraEyes wrote:
I mean scum will likely kill me - because I'm one of the only "veterans" in the game.

And I've already said - my full thoughts are going to come closer to deadline.



After all, if you're legitimately worried about getting shot by scum, you should try to post some real cases before dawn. Just a thought.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:29 GMT
#597
Look, VE, if you're legitimately town, and you have any fear whatsoever of being shot, you should try to post complete reads before daybreak. I find this to be highly reasonable. Just because I personally am somewhat incendiary doesn't mean you should condemn the rest of the town to not hearing what you have to say.

In fact, I daresay I'd like to hear your reasoning behind all your reads. It is good for the town and you know it.

Stop being a baby and play the game.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:32 GMT
#599
I'm not asking you to play with me, or even respond to my arguments (though that would be nice). I get the feeling you're not interested in doing so, either due to emotional arousal or faked emotional arousal.

Just post your reads before daybreak. Don't do it for me. Do it for the town.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:34 GMT
#602
I'm talking about real analysis and cases. You said you were putting that stuff together and were gonna post it before daybreak. I hope you live up to that statement.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:38 GMT
#606
On March 30 2012 02:35 VisceraEyes wrote:
No you don't, you think everything I've done has been worthless.

Why are you pretending to care what I think when you've made it clear that my analyisis is a fucking joke and I'm useless as shit?

OH I KNOW!!! I KNOW!!!! IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE SCUM!!!!


I said it once, and I'll say it again: if you're a town aligned player, you'll do this. You won't do it for me, you'll do it for town.

Being an effective town leader doesn't just mean herding people in your chosen direction with your iron fist of terror-- it also means picking your targets accurately, making good reads, being well-reasoned, and identifying and helping to build good cases.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:40 GMT
#608
On March 30 2012 02:39 VisceraEyes wrote:
Don't lecture me scum.


Do you disagree with the thrust of my argument? I think it's valid.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:45 GMT
#610
On March 30 2012 02:42 VisceraEyes wrote:
The fact of the matter is that there shouldn't BE a town-leader. The fact of the matter is that everyone should be reading the thread and coming to their own conclusions.

Lacking that, I felt the need to provide a strong voice for those who are less than willing to read and think to follow if they wished. Admittedly that came across as a little harsher than I'd intended, but there you have it.

So yeah, you could say that I "disagree with the thrust of your argument". I also think you're scum.


Let me rephrase, because it would appear I haven't come across clearly.

This is the thrust of my argument:

On March 30 2012 02:38 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 30 2012 02:35 VisceraEyes wrote:
No you don't, you think everything I've done has been worthless.

Why are you pretending to care what I think when you've made it clear that my analyisis is a fucking joke and I'm useless as shit?

OH I KNOW!!! I KNOW!!!! IT'S BECAUSE YOU'RE SCUM!!!!


I said it once, and I'll say it again: if you're a town aligned player, you'll do this. You won't do it for me, you'll do it for town.


Do you disagree with this? I think I shouldn't have the argue you into providing analysis and reasoning behind your reads. I think you should come forwards with them yourself, before daybreak.

When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 17:55 GMT
#613
You can do better.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 18:12 GMT
#616
I'm still well on course to posting my reads and analysis before deadline. I see no reason not to point out VE's retardation between now and then, however. In the implausibly unlikely scenario that he does in fact get shot, it would be good to have his analysis before then.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 18:14 GMT
#617
On March 30 2012 03:07 gonzaw wrote:
            BH: VE, be sure to post your reads before the deadline;
            VE: You are scum and I'll get shot tonight;
            BH: No you wont, you are useless;


Also I'd just like to note that puppet VE's statement here is dumb. If he's gonna get shot tonight, HE SHOULD POST HIS ANALYSIS BEFORE THE DEADLINE.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 20:16 GMT
#619
I need to take a nap and won't be awake at daybreak, so I'm posting this now.

Here are a few thoughts I haven't fully articulated yet in this thread.

I'll begin with some thoughts on 3C and VE.


Firstly, I wouldn't assume VE is scum just because of his scummy interactions with me. VE being "pissed off" seems a little fake to me, given how typically unfazed he is by this sort of thing. Although VE's town play is typified by caution and a lack of confidence in his own thoughtss gradually unfolding into a solid set of reads, I wouldn't assume he's scum just based on meta. That being said, as I'm sure you're aware, having him lead the town didn't go well. This is in part his fault, but it's also your fault for following him. Don't be afraid to challenge him, or anyone, in the thread. It doesn't make you scum to do so. Arguing is what makes us stronger.

Secondly, 3C has done nothing as of the writing of this post to indicate he's town. If he lives through the night and isn't helpful D2, he should be lynched. If he's town, and he's truly done being "busy", you can and should anticipate something better out of him than his current sorry filter. There's some possibility of mod action as well, so that may change things. If he gets replaced out, that doesn't mean he wasn't lurking D1, however. Keep an eye on him, but don't let some single-minded wagon totally crush the town atmosphere like it did in student mafia Day 3. We must not repeat the town's mistake that game: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=291067&currentpage=47#933 but only if he contributes. Otherwise, lynch him.




SlOosh asked me to take a look at MrZ as a lynch candidate. I thought I'd save his question for later, so here it is:

Here are my thoughts on MrZ:

+ Show Spoiler +

1) he begins by talking about policy lynches, then makes a list of reads that includes no scumreads whatsoever: + Show Spoiler +
On March 27 2012 22:49 MrZentor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 18:32 Bluelightz wrote:
Reads, Reads!

Blazinghand ---> Catapaulted to very sure is townie from his recent posting(Active, Pressuring people, etc) and being funny and awesome in starcraft ^_^

Some random summaries

MrZentor --> Has been following Discussion, has not provided any reads, I'd love some reads from him.

gonzaw --> Has followed discussion, setup speculation, I'd love some reads and more content from him .

ET --> Townie, has followed discussion pressed people to post, preety townie

C_C ---> Needs to step up, he has nothing of substance, has not taken a stance on anything yet, I want reads, willing to lynch depending on what he post's next.



Sorry, I have been dreaming.

Anyways, here are a few of my thoughts.

BH seems like a rash townie, who is fairly good a pressuring. However, he doesn't seem able to discern a noobie town from scum.

JW seems like a noobie town, who did the wrong thing under pressure and is now realizing this.

C_C looks a little suspicious because of his first post, but I feel that people are reading too far into that.

VE seems to be promoting a good townie environment and being a lot calmer than BH. I am most afraid of him being scum, because if he were, I would never know.

Those are a few thoughts on the biggest players.
To be honest, I don't feel there is anybody worth analyzing yet, and there isn't much to analyze.



2) He continues with what I'd characterize as the most noncommittal case possible on ET: + Show Spoiler +
On March 27 2012 23:34 MrZentor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 23:00 Bluelightz wrote:
Zentor, since your here, What is your read on EchelonTee?

*cough* you're *cough*

EchelonTee seems to be behaving rather erratically.

He starts by being helpful and explaining how he would treat the game.
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 10:14 EchelonTee wrote:
On March 27 2012 08:27 slOosh wrote:
On March 27 2012 08:21 froggynoddy wrote:
I am finding this setup really difficult to get my head around (not on the mechanics, just how to play optimally and scumhunt accordingly).


It shouldn't be at all different no? Actually I've been meaning to ask a similar question.
Does a closed-setup in general change basic scumhunting principles or do they just allow/favor different styles of play?


honestly I am treating this game like a standard Mini Mafia, with the knowledge that there is probably a few doods with nukes or powers revolving around nukes. AKA, re-skinned medics/vigs.

and if there's anything I learned from minis, it's that there's always scum hiding in the lurkers. In general I'll always argue against policy lynches (because they're bad) but in a Mini, with so few people town simply cannot afford to have non-contributors whose alignment cannot be determined. People lurking scummily (yeah there's a difference between innocent lurking and scummily lurking) should be axed over someone with only a weak case on them.

gonzaw! shouldn't you be spamming the thread by now?


He continues his good townie streak by questioning BH's play with reasons.
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 12:59 EchelonTee wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On March 27 2012 12:39 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 12:22 Nemesis wrote:
On March 27 2012 11:52 Blazinghand wrote:
/confirm

Good morning, gentlemen.

First off, regarding our discussion of policy lynches: I personally apply a soft "lynch all lurkers" and "lynch all liars" policy to all the games in which I play. My first goal is always to lynch scum. Scum likes to lurk, and scum likes to lie. I am highly suspicious of lurkers and liars, but I will not automatically lynch every lurker and every liar-- this is too easily abused by scum. That being said, I have lynched lurkers and liars in the past and am not afraid to do so in this game. Nobody can convince me to modify my personal stance and I will not do so.

Secondarily, regarding setup: This is fairly simple. This is a closed setup with 10 town and 4 scum. Scum can win by either the traditional fashion, or by destroying 5 specific players or the other 5 specific players as an alternative wincon. It is immediately obvious that we should not share our alignment. Anarcy fo life


On March 27 2012 10:13 Nemesis wrote:
On March 27 2012 08:19 zelblade wrote:
Blabla no lynch bad blahblah

In sch post mre ltr

Do you mind posting something coherent?

On March 27 2012 07:49 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On March 27 2012 07:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
Perhaps. Perhaps not. I noticed that you didn't give an opinion one way or the other C_C, is there a reason you don't want to commit to a stance?


As town, it's hard to stay with a solid stance. Games change, and ultimately these little things never seem to come up anyway. As mafia, having a solid stance and sticking with it is basically a free pass.
Ultimately, 'lurking' and 'lying' are only a fraction of a persons play.

However, if it's a stance you want:
In my experience, the moment you bother lynching the lurkers is the moment you know mafia are in control of the game, especially if it's done sooner.
WIFOM
If we can conclusively prove someone was lying, that person should be suspect in the first place, and automatically be rated higher than lurkers.
Thanks for stating the obvious.

This is a rather crappy post. Town SHOULD always take a stance. If your stance change throughout the game, then you just have to explain why it changed. Scum are the only one who should fear taking stances, as they can get caught when their explanation doesn't match with their stance.


The town should not take a unified stance. If we rigidly follow a unified stance scum will just crap on us. We must always adapt to the situation at hand. The idea that you're somehow gonna catch scum because of their thoughts on a POLICY LYNCH is so utterly preposterous as to be asinine in character. Policy lynches are the last resort of a lost town, not some vital centerpiece for scumhunting. I hope you can understand that.

[image loading]
In this image: Blazinghand and Nemesis.

Lol, ok one last post before I go to sleep.

Stop misrepresenting what I said to defend your scummate:
1. I never said that town should take a unified stance. Just that they should take a stance on important things.
2. I never said we shouldn't adapt. In fact, I explicitly said that stances do change, and you just need to explain it when they change.
3. I never said that discussing policy lynches are important.

Sinensis, would you please stop inflating useless topics?



1) the idea that the town should take a stance is not good. Individually, we should make our own stances and developed them with the discussion
3) discussion of policy lynches implies they are important. I believe they are important insofar as we use them in an appropriate faction.

It seems to me that your statements are unnecessarily aggressive and are hurting the town atmosphere. Your removal will help the town greatly and improve our discourse.

In any case, I think this will be appropriate:
##Vote: Sinensis

When you wake up I expect some actually helpful posts. Actually, I expect an OMGUS, but ideally you'd make some helpful posts.

[image loading]

come at me bro


preface: this aint no chainsaw

blzinghand, I feel that you're being the unnecessarily aggressive one here. first you say it's bad that nemesis is using policy as a centerpiece for lynching, then you state it's bad that nemesis says policy lynch discussion isn't important? your arguement doesn't flow. and dude, you misread his original post; he's saying "town should take stance" as in townies should each have their own stance. ur being all flashy and stuff. is this normal BH?

+ Show Spoiler +
where do you get your gifs?


He then starts to go crazy.
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 13:15 EchelonTee wrote:
blzinghand i think you talking craAAAzzzy, and not the crazy I like. I mean just look at this nonsensical post
On March 27 2012 13:04 Blazinghand wrote:
But the fact of the matter is, he did somehow wake up to respond to my posts. He will doubtlessly claim that he hadn't yet gone to bed... but bear in mind that his series of actions is distinctly something a scum player WOULD do.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Blazinghand: I thought you went to sleep.
Nemesis: I was just checking thr-
Blazinghand: He lied!! Townies never wake back up!! Lynch!!!
Jubjubs (chanting): It makes so much sense!


He then transitions from crazy back to normal good townie in this post.
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 14:09 EchelonTee wrote:
TAKE ON SOMEONE YOUR OWN SIZE BUB

##vote: Blazinghand

Being good at arguing doesn't make you town. At this point you're just wildly voting people. Sowing dat chaos. Way to take the one off statement in his post and ignore the rest. You're voting people off of semantic mistakes as opposed to having any real reasoning, so thread flounders under your boot. As you might say, this kind of thinking hurts town. Scum.


He does this a few times throughout his posts. To be honest, I can't decide if this is town or mafia behavior. He could be a town who is mixing BH's and VE's styles. He could be scum trying to make it seem like he is helping town while sowing chaos. I'll let somebody else decide. :/



But take a look at how he ends that case.

He does this a few times throughout his posts. To be honest, I can't decide if this is town or mafia behavior. He could be a town who is mixing BH's and VE's styles. He could be scum trying to make it seem like he is helping town while sowing chaos. I'll let somebody else decide. :/

This is a very long analysis to be non-committal. "I'll let somebody else decide" could be a noob move, but in my book this is another mark in the "points towards scum" column.

Coupled with slOosh's case regarding MrZ's reasoning to hop onto the C_C wagon, I think there's a case to be made here.


He's not my main man, though. I think we need to go after Sinensis. See my next post.

When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 20:16 GMT
#620

What I'm really interested in, though, is what happened with C_C's wagon. It revealed to me that Sin is scum:

The wagon didn't provide me much until I reached the part where Sin votes: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=18#356
On March 28 2012 11:51 Sinensis wrote:
Back from work.

Show nested quote +
On March 28 2012 11:00 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I've been using a simple system to keep track of people, and I have the game solved. It's just a matter of waiting it out now.
+ Show Spoiler [gg] +
[image loading]


So you just alignment claimed soviet for the second time? You are also grouping people based on Nationality.

Only one class benefits from grouping based on Nationality, so indeed, gg Nazi.

##vote: Cyber_Cheese


I don't like this at all. I think this is a completely empty/worthless reason for voting him. IF you look at it, there's no possible way C_C could know the nationality of people other than himself. Sure, he was soft-claiming SU again, but he also has some other named whirled about in his diagram in various locations.

Now, to the untrained observer, it might seem like C_C is claiming that me, Nem, and 3C are US, whereas he, JE, and ET are SU. But anyone who recieved a townie PM or read the PM in the OP immediately knows that C_C has NO IDEA what anyone's alignment is but his. Those other names are just put in there randomly.

So.. what is Sin talking about here?
On March 28 2012 11:51 Sinensis wrote:
You are also grouping people based on Nationality.

Only one class benefits from grouping based on Nationality, so indeed, gg Nazi.


Well, I took the time to ask him.

On March 28 2012 11:56 Sinensis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 28 2012 11:53 Blazinghand wrote:
On March 28 2012 11:51 Sinensis wrote:
Back from work.

On March 28 2012 11:00 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I've been using a simple system to keep track of people, and I have the game solved. It's just a matter of waiting it out now.
+ Show Spoiler [gg] +
[image loading]


So you just alignment claimed soviet for the second time? You are also grouping people based on Nationality.

Only one class benefits from grouping based on Nationality, so indeed, gg Nazi.

##vote: Cyber_Cheese


Let me get this straight: you think that this post you've quoted somehow has anything to do with anyone's nationality? C_C only knows his own nationality... and he's already soft-claimed AND backtracked SU. There's literally no way he was gonna align-fish anything with this latter post that he wouldn't have already with the first post, assuming people are reading the thread. This is a bad and scummy reason to vote for C_C. Was the flag not enough, but somehow this graphic is?


It is the combination of the flag and the graphic, and the fact that he is segregating names in his graphic based on nationality.

Emphasis mine.

Again, there's no way anyone could know anyone's nationality. What's Sin talking about? This in particular isn't a reason to think C_C is scum. Sure, the fact that he personally has been softclaiming SU, and has been seen as "align-fishing", that's a reason. But the fact that he's "sorting people"? That doesn't make sense at all.

I press further:

On March 28 2012 12:00 Sinensis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 28 2012 11:57 Blazinghand wrote:
On March 28 2012 11:56 Sinensis wrote:
On March 28 2012 11:53 Blazinghand wrote:
On March 28 2012 11:51 Sinensis wrote:
Back from work.

On March 28 2012 11:00 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
I've been using a simple system to keep track of people, and I have the game solved. It's just a matter of waiting it out now.
+ Show Spoiler [gg] +
[image loading]


So you just alignment claimed soviet for the second time? You are also grouping people based on Nationality.

Only one class benefits from grouping based on Nationality, so indeed, gg Nazi.

##vote: Cyber_Cheese


Let me get this straight: you think that this post you've quoted somehow has anything to do with anyone's nationality? C_C only knows his own nationality... and he's already soft-claimed AND backtracked SU. There's literally no way he was gonna align-fish anything with this latter post that he wouldn't have already with the first post, assuming people are reading the thread. This is a bad and scummy reason to vote for C_C. Was the flag not enough, but somehow this graphic is?


It is the combination of the flag and the graphic, and the fact that he is segregating names in his graphic based on nationality.


Explain how the segregating names in his graphic based on nationality does anything to help scum or hurt town?


Mafia wins if they kill every citizen of one nationality. Dividing reads by nationality supports that agenda.


WHAT?? How?

On March 28 2012 12:12 Sinensis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 28 2012 12:04 Blazinghand wrote:
Sinensis either knows something I don't, or literally doesn't understand the way nationality works. Nobody has claimed any nationalities, and nobody will. It's literally impossible to have a read on anyone's nationality at this point. Please sir explain your reasoning?


C_C, the "soviet scientist's," posts would have me beg to differ.


This doesn't even make sense! This was C_C talking about himself! How could he know any of these people's alignment??
On March 28 2012 12:20 Sinensis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 28 2012 12:16 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:12 Sinensis wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:04 Blazinghand wrote:
Sinensis either knows something I don't, or literally doesn't understand the way nationality works. Nobody has claimed any nationalities, and nobody will. It's literally impossible to have a read on anyone's nationality at this point. Please sir explain your reasoning?


C_C, the "soviet scientist's," posts would have me beg to differ.

That was flavour only.


The flag and writing "me" in the soviet side of the graphic was flavor too, right? Have all your posts been flavor only? Maybe we should all give you a clean slate and unvote you since I seem to have voted based on something you posted only for flavor.

On March 28 2012 12:27 Sinensis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 28 2012 12:18 Blazinghand wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:12 Sinensis wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:04 Blazinghand wrote:
Sinensis either knows something I don't, or literally doesn't understand the way nationality works. Nobody has claimed any nationalities, and nobody will. It's literally impossible to have a read on anyone's nationality at this point. Please sir explain your reasoning?


C_C, the "soviet scientist's," posts would have me beg to differ.


Assuming CC is indeed town and not scum, I currently do not have a read on whether or not he is US or SU, and nobody who is reasonable does either.


I consider myself reasonable and I have a read on his alignment. I think he's a nazi. Based on votes, 5 other people thing he's a nazi.

Again, this is all based on the LONE guy who softclaimed a nationality in the thread. Sinensis isn't saying "C_C is suspicious because he soft-claimed a nationality, and he's not scumhunting." -- he's saying that C_C somehow has reads on other player's nationalities and is revealing them to his scumbuddies in the thread.

Sinensis isn't bringing up some reasonable argument, the argument that all the town players would be convinced by.

I keep on pressing, even, and he completely diverts to some unrelated post: + Show Spoiler +
On March 28 2012 12:48 Sinensis wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 28 2012 12:32 Blazinghand wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:27 Sinensis wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:18 Blazinghand wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:12 Sinensis wrote:
On March 28 2012 12:04 Blazinghand wrote:
Sinensis either knows something I don't, or literally doesn't understand the way nationality works. Nobody has claimed any nationalities, and nobody will. It's literally impossible to have a read on anyone's nationality at this point. Please sir explain your reasoning?


C_C, the "soviet scientist's," posts would have me beg to differ.


Assuming CC is indeed town and not scum, I currently do not have a read on whether or not he is US or SU, and nobody who is reasonable does either.


I consider myself reasonable and I have a read on his alignment. I think he's a nazi. Based on votes, 5 other people thing he's a nazi.


QFFT


Right, but you admit you don't know whether anyone is US or SU, and it's GOOD that this is the case. In any case C_C is probably scum, but JW is DEFINITELY scum. That being said, it's not unreasonable that they're both scum. I think JW is a better lynch than C_C for reasons I have outlined in my two analysis posts above.


Not that arguing with you has produced results for anyone else that has tried, but is this the anaysis post you are referring to?

+ Show Spoiler +
On March 27 2012 15:34 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 15:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
Blaze, it's only pressure if what you're saying is true. You're so blatant about your logic being ridiculous that it's not even intimidating and only serves to make you look suspicious.

Now cut out the dramatics or I'll join the jubjubs and scum in lynching you...even if you're town.


I daresay my logic is largely non-ridiculous. It may appear ridiculous to you, but god does not play dice with the universe. Humor me a moment, and let me seduce you with my lascivious arguments.

A) Johnnywup's initial "pressure" on me was actually rather half-assed and non-comittal. I found his statement that "scum wouldn't play this bad" (or equivalent) to be an anti-town statement.

B) I call him out in a typically aggressive fashion. He responds in this way:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=9#171
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 14:07 johnnywup wrote:
i'm absolutely flattered <3


On March 27 2012 14:03 Blazinghand wrote:
bad logic, anti-town to be bad logic. This kind of thinking hurts town. If you plan on using this sort of reasoning going forwards, you are either scum or worthless town.

irony?

and hows it anti-town to have bad logic? it just means you're unhelpful, that doesn't mean you're anti-town.. And my logic is perfectly sound thank you.


One thing that really sets me off about you is your willingness to shift your vote to me after any pressure at all. You didn't have a case on Nemesis and you don't have a case on me.



This is generally a bad post. I really don't like this particular section:

Show nested quote +

and hows it anti-town to have bad logic? it just means you're unhelpful, that doesn't mean you're anti-town.


I think any marginally experienced player, or even someone who sits down and thinks about how mafia works should realize that bad logic being posted in the thread DOES hurt the town. as a town player, you want to avoid doing this. As a scum player, you are happy when you see this. bad logic hurts the town. it is anti town, then.

And other than these two posts, he has had a generally underwhelming filter:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&user=99700


"But, blazinghand, most of JW's stuff wasn't even there during your initial accusation! what was the deal there?"

Admittedly, my first post in which I voted him was grasping slightly at straws. this town is silent and there was basically no analysis happening. I needed to get things rolling. His utterly catastrophic responses to me after voting him have made me realize that this guy is scum, and deserves to be lynched.

Anybody who examines his filter can look and see that there is something amiss. this is now how a town player would play.

I stand by my vote, for new reasons that are stronger than the ones for which it was initially made.

The evidence is there. all you need to do is open your eyes.


I redded the part I need to comment on, not because I am speculating you are Soviet but just because there is a lot of other formatting in this post. Your argument against johnny is that bad logic hurts the town and he said otherwise. You say bad logic hurts the town and is thus anti town again in this post.

Show nested quote +
On March 27 2012 14:03 Blazinghand wrote:
On March 27 2012 13:26 johnnywup wrote:
I don't think you're mafia, blazing, because no mafia would be so stupid to post something so stupid. At least I think. Utterly garbage posting so far.


bad logic, anti-town to be bad logic. This kind of thinking hurts town. If you plan on using this sort of reasoning going forwards, you are either scum or worthless town.

##unvote
##vote: johnnywup

I'd say "come at me bro" but your argumentation skills are so benign I feel like any "pressure" you put on me will only serve to exonerate me.


There's two examples of your belief that "bad logic hurts the town and is thus anti town."

Well maybe you could comment on some of your own bad logic. Or do you need me to go back and quote just about every post you made in the beginning to remind you? My point is the case you are using against johnnywup works better on you than it does him, and that if "bad logic" is the criteria you are going to use to place your vote, maybe you ought to vote yourself.



So, to summarize: Sinensis gives a completely nonsense reason for why he voted C_C, and defends it only by diverting my pressure and dodging my questions. nothing he says makes any sense. at all. He proceeds to lurk and only comes back to the thread for a few one-liners without followup and posts this:
On March 29 2012 13:45 Sinensis wrote:
Maybe I am being overly simplistic, but I think we should lynch Blazinghand because I do not believe all 4 scum would vote for the same townie when it was certain the townie was dying anyway.


Which I, of course, personally believe to be trash.

------

So, in summary, I'm sure Sinensis is scum. Judging by the way he voted C_C, and his reasoning for voting C_C, and the way he responded to my questioning, I find this to be very likely. It's also worth noting that he and VE soft defend each other a once, but it could easily be this case with VE being town as well, so it can't be said that it's a scumtell. Still, read through Sinensis explanation for his C_C vote and his response to my pressure. It makes NO SENSE AT ALL. It started here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=18#356

Sinensis is scum. Read his filter, and his post on C_C, and his reasoning. It will reveal the truth.

+ Show Spoiler [full list of wagon links] +
VE starts the wagon, as we remember, with a case based on the flag post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=10#197
Zelblade is follows up shortly: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=12#223
Bluelightz is next: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=16#303
VE moves off C_C to ET: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=16#312
Bluelightz follows him minutes later: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=16#317
Bluelightz then moves quickly back: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=17#327
VE moves back 10 minutes later: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=17#332
JW moves from ET to VE: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=17#333
Sin votes: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=18#356
SlOosh hops on: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=20#384
VE makes his "town cred" post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=23#453
Froggy votes: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=23#458
MrZ's vote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=24#463
ET's vote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=25#485
Gonzaw's vote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=25#487
3C's vote: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=322686&currentpage=26#506
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
March 29 2012 20:17 GMT
#621
Hope to see you guys in the morning! And remember, Sinensis made no goddamn sense even under repeated questioning. He's scum.

good night.

[image loading]
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 201
Ketroc 17
Livibee 11
StarCraft: Brood War
Sexy 47
NaDa 20
Bale 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever675
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1350
taco 308
Coldzera 199
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox266
Other Games
summit1g12359
tarik_tv7479
Grubby2064
Day[9].tv753
JimRising 198
C9.Mang0177
Maynarde116
ViBE110
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1419
BasetradeTV47
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta78
• Hupsaiya 62
• RyuSc2 46
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota23040
League of Legends
• Doublelift4192
Counter-Strike
• imaqtpie983
• Shiphtur223
Other Games
• Scarra1436
• Day9tv753
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
9h 43m
Reynor vs Zoun
Solar vs SHIN
Classic vs ShoWTimE
Cure vs Rogue
Esports World Cup
1d 10h
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.