EPTPurgatory Mafia - Page 15
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 05:56 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: @Blazinghand I understand you think RoL is scum and all, but don't you think it might be useful to look through the other filters as well? In case you see something that makes someone else a better target than him, or that exonerates RoL in some way? Focus is fine, pure tunneling is not. I'm focused on Tyrran, but I read everyone else's filter at least once before making my giant post, and have read at least a half dozen of them again since making it. Fair enough-- I have, in fact, examined other filters, though. It's not like the only thing I've done this game is push the RoL lynch. I'll take some time to examine tyrran and write a case post about him, as I have for other players. On January 13 2012 05:56 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Also, your filter just hit page 15 and this is a 72 page thread in an 18 player game. -just saying- First off, it's an 18 player game, but like only 16 of us are alive right. Also we've got dudes with tiny, tiny filters in here, from captain mcbad Erandorr to guys like Mr Wiggles or Jackal whose filters are best described as "shockingly brief". Also I don't see what the problem is with posting a lot. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 06:42 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Because I want him shot tonight by the DH. He probably won't flip, though, as I get the feeling he's an angel more than a demon, so the seer can potentially check him as well. It also solves the problem of having to convince people to lynch him if he flips demon, as most people seem very reluctant to push anyone who they see as a "vet". @Blazinghand, you still haven't responded to the contradiction that Syllogism pointed out in your posting. Do so. On January 13 2012 02:56 syllogism wrote: I can't believe I somehow had missed this So first you called them both scum and then 10 minutes later you have to read Tyrran's filter to answer. You never posted your thoughts on Tyrran after that. You have done absolutely nothing in the last few days. I'd read the rest of your filter but it's a bit too taunting to bother right now, but just the above peculiarity is starting to make me wonder if your scum play too resembles that of WBGs. I called tyran scum because he strikes me as scum. I haven't read his filter and therefore cannot make a case for him. That doesn't mean I haven't read all his posts-- I read the thread itself. If you ask me to make a read on Tyrran right now without reading his filter I will call him scum. If you ask me to present a case on Tyrran and make my read, it will take some time. I am in the process of doing so right now. I haven't read his filter. But he looks like scum to me. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
step 1) read some person's post step 2) think for 4-5 seconds step 3) respond with 1-2 lines of text the other 10% of my posts are step 1) spend several hours reading someone's filter and putting together a comprehensive case on them step 2) think for 45 minutes step 3) present case In my initial post in which I said "these two guys are scum" i was like "man these two guys are scum, sounds legit, hit post button" If you really want a good Tyrran opinion from me though I don't have one yet-- just my ininformed 1-liner opinion. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 06:54 syllogism wrote: While I'm not going to bother reading Blazing's filter, I'm just going to assume that his mafia play wouldn't look like this, despite how little sense he makes. Also someone who I'm just going to start ignoring every game. ._. cmon man. You can't just assume my mafia play wouldn't look like this-- you don't even know what my mafia play looks like. What if I'm mafia? dont' be lazy. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 06:54 syllogism wrote: I think he is likely mafia by this point, though probably not the absolutely best lynch. I do not think he is mafia due to the awful plan, but rather for being otherwise completely worthless and disinterested. I imagine Grackaroni, cwave, spaackle, tyrran, Jackal is scum infested too. Jackal's tone is okay, and that is usually the easiest way to spot his scum play, but he is still just lurking and tunnelling a different person every day. If you think he's not the best lynch, who is? I think RoL is the best lynch, but I've been open to new ideas before. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 06:56 Blazinghand wrote: ._. cmon man. You can't just assume my mafia play wouldn't look like this-- you don't even know what my mafia play looks like. What if I'm mafia? dont' be lazy. Also man way to be a dick. Like, no need to be like "i'm just gonna ignore this guy every game" when apparently you agree with me on RoL. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 07:15 Refallen wrote: Honestly, I'm getting pretty tired of RoL saying he's busy and disappearing for stretches of a time. If he dosen't start giving us some reads and scumhunting I am actually fine with lynching him tomorrow. <3 Honestly though he's had so many chances to be useful and he has not been. This game's been going for like 10 IRL days. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 07:33 Refallen wrote: Honestly, I think syllo is one of my strongest (and only) town reads this game, along with blazhinghand. If he gets sent to purgatory and AoD dosen't hit , it isn't too far fetched to say that he was simply targetted again. That's a fair point. That being said, it's fairly unlikely that such a thing will happen. As a side note, we don't want corrupted town to claim, right? But if that's the case, wouldn't it be obvious they were corrupted just because they'd be like voting not they way they want to vote? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 07:32 syllogism wrote: For the record, I do not want to survive the night Given that we all implicitly softclaim VT by not claiming Blue, this is a reasonable statement for any person in this thread to make. As a VT, if you get the mafia to burn their shots/roleblocks (or both!) on you because you're being too helpful, then you've done some good work, and bought your blues another night. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 07:52 Cwave wrote: No it is not a reasonable statement?! This is a 3 faction game, there are 2 scum teams... You want scum to die, whatever scumfaction that is. You don't want "VT's to take hits" when there are 2 scums teams out there. What the hell/heaven is this... -.- Ah, that's true-- the ideal night kill for town isn't a non-blue townie getting shot, but a member of the gunless mafia getting shot. forgot about the multifactional element there herp derp | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 08:12 layabout wrote: Is it worth asking Zona to let me edit the post to update the Bullshit score counter? Um.... no? Just make a new post ._. why would you want to edit the existing one | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 08:24 Spaackle wrote: I'll be around for a little while, so feel free to ask/tell/compliment/insult me anything. I got a good one for you Mr Spaacks. Check it. On January 10 2012 13:02 Spaackle wrote: I'm with you on this one, BH. At first I thought that the RoL plan was merely just an ill-thought out plan, but after your and Mr Wiggles' arguments against it, now I see that the RoL plan isn't just bad, but that it seems to be intentionally anti-town. I want to see a defense from RoL, but until then: ##vote RebirthOfLegend OK On January 11 2012 14:31 Spaackle wrote: So, after a bit more of BH and RoL duking it out, I've decided to Unvote RoL for now. RoL has spent a long time and a lot of effort defending it, and a scum Probably would have dropped it long ago. RoL is still pretty null to me, though. Give me a bit more time to finish catching up on the thread and reading some filter, and I'll have an analysis for both Tyrran and risk.nuke Wow, way to bail for no reason What do you think about RoL now? On January 13 2012 08:23 Spaackle wrote: RoL: he's basically invisible for the first day, then during night one he comes up with a plan to mass claim. His plan is torn to shreds by everyone else while he quietly slips back into the shadows, reemerging only to defend his plan but not to do much of anything else. His lurkiness combined with his lack of contribution makes me think that he is a scum. Between him and Tyrran, I'd probably lynch RoL first. >.> Explain your flip-flopping, mr. flip-flopper. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 08:51 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: For someone so painfully active (20% of total posts) it's amazing how you don't even know how many players are still alive. 16 is closer than 18 to 15 also like this is the least "relevant to people's criticisms of RoL" post you could make | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 08:50 Spaackle wrote: When I moved off of RoL, it was because the argument between you and him had gotten kind of silly and was filling up the thread. I looked at both risk and RoL, and risk looked like thebetter lynch. I would have voted him, but he was hammered before I could. So when you moved off RoL, you thought he was still a decent lynch, but risk was better? | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 13 2012 08:53 syllogism wrote: Limited time and instantly delurk ??? | ||
| ||
