|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 08:05 Jayjay54 wrote:
there's two more reasons to lynch drazer right now, if we believe him.
a) he claims to have 3 items. Assuming the anger thing is fake, he still has two important items, which means, there's a good chance that we can get to town by lynching (assuming town votes here). I believe a DT item is pretty cool on a more trusted player.
b) he claims to have a portal gun, which makes him unshotable. I assume it's a busdriver thing.
I actually think, we make a mistake, if we leave him alive. He lied about his wincon and is still lying. I believe he's third looking at the general reactions, but I think he is not at all town favouring.
I *think* he may be lying about the portal gun to avoid getting shot. Scum would probably be worried about him killing them or something, right? That being said, it does make more sense to lynch him than to vig him, and he's certainly not a controllable fellow. He's changed his negotiating stance so many times we might as well call him Mitt Romney
ZINGGGGGGGGG
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 08:25 gonzaw wrote:
Okay people, assume zelblade IS indeed Sleeper Agent and is communicating with his buddies..
....which scum in their right mind would take a "correction of a typo" as a tell that he found his scumbuddy?
No one!
Even if he's Sleeper Agent, his buddies would most likely think he's town or null to them. They find each other via the encrypted messages they send each other, and via the behaviour in the thread, not by EBWOPS and typos.
Hell, maybe the SA would have killed their scumbuddy zelblade tonight if you hadn't mentioned that.
But really, if zelblade did in fact do that as SA it was a pretty stupid move from his part.
Even if he is a SA (this doesn't exonerate him, he hasn't contributed much and I want him to answer my questions as well) I doubt he did that on purpose to communicate with his scumbuddies..
..I can't believe I really have to explain this.
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/rQr6J.gif)
You're so clueless it's preposterous.
On March 17 2012 08:19 GreYMisT wrote:Role PM: + Show Spoiler +Welcome to Aperture Mafia! You are Melichor the Endesleid, a Shadowsinger. Every night you may visit a player and wrap reality around them, inverting effects that target the player. What this means is that medic protects will kill them, detective checks will return the opposite alignment, kp will protect, etc. You are also a member of the Sleeper Cell . You do not know the other 3 members, however you do know a Cell leader is in this game, and you may receive messages from him during the day or night phase. Your win condition is for the Cell to outnumber the remaining players in the game.
Only the cell leader sends messages... this is sleeper cell I style, not Sleeper Cell II style.
The agents themselves can only recieve messages and try to encode things to eachother here in the thread.
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 08:25 gonzaw wrote:
....which scum in their right mind would take a "correction of a typo" as a tell that he found his scumbuddy?
No one!
God, it's even in a post that's ABOUT SLEEPER CELL DUDES FINDING EACH OTHER.
Are you even thinking here? His post is ABOUT SLEEPER CELL DUDES FINDING EACH OTHER.
And he edited and BOLDFACED the word "link" in that sentence...
like if you've been hearing some "whooshing" sounds that's the sound of my arguments going over your head.
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
Would it be a good idea to have our vigis shoot into the lurkers then? As it stands, it's super easy for scum to hide by lurking. It doesn't help that it's St. Patrick's Day ;_; automatically giving people an excuse for, say, posting like this:
RayzorFlash, lurking: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=129351
BlubbDavid, lurking: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=60919
SBrubbles, lurking: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=118447
Cyber_Cheese, inactive: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=87276
Cwave, lurking: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=232648
Nisani, semil-lurking: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=105586
Sniani, Lurking: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=128360
Kitaman, lurking: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=46535
V7, lurking: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=319120&user=39803
All of these guys are lurking or semi-lurking, preventing us from winning this game.
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 09:04 phagga wrote:
For the election, Blazinghand is a valid candidate, Velinath might be as well. However, I still feel we will have the need to get rid of Wheatley somewhere later on, so I'm not sure if I want to send a competent townie on the post. As someone else mentioned, perhaps vote one of the lesser players for that role. I will therefore hold my election vote back for the moment.
Ah yes you're right an incompetent guy is the right guy to give power to
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 09:22 phagga wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 09:18 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 09:04 phagga wrote:
For the election, Blazinghand is a valid candidate, Velinath might be as well. However, I still feel we will have the need to get rid of Wheatley somewhere later on, so I'm not sure if I want to send a competent townie on the post. As someone else mentioned, perhaps vote one of the lesser players for that role. I will therefore hold my election vote back for the moment.
Ah yes you're right an incompetent guy is the right guy to give power to I just want to avoid that we are giving one of the better players this role and one day later we have to vigi him because he suddenly turns against town. there are people in here trying to kill GLaDOS. Have you played the game? After GLaDOS gets put in a potato, Wheatley runs the show, and it's not a good thing. That's what I'm afraid of.
Fair enough. I still consider the chief goal to avoid electing a power role to Wheatley. We want someone as (rule-wise) worthless as possible, since if he turns, we won't lose hard assets for the town. I also thing we want someone who's definitely town. So...
me.
Another thought (and I'm not sure this will work) is that we could just never kill GLaDOS, and Wheatley won't turn evil?
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 09:49 Velinath wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 09:29 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 09:22 phagga wrote:On March 18 2012 09:18 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 09:04 phagga wrote:
For the election, Blazinghand is a valid candidate, Velinath might be as well. However, I still feel we will have the need to get rid of Wheatley somewhere later on, so I'm not sure if I want to send a competent townie on the post. As someone else mentioned, perhaps vote one of the lesser players for that role. I will therefore hold my election vote back for the moment.
Ah yes you're right an incompetent guy is the right guy to give power to I just want to avoid that we are giving one of the better players this role and one day later we have to vigi him because he suddenly turns against town. there are people in here trying to kill GLaDOS. Have you played the game? After GLaDOS gets put in a potato, Wheatley runs the show, and it's not a good thing. That's what I'm afraid of. Fair enough. I still consider the chief goal to avoid electing a power role to Wheatley. We want someone as (rule-wise) worthless as possible, since if he turns, we won't lose hard assets for the town. I also thing we want someone who's definitely town. So... me. Another thought (and I'm not sure this will work) is that we could just never kill GLaDOS, and Wheatley won't turn evil? So if you're arguing that we should vote you on the basis of avoiding electing a power role, are you claiming vanilla townie?
No comment.
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 10:12 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 09:49 Velinath wrote:On March 18 2012 09:29 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 09:22 phagga wrote:On March 18 2012 09:18 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 09:04 phagga wrote:
For the election, Blazinghand is a valid candidate, Velinath might be as well. However, I still feel we will have the need to get rid of Wheatley somewhere later on, so I'm not sure if I want to send a competent townie on the post. As someone else mentioned, perhaps vote one of the lesser players for that role. I will therefore hold my election vote back for the moment.
Ah yes you're right an incompetent guy is the right guy to give power to I just want to avoid that we are giving one of the better players this role and one day later we have to vigi him because he suddenly turns against town. there are people in here trying to kill GLaDOS. Have you played the game? After GLaDOS gets put in a potato, Wheatley runs the show, and it's not a good thing. That's what I'm afraid of. Fair enough. I still consider the chief goal to avoid electing a power role to Wheatley. We want someone as (rule-wise) worthless as possible, since if he turns, we won't lose hard assets for the town. I also thing we want someone who's definitely town. So... me. Another thought (and I'm not sure this will work) is that we could just never kill GLaDOS, and Wheatley won't turn evil? So if you're arguing that we should vote you on the basis of avoiding electing a power role, are you claiming vanilla townie? No comment.
You MUST be aware that asking/answering that question is a bad move for town.
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 10:14 Velinath wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 10:12 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 10:12 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 09:49 Velinath wrote:On March 18 2012 09:29 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 09:22 phagga wrote:On March 18 2012 09:18 Blazinghand wrote:On March 18 2012 09:04 phagga wrote:
For the election, Blazinghand is a valid candidate, Velinath might be as well. However, I still feel we will have the need to get rid of Wheatley somewhere later on, so I'm not sure if I want to send a competent townie on the post. As someone else mentioned, perhaps vote one of the lesser players for that role. I will therefore hold my election vote back for the moment.
Ah yes you're right an incompetent guy is the right guy to give power to I just want to avoid that we are giving one of the better players this role and one day later we have to vigi him because he suddenly turns against town. there are people in here trying to kill GLaDOS. Have you played the game? After GLaDOS gets put in a potato, Wheatley runs the show, and it's not a good thing. That's what I'm afraid of. Fair enough. I still consider the chief goal to avoid electing a power role to Wheatley. We want someone as (rule-wise) worthless as possible, since if he turns, we won't lose hard assets for the town. I also thing we want someone who's definitely town. So... me. Another thought (and I'm not sure this will work) is that we could just never kill GLaDOS, and Wheatley won't turn evil? So if you're arguing that we should vote you on the basis of avoiding electing a power role, are you claiming vanilla townie? No comment. You MUST be aware that asking/answering that question is a bad move for town. I feel like you kind of made it an issue with your last post.
Then I have no choice but to advise you that I have said all that which I have to say on the matter, so you should just ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/6DdDc.gif)
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 10:23 Velinath wrote:
ebwop: On a completely unrelated note, if lurkers are still lurking at the end of the day, I see no problem vigging them, if only to increase the proportion of active, contributing players. Not having to worry about noncontributors (people who, by nature, are difficult to build cases on) means that we can scumhunt among an easier set of players to scumhunt in.
I agree. Also, I suspect a fair number of scum are hiding among the lurkers, so that's probably the safest place for vigs to shoot anyways.
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 17:33 Dirk Hardpec wrote:
Why are people giving me their votes?
I'd say it's probably due to your relatively short filter, and the fact that some people have identified your sole analysis post as being fluffy and generally unhelpful.
In fact, you'd say that too if you read anyone's reason for voting you.
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 19:35 Drazerk wrote:
JayJay - Anger core is used up on use
If I am leading in votes by lynch time I will be passing the guns to someone I believe will screw the town the most
When I flip I am going to laugh at you
The united states of blzinghand does not negotiate with terrorists.
##Vote Drazerk
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 18 2012 19:48 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On March 18 2012 19:46 Jayjay54 wrote:On March 18 2012 19:35 Drazerk wrote:
JayJay - Anger core is used up on use
If I am leading in votes by lynch time I will be passing the guns to someone I believe will screw the town the most
When I flip I am going to laugh at you Your threats show, how much of a liability to town you are. You are willing to screw town over just to fullfil your wincon. We can't leave you alive. Why would you laugh at me? I believe you are third and am completely willing to lynch you, even if everything you say is true. I am only a threat to town if you are a threat to me. Leave me alone and we will be fine.
thems terrorist words
I WILL NOT NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS
to my fellow townies let me explain situation to you
[spioler]
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Kr4Bf.png)
[bigAs we can clearly see, Drazerk is a terrorist, and he's trying to hold town hostage. Your hero is me, blzinghand!!!!
Drazerk is like full of terrorising and only gets his power from making us fear. We mus tbe like spock and remove our minds from fear!
DO not negotiate with terrorist
lynch drazerk D1 or ther terrorists win
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 19 2012 08:07 Velinath wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2012 08:05 Grackaroni wrote:
Great so he told the truth about Velinath being 3rd party. How do you figure? He had role names, throwing out random accusations means nothing. I'm town.
So what powers did you get
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
Velinath what are your powers
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
Yeah I don't even need to write anything else here. Any vigis can click that link then realize they need to shoot you immediately.
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 20 2012 03:48 Grackaroni wrote:Yesterday you were in the thread but you were being silent. (when you were asking about veli's roles) that's not like yourself. FYI, people have said that this game is full of blue roles so that won't be a valid excuse for you to be holding back on us.
Is there a question there?
|
Blazinghand
United States25559 Posts
On March 20 2012 03:51 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2012 03:48 Grackaroni wrote:Yesterday you were in the thread but you were being silent. (when you were asking about veli's roles) that's not like yourself. FYI, people have said that this game is full of blue roles so that won't be a valid excuse for you to be holding back on us. Is there a question there?
Oh wait let me answer this for myself: no, Grack is trying to "soft attack" without actually asking any questions or contributing eh
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
