|
prplhz I'm assuming that this comment was a veiled way of saying you think Nisani is scum and BF is clean? I can't see any other reason to flip from one scum to another. We have to lynch both of them anyway.
I think we all agreed that the analysis against BF was good; his last post is bizarre considering that there is an entire page of posts about him--does not seem like a townie who is about to be mis-lynched. Let's focus on what is in front of us. Unless anyone can come up with some very convincing evidence as to why BF isn't scum, we have to lynch him.
I also pointed out the differences in Bluelightz posting in purgatory, I believe prplhz you were the one who told me that I was wrong? What changed?
|
Everyone should pay very close attention to who gets killed tonight...
|
On February 14 2012 02:11 prplhz wrote:
We're lynching Nisani201 tomorrow no matter who gets killed tonight.
I'm stealing your reply-with-red-numbers style EchelonTee. It's pretty nice.
Well I think after ET's very good analysis of BF, it seems pretty clear that either Bluelightz or Nisani is the other mafia member. We actually could just lynch them both across two days and still win (though one more of us would die).
Either way I think we should wait to start discussing who is the next day's lynch until after the start of the next day. Would just give mafia the chance to snipe who ever has the best arguments and give them the chance to drag this out longer.
|
On February 14 2012 03:47 Nisani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2012 03:44 TheToast wrote:On February 14 2012 02:11 prplhz wrote:
We're lynching Nisani201 tomorrow no matter who gets killed tonight.
I'm stealing your reply-with-red-numbers style EchelonTee. It's pretty nice. Would just give mafia the chance to snipe who ever has the best arguments and give them the chance to drag this out longer. ONE WAY TRAIN TO WIFOM CITY WOOHOOO!!
Well who did you choose to kill tonight?
Also I think you mean "choochoo" not "woohoo".
|
I was almost convinced Nisani was town. But I kept thinking about the first two lynches. Why mderg and Vilonis?
Then I saw these:
On February 08 2012 06:51 mderg wrote:Nisani:He didn´t post much let alone much content. He also didn´t give reasons for his votes by himself, we often had to ask for this. He voted for timeaisis on day 1 and insisted on voting sentinel whom he had attacked from the beginning of the game already. (also without much reasoning). IMO he hasn´t played pro-town at all. He didn´t post very much, so I couldn´t get many reads out of his posts but his lurking alone would already make him suspicious. BaronFel:Same as nisani he hasn´t contributed much. Other than nisani he gave reasons for his votes like in this post: + Show Spoiler +On February 04 2012 09:16 BaronFel wrote:
After reading through the thread (sorry for "lurking", I'll try to post more), I am leaning towards Sinensis not being scum, but I think he's still dangerous with his ideas. (I personally feel his logic is sometimes faulty), but as you said it may just be extreme newness to the game.
##Unvote: Sinensis
I think we should vote, but I'm not fully sold on Sentinal being scum just yet... and prplhz has been making stronger arguments since his rough start...
##Vote: Timeaisis
For now (He has been acting odd, and I think playing up the "Im new" card a bit too much), although I'm still watching prplhz (for having such a surprising turn around of character) and Sinensis (for some questionable logic, which even as a townie, is dangerous). But he often refers to others posts and opinions and always went with the majority which makes it seem like he isn´t rying to find scum himself. BaronFel is a possible scum as he was lurking and not bringing in his own arguments. But he isn´t the main suspect because his play didn´t seem blatantly anti-town on the first 2 days.
^Second to last full post before he bit it
On February 03 2012 08:22 Vilonis wrote:
Nisani201. Started this whole bandwagon discussion. IMO, it is too early to start claiming bandwagons. We are not close to a vote, there were not many people, and the 'bandwagon' was probably the best candidate to be lynched anyway. As far as I can see it, this is only really preventing pressure on players that deserve it, as having 3 votes on you is nowhere as demanding that you make a post as having 7+ votes on you would be.
Also, "You guys make this too easy" with an explanation-less vote, followed by claiming a few people voting on suspicions are a bandwagon. Stop make a virtue out of keeping you options open. You should vote on suspicion. It makes your opinions and intentions clear. It makes you (somewhat) committed.
Suspicious
Prplhz (anyone else read this name as Purple Haze, then have the Jimmy Hendrix song stuck in their head?). Lots of votes, not many posts. Short, mostly useless posts. Probably a time zone thing, but I would like to see more discussion from him.
Who is probably scum?
My vote is for Nisani201.
And as I think you should put your vote where your suspicions are...
##Vote: Nisani201
He did eventually change his vote to Time for D1, but kept his suspicions on Nisani.
Isn't it interesting that the two players who suspected BF and Nisani early got killed first? This ain't looking good for you Nisani.
|
On February 14 2012 12:30 prplhz wrote:
I'm Yorrick or something like that, too lazy to browse back through PM history to find it.
You have that many PMs huh? Since what you mostly do is play Mafia, I think you pretty much just admitted to being scum in one of the games you currently have going.
Also...... I have no idea which way to vote today. Not sure it matters since you only need a majority of 3 I believe.
|
On February 14 2012 19:03 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 14 2012 15:07 TheToast wrote:On February 14 2012 12:30 prplhz wrote:
I'm Yorrick or something like that, too lazy to browse back through PM history to find it. You have that many PMs huh? Since what you mostly do is play Mafia, I think you pretty much just admitted to being scum in one of the games you currently have going. Also...... I have no idea which way to vote today. Not sure it matters since you only need a majority of 3 I believe. I'm very dissatisfied with how you are actively inferring things about my alignment, publicly, for a game that you are not in.
Just testing 
Is it just me or is Zbot not counting the votes properly?
|
Well, I give up.
##Vote: Nisani201
If it's not him, we can just lynch Bluelightz Day 6.
|
On February 16 2012 01:25 Nisani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 16 2012 00:48 TheToast wrote:
Well, I give up.
##Vote: Nisani201
If it's not him, we can just lynch Bluelightz Day 6. Never give up! Never surrender!
The daemonic are without number, and their legions span the galaxy. But faith does not tire. Should it take us an eternity, the Ordo malleus will find and exterminate them all.
For the Emperor!!!!!!!!!
|
On February 16 2012 15:31 Bluelightz wrote:
EchelonTee or Toast is scum. Let's win this.
-.-
If mafia uses a double kill tonight, and the game is at 1 to 1 on Day 7, is that a tie or a win for town?
|
Damn. Well assuming that Mafia doesn't have a double kill tonight, lynch bluelightz tomorrow and let's wrap this game up, yes?
I am assuming that ET or myself is going to be killed tonight, so whoever's left--win this one for the emperor!
|
On February 17 2012 00:07 Bluelightz wrote:
@Toast If Mafia had a double kill im sure GM would of ended the game on the last day we had =_=
Well good. Then we still have one day left to lynch you and win the game!
|
What's left to say? Does anyone disagree that Bluelightz is the final mafia (besides Bluelightz)? Also we're in space, there are no tumbleweeds. Though I suppose their could be crickets, if that was the will of the emperor.
|
Damn nicely done ET. I was suspicious of you for a while, especially after the Day 1 lynch of Time. But I have to admit the "analysis" on BaronFel completely threw me off; completely convinced me you were a blue after that.
|
On February 17 2012 12:36 EchelonTee wrote:
my vet claim, honestly, was not the optimal move, but to be perfectly honest I just did it so that I could use the delay effect. Also, I thought that someone was actually a vet, so I wanted them to counter claim me, so that I would know who not to shoot.
If it came to that, I was confident in my ability to convince town either that 1. I'm the real vet, or 2. there are 2 vets in this set up. Since GMarshal previously did a 3 mafia goon vs. 1 vig 2 vet set up, a 2 goon 1 RBer vs. 1vig 2vet 1medic is reasonable.
Your "analysis" was really good, I scrutinized the hell out of it and the only thing I came up with was that whole thing calling out Time for "playing the I'm new card".
Honestly though part of it may have been that a lot of town was just so lurky this game. Wasn't a whole lot of information to go on.
-edit: Only 46 posts for Nisani. Part of the reason I just gave up and decided to lynch him.
|
On February 19 2012 11:21 gonzaw wrote:
Yes, I dunno why but all of the Obs QT was convinced ET was scum by D2, but I'm more concerned how no townie even tried to analyse ET in the whole game.
Evidently you didn't read the whole game.
I said (I think night 2) that either ET or Sentinel was mafia. Obviously I picked the wrong one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
