C9++ Mini Mafia - Page 28
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
Mother Natures a cunt. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 20 2012 07:41 Jackal58 wrote: Fucking Jub Jubs. Mother Natures a cunt. ![]() GG to you too sir. | ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
On March 17 2012 15:39 sandroba wrote: lynch jackal day 1 pls I'd like to point out that I knew jackal was scum before he knew himself he was scum. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 20 2012 07:59 sandroba wrote: I'd like to point out that I knew jackal was scum before he knew himself he was scum. That's cause you're IMBA Sandroba. | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
| ||
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
Also DT can check someone else if they feel strongly about it of course. | ||
Toad_in_Pink_Dress
United States50 Posts
/Blue | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Check scum instead. I have nothing to fear from a check, and with hitting scum D1, we have a check to spare...but I think the list of non-Jackal-voters is a good enough list to DT into. But that's just my opinion, and it's heavily biased with the information I have (my alignment.) e: My bad. Image Removed. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
And you yourself said we were bandwagoning too fast. You doubted your vote. So just because other people doubted the vote on jackal and didn't vote on him is suddenly scummy? By that logic you're just as scummy as those who didn't vote for him. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
VisceraEyes is given permission to edit out an ad that randomly appeared in his post. I have taken a screenshot of it and it has been noted that VisceraEyes' tastes in porn are incredibly strange. Original post, sans image: On March 20 2012 09:42 VisceraEyes wrote: I'm a cuddly kitten - no one needs to check me. Check scum instead. I have nothing to fear from a check, and with hitting scum D1, we have a check to spare...but I think the list of non-Jackal-voters is a good enough list to DT into. But that's just my opinion, and it's heavily biased with the information I have (my alignment.) | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 20 2012 09:53 wherebugsgo wrote: the fuck lol VisceraEyes is given permission to edit out an ad that randomly appeared in his post. I have taken a screenshot of it and it has been noted that VisceraEyes' tastes in porn are incredibly strange. Original post, sans image: :S | ||
johnnywup
United States3858 Posts
On March 20 2012 06:07 VisceraEyes wrote: Well...that was fast. We're either all on the same wavelength or this wagon was too fast. -.- My brain hurts. I hope we're doing the right thing. You're doubting your vote but you keep it because it's going to be lynch. then On March 20 2012 09:42 VisceraEyes wrote: Check scum instead. I have nothing to fear from a check, and with hitting scum D1, we have a check to spare...but I think the list of non-Jackal-voters is a good enough list to DT into. But that's just my opinion, and it's heavily biased with the information I have (my alignment.) you say the wagon was too fast yet you think that those who didn't vote are candidates for scum. maybe they were on the same boat as you, his lynching came too fast and there weren't that many facts there so they withheld their vote (as opposed to you who voted anyways). Now jackal happened to be mafia. You and non-voters were on the same boat of the vote going too fast without that much substance to base it off. So thinking the non-voters are scum is thinking you yourself are scum. | ||
xsksc
United Kingdom1044 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 20 2012 09:58 johnnywup wrote: Lets see here. You're doubting your vote but you keep it because it's going to be lynch. then Except, the thing is, if I had removed my vote it would NOT have been a lynch. That's all there is to it, because Jackal was lynched with 7 and 7 only votes...if I had moved my vote to someone else, there would have been no lynch. On March 20 2012 09:58 johnnywup wrote: you say the wagon was too fast yet you think that those who didn't vote are candidates for scum. maybe they were on the same boat as you, his lynching came too fast and there weren't that many facts there so they withheld their vote (as opposed to you who voted anyways). Now jackal happened to be mafia. You and non-voters were on the same boat of the vote going too fast without that much substance to base it off. So thinking the non-voters are scum is thinking you yourself are scum. ...I did say the wagon built super-fast. That's a fact, Jackal went from having what, 2 votes? To SEVEN votes in the span of like 10 minutes. That's a fast wagon bro, I don't care where you are used to playing. However, the fact that I brought attention to this yet kept my vote on him is actually a town tell if you think about it. First of all, the fact that the wagon built so fast is absolutely a good reason to mistrust a wagon, and if I were Jackal's scumbuddy, I would have been sooooooooooo safe in just removing my vote and causing the no-lynch. Anyone who's played with me knows my stance on no-lynches...if I thought Jackal was town I would have forced a no-lynch regardless of my alignment because in my humble opinion, a no-lynch is better than a town-lynch. I, however, did not think Jackal was town, and kept my vote where it was. Anyone who wasn't on Jackal, was not on Jackal. You can speculate that it was because they thought the wagon built too fast, you can speculate that they thought he was town, you can speculate that they were scum...but the fact of the matter is that they were not on the Jackal wagon, and I was on the Jackal wagon, so my holding people not on the Jackal wagon accountable is not, as you put it "thinking I myself am scum"...and the leap you took to arrive at that conclusion is pretty staggering - I'm surprised your legs aren't broken. | ||
| ||