EPTHammer Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
And just so we are clear The best thing in death is To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of NOOOBS! | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 20 2012 00:55 Hesmyrr wrote: ARGHH I wanted to get one mini-game in before mid terms start but it's no flip T_T Whats wrong with no flip more challenge :D | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Ok i got Node to join now you guys have to find other people to join | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 20 2012 13:08 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: He dropped out earlier, read his filter He went /in then /out then back /in again we need One more | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 24 2012 10:09 Mattchew wrote: Probably an isolated incidence with the voting system of this game Oh yea thats a good point. I wonder if you dont see the points then its completely possible that the lynch with out the majority of people could win the lynch that would be kinda comical tbh | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 25 2012 08:40 VisceraEyes wrote: >amused berating of puerile shenanigans here< Good Grief | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 26 2012 12:24 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Alright, let's keep it simple and trade one vote each night to the person below us on the list, and last person gives one VP to the top person? That way we all stay at 3 and everything's fair. Yea this makes a lot of sense. This way we know where the voting power is at. And we also can ensure that we dont have a mafia loading all there votes on one person. To sway a lynch. I dont see any reasons against. (Withholding of course later in the game when we are positive someones mafia then dont trade to that guy.) Does anyone have any objections to this plan? I'm all for it. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 26 2012 18:28 prplhz wrote: Everybody should give away as many votes as they can every day. This is a good idea because it will prevent scum from eliminating voting power through night kills, and voting power will only get eliminated through the lynch which is more likely to hit scum than night kills. I think this is a bad idea. Trading away votes like that makes it so that the scum can easily manipulate the vote and when one of there teammates can swing the lynch by putting a crap ton of there votes on a one guy. Think about it this way if all the mafia put there votes on one person then we can have about eight votes on one guy. If they all pool there votes and then that's not including any townies that might happen to put there votes on the mafia votebag. This one person has huge potential to sway the lynch and ensure that the mafia can lead the lynch to a townie with out all piling there votes and revealing themselves. The Sentinal Method gives us the ability to have each townie be accountable for his votes. Also importantly for us to know the power behind each vote. And to make sure to give us no surprises. If we are allowed to trade haphazardly then the scum can use there vote bag to hammer the vote if we get close to lynching a townie. @Palmar Putting everyone's votes on you is a terrible idea. I'm not even sure why you are mentioning it. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Saying that four people trading together will be obvious is not so true imo. We cant even tell who they are trading to if they lie about it. I like town circles most because we have the control If they choice to kill a player so that the mafia would come out with an extra vote. Then we ofc should scrutinize that player. And it would be down rigth foolish for mafia to do the same thing a second time. They gain a single vote or maybe two votes for what possible reveling half there scum team. I dont think the mafia are that dumb. However. If we dont go with the vote circles. Then i believe that we should announce who we are giving our vote too. It helps gives us transparency and the ability to caught scum in scummy behavior or even lies. The vote circle seems like a good idea tho. Palmar if you think the the person above you or below is town will you be part of our town circle  | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
So that leaves us with the Pick your Vote and justify it the next day plan. Thats fine. I do see some of Palmar's points more choices mafia have to make. I still think that the mafia might have a really good scum player who may appear town. But that just a risk we are going to have to take. Also i would prefer to give 1 vote rather then 2 just because there's less risk involved but giving away what number of votes is up to the players discretion. About who to lynch yet im honestly not sure yet I dont support the Sentinel lynch tho. I think his first plan of circle trading was fine and pro town. Gonna go read thru some filters | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
im voting for WBG because i do think he would go for the Free Trade Voting plan. It makes the most sense. The more opportunities mafia has to mess up the more likely we can get one to mess up. I know WBG is a smart player and i do like prplhz argument against him. It makes alot of sense. I know WBG is smart and he should be smart enough to see the better plan. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 29 2012 08:36 Node wrote: Putting this out there just in case: multiple people have said something along the lines of "the lynch is tonight". That's wrong. We have to make a lynch happen by tonight. Instant majority. Okay, I still honestly believe the circle jerk is the town's best option by far. It's easy, it's safe, it's enforceable, and I still don't understand why we need to look at where people send their votes when we still have the tried-and-true method of seeing who people actually vote to lynch. But I'm willing to drop it if that means getting a lynch in today -- and it's pretty clear that it's useless if multiple people don't follow it, which is going to happen whether I like it or not. Reading through WBG's posts, I'm not getting huge scum vibes, but that's at least partially because I agree with much of his logic, which it's clear a lot of people don't. It seems that a lot of the votes going towards him are based on his meta, which I don't know very well. But at the very least he has a strong, stated opinion on a plan, which is something scum would like avoid. VisceraEyes, on the other hand, has wavered wildly. In-thread, he's gone from supporting the circle-jerk, to being against it, to giving mild support for it again. In the latter case, his opinion changed in the space of a couple of hours. I feel that he isn't figuring out what the actual best approach is, but is instead trying to sneak in with whatever the popular opinion of the time happens to be. Also, there's this: Wha? Just... what? ##Vote: VisceraEyes Thats the problem thats how WBG plays. He thinks what a townie would do and tries to imitate them. Thats why its so damn hard to catch him as scum. Hes damn good at it. WBG is very aggressive regardless of his alignment. And hes very convincing. And to be honest why wouldn't scum want to be convincing. By being loud they can carry there agenda easier. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 31 2012 04:17 Palmar wrote: LSB Layabout VisceraEyes risk.nuke GG guys! Deja Vu of student mafia. The funny thing is that palmar is prolly right. ##Vote VisceraEyes Reasons Because of his claim and trying to lynch palmar rofl | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
 | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On January 31 2012 05:13 layabout wrote: Scumteam: 1) Palmar or ViceraEyes 2) jaybrundage 3) Meatless taco 4) sentinel 5) jackal58 4 from that, in any order. Either Palmar or Vicera is scum due to claims. (them both being town and claiming hits with no NK and 1 scum KP is extremely unlikely) None of these players has looked very town to me. Wait does this mean that im confirmed town then if scum is pointing fingers at me :D I was curious about meatless taco as well was fingering him as the last scum. But i guess that this disproves it : ( I think the jackal one is just odd. I have had a town read on sentinel since day one tbh and obviously palmar is town | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
But in your scum list i was the second person (after VE/Palmar) So put a case against me then against anyone. Complaining that your a bad lynch isnt helping anyone. How about you scum hunt instead of going on. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Here's a suggestion don't give your votes to LSB XD | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
If people could get there input on him i would appreciate it. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
A. You have contributed absolutely nothing to the discussion, this last night or so. B. You refuse to trade your votes and instead want to keep them all to your self KNOWING FULL WELL THAT TOWN WILL LOSE THOSE VOTES. If you don't want to get lynched then start a case on someone. Find someone scummy. These are pro-town things to do. But instead you go on and on and on. About how the town is lynching you and it's bad. If this is your defense then you might as well hang your self.  | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On February 01 2012 08:33 Jackal58 wrote: Give your votes to Palmar. He's town. If he's not town I'm going to fly to Iceland and kick his little Euro ass. The mental image of this made me lol. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
How do I know this. o.O Uh lucky guess? | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Wait shouldnt Prplhz still have his votes because palmar died during the night? Im confused about this. Also I gave one vote to Jackal58 because i have a town read on him. Paperscraps why would you give risk.nuke votes when palmars reads were on risk.nuke being possible scum?\ | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
My other question is how did chaoser get so many votes. It seems odd that he does speak much and gets that high number of votes. We should of expected this mechanic btw. And been more proactive with spreading our votes out. Like we did the first day. Instead of piling them on palmar. But hindsind is 20/20 ##Vote: Layabout | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
But paperscraps who do you figure as the last mafia and why? | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On February 01 2012 11:14 Paperscraps wrote: Well your sudden FOS on me is suspicious, but I want to hear what others have to say and analyze who traded with who before I announce anything. My FOS on you? please elaborate | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
To put it simply layabout lives in the uk its 2:35 am where he is and we don't have any solid lead on the next mafia. Getting layabout's opinion might help us along. And discussion always helps town. Before someone hammers it what do you guys think about waiting for more discussion | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Although if the mafia team is Bugs, LSB, VE, Layabout. THEN WE COULD END THIS SHIT RIGHT HERE. Sadly I think Bugs might have been town tho D: So any ideas about the remaining mafia player. I would suggest we think about risk.nuke Simply because Palmar is a smart mutha fucka TO THE FILTERS! | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Notice this he CLAIMED that he got votes from layabout. Before everyone had even claimed only 7 people had declared where there votes went. That means 4 people had not declared who they were voting for. However instead of thinking other people voted for him he assumed that layabout gave him those votes. Looks like he had prior knowledge that he was going to get those votes. Also he defended LSB for a bit till he figured that he too was a lost cause. Chaoser also didnt know about the VE lynch till it already happened he could not really have a say in it. (although maybe he would of tried to defend his mafia buddy) It seems pretty obvious that hes mafia. Unless layabout was using WIFOM to try to make chaoser look bad. What do you guys think. If Chaoser doesn't work out i have another candidate in mind. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
I hope your mafia Chaoser. Then you can validate my 500th post :D | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On February 02 2012 06:32 chaoser wrote: IF you dont know wanna use this format just type out the persons name at the top of the quote. Holy crap thats so annoying. Its mostly you Chaoser. *Smashes more things in rage* If you guys dont use quotes imma sic Viking Palmar on you ![[image loading]](http://mail.is/palmar/derp.jpg) | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Also thx to mafiascum.net lol I had no idea what a bus driver was XD I do still wanna lynch chaoser. Chaoser if you are town then trade all your votes tonight to your most pro town read. Keeping all your votes is probably the most scummy thing you can do. Also I don't think dirkzor is scum. But i have been wrong before. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
WE CAN STILL MAKE THE DEAD LINE :O | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
I do have a strong town read on you. So what are you thoughts you seem to want to lynch chaoser too. But i dont know about dirkzor next if chaoser doesnt work out. Dirkzor has tried to spread his votes to townies as opposed to keeping them in the scum circle. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
On February 03 2012 00:36 Dirkzor wrote: I've read most filters now. (still need to read node, paper and sentinel but will do that later tonight) I think the last 1/2 scum are in this list of 4: Chaoser MeatlessTaco Jaybrundage Jackal58 In that order. The reason I say 1/2 scum instead of only 1 is because I only see VE and LSB as confirmed scum. We got flip on LSB and VE basicly sacrified himself to save LSB. WBG is probably town and layabout is probably scum. layabout vote magnet could also be a major powerplay from scum to throw town totally off. Also where the fuck is everyone? This game isn't over yet... Ok first off Dirkzor why would you trade me a vote because you think you have a town read on me. And then say Im possible scum. For that don't even trade a vote. You should give your votes to people you are confident are town. My question for you then is what am i good town read, or suspected scum? Second off I don't suspect Dirkzor and Meatless taco in part because they both sent me votes. Is that quite simple could they still be mafia. Of course, however Occams Razor, They are probably town because their sending a town there vote. In response to Dirkzor I so far i would push a risk.nuke lynch. If chaoser does work out. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Node (6), Jackal58 (4), prplhz (1), jaybrundage (1), risk.nuke (3), [UoN]Sentinel (2), MeatlessTaco (1), Dirkzor (1), I sent two votes to Jackal58 because i still have a town read on him. Lets get the voting sorted out. | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
Well played scum. Well played town too. Jackal58 I really thought you were town D: | ||
|
jaybrundage
United States3921 Posts
| ||
| ||
