TL Mafia LII: JubJub Mafia - Page 2

On March 13 2012 00:38 Jitsu wrote:


I'm going to tie this into the response to ET's case against me, because I think it's important to note.

I read you're case, and broke it up into two sections. The first section is a case against me that I am spewing bullshit about Lynch All Liar's policy. Whether it's useful or not to town isn't the issue. I believe it is, and when enforced, can be powerful too. Whether you agree or disagree doesn't matter. My intention was to come in, set the tone, show that no bullshit was going to be taken, and then continue on.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=316574&currentpage=9#169

At this point, I was essentially finished talking about Lynch All Liars. I stressed my point many times, and felt that it was enough and didn't need to be reopened. You say that I continued to talk about the LaL policy up.

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=316574&currentpage=9#175

Layabout comes in and questions my reasoning on the matter, which turns into a large (albeit un-needed) blowout about two players opinions on how the game should be played. The snowball grows and we continue to bicker. Mr.Wiggles comes in, asks me a final question, and I think that's the end of the topic of LaL.

Also, ET, you're first quote...:


...is in response to gumshoe. Go back and look at it. I didn't feel the need to add a quote because his post was one or two above mine, and was "easily" associated with it. It's not a continuation, it's a response. Don't make it out like it is.

Secondly, you say that my case on prphlz is flimsy.

How many games have you played? Have you ever mis-read the name of a player? It's generally the first thing I look at when someone posts. I don't "get all giddy and assume" that it's someone. You think prphlz would just go right by a nametag at the top of a post, and assume it's someone? Please. You and I both know he is better then that.

For example:

If I say, "Hey ET, nice case on Qatol."
And then you post your case on Qatol.
zzz...

How does that not give outside communication? Curu already say they weren't PMing, so that kills that reason.

As for LayAbout, I have no idea. I think he was more interested in trying to prove me wrong on the Accountability discussion then actually contributing to town. I've only played one other game with him, but that's something we can't discuss at this point.

On March 13 2012 01:08 layabout wrote:
Mattchew, where in all of that empty fluff did you find a reason to unvote?

Was it the narrative at the begin that was suppoosed to address the case against him?
Was it was the "you called my case flimsy, how about i address none of your points and clarify none of my points and pretend to have refuted your criticism?"
Or maybe it was the I cannot be bothered to think of somehthing to say about layabout part?

On March 14 2012 09:49 deconduo wrote:
Where is Bill Murray? He almost has less posts than me and I've been around for about five minutes total.

On March 12 2012 15:36 Bill Murray wrote:
top 2 suspects are jitsu and layabout, but i'm voting for caller... hmmm... sorry to spam, but something must be wrong with my brain. I'm going to switch my vote to jitsu, actually.

On March 14 2012 10:37 jaybrundage wrote:


Simple, Its just like looking at someone that post's regularly. You look at there posts and see any hidden agenda's or inconsistencies. I'm post who i think we should lynch tommorow. Don't like posting cases at night D:

But Doc how about you do you think we should go for Caller or Jitsu still?

On March 14 2012 10:44 Jackal58 wrote:

I think I can't answer that without being mean.

On March 14 2012 10:47 Jackal58 wrote:

Bill Murray of course.

On March 14 2012 10:50 DoctorHelvetica wrote:


In AC when he was a medic