On February 28 2012 10:44 prplhz wrote: Can't you do something instead?
You make me smile prpl.
You don't make me smile as much as you usually do. You want to lynch me, there are people around who want to lynch me, why are you not pushing me? This is relevant to my interests.
Also, DrH, you never responded to my question earlier. What triggered you to move to blazing over RoL yesterday? Do you believe "giving up" is a town RoL response?
On February 28 2012 10:59 kitaman27 wrote: Also, DrH, you never responded to my question earlier. What triggered you to move to blazing over RoL yesterday? Do you believe "giving up" is a town RoL response?
Thought BH was scummier and lost confidence in my read once I started second-guessing myself mostly based on RoL's personality and remembering how things were with youngminii when we played together. I figured RoL, being more inactive, is better left to vigilantes since a bandwagon on an inactive player doesn't move discussion
You think there is a vigilante after RoL or chaoser wasn't shot last night? Do you think he would be a better lynch tomorrow if he lives another night? I'm really not sure what we gain by keeping a likely scum player alive.
On that note, I've been tricked into putting off my hw yet again. bbl
On February 28 2012 11:06 DoctorHelvetica wrote: If I had to guess right now I'd say the scum team is between these 5: Toades/Dirk BC VE RoL
I think it's gonna be 4 of these players.
On February 28 2012 09:24 wherebugsgo wrote: I guess it's possible that the entire scum team is something like you, prpl, RoL, and VE. In fact I wouldn't be shocked
Weird seeing you guys list 4 person scum teams considering red's flip was hidden.
On February 26 2012 07:06 syllogism wrote: Should have gone with RoL. I'm going to have complaints about the setup if the vote counts can't be trusted.
On February 24 2012 09:31 Blazinghand wrote: ##unvote bloodyc0bbler
Well, that didn't take much.
I appreciate the effort BC. If your quality of posting stays at least close to the quality of your last post, I can entertain the possibility of lynching others first.
What are your thoughts on WBG BC?
at the moment an aggressive asshat who needs to shape up or ship out.
By your estimation, how much "aggressive asshattery" is it going to take before he's no longer able to "shape up" enough and has to be "shipped out"? That's a really really wishywashy stance on someone who's active when you're largest gripe with RoL is his inactivity sir.
RoL's biggest tell in near all games as red that I can recall is his activity level. He lurks and will bust out excuses as to why he was inactive but always appears when he has to (called out or to avoid being heavily suspected, etc..) whereas town he even when busy with life shite always has quality posts if inactive.
As for how much it will take for wbg is similar to what I would expect what it will take for myself or RoL. IE contribute. I am overall fine with aggressive posting but aside from a few of his posts he has come off as someone attempting to avoid leaving a huge mark on the thread in solid opinions. He obviously has had some solid posts, but he has a ton of fluff ones as well.
LOL holy shit. Scum much? You have played enough with me to know my play is erratic and that I have played plenty of games active as scum. Just because I was busy for 16 hours (get over it guys) doesn't mean you are going to get away with this shit when I am actually reading the thread.
Helvetica you are scum, will get to that in a minute though.
Your play is erratic only in terms of quality of your posts. Now and then you have things like work keeping you distracted or the like, but the level of posts you make are normally decent as town and lazyish as scum. If your telling me I am wrong on this, prove it to me. Til then your on my radar.
Is RoL still on your radar BC? What do you think about his ragequit?
[QUOTE]On February 28 2012 09:26 wherebugsgo wrote: [QUOTE]On February 28 2012 09:23 Toadesstern wrote: [QUOTE]On February 28 2012 09:17 Toadesstern wrote: [QUOTE]On February 28 2012 09:13 wherebugsgo wrote: [QUOTE]On February 28 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote: [QUOTE]On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote: anyway I'm not going to get lynched today, and if scum tries it's going to be hilarious.
I have secrets so go ahead VE, try to lynch me. Really, I feel sorry for you since you have 0 idea what's coming. [/QUOTE]
I must have missed something. How does that useless mason summary have any importance whatsoever?
What I'm really wondering is what exactly do you guys think is going to happen to RoL that is going to make things better? Do you guys even care what RoL might have to say on day 5 lylo after being absent the previous four days? How can we bring a player that ragequit to endgame?
I'm amazed how everyone can be against RoL going into today, yet when he posts for us to lynch him that everyone suddenly sees him in a better light. If there is one policy lynch that I don't mind pushing through, its a martyr.
On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote: anyway I'm not going to get lynched today, and if scum tries it's going to be hilarious.
I have secrets so go ahead VE, try to lynch me. Really, I feel sorry for you since you have 0 idea what's coming.
I must have missed something. How does that useless mason summary have any importance whatsoever?
What I'm really wondering is what exactly do you guys think is going to happen to RoL that is going to make things better? Do you guys even care what RoL might have to say on day 5 lylo after being absent the previous four days? How can we bring a player that ragequit to endgame?
I'm amazed how everyone can be against RoL going into today, yet when he posts for us to lynch him that everyone suddenly sees him in a better light. If there is one policy lynch that I don't mind pushing through, its a martyr.
I'm interested to see if RoL is going to show up to save himself from modkill. If him and red are town, its a shame they've decided to quit after becoming the center of attention.
I'm content with the prpl lynch, sorry if I'm wrong
On February 29 2012 07:19 wherebugsgo wrote: And you still have no intention of doing anything, it looks like?
Holy shit, why sign up for games if you're just going to go inactive, make a bunch of excuses, fake a ragequit, then come back again just to go "trolol just shoot me you guys all suck"
You retards shrugged off every attempt at activity I ever made as OMGUS and worthless and were going to lynch me regardless of what I said. When I left the thread, you guys had every intention of killing me, and zero intention of ever listening to me. Why on Earth would I waste my valuable time continuing to fight an uphill battle for no reason when my shits dismissed without even being read?
Hint: No one would.
I asked you multiple times to respond to my questioning of your case. Instead of responding, you decided to play the "everyone is against me" card and left the thread. I do find it pretty hilarious how good you are at getting away with this though :p
EPT
![[image loading]](http://media.giantbomb.com/uploads/2/22423/1465854-yoda1_super.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/all_c69ac5_46945.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://api.ning.com/files/K-U5OJQkPuHkpfmxY7HYOdx3Aw5lxfsAvfcM99P2pldbRRBehqKyYhMqJxMmS5kj/Hypnotoad.jpg?width=692&height=515)
so go ahead VE, try to lynch me. Really, I feel sorry for you since you have 0 idea what's coming. 
